These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Second Minmatar Destroyer - Unofficial Render

Author
No More Heroes
Boomer Humor
Snuffed Out
#41 - 2012-09-17 17:01:01 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
What a piece of junk!


She'll make point five past lightspeed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, kid.

.

Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#42 - 2012-09-17 17:03:13 UTC
No More Heroes wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
What a piece of junk!


She'll make point five past lightspeed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, kid.
Looks like the creation of a drunk jawa. What?
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).
Sofia Wolf
Ubuntu Inc.
The Fourth District
#43 - 2012-09-17 17:05:43 UTC
Paul Oliver wrote:
No More Heroes wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
What a piece of junk!


She'll make point five past lightspeed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, kid.
Looks like the creation of a drunk jawa. What?


Well... It is Minmatar.

Jessica Danikov > EVE is your real life. the rest is fantasy. caught in a corporation. no escape from banality. open up yours eyes, peer through pod good and seeeeeee. I'm just a poor pilot, I need no sympathy. because I'm easy scam, easy go, little isk, little know. anyway the solar wind blows...

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#44 - 2012-09-17 17:06:35 UTC
Needs more chewing gum, baling wire and duct tape.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#45 - 2012-09-17 17:10:28 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Needs more chewing gum, baling wire and duct tape.

Atleast they're not sticking loads of badly aliasing antennae on the ships anymore.
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).
Lord Ryan
True Xero
#46 - 2012-09-17 17:10:45 UTC
As a lover of new ships all I can say is holy ship that things is ugly. I mean typhoon ugly. I'm talking I've made pretty things in the toilet after a long night of mexican food an tequila in TJ.

Do not assume anything above this line was typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient.

Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#47 - 2012-09-17 17:14:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Paul Oliver
Lord Ryan wrote:
As a lover of new ships all I can say is holy ship that things is ugly.
The typhoon isn't that bad, its hardly a stinking pile of revenant is it?
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).
stoicfaux
#48 - 2012-09-17 17:14:38 UTC  |  Edited by: stoicfaux
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:
stoicfaux wrote:
Dear lord, that is horrific.

Firstly, overlapping solar panels?


Those aren't solar panels, they're shield emitters, or wingy bits.

Heat radiators, which are necessary to vent heat buildup in space. Minmatar ships are the only actual realistic ships in Eve.

Emitters, radiators, receivers, transmitters... none of those things should overlap or otherwise block each.

Wingy bits, i.e. they're cosmetic, and would make sense.

Emitters, et. al. would make sense if the first set is the real, and the rest are cosmetic. Similar to how the Titantic's 4th smokestack was cosmetic only.


Aside from that, I still can't decide if the damn thing was modeled after a tootsie roll, a ww2 duck boat, a tank with a brushcutter/minelayer attachment, an engineering tank, or even a Merrimack/Monitor hybrid as Roll Sizzle Beef observed. It's on the tip of my tongue and it's making me mad that I can't make the connection.


edit: senility

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#49 - 2012-09-17 17:37:04 UTC
As nice as the updated Stabber model is, this new destroyer is just as HIDEOUS. It looks like a narrowed Retriever with a snow plow on the front and a pill box stuck on top. I sincerely hope this abomination won't make it into the game.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#50 - 2012-09-17 17:42:06 UTC
Look, Minmatar steam powered starship. Shocked

"Abomination", I like that. Cool
Kult Altol
The Safe Space
#51 - 2012-09-17 17:43:10 UTC
Bleh, I don't really like it. I'm afraid to see the Amarrian hull now.

[u]Can't wait untill when Eve online is Freemium.[/u] WiS only 10$, SP booster for one month 15$, DPS Boost 2$, EHP Boost 2$ Real money trading hub! Cosmeitic ship skins 15$ --> If you don't [u]pay **[/u]for a product, you ARE the [u]**product[/u].

Tolkenmoon
Hogan's Heroes
#52 - 2012-09-17 17:51:46 UTC
That has got to be the crapest looking ship in eve, in fact the crapest looking ship i have seen in any game or film, it truely is awful.
Lord Ryan
True Xero
#53 - 2012-09-17 18:02:18 UTC
Tolkenmoon wrote:
That has got to be the crapest looking ship in eve, in fact the crapest looking ship i have seen in any game or film, it truely is awful.



Eve does seem to have some of the crappiest looking ships. If you did a survey of the ugliest spaceship ever imagined, Eve would probably have 8 of the top 10. With the that ship being in the top 3.

Do not assume anything above this line was typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient.

stoicfaux
#54 - 2012-09-17 18:15:27 UTC
Kult Altol wrote:
Bleh, I don't really like it. I'm afraid to see the Amarrian hull now.

Good. God and his mortal instruments should be feared.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

kerradeph
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#55 - 2012-09-17 18:58:41 UTC
Petrus Blackshell wrote:

Heat radiators, which are necessary to vent heat buildup in space. Minmatar ships are the only actual realistic ships in Eve.

no, minmatar power systems are the only ones that are so inefficient that they need to radiate wasted energy in the form of heat.
Solhild
Doomheim
#56 - 2012-09-17 18:58:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Solhild
Tolkenmoon wrote:
That has got to be the crapest looking ship in eve, in fact the crapest looking ship i have seen in any game or film, it truely is awful.


That honour goes to the new Reaper I'm afraid. I agree that this ship hasn't made the grade either. New Stabber is awesome, but this Cry

EDIT: Perhaps it's OK, growing on me.....still thinking about it. The box on the top should be narrower, or the whole ship flipped upside down maybe?
Romvex
TURN LEFT
#57 - 2012-09-17 19:51:32 UTC
remove the boxy tank-turret type thingy from the top and i'm happy
Solhild
Doomheim
#58 - 2012-09-17 20:05:11 UTC
Romvex wrote:
remove the boxy tank-turret type thingy from the top and i'm happy


Agreed Blink
Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#59 - 2012-09-17 20:11:22 UTC
It needs more dimension, as it is the thing looks like a brick with a snow plow on the front.
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#60 - 2012-09-17 20:16:02 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
What a piece of junk!
She'll do .5 past light speed…


…which, come to think of it, is horribly slow compared to the 1500× that the Thrasher is capable of. P