These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is Eve for bots?

Author
Kell Tarhun
Neptunis
#21 - 2012-09-15 09:37:36 UTC
unloadedx16 wrote:
Everything you said you just pulled out of your ass.
CCP hates botters just as much as we do.
CCP are not mind readers and they are continually working on the bot issue.


unloadedx16 wrote:
Everything you said you just pulled out of your ass.
CCP hates botters just as much as we do.
CCP are not mind readers and they are continually working on the bot issue.


Not good enough. I am not satisfied with CCP activity in boting matter.
Want some true action from them not just empty promises.

Besides bot owners play this game and they influence me and my actions by way they getting isk. If you know some guy is reporting bots and you are running bot environment alliance - you will do everything to make sure he is as far from you as possible.

I would like to focus on other aspect of game, however bot aspect destroy them all - considering Eve is Sandbox.

For example:
Imagine my alliance runs bot network and found all ships lost every mount from bots arround 300bil isk (having it washed),
Imagine your alliance doing same but you got no idea about it.
Imagine you pay for ship lost in fight in Jita from bot owner who wash isk
Imagine bot owner produces items and ships
Imagine you get reimbursement from lost ship from boting alliance
Imagine corporations paying isk for rent from ISK farming bots
Imagine bots running lvl 4 missions in highsec
Imagine bots mining everywhere.
imagine all alliances doing RMT bot network
Imagine players do not afraid to loose their supers as they use bots

Is this just imagination or real to many of us. For me it is real in many places of Eve Online.
For me it is important what CCP actually plan to do with all that. As at the moment as i observe such activity everywhere arround i see no sense in most of actions current Eve got to offer.
Sugar Kyle
Middle Ground
#22 - 2012-09-15 11:34:30 UTC
I am interested to learn more about this invis bot that occupies systems with me when I am the only one in local. Will it gank me? PvP bots?

Member of CSM9 and CSM10.

Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#23 - 2012-09-15 12:12:33 UTC
Pleasure Model 00213 Reporting.

Oops

Error #123 Wrong Bot request

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.

Doddy
Excidium.
#24 - 2012-09-15 12:23:57 UTC
Paul Oliver wrote:
If I did CCP would be the first to know and you would probably be one of the last. Be that as it may my original point stands, it's not fair that new players like myself have to grind more and take proportionately higher risks for less rewards than players in large nullsec alliances who according to the OP are using tools apparently outlawed by CCP to amass vast fortunes and all but remove risk on their end.


The problem here is that you are believing the OP, who basically wrong in everything he said. Botting is definately on a downward trend (though changes can be quick). The biggest bot groups are people doing it for RMT. After that its people who can't make enough isk, and they can be from anywhere. Large null sec alliances already have masses of isk (lol tech) so are probably the least likely to resort to botting unless they are doing it for RMT (you know who they are), in which case its leaving you as a "new player" at no competitive disadvantage to them but rather to the people buying isk through rmt. Players in null also tend to be playes who have invested the most time and money in the game and so have most to lose from getting banned, so again are less likely to be using bots on average.

Of course i have no more FACTS than the op does but at least what i say follows some sort of logic Blink
Doddy
Excidium.
#25 - 2012-09-15 12:24:59 UTC
Plus he is in -A- which says it all really Roll
Kell Tarhun
Neptunis
#26 - 2012-09-15 12:28:40 UTC
Doddy wrote:
Plus he is in -A- which says it all really Roll


Well check my history :> I am in your alliance as well. i switch whenever i wan't to. Besides your alliance using bots in XZH-4X for example.

So....hmm looks like you just do not know about it. I find it normal as many players do not want to to have
Eyes wide open.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#27 - 2012-09-15 12:38:02 UTC
I've been botting for over eight years now.

