These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls?

Author
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#101 - 2012-08-21 17:43:16 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Then shortly after this I heard nulli was going to cash out at tier 4! I was amazed at this. The areas I mention above easilly could have been added to our cashout. It was just taking some time because nulli wasn't even trying to plex there. They were just plexing vulnerable systems. But these systems were easy to plex in a merlin as there was no resistance.
So really you are criticizing the old amarr for not being able to control nulli.


I'll be blunt Cearain ... a child could control Nulli knowing what you did about their intentions.

When they started leaving systems vulnerable pending a push to tier 5 in a single night strategy you guys should simply have flipped those systems to prevent Nulli approaching their goal and told their leadership that you were prepared to go along with their plan only after they eradicated the minmatar stronghold systems.



Its funny you say a child would figure this out because I think this is really a childish strategy.

Ok I think this is not really clear thinking. So you think ILaw or fweddit or moar tears could have basically held nulli at gun point and forced their pilots to get in ships and plex a system some 12 or so jumps away from their home system? "Either you do what I say or I will **** all over our common goals!" This sort of tactic would have just ended poorly for everyone. You guys can give it a try if another null sec entity joins minmatar. But again I am not really sure if you are just trying to steer us wrong with more bad ideas.

I wanted to hit tier 5. I didn't want to start flipping systems early.

Plus you can't actually eradicate a system in faction war. You can make it so the minmatar cant' dock there until the hordes of pve ships come to plex it back up. But that only takes the minmafarm a few days.

I am not saying that taking houla wouldn't have been great. It would have been. But it wouldn't have crushed the minmafarm.

It wouldn't have changed anythign that happened after we flipped the systems. All those alts would have still hit metro after we flipped the systems regardless of who held huola at the time we flipped them.


Jade Constantine wrote:

There is nothing Nulli can do to stop you messing with their plan and eventually they'd either have to do what you asked or leave FW on a disappointing tier 2-3 outcome.

Same goes for any interfering nullsec power really.


I really didn't see nulli as an interfering power until they decided to cash out early. If they wanted to farm vulnerable systems I didn't mind they did work up in metro.

My plan was somewhat similar to yours. We were willing to move things along to be able to hit tier 5 even though they kept farming todifraun. We were hitting the center systems around frerstorn trying to get them vulnerable. After they became vulnerable and we had enough to hit tier 5 then we could have forced thier hand by starting to flip systems.

I don't think anyone was expecting them to quit at tier 4. I know I was really surprised. It didn't make any sense.

Really we learned what was happening and took action as best we could. Minmatar with their huge head start of isk being shot at them through a firehose on day one of inferno, always like to pretend they are winning because of superior tactics/strategies. But there it is I gave you the inside story of what happened and core amarr militia did the best we could.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#102 - 2012-08-21 17:46:42 UTC
Machiavelli's Nemesis wrote:
confirming that the horde of AFK plexers was new to inferno.

Before that, we ALL had to sit and watch the timer constantly.

Funny, amarrians didn't seem to be whining back in the day when PERVS flipped most of metro using plexing alts and exploits. Shoe, other foot, sadface, hypocrisy. Lulz



I have been arguing that plexing should be pvp centered for years.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#103 - 2012-08-21 17:46:45 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Kuehnelt wrote:
3/4 militias have pvp and isk. 3/4 militias can shut the **** up about how amazing they are for having chosen pvp over isk any day now. No, you haven't chosen between them, because you get them both. Given that pvp is an isk sink, I'd think that it wouldn't take long at all for you notice that this greed vs. pvp talk is ludicrous - that nobody can ever eschew isk-making to war-fighting with the tone that you keep hitting. You need one for the other. But maybe you don't even read what you type.
Tier 2 (even Tier 3) is easily done by all sides, and at that level there's still plenty of isk to fund everybody's pvp habit. The Minmatar let you guys make systems vulnerable so you can flip them so they can farm again. Easy stuff. If you don't want to make isk that way, then do whatever you want to farm. Up to you. Please move to Caldari and farm Gallente plexes so I can get even more fights. Switch to Caldari and farm Amarr plexes for your side. Whatever.

