These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Is this for real? I think I might have missed those patch notes.

Author
Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#41 - 2012-08-31 14:24:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Renan Ruivo
Osabojo wrote:
Can we all just agree that Beaker is one of the best Muppets?


Crazy Harry is obviously the best one.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

THEHOODITDOESNOTHING
Doomheim
#42 - 2012-08-31 15:15:59 UTC
You can counter this tactic by summoning Concord away from the belt. Have a trial alt attack a high sec POCO in the same system.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#43 - 2012-08-31 15:19:14 UTC
THEHOODITDOESNOTHING wrote:
You can counter this tactic by summoning Concord away from the belt. Have a trial alt attack a high sec POCO in the same system.
They aren't any POCOs in highsec. Only COs.
Jypsie
Wandering Star Enterprises
#44 - 2012-08-31 16:27:46 UTC
Tippia wrote:
THEHOODITDOESNOTHING wrote:
You can counter this tactic by summoning Concord away from the belt. Have a trial alt attack a high sec POCO in the same system.
They aren't any POCOs in highsec. Only COs.


NPOCO

P
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#45 - 2012-08-31 16:30:15 UTC
Jypsie wrote:
NPOCO

P
…or COCOs, at most, since they belong to CONCORD.
Jypsie
Wandering Star Enterprises
#46 - 2012-08-31 16:32:58 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Jypsie wrote:
NPOCO

P
…or COCOs, at most, since they belong to CONCORD.


Ooo, I like the sound of that better.

Of course, I now have some vision of a huge beam of death shooting out of a POCO and blasting someones Ibis.

COCODOKKEN!

THEHOODITDOESNOTHING
Doomheim
#47 - 2012-08-31 17:03:05 UTC
Tippia wrote:
THEHOODITDOESNOTHING wrote:
You can counter this tactic by summoning Concord away from the belt. Have a trial alt attack a high sec POCO in the same system.
They aren't any POCOs in highsec. Only COs.

leave it to tippia to post petty trivia. you know what i mean.
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#48 - 2012-08-31 17:14:14 UTC
Eventually all the CONCORD spawning manipulation mechanics will go away. CCP has said they want to have CONCORD use some method to destroy your ship other than their odd invincible ships. I propose they simply remotely activate the self destruct on your ship.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#49 - 2012-08-31 17:21:59 UTC
THEHOODITDOESNOTHING wrote:
leave it to tippia to post petty trivia. you know what i mean.
You mean that I am a fount of knowledge about all things EVE.
I know. Thank you. Smile

Vincent Athena wrote:
Eventually all the CONCORD spawning manipulation mechanics will go away. CCP has said they want to have CONCORD use some method to destroy your ship other than their odd invincible ships. I propose they simply remotely activate the self destruct on your ship.
That was more a matter of making it mechanically simple. The ships would still be there to provide decoration, but the whole thing about shooting the other ships and applying ewar would be removed for the far simple effect of just shutting the target down and then blowing it up — no need for the server to calculate attacks and effects. Granted, this may very well mean that the whole timer manipulation goes away as well since, technically, their presence on the field is no longer needed, but I don't recall it being discussed.
Previous page123