These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Case for Removing Learning Implants

First post
Author
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#321 - 2012-09-01 12:41:57 UTC
Hey this thread is still alive neat.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#322 - 2012-09-01 12:43:50 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
"Oh, you're not fitting learning implants? You must be having a strong dislike to risk or an opposition to loosing them!"


By your logic: your last pod loss didn't have a single implant and the ship you lost was cheaply fitted. You are clearly risk averse.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Din Chao
#323 - 2012-09-01 12:44:42 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Members of RvB seem to get along quite well with things as they are and with learning skills removed you can actually use your character for PvP or what ever you like straight off the bat.

Just FYI: RvB don't podkill.
Frying Doom
#324 - 2012-09-01 12:48:31 UTC
Andski wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
"Oh, you're not fitting learning implants? You must be having a strong dislike to risk or an opposition to loosing them!"


By your logic: your last pod loss didn't have a single implant and the ship you lost was cheaply fitted. You are clearly risk averse.

Yes I am and I also use a skiff so that should say it all.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#325 - 2012-09-01 12:49:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Din Chao wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Members of RvB seem to get along quite well with things as they are and with learning skills removed you can actually use your character for PvP or what ever you like straight off the bat.

Just FYI: RvB don't podkill.

Edit My apologies RvB don't pod people in Red or Blue just everyone else.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Din Chao
#326 - 2012-09-01 13:09:13 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Din Chao wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Members of RvB seem to get along quite well with things as they are and with learning skills removed you can actually use your character for PvP or what ever you like straight off the bat.

Just FYI: RvB don't podkill.

Edit My apologies RvB don't pod people in Red or Blue just everyone else.

Yes, but this is also true of any other corp. Just saying, they're a poor example to build an argument on.

And just to get my 2¢ in, it's already been said in this thread, but "only fly what you can afford to replace" also applies to what's in your head.
Frying Doom
#327 - 2012-09-01 13:14:55 UTC
Din Chao wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Din Chao wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Members of RvB seem to get along quite well with things as they are and with learning skills removed you can actually use your character for PvP or what ever you like straight off the bat.

Just FYI: RvB don't podkill.

Edit My apologies RvB don't pod people in Red or Blue just everyone else.

Yes, but this is also true of any other corp. Just saying, they're a poor example to build an argument on.

And just to get my 2¢ in, it's already been said in this thread, but "only fly what you can afford to replace" also applies to what's in your head.

On that I completely agreeSmile

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#328 - 2012-09-01 13:51:19 UTC
I will admit I don't believe it was a coincidence this article appeared on themittens.com the day after the announcement that Dr Caymus has entered the 200.000.000 skillpoint club.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Aruken Marr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#329 - 2012-09-01 13:54:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Aruken Marr
You were beginning to make a little sense. Then you just lost it again.

I can't afford to keep fitting +5s in my clone because I'd become bankrupt from multiple pod losses. Does that make me risk averse or does that make me realistic? I usually use +3s and sometimes I have to fight in my +4 clone. I don't like it but I do it anyway. Does that make me risk averse? I'd do it in +5s if I had the bank roll.

Just because people are willing to put up with a system doesn't mean that the system isn't broken.
Frying Doom
#330 - 2012-09-01 14:13:01 UTC
Aruken Marr wrote:
You were beginning to make a little sense. Then you just lost it again.

I can't afford to keep fitting +5s in my clone because I'd become bankrupt from multiple pod losses. Does that make me risk averse or does that make me realistic? I usually use +3s and sometimes I have to fight in my +4 clone. I don't like it but I do it anyway. Does that make me risk averse? I'd do it in +5s if I had the bank roll.

Just because people are willing to put up with a system doesn't mean that the system isn't broken.

Just because you cannot afford to do it does not make it broken, it just means you are choosing not to risk it.

I cannot afford to buy a Dreads and lose them multiple times without becoming bankrupt, does that mean that system is broken? or instead of flying dreads in PvP I could fly brutix and then have to worry a lot less about the numbers I loose. Just like putting in +2 or +3 implants instead of +5s.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#331 - 2012-09-01 15:36:23 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
I cannot afford to buy a Dreads and lose them multiple times without becoming bankrupt, does that mean that system is broken?

Do your dreads blow up if you choose a smaller, cheaper ship to fly?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#332 - 2012-09-01 15:51:04 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
I will admit I don't believe it was a coincidence this article appeared on themittens.com the day after the announcement that Dr Caymus has entered the 200.000.000 skillpoint club.


