These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Exhumers have no business in high sec.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-09-03 10:41:19 UTC
Andski wrote:
nat longshot wrote:
yet more morons thinking they are right. Damn you people are way off.

Lady Spark please tell me what will happen if you idea comes around? what will happen to the market and ship building.

Well ill tell you this only poeople playing will be those in 0.0 they get the tect moons and all the ore's so low still will be the sh*t whole its allways been.

players will leave high and head stright for 0.0 and given goons have they highest count for players right now they will just grown and not one soul will beable to do anything or buy anything without handing more isk to the larger allinaces.

Just used goons becase they have the highest body count btw.

now lets here another failed idea from Lady.


you're right everyone in 0.0 has tech moons

lol


no not everyone many goon have the highest % of them that well know and well posted. but thanks for adding your 2 cents.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#22 - 2012-09-03 10:42:37 UTC
Rather than showing your complete lack of understanding, it would be better if you posted something constructive.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-09-03 10:48:12 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
Rather than showing your complete lack of understanding, it would be better if you posted something constructive.


Lady Spank you idea's are in my view way off and from the looks of it other feel the same.

just let me reset what ccp has said then you might learn something.

There are 3 high sec rookie system's per race thats 12 total out of 5000 system's.

So how can you say all high sec is rookie training? Given what the intro to the game state's its your path to deside were you go do you stay in high sec doing pvp/pve/mining.building or do you risk it all and go to low sec or 0.0 and try to build a large allinace to rule 0.0

So given that and what you have posted you way off and dont understand what ccp's design.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#24 - 2012-09-03 10:50:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
...ok, ban all T2 ships from HS then... why? 'Cause their T1 equivalents are sufficient for missioning, exploring and hauling...

Your arguments are very well thought through. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2012-09-03 10:54:42 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
...ok, ban all T2 ships from HS then... why? Cause their T1 equivalents are sufficient for missioning, explorering and hauling...

You arguments are very well thought through. Blink


lol i like this lady.

jus a side point Marauders were made with mission running in mind not pvp so ah please tell me why is there a ship just buildtfor mission running then and its a pvp ship though yes and can be use as one as long as no one uses a kind of ecm.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#26 - 2012-09-03 10:55:52 UTC
Mission running is not confined to high sec. Again your lack of understanding is quite shocking.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#27 - 2012-09-03 10:56:51 UTC
...and mining is... you even read what you write?

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2012-09-03 11:04:47 UTC
nat longshot wrote:
Andski wrote:
nat longshot wrote:
yet more morons thinking they are right. Damn you people are way off.

Lady Spark please tell me what will happen if you idea comes around? what will happen to the market and ship building.

Well ill tell you this only poeople playing will be those in 0.0 they get the tect moons and all the ore's so low still will be the sh*t whole its allways been.

players will leave high and head stright for 0.0 and given goons have they highest count for players right now they will just grown and not one soul will beable to do anything or buy anything without handing more isk to the larger allinaces.

Just used goons becase they have the highest body count btw.

now lets here another failed idea from Lady.


you're right everyone in 0.0 has tech moons

lol


no not everyone many goon have the highest % of them that well know and well posted. but thanks for adding your 2 cents.

And who gets the income from the moons?
The alliance. Not the individual alliance members, but the alliance as a whole.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2012-09-03 11:05:09 UTC
Lady wrote:
Spank]Mission running is not confined to high sec. Again your lack of understanding is quite shocking.


your right Mission running is not confined to high sec so why should minning not be open to all high sec not just low or 0.0 given your post. so that should mean t2 ships sould be open to all sec. Btw they remove combat cap ship's from high sec for a good reason. just like they dont let a Rorgaul in high sec for the same reason it would really mess up high sec mining. Do you have a clue what miining corp would give for a high sec rorgual?

Lack of understanding?

i point stuff out and you cant rebuff a damn point lady you not holding up your view of the mining ships or t2 ships beening removed.

the only thing your doing is take little cheap shots witch i must add are very weak.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2012-09-03 11:07:07 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
nat longshot wrote:
Andski wrote:
nat longshot wrote:
yet more morons thinking they are right. Damn you people are way off.

Lady Spark please tell me what will happen if you idea comes around? what will happen to the market and ship building.

Well ill tell you this only poeople playing will be those in 0.0 they get the tect moons and all the ore's so low still will be the sh*t whole its allways been.

players will leave high and head stright for 0.0 and given goons have they highest count for players right now they will just grown and not one soul will beable to do anything or buy anything without handing more isk to the larger allinaces.