It's the only way to satisfy my addiction to this terrible game without having to actually play it.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-09-15 12:39:31 UTC
I know some guy with a toon named CCP Shreegs that must be smiling with this thread. Even I do. Lol

brb

Kell Tarhun
Neptunis
#29 - 2012-09-15 12:48:40 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
I know some guy with a toon named CCP Shreegs that must be smiling with this thread. Even I do. Lol


Pretty sure CCP Sreegs' head exploded when my last thread was posted.
Doddy
Excidium.
#30 - 2012-09-15 13:02:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Doddy
Kell Tarhun wrote:
Doddy wrote:
Plus he is in -A- which says it all really Roll


Well check my history :> I am in your alliance as well. i switch whenever i wan't to. Besides your alliance using bots in XZH-4X for example.

So....hmm looks like you just do not know about it. I find it normal as many players do not want to to have
Eyes wide open.


Merely that -A- is one of the few 0.0 alliances which has/had a well documented botnet/rmt business (along with en garde but i guess you know that). Also XZH really isn't a very good place to pretend there are botters given how busy it is. Any bots would just spend their whole time cloaked there.
FU10011101
Doomheim
#31 - 2012-09-15 13:05:09 UTC
01010101111010110101101010110110101101101111001010011011001011010101
Kell Tarhun
Neptunis
#32 - 2012-09-15 13:27:00 UTC
Doddy wrote:
Kell Tarhun wrote:
[quote=Doddy]Plus he is in -A- which says it all really Roll


Merely that -A- is one of the few 0.0 alliances which has/had a well documented botnet/rmt business (along with en garde but i guess you know that). Also XZH really isn't a very good place to pretend there are botters given how busy it is. Any bots would just spend their whole time cloaked there.


Interesting considering i sold lots of ammo for bots characters of your alliance. If you ever wondered why so many market orders got so huge price in your alliance - it is me . Well do not get me wrong i got nothing against your alliance as many other alliances. Fact is i know some of your alliance members boting because there is perfect environment for that aproved by CCP actions. You mentioned en garde and -a- however those are not those boting directly in territories blue to -A-.
All those bots running i could pretty much give bots example in every alliance said anything in this post.
They destroy your and mine way of playing as there is no space for "normal" politic or "economy".

My hate is towards CCP that is unable to make players fallow rules. If you CCP give players 10000000$ cash in hand and your only way of prevent stealing will be "rule do not do it" you will find out lots of players having awesome time with your cash playing poker and sunbathing in tropical island.
There is no real mechanic to prevent bots dear CCP - think about it as you still got player base.
Current solutions make bot users benefit all the time.
Jason Xado
Doomheim
#33 - 2012-09-15 13:46:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Jason Xado
Please do not confuse Multiboxers with Bots. They are not the same thing.
Doc Severide
Doomheim
#34 - 2012-09-15 13:57:56 UTC
Whats a bot?
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#35 - 2012-09-15 15:51:44 UTC
For pete's sake just check out the botting forums (no I will not link them, use Google), bots are being banned left right and center.

And it is hilarious.
SmilingVagrant
Doomheim
#36 - 2012-09-15 15:58:21 UTC
Paul Oliver wrote:
If the nullsec alliances are really funding their empires using automated bot programs I wish I could use those same tools to farm isk and make pvp as painless for me as it is for them. It doesn't seem right that they have access to billions in resources which apparently they farm via hundreds of players and automated programs while people like me have to grind our asses off just to make a pittance. Then to top it all off they lobby for changes to highsec in order to make it even less profitable in order to force even more players into their part of the sandbox to farm even more isk for them.

I've heard many a person on here chant the mantra "risk vs reward", and yet it seems that many of the people saying this are making huge amounts of isk with little to no risk, while people like me are expected to take relatively high amounts of risk for only minimal rewards, which is almost ironic considering that they claim highsec players aren't taking enough risk, when their vast wealth and resources ensure hardly any risk for them.


