These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

T2BPO why they should be removed and how.

First post
Author
Pipa Porto
#1081 - 2012-09-07 13:53:54 UTC
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
All those who speak out against the dumbfuckery that is T2BPO along the years are my alts.


Glad you finally admitted it.


Quote:
If present counts stand I have over 1000 accounts so CCP hey up remove T2BPO before you lose 1/30th of your player base.


1,000/350,000=1/30

Glad to hear it, Brewlar.

Oh and, [citation needed] on the "1000 people have spoken out against T2 BPOs."

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Pipa Porto
#1082 - 2012-09-07 13:57:15 UTC
Akita T wrote:
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
Horrible ROI for new players. Astronomical ROI for players who were gifted them. Can you please stop making out that T2BPO's somehow cost their owners massive amounts of effort or isk as it's simply not the case.
A significant portion of useful T2 BPOs have changed hands for ISK, as opposed to still being in the original hands.
So, actually, yes, a good number of T2 BPOs did cost their current owners a lot of ISK.


Even if the BPOs were in their original owner's hands, the fact that they have a market price and can be sold means that holding on to one incurs an opportunity cost equal to the item's sale value, which means that the method of acquisition isn't relevant, it's still (from a profit standpoint) far better to sell the BPO and invest your ISK elsewhere.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#1083 - 2012-09-07 20:22:21 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
All those who speak out against the dumbfuckery that is T2BPO along the years are my alts.


Glad you finally admitted it.


Quote:
If present counts stand I have over 1000 accounts so CCP hey up remove T2BPO before you lose 1/30th of your player base.


1,000/350,000=1/30

Glad to hear it, Brewlar.

Oh and, [citation needed] on the "1000 people have spoken out against T2 BPOs."


This looks like Serious buziness, I should stay out of
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
#1084 - 2012-09-07 21:20:48 UTC
Where are all these people I only ever see 29k to 32k except my 1k on at any one time? I think you're over estimating EVE's player base. Weekend numbers rarely rise over 35k at peak time nowadays.
Pipa Porto
#1085 - 2012-09-08 05:09:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
Where are all these people I only ever see 29k to 32k except my 1k on at any one time? I think you're over estimating EVE's player base. Weekend numbers rarely rise over 35k at peak time nowadays.


So you're saying that the majority of players are logged on 24/7? Ooookay...

By the way, according to the QEN, EVE had 357,000 active accounts at the end of 2010. That stagnated some, fell a bit (Incarna), and has pretty much recovered.


Tell me more about how your 1,000 accounts represent 1/30th of EVE's 350,000 subscriptions.

And tell me more about how there have been 1,000 different active characters arguing for the removal of T2 BPOs. Feel free to list them. Since you already counted them, I'm sure listing them will be trivial.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Azrael Dinn
Imperial Mechanics
#1086 - 2012-09-08 06:30:02 UTC
Akita T wrote:
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
If the lottery was fair (it wasn't)

Says who (except you) ? Do you have any shred of a proof ? Why are you not presenting it to CCP Internal Affairs ?
[


CCP admitted that some prints where given out. Or I recall something like this from the past year when invention was being made.

After centuries of debating and justifying... Break Cloaks tm

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#1087 - 2012-09-08 08:16:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Azrael Dinn wrote:
Akita T wrote:
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
If the lottery was fair (it wasn't)

Says who (except you) ? Do you have any shred of a proof ? Why are you not presenting it to CCP Internal Affairs ?

CCP admitted that some prints where given out. Or I recall something like this from the past year when invention was being made.

The so-called "t20 incident" was exposed to the general public on the 9th of February 2007 (so, nearly 5 and a half years ago) by a player whose name used to be filtered out for a long time on the forums ( Kugutsumen ).
In a hotly disputed move afterwards, t20 was only "internally punished" and Kugutsumen banned due to the particular way in which he made the discovery public.
The CCP Internal Affairs division ("CCP IA")was created shortly afterwards to pro-actively supervise CCP employee actions, investigate and punish allegations of misconduct.

The fishy stuff involved a grand total of 10 (TEN) T2 BPOs, out of which, only 1 (ONE) was actually valuable (a Sabre BPO), and they were all removed from those who obtained them through favouritism and put back into the lottery queue.
That's less than 0.1% of the total number of T2 BPOs, and they were all yanked out, so any "unfairness" past the normal effect of lottery randomness was minuscule to begin with, and nevertheless redressed.
This makes Brewlar's accusations that "the lottery was unfair" a bit harder to believe at face value.

