These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Small Truths: The Gallente

Author
Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#101 - 2012-08-01 14:07:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
I find much irony in this simple statement. You agree, then, that the Federation has an invasive, expansionist agenda. And then, go on to imply that this is something more than simple cultural genocide for those who lack the will or the intellectual strength to dispute it on Gallente terms.

With no backing argument as to why. Simply that the cluster must, inevitably see the right of it. Which they will, under your assumptions, once the Federation has crushed all resistance to it's ideological preconceptions. The Caldari have been a part of your Federation, in the past. We suffered under the onus of requisite adaptation. We rejected it and moved on.

The majority of our citizenry did this. We built an Empire, that, while smaller and supposedly inferior to the Federation, has managed to survive and flourish in direct competition with it.

We have adapted. We have chosen, under the “free will” you so ardently espouse, to go in another direction. To hold on to our notion that the needs of our society outweighed the needs of our individual right to success at the expense of the whole. And we are decried for it. So, your live and let live stance is only valid if it conforms to your personal worldview?

Many of you would use Tibeth Heth as an example of our failings. Yet, it was the direct result of Gallente arrogance that his opportunity to assume power was created. Arrogance in assuming that you know what is best for everyone else. Ethics, morality and the way things should be is not always so simple.

Capsuleers are a perfect example of anarchistic, cultural adaptation at it's finest. Those who hold the power, the intelligence, the ISK, make the rules and those less fortunate or less able to adapt, for whatever reason, become extinct. What I really hear, then, is that the Gallente prescribe to a “survival of the fittest” dogma. Then, they have abandoned any moral high ground they may once have commanded. They have abandoned the cause of humanity for the narcissistic desires of the individual.

Individualism will never lead to a Utopian society. The average individual, above all, desires one thing, survival. Once that requirement is met, they desire comfort and stability of the status quo. It is evident in every power structure in New Eden. While I would agree that the desire of individual freedom is inherent in the majority of New Edenites, I disagree emphatically that the realization of that desire, is, in fact, desirable.

I have a hypothetical for everyone. What if the majority of Federal citizens, for whatever reason, no matter how outlandish, chose to accept a religious monarchy as their direction of choice? Would Federal politicians accept this, or would they stamp it out as a cultural ambiguity that should never be? Strength of character is most often illuminated in the light of adversity. Does the leadership of the Federation truely possess it? Or is it an ideological sham behind which they retain the comfort mechanisms that they have instituted?

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

Pierre Echerie
Horseshoe Industries
#102 - 2012-08-02 17:08:46 UTC
Before you begin throwing some rotten fruit at my face, let me mention that I am one gallente citizen that spent too much time in Jita for his own good, plus I'm enjoying a rather violent mixture of rum and some other stuff at the moment of writing this.



Now, what I want to say is to clarify what relation exists between the words 'freedom', 'liberty' and 'democracy' in their current implied meaning, but that's my personal drunk opinion. Agree with me or not, it's your choice.



You see, a state is like a public toilet. You absolutely need one, unless you got your own, or are perfectly ok using something less elaborate. The quintessence of liberty would be walking into one and having a choice of ceramic, stone, plastic, golden and glass WC's with music/videos/silence/sexy poster/whatever else you so desire. Freedom, however, is your choice whether to use one at all. Obviously, you don't have a choice like that at times. You do get a choice which stool to use among those that are already installed there.



And delegated democracy means that you had once selected among several architects the one who will build that public toilet in a place of his choosing and equipped by his design. At best he gave you a speech about what it exactly was he planned to build. Mind you, if there are twenty customers, and fifteen of them chose the guy that offered marble seats, you're not getting a wooden one even if you ask for it.



So, make it so that you are prescribed a certain stool in there, or that you are given one based on your current wealth, you still don't get to make the choice of whether to use one at all, nor you can choose what to choose from (pardon the pun). I guess, in these terms, the Caldari weren't happy about how WE chose to build toilets for THEM. And we didn't like THEM for demanding wooden seats in the neighbourhood that favours marble.