Anyways, my point was that while many of us may bail and look for greener pastures if we were in the current Amarr position, the Minmatar RP alliances (and sasawong) would not. Those guys are willing to do the dirty work required in FW, (and they have isk incomes not associated with FW). Only a few other players (Val Erian for one, perhaps Damar although he's slacked off lately) have that level of dedication. The Minmatar FW player based is loaded with them. that's why they won the Occupancy War - They CHOOSE to care about it - not because of fickle afk plexing alts who we know bounce to the "winning side" (as they did for Amarr when Nulli was around).
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#104 - 2012-08-21 18:07:48 UTC
People were whining before inferno that NPC was too hard so they could not gank afk alts, and ccp nerfed npc by removing evar.

People also wanted that ccp should balance NPC so that everyone can tank those, CCP made so, now you can tank every plex with t1 frigate.

CCP also move those alts from defence plexes to attack plexes where npc do not shoot gankers at all.

But what happend? People are not happy.

Gunless frigates orbiting button and no one is interested to kill those, because after all those are not afk, those run away when you try to gank them, HOW LAME they try to escape !

I do not really know what ccp can do anymore to make it easier.


I've always said that problem is not the npc. Problem is players who do not want to do anything but still they want to win.

CCP made current system so that everyone will 'win' and get systems on some point. But still players are not happy.

Plexing is now so easy that everyone can do it, you get rewards from it and it is easy to pvp in plexes (atleast killing farmers is easy).

There should be no reason why this does not work, because ccp changed everything just like you wanted including docking denial.
Dan Carter Murray
#105 - 2012-08-21 18:26:06 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:

Who are the Amarr equivalents of these alliances and corporations?


no one since ______ left

http://mfi.re/?j7ldoco 50GB free space @ MediaFire.com

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#106 - 2012-08-21 18:39:37 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Dan Carter Murray wrote:
no one since ______ left

Answer: flyinghotpocket, flyingleanpocket, flyingdankpocket, flyingcheesepocket, flyingpantspocket, and flyingrocketpocket
Dynast
Room for Improvement
Good Sax
#107 - 2012-08-22 00:01:07 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Are you seriously trying to guilt him into saying it was his fault, when CCP made a game mechanic which is gameable as all hell?

A ***** move is a ***** move whether or not it is profitable. It's like betting against the sports team you play on. If enough people do it, it pretty much forces a realization that there isn't a team, just a bunch of greedy bitches trying to get their fingers in a pie. At that point everything falls apart and you get Amarr Militia.

I mean c'mon now, you're not making any money off these plexes. You can't pay your bills in ISK, at least not efficiently, you'd do better flipping burgers. There is nothing real in this video game that merits making decisions based on their financial merit, unless you derive your enjoyment from roleplaying that sort of thing. When you give up team spirit for ISK, you're giving up something of value for something without value, it's a terrible trade.

You can farm your way to a titan gaming the FW system, but it won't do you a lick of good without a fleet to bridge.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#108 - 2012-08-22 00:56:46 UTC
Dynast wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Are you seriously trying to guilt him into saying it was his fault, when CCP made a game mechanic which is gameable as all hell?

A ***** move is a ***** move whether or not it is profitable. It's like betting against the sports team you play on. If enough people do it, it pretty much forces a realization that there isn't a team, just a bunch of greedy bitches trying to get their fingers in a pie. At that point everything falls apart and you get Amarr Militia.

I mean c'mon now, you're not making any money off these plexes. You can't pay your bills in ISK, at least not efficiently, you'd do better flipping burgers. There is nothing real in this video game that merits making decisions based on their financial merit, unless you derive your enjoyment from roleplaying that sort of thing. When you give up team spirit for ISK, you're giving up something of value for something without value, it's a terrible trade.

You can farm your way to a titan gaming the FW system, but it won't do you a lick of good without a fleet to bridge.

I always find it so cute when people look at other people saying "**** this, I'm going to abuse the **** out of this mechanic to get an advantage", and actually, unironically, start to ***** and moan about how they're "not playing the game right" or "not being honourable".