Just used goons becase they have the highest body count btw.

now lets here another failed idea from Lady.


you're right everyone in 0.0 has tech moons

lol


no not everyone many goon have the highest % of them that well know and well posted. but thanks for adding your 2 cents.

And who gets the income from the moons?
The alliance. Not the individual alliance members, but the alliance as a whole.



this is known james that how goons could aford hulkaggend and the whole burn jita bit.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
pussnheels
Viziam
#31 - 2012-09-03 11:09:50 UTC
Bubanni wrote:
hmm limiting the exhumers to low and null sec is actually a good idea, it would encourage more people to move to low sec for mining, but they could still stay in high sec with retrievers and such...

simply disallow the hulks and such to activate their strip miners in high sec.. (so they can still travel to low sec)

no people will just switch to covetors their yield i pretty good if you fit them for yield and when they do get ganked owell only lost 30 mil or so,
the only people who will really whine are the gankers , when suddenly there are no more 200mil + untanked ships anymore that they can gank

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#32 - 2012-09-03 11:09:54 UTC
So who exactly will ban all these T2 ships? The factions who originally designed them for use by pilots, or Concord? What would be the explanation for why they're not allowed in high-sec? If you're going to ban all T2 ships in high-sec because they are too powerful, why not ban all weapons because they are dangerous?

Oh god.
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#33 - 2012-09-03 11:10:59 UTC
I came hoping to read an intelligent thread by Lady Spank.
I leave dissapointed.

Just remove local, that will make everyone happier. People will then have to use ship scanners to determine who is in the system and probes to find them. Yes, I know this proposal has been beaten to death, but it's still valid.

I'm not a miner, but really, remove a mining ship from High-sec because it does not comply with your style of gameplay ? Tch.


COO - Bene Gesserit Chapterhouse  CEO - Sanctuary Pact Alliance
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#34 - 2012-09-03 11:11:29 UTC
Most Americans have no business with a gun but you don't see them getting banned there even though it is the most logical thing to do.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#35 - 2012-09-03 11:15:47 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
Most Americans have no business with a gun but you don't see them getting banned there even though it is the most logical thing to do.


Yeah, Americans aren't allowed to carry guns around with them. They have to leave them at home.

Oh god.
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-09-03 11:19:23 UTC  |  Edited by: nat longshot
Lady Spank wrote:
Most Americans have no business with a gun but you don't see them getting banned there even though it is the most logical thing to do.


well given iam a Amercan are you? dont sound like it from that post.

Yes we have our reasons for keeping them open to buy it's in our law's for one reason and one reason only. WE the people have the right to keep and bear arms so the Governmet know damn well if it's step out of line we the people are armed and will take the steps needed to take whats ares back.

Well that and any other nation try's to take our land they will have deal with the most heavyly arm people in the world to take it.

Your logic is short and way off.

Logical would mean england would have had more gun's for its people and then maybe wwII might have been diffent.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2012-09-03 11:22:12 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Lady Spank wrote:
Most Americans have no business with a gun but you don't see them getting banned there even though it is the most logical thing to do.


Yeah, Americans aren't allowed to carry guns around with them. They have to leave them at home.



lol leave them at home lol i walk around with a 9mm in my car and jacket daily. Witch i have a perment to carry btw.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#38 - 2012-09-03 11:26:18 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:
Just remove local, that will make everyone happier. People will then have to use ship scanners to determine who is in the system and probes to find them. Yes, I know this proposal has been beaten to death, but it's still valid.


Actually... I start to find that a good idea.^^

If not remove, then alteast make it a broadcasting channel only... if you send a signal (ie. write something) you become visible for a short amount of time.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)
Aine Ni
Doomheim
#39 - 2012-09-03 11:28:15 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
These ships are designed for deep space operation and using them in high sec is overkill.

Either allow use of bombs, warp bubbles and capitals in high sec or also remove these specialised ships from use in high.

What is the point of low and null sec industrial 'content' if you are going to give no incentive for being out there. People play Eve for the spaceships, give them a reason to earn their shiny toys.

At present I am pushed to find a belt that hasn't been mined out by greedy bots and the mining 'community' needs to be displaced. At present it's more crowded than the M1 during rush hour.


Lady Spank wrote:
Rather than showing your complete lack of understanding, it would be better if you posted something constructive.


Funny - you answeared your own thread :D
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#40 - 2012-09-03 11:28:34 UTC
nat longshot wrote:
Ah you need to learn what the term "deep space means" look it up and its1 Au from a planet is what is called deep space.

as the game specifies ships that are built for deep space we can safely assume that other ships are not built for deep space

as such I demand you cease using any ships other than transports and exhumers outside 1au of a planet