So, our mistake is, we assume everyone to be perfectly happy with the idea that what is good for most, is good for everyone, and the system that favours most will undoubtedly prove it's merit to all within it. Maybe, if Caldari had a small voting on their own public toilet, they would get wooden seats and be happy with them, so to speak. But that would mean having a state within a state, something that doesn't sit well with ideas of being united through diversity; rather being divided by it.

/irony
Rhiannon Dellacorte
Liberty Vanguard
#103 - 2012-08-02 17:48:41 UTC
Echerie, I owe you a drink.

Rules of Acquisition #261

A wealthy man can afford anything except a conscience.

Pierre Echerie
Horseshoe Industries
#104 - 2012-08-02 18:02:19 UTC
Rhiannon Dellacorte wrote:
Echerie, I owe you a drink.


Thanks, but I got my grog right here. Plus, if I go on, I'm going to need that metaphorical state I mentioned above quite literally soon. Lol
Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#105 - 2012-08-09 11:34:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Nicely put Aria, I will write something in reply to reciprocate - if I try I might even be able to find something to argue about in there.
Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#106 - 2012-08-24 20:22:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Review of ‘Small Truths: The Gallente’
(or) One fine day in the middle of the night …

Aria Jenneth begins her elegant series of reflections upon the national character of each Empire: Small Truths, by examining the Gallente. She begins by taking their homeworld, the temperate Luminaire - planet of light, as her central motif, but rather surprisingly devotes a good deal of the article to ‘Gallente rights’.

She is by turns both complementary and skeptical. She agrees that rights, so conceived, must necessarily be universal but would have the Gallente admit … “that their rights are forged by humans, and not by the universe”. One is powerfully reminded of the Deteis attaché’s comment when witnessing the ratification of The Federal Constitution, "... more strange fruit from the Gallente glass-house.” These rights exist at the crux of approaches to liberty that are antagonistic. It’s true they limit the power to treat people as mere instruments of the collective good, but they also limit autonomy: the absolute property right of the individual in herself, in her ability to bind herself by agreement, disentangling preference from coercion.

The Gallente obsession is portrayed, with a degree of embarrassment by all but the Gallente, as idealistic, individualistic and ahistorical, or simply as plain ideology, all with some justification. It’s true that these rights have no existence independent of the words used to express them. Their language requires agreement, and one can not take deliberation and agreement about words and make a truth. What you may say is this: these are the ideas exposed by the failure of authority challenge by pluralism.

“... the small truths that limit the power of human to prey on human become predatory, themselves.” Aria Jenneth

If they have been used rhetorically to assume the moral high ground, what then? What might the enemy expect as the outcome of the pure vengeful violence of a Gallente victor? The obliteration of their society, children stolen, women made into slaves, men cut to pieces?

Agreement upon the meaning of these rights makes spotting bad faith easier. The freedom fighter who intends to slaughter the innocent to secure their freedom. The professor who believes that a little torture is necessary to protect the majority. There is a small truth however: Gallente democratic and legal process are in constant danger of being overwhelmed by the powerful, while its public culture is increasingly filled with the noise of demonising populism.

One Gallente will admit it Aria, natural or human rights are a fiction. However, I will have my body treated with dignity for all the ignorance of my talkative mind.

Evet Morrel
Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#107 - 2012-08-25 08:58:49 UTC
I gotta admit Aria Jenneth's essay was pretty spot on. Growing up my parents would often tell me about the nature of freedom and how it was the essential right of all living beings to be free, and that life should be respected for all forms are aspects of Ida.

Naturally when I grew up and moved out into the universe I found it to be a bit of a shock and even a little mortifying living among cultures that did not share these values. As naive as it may sound I often thought to myself, how can human beings enslave or otherwise force into servitude other living beings, much less a fellow human, when even the very concept of servility fills me with such a profound sensation of gloom and despair.

I suppose in the end one of the reasons I enrolled in the Federal Naval Academy was because I realized that it is indeed a cold and dark universe, and that the freedom and liberties I took for granted growing up are something worth fighting to protect, at any and all costs.
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).