People have flocked to hisec L4s for years instead of doing anoms or ratting in nullsec, not because it's what someone tell them to do, but because it means they get to spend less time doing boring **** (shoot red crosses), they can relax more while doing it (they don't have to watch local all the time, they don't have to deal with logistics, they don't have to replace their ship when they aren't paying attention at the wrong monent, etc etc etc), and it's just all over a much more pleasant gaming experience. Can we ***** and moan about them "not playing the game right" or "not being honourable" (by not being readily available in nullsec to be shot by ~elite pvp~ roamers)? Sure, we can do that, but we'd look like absolute dorks, because this is the game CCP has designed.

People have abused titans in literally every iteration they've been in since they were first launched. Sure, we can ***** and moan about how it's a cheap tactic to use remote AOE DDs, on-grid AOE DDs, DDs to take out all the logistics on one side, or tracking titans to lay waste to whole fleets with impunity, but can we really point to a titan pilot and say "you're a bad person for playing with the tools CCP gave you"? No.

Just like we can't tell people they're bad people for saying "you know what, I'm going to just farm the **** out of minmatar and cash out when they hit T5, and I'll be rich as ****", because they're using the game mechanics which CCP have put into the game.

***** about the game mechanics, they're what's bad here. And take your indignant "you're just greedy, you don't want to fight honourably" e-bushido bullshit and get the **** out of here.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Dynast
Room for Improvement
Good Sax
#109 - 2012-08-22 04:51:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Dynast
Lord Zim wrote:
I always find it so cute when people look at other people saying "**** this, I'm going to abuse the **** out of this mechanic to get an advantage", and actually, unironically, start to ***** and moan about how they're "not playing the game right" or "not being honourable".

People have flocked to hisec L4s for years instead of doing anoms or ratting in nullsec, not because it's what someone tell them to do, but because it means they get to spend less time doing boring **** (shoot red crosses), they can relax more while doing it (they don't have to watch local all the time, they don't have to deal with logistics, they don't have to replace their ship when they aren't paying attention at the wrong monent, etc etc etc), and it's just all over a much more pleasant gaming experience. Can we ***** and moan about them "not playing the game right" or "not being honourable" (by not being readily available in nullsec to be shot by ~elite pvp~ roamers)? Sure, we can do that, but we'd look like absolute dorks, because this is the game CCP has designed.

People have abused titans in literally every iteration they've been in since they were first launched. Sure, we can ***** and moan about how it's a cheap tactic to use remote AOE DDs, on-grid AOE DDs, DDs to take out all the logistics on one side, or tracking titans to lay waste to whole fleets with impunity, but can we really point to a titan pilot and say "you're a bad person for playing with the tools CCP gave you"? No.

Just like we can't tell people they're bad people for saying "you know what, I'm going to just farm the **** out of minmatar and cash out when they hit T5, and I'll be rich as ****", because they're using the game mechanics which CCP have put into the game.

***** about the game mechanics, they're what's bad here. And take your indignant "you're just greedy, you don't want to fight honourably" e-bushido bullshit and get the **** out of here.

Doesn't fly dude. If the mechanics were the cause, it'd have long since happened up in Cal/Gal space as well.. but it hasn't. We've had months now for once side to achieve dominance and drive the other out, instead we have pushes back and forth when one side or the other wants to dump LP, and steady fighting. Despite swarms of minmatar-tagged LP farmers which should have, by your logic, long since flipped our space as well.

Why? Because we actually want to fight. We show up to fight, and not just in logiblobs with a minimum of ten Guardians. Amarr run their mouths about wanting to fight but push come to shove, they'd rather run no-gun minmatar alts to increase the number in their wallet. Then they cry on the boards about how they're so terribly abused, and everything is just so terribly unfair, and it must be the mechanics that are broken, because they know in their hearts that they are elite PvPers and if they're losing the game must be rigged!

