These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Its finally happend: ccp killed amarr/minm fw fun

Author
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#161 - 2012-08-20 12:55:03 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Muad 'dib wrote:

because i cant get access to it.

lol.... in sov-0.0 space this is normal to loose access to your stuff....
Right now some people from RED and allies are locked inside 319- station. And nothing bad happened. People fly and kill.

So what is the problem again?


problem is hordes of pvers making buckets of isk cause this and that sucks

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.

Machiavelli's Nemesis
Angry Mustellid
#162 - 2012-08-20 12:56:50 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Muad 'dib wrote:

because i cant get access to it.

lol.... in sov-0.0 space this is normal to loose access to your stuff....
Right now some people from RED and allies are locked inside 319- station. And nothing bad happened. People fly and kill.

So what is the problem again?


It means that either his targets can't dock in a station or he can't play docking games there. CCP have ruined his ability to camp station undocks in a machariel in complete safety
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#163 - 2012-08-20 13:00:08 UTC
Machiavelli's Nemesis wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
Muad 'dib wrote:

because i cant get access to it.

lol.... in sov-0.0 space this is normal to loose access to your stuff....
Right now some people from RED and allies are locked inside 319- station. And nothing bad happened. People fly and kill.

So what is the problem again?


It means that either his targets can't dock in a station or he can't play docking games there. CCP have ruined his ability to camp station undocks in a machariel in complete safety


You know that i could camp any station i like extremely easily if i wanted to use a out of miltia carrier/orca to drop it into instead.

But im not like that :P

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
#164 - 2012-08-20 13:00:42 UTC  |  Edited by: IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Mardrus wrote:
PLEXing


There is a special place in hell for the first person who capitalised the 'plex' in 'plexing.

I just feel sorry for the Amarr and FATE pilots that actually type coherent and rational arguments only to have a post from Maud, DCM, Bad Messenger etc. next to it. Makes it harder to be objective from an opposing side when you have to put up with that.



Anyway, we knew from before the patch when we made our land grab that this could mean reduced enemies to shoot if we did crush Amarr and many people were very clear from the start that we should be careful if we wanted to keep any WTs to fight. However many people were already disappointed with the amount of PVP we were getting from Amarr compared to how much we were getting just from random neutrals. Anyway a month or two before patch day and it became clear quite how rich we could be, coupled with the very small resistance we were experiencing on TQ it seemed inevitable that Amarr morale was going rapidly downhill. There were a few blips when it spiked up again and we might have a real fight on our hands (the pre-emptive Kamela attack + SOTF response and the Nulli incident) but generally its continued downwards since then.


I'm not saying "we don't care" because FATE have given us good fights, but you try and project an aura of nonchalance towards FW all you are getting is a reflection of that back at you. We need you to care about FW for us to care about you. The WBR we fought a year ago that was dominating us, now I wouldn't have traded that for T5, but we are talking about an entity that seems more interested in SCs and toying with Null than a good old cruiser/BC/BS brawl of old. (Which, BTW is fine you play Eve how you want, just don't lump all the blame on us)


All I'm saying is it isn't entirely our fault we have lost some WTs, when most of your ops are 3 bridges away in some far off null you can see why we might chose to give that up.
FIRST GENERAL
Hostile.
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#165 - 2012-08-20 13:21:53 UTC  |  Edited by: FIRST GENERAL
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:
Mardrus wrote:
PLEXing


Making sense




Generally we are and were nonchalent as you put it very well towards FW, how could we be anything else considering how broken the mechanics were and still are. (I'm presuming we agree that FW mechanics are still broken, regardless of the undeniable truth that Inferno brought a lot of activity back into the area).

You speak about nonchalence being reflected back upon us? Maybe from the Minmatar side yes (because we only undock to fight you in a medium plex when we're desperate for kills), never however from the Amarr side - it used to be, and this was especially the case in the beginning - that we tried to help lead Amarr Militia and when we stopped trying because we were called 'elitist pricks' (by people who didn't even have a clue how stacking penatlies work yet were hailed as the greatest FC's ever) because we didn't want just any other Drake or Rupture in our Armor fleets, we stopped caring. Amarr Militia never however met our 'newly found' lack of caring with nonchalence. It was especially in the beginning met with irritation, in some cases disdain, some jealousy, but also sometimes straight out hate.

Towards the end much of that changed and we started flying with more other people too and it was all good and fun.

Just don't say that we get the benefit of 'nonchalence' just by being exactly that with FW because that's at least wrong for the Amarr Side of things.


Gave you a like for the rest of your post since, unlike many others, it makes a lot of sense.
Shaalira D'arc
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#166 - 2012-08-20 13:29:25 UTC
roigon wrote:
joins FW [BADLUCK BRIAN] Gets locked out of home system /o\ Big smile

Just had my first day in FW, and what a day it was. Very different from what I'm used to in nullsec.
We like our environments target rich and so far FW certainly delivered in that respect. But we are new to this, the meta, the mechanics, etc.. So please bear with me, while we all collectively get used to faction war.

As for working with other amarr faction corps/alliances. I'm not leadership but as far as I know that's certainly something we are interested in, but this was like literally our first day :P Give it some time.



Welcome to FW. It wasn't a bad performance at all for the first day. As people were commenting on minnie comms, you guys were picking up on things a lot faster than most null-sec groups entering FW do.

While the Kourm/Kamela op was unusual in terms of activity and participation (it was a rather historical event for a lot of Minnie pilots, after all), I hope you keep getting good fights out of FW.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#167 - 2012-08-20 13:35:44 UTC
chatgris wrote:
Cearain wrote:
I agree that I have had an easier time getting fights after inferno.

But I wouldn't say that is true everywhere. Have you been in metro after nulli left? Actually amarr gets some wartargets with electus matari up there. (EU tz) But I am not sure who the minmatar up there are fighting regularly - probably pirates.

Anyway I am hoping minmatar will stick around and I will have wartargets.


Well, did you get more fight sup there pre inferno?

I think that there's a lot to be fixed in fw - balancing the rats for one. Plexing mechanics. Maybe CCP could even make WZ control levels go from tier 3 to tier 5 so the losing faction has more resources to keep fighting.

But, unlike the OP, I think inferno has been a net positive for FW, not a net negative.


I think I got a boost from the crucible patch that made it so plexes don't just spawn at downtime. I got a considerably larger boost from inferno due to more people in faction war.

So I agree I give inferno a net positive so far. I think it will remain decent while minmatar stick around to collect a medal. After that happens I don't know. Do you think we will have as much pvp on the amarr minmatar front?

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
#168 - 2012-08-20 13:51:52 UTC
FIRST GENERAL wrote:
Generally we are and were nonchalent as you put it very well towards FW, how could we be anything else considering how broken the mechanics were and still are. (I'm presuming we agree that FW mechanics are still broken, regardless of the undeniable truth that Inferno brought a lot of activity back into the area).


Yes the mechanics are a disaster, while the millions of plexing alts do help us in the sov war, its of course not something I would have chosen, they are probably almost as much of a pain to us as you. I hope soon(TM) CCP will realise the disaster that as Inferno and give us a sensible FW system back

All my post was trying to say was through all of this we have lost some (real) targets to shoot, but I don't think that is entirely down to our poor WT managing (which was a consideration).

In simplest terms from my point of view: it wasn't worth trying to keep a place for you in FW (READ - through letting up on the boring stuff and working to keep it fun, NOT - OMG we can could kick you out whenever we want with our L33t PvP) when FW seemed to be a secondary concern for you at the time. Why go to the effort when it wasn't yielding the GFs for us at the time.

Of course I'm sure Kourmonen the other night reminds us why we joined FW and why we would be sad to lose you, which is oddly nothing to do with FW and if CCP are to be believed the opposite of what they want from it (e.g. no caps). Of course I hope fights like that will continue to happen regardless of who is in FW. I am gutted to have missed it. Inferno should have focused on fights like that rather than rifters.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#169 - 2012-08-20 13:55:54 UTC
FIRST GENERAL wrote:
And yes, maybe some of the criticism against Lost Obsession is justified....
lol at camping Agony Unleashed in station. +1
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#170 - 2012-08-20 14:06:36 UTC
David Devant wrote:
I appreciate that you people feel pissed off at the pve gunless yada yada. But you are sadly mistaken if you think that your core systems are being taken by null bear alts. You are accountable for your losses.

Rather than whine about it I suggest you come up with a plan. The truth is you now live in a target rich environment, adapt and you will profit. The wheel will turn and shortly after we get our medals there will be an exodus of pvpers from the Minnie front because there's nothing to shoot.

The 'fun economy' is this game far more important than the isk economy.


Tthere are no core systems according to the tier system. All systems count the same according to the dev blog. But beyond that it wasn't fighting for kamela kourmonen or huola that made the amarr say f this. It was seeing the all the backwater systems get so heavilly contested so fast the very next day. And what do we see when we go back there? