These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Interceptors, the loosers of frigate buf?

Author
Meditril
Hoplite Brigade
Ushra'Khan
#1 - 2012-09-06 15:14:53 UTC
Am I the only one or is anybody else thinking that interceptors are the complete loosers of the recent frigate buf. Execpt maybe from the Taranis most of them suffer either from too less damage output or from too less medium slots. What do you think?
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#2 - 2012-09-06 15:20:26 UTC
Tiericide is not exactly small potatoes and has to start somewhere, they chose to go from ground up which makes sense as everything above (T2) depends on what is below (T1).

In time I am sure current T2 hulls will feel the effects of their descendants being almost as good as they are themselves Smile
Londor Rogers
Public Menace
#3 - 2012-09-06 15:24:33 UTC
Interceptors are fine they still intercept things better than t1 frigs do to microwarpdrive sig radious reduction/Speed. Ships in EVE are not designed around 1v1s. Interceptors fulfill their role nicely in fleets and small gangs.
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#4 - 2012-09-06 15:31:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Deen Wispa
Meditril wrote:
Am I the only one or is anybody else thinking that interceptors are the complete loosers of the recent frigate buf. Execpt maybe from the Taranis most of them suffer either from too less damage output or from too less medium slots. What do you think?


Not at all. T2 inties still go way faster and have a longer point range due to inty bonuses. With overheat, an ares can point out to 34ish KM with Level 4 interceptor. An atron cannot do that. And it sure as hell cannot go 5km/sec

I think if you argue from the angle of cost effectiveness, then certainly t1 inties are the way to go. But it's not like any of you Minmatar fw pilots are isk starved anyway :)

And with the exception of perhaps the ranis, T2 inties are meant to be fleet ships. Reminds me of a thread where a guy wanted advice on how to fly a Huginn solo despite it being a fleet ship. I LOLed at that one.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Pinky Feldman
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#5 - 2012-09-06 21:02:55 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
Meditril wrote:
Am I the only one or is anybody else thinking that interceptors are the complete loosers of the recent frigate buf. Execpt maybe from the Taranis most of them suffer either from too less damage output or from too less medium slots. What do you think?


Not at all. T2 inties still go way faster and have a longer point range due to inty bonuses. With overheat, an ares can point out to 34ish KM with Level 4 interceptor. An atron cannot do that. And it sure as hell cannot go 5km/sec

I think if you argue from the angle of cost effectiveness, then certainly t1 inties are the way to go. But it's not like any of you Minmatar fw pilots are isk starved anyway :)

And with the exception of perhaps the ranis, T2 inties are meant to be fleet ships. Reminds me of a thread where a guy wanted advice on how to fly a Huginn solo despite it being a fleet ship. I LOLed at that one.


Agree completely. T2 Inties still have a very clear role that they excel in over their T1 counterparts. Just because you now have T1 options doesn't make the T2 options a complete waste.

The huge sig bloom means that anything other ships that are further away from the target you're tackling will completely destroy you as well as getting munched on hard by drones. Their survivability doesn't even compare to Interceptors.

Also, I hate TD/light missile kiting Condors. That is all.
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
#6 - 2012-09-06 22:09:01 UTC
While I partially agree, I still say my little Crusader needs some buffing love. ;P

There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly

kraiklyn Asatru
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2012-09-06 22:28:24 UTC
I am definitely done flying interceptors solo. I'll still keep an instalock stilly and a pretty much unarmed claw for pointing stuff when I am in a gang but thats it. Not going to waste my cash on em.

Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#8 - 2012-09-06 23:48:55 UTC
CCP acknowledged that interceptors needed a makeover. To be honest I'm a little tired of kitey ewar frigates.
Lock out
Shadows Of The Federation
#9 - 2012-09-06 23:57:24 UTC
Tbfh, they are kinda useless.

For null, for the same cost you can get a dictor, which allthough has smaller tackle radius, benefits from AOE tackle.

For low, it only works if your target is a legitimate one or not in sight of sentries and even then there are many things to consider. Sure it can do huge speed and keep up with what's tackled, but if the rest of the fleet can't keep up to apply dps, then it's still p useless.

Not only that, but every day I see people on the forums or in various ig chats telling noobs "sure your frig can be useful, a fleet always needs tackle". Fact of the matter is... your fleet kinda doesn't need that kind of tackle unless it wants to get a gank. In a fleet fight a ceptor tackilng somethign makes fuckall difference, one would hope that fleet members point random ships in enemy fleet and hold them there. In a shield rangey fleet obviously the lachesis will be the beast of choice, so again ceptor doesn't have much use and it will die to enemy's neuts, smartbombs and warriers in about 5 seconds anyways.


TL;DR : In fact ceptors are useless, only good for pointing single targets for ganks, and even then with severe limitations (speed of the ceptor's fleet, valid target, etc.)

Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#10 - 2012-09-07 01:08:36 UTC
Lock out wrote:

TL;DR : In fact ceptors are useless, only good for pointing single targets for ganks, and even then with severe limitations (speed of the ceptor's fleet, valid target, etc.)



I respectfully disagree. I was in a lowsec FW fleet a little while back, and we had a mix of battlecruisers and a few assault frigs and interceptors. We engaged onto a sniper fleet via a cloaky warp in, but there was a fuckup and we landed 35km off of them. I was flying a jag at the time, and myself and a few other pilots in jags and stilettos were one of the main reasons we pulled that fight out and won. We moved in, scrammed a few targets and held them while our canes caught up, then ran like hell once the drones and **** were on us. Rinse, repeat, etc.

We completely annihilated them. After the resistance was wiped out FC called for us to switch our frigs out for battlecruisers so we could start flipping i-hubs. Another fleet re-engaged on us about an hour later running a similar setup. We got completely assfucked because we lacked fast tackle.

So yeah...interceptors are totally useless.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#11 - 2012-09-07 02:33:03 UTC
Interceptors are still good at what they are supposed to do.

Tackle.

They should not be leaps and bound more powerful than t1 combat frigs.

BYDI recruitment closed-ish

Lock out
Shadows Of The Federation
#12 - 2012-09-07 03:01:05 UTC
Garresh wrote:
Lock out wrote:

TL;DR : In fact ceptors are useless, only good for pointing single targets for ganks, and even then with severe limitations (speed of the ceptor's fleet, valid target, etc.)



I respectfully disagree. I was in a lowsec FW fleet a little while back, and we had a mix of battlecruisers and a few assault frigs and interceptors. We engaged onto a sniper fleet via a cloaky warp in, but there was a fuckup and we landed 35km off of them. I was flying a jag at the time, and myself and a few other pilots in jags and stilettos were one of the main reasons we pulled that fight out and won. We moved in, scrammed a few targets and held them while our canes caught up, then ran like hell once the drones and **** were on us. Rinse, repeat, etc.





Same could've been achieved with a lach in case you were in a shield gang or with a prot in an armor gang, with much more EHP . Obviously , for greater cost, but the discussion here is effectivness not cost, otherwise we're going back to T1 frigs ....
Vordak Kallager
Descendance.
GoonSwarm.
#13 - 2012-09-07 03:32:48 UTC
Lock out wrote:
Garresh wrote:
Lock out wrote:

TL;DR : In fact ceptors are useless, only good for pointing single targets for ganks, and even then with severe limitations (speed of the ceptor's fleet, valid target, etc.)



I respectfully disagree. I was in a lowsec FW fleet a little while back, and we had a mix of battlecruisers and a few assault frigs and interceptors. We engaged onto a sniper fleet via a cloaky warp in, but there was a fuckup and we landed 35km off of them. I was flying a jag at the time, and myself and a few other pilots in jags and stilettos were one of the main reasons we pulled that fight out and won. We moved in, scrammed a few targets and held them while our canes caught up, then ran like hell once the drones and **** were on us. Rinse, repeat, etc.





Same could've been achieved with a lach in case you were in a shield gang or with a prot in an armor gang, with much more EHP . Obviously , for greater cost, but the discussion here is effectivness not cost, otherwise we're going back to T1 frigs ....


One of the unique uses Interceptors have are getting out in front of a burning fleet to provide warp ins for beefier tackle. They are also less intimidating than seeing Lachesis or Proteus in the enemy fleet and help your gang's "engage-ability". Otherwise, there are better choices for fleet tackle.

Sa souvraya niende misain ye.

William Walker
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#14 - 2012-09-07 06:32:58 UTC  |  Edited by: William Walker
I agree with Lock Out that frigate class ships in general have no chance in larger fleet engagements. However in small to medium gang pvp they are still very viable and useful. People scatter a lot more in those types of engagements and if it tips over to one side too much people run and they scatter so an inty is great in that aspect to catch stragglers. They are still viable in those instances as well as camps or small engagements.

ヽ(⌒∇⌒)ノ へ(゜∇、°)へ (◕‿◕✿)

Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#15 - 2012-09-07 18:07:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Garresh
Lock out wrote:

Same could've been achieved with a lach in case you were in a shield gang or with a prot in an armor gang, with much more EHP . Obviously , for greater cost, but the discussion here is effectivness not cost, otherwise we're going back to T1 frigs ....



Actually, not so much. We were running scrams on our interceptors. The lachesis or Proteus would not have been able to get close enough to apply short scrams to their snipers before getting scrammed or webbed by THEIR recons, and probably would've just melted to getting primaried by 12+ sniper battlecruisers for flying directly at them. Interceptors still provide a much safer and quicker way to apply tackle and provide warp-ins to fleet members. Sure they don't have the range or the tank, but I think anyone with any experience in 1v1, small gang, or anything up to medium gang PvP understands the importance of speed.

Fun fact: Their Lachesis died that fight. My Jag lived.

Edit: And for the record, I'm not saying the Lachesis is useless, or that interceptors and fast tackle frigates are somehow uber-god tackle machines, but seriously, different ships for different roles. I personally don't feel comfortable without at least 1 competetent interceptor pilot in my fleet. I enjoy flying a Jag for that role because it's a happy medium between heavy and fast, but without a good interceptor you're going to have problems vs certain fleet doctrines.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-09-07 18:27:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Muad 'dib
i dont think intys have been damaged that badly.

The cost effectiveness is just undeniable but a cepter DOES still present a harder tackler to deal with, good tacklers for the skill was missing and i think this change is good for frigs in general and still leaves the extra space for the intys, combat and gang, to offer something more.

T2 intys HAVE had a niche role with no other frigs really getting anywhere near, and for low sp pilots that get popped all day its a nice general pvp buff.

It costs 10m now to fit them so whats 10m more for a range bonus/sig mwd bonus

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.

The VC's
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-09-07 19:15:14 UTC  |  Edited by: The VC's
Londor Rogers wrote:
Interceptors are fine they still intercept things better than t1 frigs do to microwarpdrive sig radious reduction/Speed. Ships in EVE are not designed around 1v1s. Interceptors fulfill their role nicely in fleets and small gangs.


A lone combat inty doesn't provide much more solo performance than it's T1 counterpart. However, you should see how well a squad of them drops support ships (eg. ecm boats) on a busy grid, with other members of the opposing fleet trying to pick them off before they do.
Reppyk
The Black Shell
#18 - 2012-09-08 15:19:36 UTC
hi

i'm a keres

i'm better at pointing stuff and can survive thanks to my damps

i am so pretty

I AM SPACE CAPTAIN REPPYK. BEWARE.

Proud co-admin of frugu.net, a French fansite about EVE !

Xirin
Estrale Frontiers
#19 - 2012-09-08 15:40:12 UTC
Interceptors aren't supposed to have DPS. They're tackle ships, after all. Their speed is more than adaquate tank for them, so EHP isn't an issue either.

The only problem with interceptors that I can see (judging by the hundreds I've lost...) is that they are far too easy to kill for large ships. Oracles, for example, can insta almost any inty from 40km with scorch. For those keeping score, that's battleship-sized guns tracking a ship doing 5km/s. Something is horribly wrong there. But it's not an easy fix: Interceptors already have a small sig radius, so the problem is that big guns hit small targets too easily. The only viable fix I can see would be to do what was done with titan guns, make them suffer a significant damage penalty when firing upon small vessels.

I'd love to see a situation where an interceptor and other small-sig, fast ships only had to worry about drones, destroyers, and other frigtes (and bombs, because I'm a terrible pilot and fly straight into them). Being one shot by HAC's and battleships makes them, as has been said in this thread, useless in large fights.
RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
#20 - 2012-09-08 16:33:51 UTC
Don't forget the 'cool' factor.
When it says 'Intercepter' in the description, you just fly different.
123Next page