These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

More Nerf to ganking

First post
Author
Samahiel Sotken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#121 - 2012-09-10 18:51:55 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:


Yes, the oil tanker hired support. What a concept. Big smile

By the way, they also did so in defiance of Maritime Law and if caught could suffer legal repercussions.

Still, it does highlight the concept that taking precautions can save you from a gank. It's just that in EVE those precautions tend to take other forms.



Vice Admiral Bill Gortney, Commander of the United
States General Command wrote:
“Due to Maersk Alabama
following maritime industry’s best-practices such as embarking
security teams, the ship was able to prevent being successfully
attacked by pirates. This is a great example of how merchant
mariners can take pro-active action to prevent being attacked.”


I know it's a bit of a derail, but how are private security contractors a violation of Maritime Law?
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#122 - 2012-09-10 18:56:21 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Paul Oliver wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Ever seen an oil tanker? Man, the armor and guns on those things!
Last I checked irl oil tankers don't usually have to worry about fleets of pirates in battlecruisers with battleship sized guns blowing them up.
That's because you don't need something as ridiculous as a battlecruiser (which, by definition has battleship-sized guns… that was the whole point of inventing them) to take one on. Instead, they have to worry about fleets of pirates in dinghies.

Boost Rookie ships!


(Oh wait...)

Gankalyst. Let's do this thing Cool

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#123 - 2012-09-10 19:03:16 UTC
Stupidly is lethal, as it should be....Haven't these morons heard of Jump Freighters?

Of course, it could just bee Bee's ganking their alts to become relevent again....Things like that happen when you have endless isk and no way to waste it ....Shocked




Signature removed - CCP Eterne

Eternus8lux8lucis
Guardians of the Gate
RAZOR Alliance
#124 - 2012-09-10 19:04:02 UTC
Bloutok wrote:
The only real problem with high sec is that one cannot defend, we are all sitting ducks, you cannot counter someone who knows he is going to die whatever the result of his attack will be. The ganking side will do it right and you die or you will smile a big smile.

I have no idea how to fix that in a way that is "sandbox thinking people" friendly.

CCP could always code something like, if someone red box you in high sec, you get 5 seconds while the ganking side guns do not fire, but they are GCC. Falcon to the rescue.

Or make all kinds of transport, mining ships have a 1 million armor and shield bonus in high sec.

Or make it impossible to fire at someone if you are not at war with that person..........

This is actually a decent idea in its form.

Ganker goes GCC to the person they have targeted and engaged as well as their entire corporation/alliance for the 5 sec period.

There is NO GCC until the 5 sec time period is over and the guns and mods activate. Gate guns and faction police then engage as per normal times and rules.

Ganker GCC is activated when the warning screen YES button is clicked as is the 5 sec hold period.

Only way this is not initiated is if the target is -5 or under so KOS in high sec anyway.

Red boxed ship and ganker basically freeze, ie no warping off for the target even if warp is engaged, but any corp or target ship can engage ganker within that 5 sec time period. Theres no running, its fight or you die after 5 secs. Anyone truly afk or too slow still gets ganked but at least now you have a 5 second window to fight back, preemptive strike.

Right now ganking in high sec is effectively someone approaching a security guard with a money bag in hand and a pistol on his hip with a loaded gun pointed at the guard. The guard cannot pull his gun out and shoot the ganker even though you know hes going to one shot you in the head and take your money.

5 secs is a small window. Basically you can "draw and shoot first" Han Solo style. But the rest is all over but the crying once it flies. Large freighter ganks are still viable as are small solo ganks. Itll be a slightly less aware target that will be able to be ganked, or a true afk one without any sort of protection. This would allow basically ECM, or one shot defensive measures. Moar DPS will counter it of course, and theres still the % dice roll of ECM mods to be effective. Can you jam that many? Etc etc. And all afk targets are stil juicy. Only the effective, organized and aware pilots, corps and alliances can pull this off.

Also because its limited to corps and alliances it means noob corp hauler alts, mining alts, indy alts are all still fair game. Only corp or alliance members can defend anyway. Forcing these pilots into corps or alliances to make use of this measure. Allowing them to be wardecced in turn and therefore still vulnerable to another form of piracy.

As long as the target ship cannot "escape" and warp off, or log out within the 5 secs timer, but ONLY defend themselves, this could potentially work.

Have you heard anything I've said?

You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?

That's right.

Had to end sometime.