Actually belt bots went out of vogue a while back, I won't go into too much detail but most of our "enthusiastic" ratters got caught in CCP Sreegs hellban last year (Or was it a year and a half ago?... I forget). Most of our player isk is now provided via regular ratting (We've figured out the ultimate isk/hr for regular ratting) and faction warfare farming (I won't go into details again but running faction warfare missions can peak at about 300m an hour...
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#37 - 2012-09-15 17:46:56 UTC
The question I must ask is "What kind of bots are we talking about?" Bots get used for everything in this game, be it mining or missions.

Does anyone honestly believe that there is even one 23/7 Alliance border gatecamp in operation that isn't entirely manned by bots?

Does anyone honestly believe that there isn't even one mining bot operation running in those fifty Hulk null-sec mining fleets that eat entire systems daily?

Rat farming? Bots. Mining? Bots. Gate camping? Bots.

But see the problem isn't the bots. The problem is in the structure of the game itself. The first problem is that (just as in real life) automation is employed when a task becomes too freakin' dull for human beings to tolerate any more. How many hours can any sane person sit in place and cycle through a bunch of rocks? How many hours can any sane person sit next to a disruption bubble next to a gate? Yet the structure of the game mechanics makes these tasks necessary.

Pay attention here, CCP: MMOs are games. Games are supposed to be fun. Sitting in gate camps and staring at rocks isn't fun. We only do these things because you force us to. Now I know here is where many of you say "I don't mine, I just pew-pew all day lulz kee kee lol rotfl ohgodImgonnadieavirgin lolololololol" Alright, fine, but that ship you're flying? Someone else built that from a blueprint that required minerals that came from asteroids. Your PvP Superflash Leetard Deluxe Special Edition that you love so much only exists because somebody out there spent a lot of time mining asteroids. If every miner in the game quit you wouldn't have your shiny spaceships anymore, capeche? CCP would have to start seeding ships & modules into the game at whatever prices they felt fit. Sometimes I wonder why they don't do exactly this, but that's not my decision.

The second problem is that, by accident or design, people are more obsessed with ISK than anything else. "But of course!" you say, "That's the whole point of the game!" To which I reply, "Is it?" Do you ever take a moment to step back from your endless ISK grinding and ask "What do I need all this ISK for, anyway?" Buy a better ship? Okay, why do you need a better ship? To do harder tasks and make even more ISK? It's the same circular argument that plagues the MMO industry in general: Spend gold to buy bigger swords to fight bigger monsters that drop more gold so you can buy bigger swords. It's a hamster wheel and those who aren't blind to it are sick of it.

The question you might want to ask instead is "What kind of impact will my character have in the game? Will have had stood out in any way? Will people remember me? What will they say? What will I say about my character when reminiscing about EvE ten years from now?"

"I made a lot of ISK using bots!"

*golf clap*

And there you have it: A combination of forcing people to partake in lots of boring as heck gameplay mechanics and a tunnel-vision mentality towards gameplay goals have created the "bot problem." And I use quotation marks for a reason: Bots are not the real problem. Bots are a symptom of the real problem.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Pipa Porto
#38 - 2012-09-15 17:47:23 UTC
Corina Jarr wrote:
For pete's sake just check out the botting forums (no I will not link them, use Google), bots are being banned left right and center.

And it is hilarious.


Or, instead of going to the skeezy side of the internet, head over to the nosy gamer, who does the looking for you.

http://nosygamer.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/ccps-war-on-bots-questor-tears-mixed.html

And the botting tears are hilarious.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

KIller Wabbit
MEME Thoughts
#39 - 2012-09-15 17:50:27 UTC
Corina Jarr wrote:
A fact can be false...


1) no they still do investigations based on petitions and emails just like the good old days.


Really? How do you know that? Ever received feedback from CCP that said - "GJ, you found a bot and we have perm banned them!" Nope - you haven't, because CCP has said they won't name-shame, even though that would be the highest form of deterrent they could have. If Alliances are profiting from it - it would stop in it's tracks.


Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#40 - 2012-09-15 18:03:12 UTC
Now I understand why you guys aren't allowed to use local.

Ironic troll is ironic.