...

t20 kept working at CCP for a while, but in other capacities, then changed employers later, in 2008 (IIRC, allegedly, to "Realtime Worlds", which funny enough, closed down in 2010).
Kugu started that other site that lambastes every mistake CCP makes (it's more EVE politics and goings on than anything else nowadays), with a fairly active forum, which alongside SHC/FHC are the most often used external forums by EVE players.


If Brewlar really thinks he has any sort of actual evidence that the tampering with the lottery extended in any way past the t20 incident, he should have brought that evidence to CCP IA a long time ago already, which are in a far better position to actually see what really happened, because that's who has all the logs (as opposed to wild speculations, unfounded rumours, or outright malicious lies).
As things stand now, in that particular sub-argumentation line, Brewlar looks like nothing more than a scaremonger.
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
#1088 - 2012-09-08 12:26:32 UTC
Good point. release a T2BPO winners list so we can see which players and corporations had the T2BPO's dished out to. After all it was a lottery and all players deserve to see a winners list.

Oh CCP is not going to publish the list? Then I call corruption. The lottery was corrupt and CCP simply chose which players to give the best T2BPO's to and until a winners list is published my call of corruption is relevant. The only difference with T20 Vincent was that he got caught.

Or CCP could move on from T2BPO's and remove them as clearly they are not going to be forgotten about.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1089 - 2012-09-08 13:57:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Was T20 a tank?

Or was it fictional character created by someone?
Pipa Porto
#1090 - 2012-09-08 14:07:29 UTC
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
Good point. release a T2BPO winners list so we can see which players and corporations had the T2BPO's dished out to. After all it was a lottery and all players deserve to see a winners list.

Oh CCP is not going to publish the list? Then I call corruption. The lottery was corrupt and CCP simply chose which players to give the best T2BPO's to and until a winners list is published my call of corruption is relevant. The only difference with T20 Vincent was that he got caught.


Do you have any evidence to suggest that such a list would fruitfully produce evidence of corruption, or is it simply a fishing expedition? You're making the accusation. It's up to you to provide evidence to get an investigation started.

Regardless, even if BPOs were seeded unfairly, the origins of the BPOs is not relevant to their current economic importance (and lack thereof) unless you have a time machine, so they're irrelevant to the question of whether they need to be removed.


Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Was T20 a tank?

Or was it fictional character created by someone?


This is just getting sad.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

shar'ra matcevsovski
Doomheim
#1091 - 2012-09-08 14:23:39 UTC  |  Edited by: shar'ra matcevsovski
relseasing that list would:
1) not tell you if or who of them got the BPO`s properly or gifted
2) consist like ~3000 differenct accounts
3) kinda violate the ingame privacy, as you probably wouldnt like others to know, what you have in ur wallet/assets either.

wouldnt be the worstthting ever to release it but I just cannot see nay benefit to do so, not for the owners neither for the haters.


Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Was T20 a tank?

Or was it fictional character created by someone?


lol, its so hard to be funny these days, isnt it?

shar'ra phone home

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#1092 - 2012-09-08 20:40:32 UTC
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:
relseasing that list would:
1) not tell you if or who of them got the BPO`s properly or gifted
2) consist like ~3000 differenct accounts
3) kinda violate the ingame privacy, as you probably wouldnt like others to know, what you have in ur wallet/assets either.

wouldnt be the worstthting ever to release it but I just cannot see nay benefit to do so, not for the owners neither for the haters.


Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Was T20 a tank?

Or was it fictional character created by someone?


lol, its so hard to be funny these days, isnt it?


On the contrary, Why so serious?
Lara Dantreb
Reisende des Schwarzschild Grenze
#1093 - 2012-09-09 00:31:14 UTC
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
Where are all these people I only ever see 29k to 32k except my 1k on at any one time? I think you're over estimating EVE's player base. Weekend numbers rarely rise over 35k at peak time nowadays.


it proves nothing except that you are limited by your perception, and that you talk about things without knowing. You're in subjectivity, not in the pursuit of knowledge, otherwise you would not dare to write as deeply stupid things : You are of the worst ignorants, of those who are satisfied by their subjectivity and who don't try to improve themselves.

Instead of worrying about you to improve things for others, you'd better worry about improving your own level of understanding of how things work

---   Buying T2 ship bpos since 2005  ---

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#1094 - 2012-09-10 13:52:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
it was a lottery and all players deserve to see a winners list

Do they really deserve that ? I find that questionable.
That precise data with no additional info would say nothing useful and be employable only for "spin" purposes.
For all I know, AllianceX could indeed have gotten most of the useful T2 BPOs, but without knowing how many players were having RPs in the appropriate fields, how much appropriate-types of RPs that was total, and how much RP the winners ended up spending to get one vs how much they had in play total themselves, you really can't honestly say they got them unfairly.