Samahiel Sotken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#125 - 2012-09-10 19:04:32 UTC
Actually the PSC derail leads to an interesting point,

From The Journal of International Buisness & The Law 4/15/2010:
PIRATES, BLACKWATER AND MARITIME SECURITY:
THE RISE OF PRIVATE NAVIES IN RESPONSE TO
MODERN PIRACY wrote:

Another concern with the use of PSCs is that many flag states
discourage the use of armed guards and also restrict commercial vessels from
carrying arms aboard. 56 Members of the U.S. Navy have expressed their
support of the use of private security contractors. 57 Surprisingly, Somali official
Abdulkadir Muse Yusuf, the deputy marine minster of Puntland, has stated that
PSCs are “welcome” in Somalia’s waters. 58 Minister Yusuf even asserts that
the presence of PSC personnel might not only deter piracy in Somali waters but
also other harmful acts being committed off of Somalia’s coast, such as illegal
fishing and waste dumping. 59


It would seem to suggest, that coupled with the upcoming changes in GCC flagging under crime watch it might be in the interests of High Sec industrialist to organize professional security corporations to patrol known problem systems. A Sandbox version of CONCORD if you will. Surely such emergent game play is preferable to heavy handed systematic changes.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#126 - 2012-09-10 19:05:45 UTC
Samahiel Sotken wrote:
It would seem to suggest, that coupled with the upcoming changes in GCC flagging under crime watch it might be in the interests of High Sec industrialist to organize professional security corporations to patrol known problem systems. A Sandbox version of CONCORD if you will. Surely such emergent game play is preferable to heavy handed systematic changes.

And thus it must be irrelevant to our internet spaceships game.

Buff CONCORD, only the magical police can save us from "teh g4nk3rs"

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#127 - 2012-09-10 19:06:37 UTC
Oh wow, Firefox crashed but not before sending the above post. How lucky !

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#128 - 2012-09-10 19:07:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Paul Oliver
Samahiel Sotken wrote:
It would seem to suggest, that coupled with the upcoming changes in GCC flagging under crime watch it might be in the interests of High Sec industrialist to organize professional security corporations to patrol known problem systems. A Sandbox version of CONCORD if you will. Surely such emergent game play is preferable to heavy handed systematic changes.
I love this idea, one could purchase security from this mercenary market thing I read is coming.
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#129 - 2012-09-10 19:08:16 UTC
Beekeeper Bob wrote:
Stupidly is lethal, as it should be....Haven't these morons heard of Jump Freighters?

Less cargo, higher cost, higher agility, higher EHP. Can't cyno in highsec though.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

NEONOVUS
Mindstar Technology
Goonswarm Federation
#130 - 2012-09-10 19:09:18 UTC
Samahiel Sotken wrote:


I know it's a bit of a derail, but how are private security contractors a violation of Maritime Law?

Yes, you are technically a privateer/pirate due to old British law of the seas.
Get a writ of plunder and hoist the Jolly Apple, me maties we be hauling great bootie tonight.
Hard to port my Goons this thread be under new writing!
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#131 - 2012-09-10 19:14:26 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Greetings from Bat Country!

Apologies for our late reply to this thread but alas we have been hard at work. To be honest I am shocked it has taken this long for a thread of this nature to pop up, we were banking on a bit more rage from beople losing billions. Now, as many of you remember we tried to teach miners how to tank their ships with mixed results. Miners for the most part remained stupid, ice value went up and scores of bots were torn apart.

Well now its the turn of the traders. For years frieghters have been chugging around their baggage with not a care in the world, safe in the knolage that they are too big for the average ganker Joe, who could only look on as billions sail past his tornado. Poor Joe.

Well as of last month this is no longer the case. You see, we too have looked at these supersized metal pinatas and decided to use our staggering pile of gankboats to once again teach the bleating masses of highsec a lesson. This lesson is not to fill your cargohold with too much isk. Under the ever wise Warr Aki and now with extended access to people not in Bat Country we will attempt to educate the dumb for the good of EVE.

As well as making ourselves filthy rich.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#132 - 2012-09-10 19:14:42 UTC
Samahiel Sotken wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:


Yes, the oil tanker hired support. What a concept. Big smile

By the way, they also did so in defiance of Maritime Law and if caught could suffer legal repercussions.

Still, it does highlight the concept that taking precautions can save you from a gank. It's just that in EVE those precautions tend to take other forms.



Vice Admiral Bill Gortney, Commander of the United
States General Command wrote:
“Due to Maersk Alabama
following maritime industry’s best-practices such as embarking
security teams, the ship was able to prevent being successfully
attacked by pirates. This is a great example of how merchant
mariners can take pro-active action to prevent being attacked.”


I know it's a bit of a derail, but how are private security contractors a violation of Maritime Law?