Sorry dude, but the effective range of an excuse is zero meters.
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#110 - 2012-08-22 07:37:06 UTC
Dynast wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
I always find it so cute when people look at other people saying "**** this, I'm going to abuse the **** out of this mechanic to get an advantage", and actually, unironically, start to ***** and moan about how they're "not playing the game right" or "not being honourable".

People have flocked to hisec L4s for years instead of doing anoms or ratting in nullsec, not because it's what someone tell them to do, but because it means they get to spend less time doing boring **** (shoot red crosses), they can relax more while doing it (they don't have to watch local all the time, they don't have to deal with logistics, they don't have to replace their ship when they aren't paying attention at the wrong monent, etc etc etc), and it's just all over a much more pleasant gaming experience. Can we ***** and moan about them "not playing the game right" or "not being honourable" (by not being readily available in nullsec to be shot by ~elite pvp~ roamers)? Sure, we can do that, but we'd look like absolute dorks, because this is the game CCP has designed.

People have abused titans in literally every iteration they've been in since they were first launched. Sure, we can ***** and moan about how it's a cheap tactic to use remote AOE DDs, on-grid AOE DDs, DDs to take out all the logistics on one side, or tracking titans to lay waste to whole fleets with impunity, but can we really point to a titan pilot and say "you're a bad person for playing with the tools CCP gave you"? No.

Just like we can't tell people they're bad people for saying "you know what, I'm going to just farm the **** out of minmatar and cash out when they hit T5, and I'll be rich as ****", because they're using the game mechanics which CCP have put into the game.

***** about the game mechanics, they're what's bad here. And take your indignant "you're just greedy, you don't want to fight honourably" e-bushido bullshit and get the **** out of here.

Doesn't fly dude. If the mechanics were the cause, it'd have long since happened up in Cal/Gal space as well.. but it hasn't. We've had months now for once side to achieve dominance and drive the other out, instead we have pushes back and forth when one side or the other wants to dump LP, and steady fighting. Despite swarms of minmatar-tagged LP farmers which should have, by your logic, long since flipped our space as well.

Why? Because we actually want to fight. We show up to fight, and not just in logiblobs with a minimum of ten Guardians. Amarr run their mouths about wanting to fight but push come to shove, they'd rather run no-gun minmatar alts to increase the number in their wallet. Then they cry on the boards about how they're so terribly abused, and everything is just so terribly unfair, and it must be the mechanics that are broken, because they know in their hearts that they are elite PvPers and if they're losing the game must be rigged!

Sorry dude, but the effective range of an excuse is zero meters.


You're tarring with a great big ******* brush here. My issue is not that amarr are losing, I'm not bitching because I want to be on the winning side OR make lots of ISK. I already make ISK elsewhere and I am fortunate in that.

Amarr have failscaded, that simple.. lots of things created that failscade which are both amarrs fault AND the mechanics. The amarr failing I accept, the mechanics still need to be changed.

These are all reciprocal arguments though, it's almost like all this psting activity is lobbying CCP to go one way or the other. my assumption is the system will remain the same with a few tweeks over the next few months maybe then it'll stay that way.

So good luck to new amarr, GG minmatar and lets see how we adapt aye :P
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#111 - 2012-08-22 07:47:52 UTC
Dynast wrote:
Doesn't fly dude. If the mechanics were the cause, it'd have long since happened up in Cal/Gal space as well.. but it hasn't. We've had months now for once side to achieve dominance and drive the other out, instead we have pushes back and forth when one side or the other wants to dump LP, and steady fighting. Despite swarms of minmatar-tagged LP farmers which should have, by your logic, long since flipped our space as well.

Why? Because we actually want to fight. We show up to fight, and not just in logiblobs with a minimum of ten Guardians. Amarr run their mouths about wanting to fight but push come to shove, they'd rather run no-gun minmatar alts to increase the number in their wallet. Then they cry on the boards about how they're so terribly abused, and everything is just so terribly unfair, and it must be the mechanics that are broken, because they know in their hearts that they are elite PvPers and if they're losing the game must be rigged!

Sorry dude, but the effective range of an excuse is zero meters.