I will admit that this makes zero sense because it's not the first time somebody brings up removing learning implants and it won't be the last. Feel free to keep making connections that don't exist, though, it's amusing.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Suqq Madiq
#333 - 2012-09-01 15:51:21 UTC
I love how this argument was lost before it even left the ground (by ground, im referring to the horrid 3rd party site from which it sprang) and yet, here it is, still with no compelling argument as to why Nullsec should have this particular risk removed beyond "aderp, cuz it halps us peeveepee, aderp".

Here's a tip for all you risk averse cry babies in Nullsec: Move to highsec, or lowsec if you can hack it, and stop crying.

You're making fools of yourself, beyond how foolish you normally look. Learning implants too expensive to replace? Don't use them. How difficult is that? Stop asking CCP to hold your hands and nerf learning implants for the rest of EVE because you can't make the retardedly simple decision to use them if you can afford it and not use them if you can't.

"BAAAAAAAAH!!! But then ours noobs suffer from slow skill training. BAAAAAAAHH!!!"

Then instruct those noobs about the risk / reward scenarios you're so fond of trotting out. Teach them how easy it is to setup jump clones (it's really ******* easy; hai Estel Arador and others). You could even, gasp, spread some of that sickening amount of wealth you hoard and do something that even Eve ******* University has figured out and provide +3 implants at a discounted rate. If Eve University can figure out a way to subsidize implants for it's noobs, i'm sure the great minds you have squirreled away in Null can come up with something similar.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#334 - 2012-09-01 15:52:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
Suqq Madiq wrote:
I love how this argument was lost before it even left the ground (by ground, im referring to the horrid 3rd party site from which it sprang) and yet, here it is, still with no compelling argument as to why Nullsec should have this particular risk removed beyond "aderp, cuz it halps us peeveepee, aderp".

Here's a tip for all you risk averse cry babies in Nullsec: Move to highsec, or lowsec if you can hack it, and stop crying.

You're making fools of yourself, beyond how foolish you normally look. Learning implants too expensive to replace? Don't use them. How difficult is that? Stop asking CCP to hold your hands and nerf learning implants for the rest of EVE because you can't make the retardedly simple decision to use them if you can afford it and not use them if you can't.

"BAAAAAAAAH!!! But then ours noobs suffer from slow skill training. BAAAAAAAHH!!!"

Then instruct those noobs about the risk / reward scenarios you're so fond of trotting out. Teach them how easy it is to setup jump clones (it's really ******* easy; hai Estel Arador and others). You could even, gasp, spread some of that sickening amount of wealth you hoard and do something that even Eve ******* University has figured out and provide +3 implants at a discounted rate. If Eve University can figure out a way to subsidize implants for it's noobs, i'm sure the great minds you have squirreled away in Null can come up with something similar.


why do you think that I'm concerned about /your/ input?

good to know that my article made you this upset, though!

also I don't give a flying **** what Eve University does because they're not funding a gigantic supercapital fleet, they're not running a massive campaign nor do they have space to upgrade and pay for

lol npc alts

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#335 - 2012-09-01 15:52:49 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
I will admit I don't believe it was a coincidence this article appeared on themittens.com the day after the announcement that Dr Caymus has entered the 200.000.000 skillpoint club.

Are you suggesting that any of us feel threatened by Caymus's skillpoints?
L O L

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#336 - 2012-09-01 15:58:22 UTC
Suqq Madiq wrote:
I love how this argument was lost before it even left the ground (by ground, im referring to the horrid 3rd party site from which it sprang) and yet, here it is, still with no compelling argument as to why Nullsec should have this particular risk removed beyond "aderp, cuz it halps us peeveepee, aderp".

Here's a tip for all you risk averse cry babies in Nullsec: Move to highsec, or lowsec if you can hack it, and stop crying.

You're making fools of yourself, beyond how foolish you normally look. Learning implants too expensive to replace? Don't use them. How difficult is that? Stop asking CCP to hold your hands and nerf learning implants for the rest of EVE because you can't make the retardedly simple decision to use them if you can afford it and not use them if you can't.

"BAAAAAAAAH!!! But then ours noobs suffer from slow skill training. BAAAAAAAHH!!!"

Then instruct those noobs about the risk / reward scenarios you're so fond of trotting out. Teach them how easy it is to setup jump clones (it's really ******* easy; hai Estel Arador and others). You could even, gasp, spread some of that sickening amount of wealth you hoard and do something that even Eve ******* University has figured out and provide +3 implants at a discounted rate. If Eve University can figure out a way to subsidize implants for it's noobs, i'm sure the great minds you have squirreled away in Null can come up with something similar.


As much as I'm against the removal of learning implants and Goons seem to be the one's for it. It's hard to try and call out Goons ability to help out newbie goons. They really do have one of the better programs on getting newbies on their feet in Eve that I've seen.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Aruken Marr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#337 - 2012-09-01 16:01:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Aruken Marr
Frying Doom wrote:
Aruken Marr wrote:
You were beginning to make a little sense. Then you just lost it again.

I can't afford to keep fitting +5s in my clone because I'd become bankrupt from multiple pod losses. Does that make me risk averse or does that make me realistic? I usually use +3s and sometimes I have to fight in my +4 clone. I don't like it but I do it anyway. Does that make me risk averse? I'd do it in +5s if I had the bank roll.

Just because people are willing to put up with a system doesn't mean that the system isn't broken.

Just because you cannot afford to do it does not make it broken, it just means you are choosing not to risk it.

I cannot afford to buy a Dreads and lose them multiple times without becoming bankrupt, does that mean that system is broken? or instead of flying dreads in PvP I could fly brutix and then have to worry a lot less about the numbers I loose. Just like putting in +2 or +3 implants instead of +5s.


You can't use a dread in hisec, why should you be able use +5s? See I can draw really poor parallels too.

The main problem is that it's a system which rewards risk aversion. No one in their right mind would want to pvp with +5s in if they couldn't afford to replace them. So they don't risk losing them by not using them. Those who are risk averse and remain in the safety of hisec use them. They are rewarded for being risk averse.

You understand how this argument can work both ways, yes? That's because it's such a silly argument. It's a system that has a negative impact of the game.

edit: Someone raised the idea of being able to unplug implants without destroying them. I quite like that idea maybe it would require certain drawbacks but it provides options in an unnecessarily restrictive system.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#338 - 2012-09-01 16:07:36 UTC
It's all about progression. Newbies shouldn't be flying around in +4/+5s when they could barely afford them in the first place. Stick +1s up to +3s in depending on what you can afford to replace and move up to the higher level implants when you can afford to replace them. Change your mentality about implants, not the mechanic.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Aruken Marr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#339 - 2012-09-01 16:14:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Aruken Marr
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
It's all about progression. Newbies shouldn't be flying around in +4/+5s when they could barely afford them in the first place. Stick +1s up to +3s in depending on what you can afford to replace and move up to the higher level implants when you can afford to replace them. Change your mentality about implants, not the mechanic.


Why should newbies be punished for being new?

I get it. You're gonna say "In that case why not just let them hop straight into a BS?!" It's not the same. Being new doesnt restrict their ability to pvp (as they can do it in a frigate) but implants prevent them from training skills at peak rates where as a point on a frigate stops a ship warping off as good as any other ship. This is like the learning skills argument all over again. Its like saying you need to earn a certain amount of isk for +4s so that you can start training skills like everyone else. It's become that much of a necessity these days it prevents some players from venturing out of hisec. It's not so much about their risk aversion but more about bad habits and a poor mentality acquired during the first few months of playing.

I dont care so much about skill training times now as I usually just use +3s but I remember it was an issue as a low sp player because sp/hr was all important. I worry more about it presenting a problem to newer players who think that you need to have +5s to be level with everyone else.
Suqq Madiq
#340 - 2012-09-01 16:14:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Suqq Madiq
Andski wrote:
your opinion is totally irrelevant to me though

glad that my article made you so ******* angry in any case

also I don't give a flying **** what Eve University does because they're not funding a gigantic supercapital fleet, they're not running a massive campaign nor do they have space to upgrade and pay for

lol npc alts


LOL! Delicious tears. Thank you for that.

Keep crying about how expensive it is to fund your supercapital fleet and how unworthy your noobs are to see any of that ISK in their pockets and how hard it is for you and them to fund PVPing with learning implants and also how hard it is to setup jump clones.

Keep pretending you dont care waht Eve University does while you troll their channels day in and day out recruiting from their ranks and giving their noobs awful, terrible advice. And dont stop responding to me despite how irrelevant I am.

And, lastly, keep coming up with the terrible ******* ideas that even the people on your own terrible mouthpiece propaganda website will downvote into oblivion even before it reaches the masses of the Eve Forums. Come on, really, how pathetic do you feel when even the goons and testicls on that awful site wont back up your awful idea. You should be ashamed of yourself.