Pardon, my bad. Civilian crew of commercial vessels have always been restricted from carrying firearms onboard their vessels, and until recently these restrictions defacto included "hired security personnel"... however this policy seems to be changing
in recent times (as of last year or so). This approach is still under intense criticism and restriction by many port cities that are concerned with the weaponry coming into their ports.
On the other hand, may of these private defense companies charge enough for their services that they simply drop their armament overboard when approaching a highly restricted port and manage to aquire fresh armament when they leave. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#133 - 2012-09-10 19:15:10 UTC
NEONOVUS wrote:
Samahiel Sotken wrote:
I know it's a bit of a derail, but how are private security contractors a violation of Maritime Law?

Yes, you are technically a privateer/pirate due to old British law of the seas.
Get a writ of plunder and hoist the Jolly Apple, me maties we be hauling great bootie tonight.
Hard to port my Goons this thread be under new writing!

Oh look, there's a freighter, let's "stop and search" it.

With large guns~~

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#134 - 2012-09-10 19:16:42 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
You see, we too have looked at these supersized metal pinatas and decided to use out staggering pile of gankboats to once again teach the bleating masses of highsec a lesson. This lesson is not to fill your cargohold with too much isk. Under the ever wise Warr Aki and now with extended access to people not in Bat Country we will attempt to educate the dumb for the good of EVE.

You're never going to succeed in reeducating them.

You are however, making great progress in culling them. Do your best ~~

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#135 - 2012-09-10 19:18:09 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:

You're never going to succeed in reeducating them.

You are however, making great progress in culling them. Do your best ~~


We can but try.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#136 - 2012-09-10 19:22:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
On the subject of private security contractors, many countries will not let you dock with armed personnel on board unless those personnel & the ship belong to a friendly nations armed forces. There is also the risk of vessels being hit not only for their cargo but for their crews weapons, especially in countries where the supply, ownership & use of firearms is extremely regulated.

Alavaria Fera wrote:

Oh look, there's a freighter, let's "stop and search" it.

With large guns~~

Goonswarm Customs and Excise, searching your freight for shinies erryday Pirate

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#137 - 2012-09-10 19:23:53 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Greetings from Bat Country!
By the way, I'm seeing an awful lot of you guys in ones or twos in local (since I live right on top of two pipelines)… I sure hope those aren't your scouts because that would be ridiculously obvious.

Then again, with customers like these, I suppose that finesse and discretion isn't all that necessary. P
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#138 - 2012-09-10 19:31:21 UTC
Tippia wrote:
By the way, I'm seeing an awful lot of you guys in ones or twos in local (since I live right on top of two pipelines)… I sure hope those aren't your scouts because that would be ridiculously obvious.

Then again, with customers like these, I suppose that finesse and discretion isn't all that necessary. P


All part of the lesson we are teachingBlink
Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#139 - 2012-09-10 19:34:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Paul Oliver
Alavaria Fera wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
You see, we too have looked at these supersized metal pinatas and decided to use out staggering pile of gankboats to once again teach the bleating masses of highsec a lesson. This lesson is not to fill your cargohold with too much isk. Under the ever wise Warr Aki and now with extended access to people not in Bat Country we will attempt to educate the dumb for the good of EVE.

You're never going to succeed in reeducating them.

You are however, making great progress in culling them. Do your best ~~
Tippia wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Greetings from Bat Country!
By the way, I'm seeing an awful lot of you guys in ones or twos in local (since I live right on top of two pipelines)… I sure hope those aren't your scouts because that would be ridiculously obvious.

Then again, with customers like these, I suppose that finesse and discretion isn't all that necessary. P
Mean people suck.
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).
NEONOVUS
Mindstar Technology
Goonswarm Federation
#140 - 2012-09-10 19:34:20 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
NEONOVUS wrote:
Samahiel Sotken wrote:
I know it's a bit of a derail, but how are private security contractors a violation of Maritime Law?

Yes, you are technically a privateer/pirate due to old British law of the seas.
Get a writ of plunder and hoist the Jolly Apple, me maties we be hauling great bootie tonight.
Hard to port my Goons this thread be under new writing!

Oh look, there's a freighter, let's "stop and search" it.

With large guns~~

Aye, why use these newfangled cargo scanners when we can be sending them on their journey faster.


The real issue is that a pmc could be very easily a bridgehead, and a lot of the world does not like a well armed foreign national in their country, much less a citizen.

Also I hardly feel bad for these people in the standard industrials.
The freighters a bit more so unless some one dissuades me through explaining how you can bump a ship off grid.