So your analysis is that because the gal/cal faction have apparently not clued into this fact yet, and as such you conclude that there's nothing wrong with the mechanics at all, just like remote AOE DDs were working as intended, and as such the only thing that needs to happen is that amarr needs to harden the **** up.

This is a fallacious line of thought, and one which'll become readily apparent to you soon enough. It's a mechanic which is easy enough to exploit for hilarious isk gains, and sooner or later even you'll have to face this.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch
#112 - 2012-08-22 07:56:42 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
So your analysis is that because the gal/cal faction have apparently not clued into this fact yet


No, we simply hate each other too much to go for rational behavior of amassing **** ton of space isk. As added bonus prove Ayn Rand to be nothing but a crazy *****, as is right and just Big smile


Dynast
Room for Improvement
Good Sax
#113 - 2012-08-22 11:10:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Dynast
Lord Zim wrote:
So your analysis is that because the gal/cal faction have apparently not clued into this fact yet, and as such you conclude that there's nothing wrong with the mechanics at all, just like remote AOE DDs were working as intended, and as such the only thing that needs to happen is that amarr needs to harden the **** up.

This is a fallacious line of thought, and one which'll become readily apparent to you soon enough. It's a mechanic which is easy enough to exploit for hilarious isk gains, and sooner or later even you'll have to face this.

Your theory is that Gallente and Caldari militias, which have been doing LP dumps at T4 for a couple months now... have not noticed that they can make a lot of money farming FW LP? Do you realize how patently absurd that is? Of course we know how much money we can make, we're doing it.

We'd rather just actually get some fights in the process, than switch to no-gun frigs alts or mission alts in whatever militia looks the most profitable this week. We'd rather have the action than whatever percentage increase in ISK you can get by switching, because we're not a bunch of short-sighted idiots. Most of us understand that ISK is nice and all but it's only good for enabling PvP, and if you have to **** away a whole lot of time to make your "awesome profits"... you're screwing yourself out of the part of the game that makes it worth playing. And liable to end up unhappy, like notable chunks of Amarr Militia.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#114 - 2012-08-22 15:49:29 UTC
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
So your analysis is that because the gal/cal faction have apparently not clued into this fact yet
No, we simply hate each other too much to go for rational behavior of amassing **** ton of space isk. As added bonus prove Ayn Rand to be nothing but a crazy *****, as is right and just Big smile
That that b**** Yuri said above. Besides, we all have enough isk to fly Atrons and Condors for the next 5 years. You can have fun maintaining POSes, jump bridge networks, accumulating massive numbers of Titans/Super Carriers, jumping moon goo to Jita. We'll have fun killing each other.
Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#115 - 2012-08-22 20:36:03 UTC
Dynast wrote:
And liable to end up unhappy, like notable chunks of Amarr Militia.


Sadly, the 'notable chunks of the Amarr Militia' are the people to busy to literally do anything of any consequence except shoot at each other on an undock or to criticize the actions and effectiveness of fellow militia mates; The most bitter of bitter justify this by swinging around wild excuses about Link Alts, Online Titan Pilots and whatever they spout off in any attempt to not look like chumps by station spinning.

They also love to spout off at length about how whatever group they lost an argument in Militia chat with hasn't had any impact on the warzone.

Fweddit & Friends Leave... didn't want Kourmonen, Kamela or Sosala anyway.


Gee Eff Minmatar Bros.
Pinky Feldman
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#116 - 2012-08-22 20:55:10 UTC
Xolve wrote:
Dynast wrote:
And liable to end up unhappy, like notable chunks of Amarr Militia.


Sadly, the 'notable chunks of the Amarr Militia' are the people to busy to literally do anything of any consequence except shoot at each other on an undock or to criticize the actions and effectiveness of fellow militia mates; The most bitter of bitter justify this by swinging around wild excuses about Link Alts, Online Titan Pilots and whatever they spout off in any attempt to not look like chumps by station spinning.

They also love to spout off at length about how whatever group they lost an argument in Militia chat with hasn't had any impact on the warzone.

Fweddit & Friends Leave... didn't want Kourmonen, Kamela or Sosala anyway.


Gee Eff Minmatar Bros.


#YOLOCOLO #noregrets
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#117 - 2012-08-22 21:52:45 UTC
Xolve wrote:
Dynast wrote:
And liable to end up unhappy, like notable chunks of Amarr Militia.


Sadly, the 'notable chunks of the Amarr Militia' are the people to busy to literally do anything of any consequence except shoot at each other on an undock or to criticize the actions and effectiveness of fellow militia mates; The most bitter of bitter justify this by swinging around wild excuses about Link Alts, Online Titan Pilots and whatever they spout off in any attempt to not look like chumps by station spinning.

They also love to spout off at length about how whatever group they lost an argument in Militia chat with hasn't had any impact on the warzone.

Fweddit & Friends Leave... didn't want Kourmonen, Kamela or Sosala anyway.


Gee Eff Minmatar Bros.



My experience with the amarr militia was not the same as yours. But then I dont talk in militia chat very much.

Anyway what the minmatar do is what is most important to me. Because whether or not they are online decides whether I get fights. I don't have allot of complaints in that department so I am glad my corp is staying here.

I don't do allot of fleet stuff but it was fun fighting with fweddit and more tears, the few times I did. Good luck to you.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Andre Vauban
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#118 - 2012-08-22 21:58:27 UTC
Dynast wrote:
Doesn't fly dude. If the mechanics were the cause, it'd have long since happened up in Cal/Gal space as well.. but it hasn't. We've had months now for once side to achieve dominance and drive the other out, instead we have pushes back and forth when one side or the other wants to dump LP, and steady fighting. Despite swarms of minmatar-tagged LP farmers which should have, by your logic, long since flipped our space as well.

Why? Because we actually want to fight. We show up to fight, and not just in logiblobs with a minimum of ten Guardians. Amarr run their mouths about wanting to fight but push come to shove, they'd rather run no-gun minmatar alts to increase the number in their wallet. Then they cry on the boards about how they're so terribly abused, and everything is just so terribly unfair, and it must be the mechanics that are broken, because they know in their hearts that they are elite PvPers and if they're losing the game must be rigged!

Sorry dude, but the effective range of an excuse is zero meters.


This is not true. The only reason Caldari hasn't ROFL-stomped the Gallente as far as plexing goes is the Minmatar farmers. All of the farmers went to either Caldari or Minmatar. Just look at the VP numbers. The Gallente numbers are accurate as there is virtually no Gallente plexing in Amarr systems because there aren't any. The Caldari numbers are accurate because there is no need to plex in harder Minmatar systems when there are plenty of easier Gallente plexes to farm. The Minmatar numbers are completely inaccurate because most of the farmers plexed Caldari systems because that was really all there was. However, after the Amarr T4 push, the Minmatar VPs surged 3x to roughly equal the Caldari numbers and we got to briefly see the real power of the Minmatar plexing army. They all left the harder Caldari plexes to briefly farm the Amarr plexes until they were gone. This tells us that Caldari and Minmtar are about equal in terms of plexing power, with Gallente being about 1/3 of what Caldari plex.

The only reason it collapsed this way was because the Gallente/Caldari front has more systems, there was a more even balance before inferno, and the Gallente were able to hold a little bit of ground long enough for the Minmatar to save them. If the Gallente collapsed before the Amarr, we would see the same thing in reverse. That being Caldari owning all Gallente systems and a stale-mate on the Amarr/Minmatar front.

.

Vordak Kallager
Descendance.
GoonSwarm.
#119 - 2012-08-22 22:18:17 UTC
Contributing my **** post to **** up a **** thread. Bear
Now that W-BR is out of the militia I am no longer able to realize my dream of making the internet spaceship boy band, Smurfsbrigade and the Amarrios. Sad

Sa souvraya niende misain ye.

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
#120 - 2012-08-22 22:27:15 UTC
Faction Warfare, where the LP store is an ISK faucet and PVP is an ISK sink.

This sub-forum has about 5 too many chromosomes.