What WOULD be useful however would be anonymous statistical data : a list of RP in play total in each field, number of players total, number of players that got an offer and rejected it or let it expire, and average RP spent on accepted offers per BP type.
THAT would be a lot more useful in determining whether the lottery was somewhat fair or not.
But even this data could be used for spin by people with limited understanding of statistics and what constitutes something one could call "acceptable//normal randomness".

So, no, the players don't really "deserve" any such thing.
You either accept that CCP was as fair as possible because they tell you they were, or you consider CCP untrustworthy, in which case, why bother playing such a corrupt game at all ?
If you want to take a third option, either bring your case to the CSM, or run for CSM yourself, bringing up this issue to the CCP-CSM meeting (just be prepared to be laughed off as the crackpot you come across as).

Making baseless accusations on the forums and making unfeasible demands, refusing to use any of the already-existing proper channels and refusing to accept any forms of less collateral-damage causing scenarios, this all but ensures you will be ridiculed or ignored rather than get any sort of positive action happening.
Make accusations based on FACT and back them up with evidence, make reasonable demands, take the proper channels, and you might just solve something.
CorInaXeraL
The Dresdeneers
#1095 - 2012-09-10 14:08:35 UTC
How is this thread still alive? T2 BPOs are in the game. Deal with it. Just like the specialty ships. Some people have them, some don't, big deal. Know how many T2 BPOs I have? 0. Do I care? Not really. Much like the super-rare ships, moving one out of a station would probably just mean getting ganked anyway.

However, I do like the 100-run BPCs that come out of them, so...keep chuggin' along, all you T2 BPO-ers.

If you're crying over this tiny, relatively insignificant factor in EVE-dom, you need a new MMO, and WoW is over here.

You can now play with fuzzy pandas. Enjoy.
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#1096 - 2012-09-10 14:12:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
CorInaXeraL wrote:
How is this thread still alive?

People are naturally bad at math in general and statistics in particular, full of envy and greed, assuming anybody else who has it better than them does so because of some sort of favouritism, and would rather hurt people who have any advantage than work towards getting a similar advantage themselves, even if the advantage is quite minimal, carries a huge cost, and those that have the that advantage would generally be better off selling it to somebody else given current market prices.
If this thread would not keep getting back from the brink of oblivion, some other similar thread will soon pop back up a few weeks or at most a few months later, saying basically the same thing in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

The funny thing is that such angry people are never angry enough to just leave, so they don't really find the unfairness strong enough to justify a departure Blink
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
#1097 - 2012-09-11 00:26:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Brewlar Kuvakei
No one has a problem with unique ships. Unique ships don't stop me undocking in my regular ships, T2BPO does however rule out complete areas of T2 manufacture.

If CCP gave a selected few players a special ship that insta'd titans and was indestructible we'd call this a game imbalance, such an imbalance exists in regards to T2 manufacture.

The only people here who are bad at math are CCP. They gave out content who's value far exceeded any effort put into the game to achieve or acquire, they then stoped giving out this content. That is the worse math this game has seen and yet CCP have failed to correct this error and simply allows the error to multiply and compound with each passing day.
Pipa Porto
#1098 - 2012-09-11 01:00:00 UTC
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
No one has a problem with unique ships. Unique ships don't stop me undocking in my regular ships, T2BPO does however rule out complete areas of T2 manufacture.

If CCP gave a selected few players a special ship that insta'd titans and was indestructible we'd call this a game imbalance, such an imbalance exists in regards to T2 manufacture.

The only people here who are bad at math are CCP. They gave out content who's value far exceeded any effort put into the game to achieve or acquire, they then stoped giving out this content. That is the worse math this game has seen and yet CCP have failed to correct this error and simply allows the error to multiply and compound with each passing day.


Nope. Name one instance where all the markets related to a science skill are dominated by BPO manufacture. If you can't, then no area of T2 manufacture is dominated by BPO manufacture. Specific markets may be, but invention is all about following the market anyway.

No, it doesn't.

So now you want CCP to keep seeding T2 BPOs? Which is it? Are they overpowered and in need of removal, or are they [something] and in need of extra seeding? You gotta limit yourself to swinging the bat in one direction at a time man.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Ginger Barbarella
#1099 - 2012-09-11 02:33:16 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
The only people here who are bad at math are CCP. They gave out content who's value far exceeded any effort put into the game to achieve or acquire, they then stoped giving out this content. That is the worse math this game has seen and yet CCP have failed to correct this error and simply allows the error to multiply and compound with each passing day.

[/quote]

Why are you still arguing with this troll after all these pages?? What?

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Pipa Porto
#1100 - 2012-09-11 03:37:38 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Why are you still arguing with this troll after all these pages?? What?


Fanatics and Trolls are different beasts.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto