EVE General Discussion

So is Issler trolling or genuinely that thick, in your opinion?

Wait a minute....you live in low sec, got enough people to vote for you to win a trip to Iceland and you can't bust a gate camp....


You DON'T know what you're talking about. Who cares about the 2 hours you had to play. In that time if you can't avoid or destroy a static camp with a batphone alone you should be impeached as a representative of EVE players. If you're talking about Titans bombing gates then you really don't know what you're talking about because that only happens in a couple places which are easy to avoid.

Good luck on the next contest to win a vacation with these quotes floating around....friggen clueless trader looking to be can clouded and inty ganked....what a maroon.

If the alternative is an idea that completely destroys my playstyle then yes I would. What i would really like is for them to actually be aware of and educated on issues in an area before they start commenting on it, something Issler has demonstrated an utter lack of ability in despite claiming to live in the area concerned.

It be great to get a true pirate onto CSM as long they look afta lo-sec intrests they have my vote and im sure most other lo-sec dwellers votes

becouse atm from isslers veiws and post this dude is utterly clueless in lo-sec matters oh and i forgot he/she lived on hi-sec island that had to pass through lo-sec so he/she must know what they talking about

but good idea lets get a pirate into CSM

m8 comon its not about not earing what i want to ear

read isslers posts m8 clearly someone who has no clue about lo-sec life bu t suports the sentry buff

now if i dont know about something im not gona put my opinion across make out like i know what im talking about and look like a idiot

would be better to do bit resurch go and live with a actual lo-sec crowd for a bit then come back with full understanding of the subject beeing debated not just asume sh!t on miniman experiance and knoladge

and about CSM i av no intrest in these matters but i would gladly suport someone running for CSM with 2 years min lo-sec experiance


i honestly belive this sentry gun buff has nothing to do with lo-sec pirate gate camps but more to do with opening lo-sec to carbare types to fill the lo-sec planets for Dusty's to fight over


Initially, DUST 514 mercenaries will be able to join EVE Online players to participate in factional warfare happening at the contested boundaries between the large EVE Universe empires.

http://www.dust514.com/game/faq/

i didnt say wanted csm to keep mouth shut

i said do some resurch b4 open mouth that effects thousends of pll

getting off topic now this is not a issler is a fck wit thread its sentry buff whine thread can we please get back on topic

I wasn't aware that low sec sentry guns were broken. I participate in fleets that roam both null and low sec looking for fights. In low sec we commonly fight on gates. Typically we try to bait the other side into attacking first, so they get the gcc and resulting sentry gun fire, but on occasion we will go gcc (especially if we are already in a fight and we need to hit the other sides logi or ecm ships).

Right now we don't use frigates much in low sec, this might change that a little. But this will probably end most of our fights on gate. We don't do much quick ganks, which is what this will require gate fights to become. On a positive note we won't have to roam so much in low sec and people who want actual small to medium gang fights will have to come into null sec to do it.

I also don't see how this will undermine gate camps, it will just change how they are organized, with a group on gate without gcc waiting for a solo ship to gank, and those with gcc waiting it out away from the guns.

I regularly run the camps and the folks that voted me in largely agree with me on this. The folks that disagree aren't the ones I expect any support from. So this wouldn't have any affect if I was inclined to run again. Also, I'm not a CSM that goes to Iceland and if you ask the ones that do it is not a vacation.

Issler

for the record..

I have used interceptors on low sec gates and popped pods with it and gotten away.

its all about timing.

1st

as someone jumps into low sec from high sec.
gatecamp tanker shoots gate,
gate agro's tanker
frig's/ceptors tackle said target.
everyone else if possible shoots and kills the target.

nothing will really change if ccp go ahead with the proposal.

so once again adapt or go away!

It's beyond me how you came to that conclusion from what she posted. But I'll have another go at it.

Issler is explaining that she ran on a platform for which she got elected as CSM. If you did not agree on her platform to begin with she doesn't expect you to really agree with her on this issue. If that's the case, you are not her targeted audience and not really after your vote to begin with.

I suspect that if she would have run on a platform favorable to your ideals you would have refrained from calling her a "token" of any kind. She isn't, ergo, in your world, she must be a puppet.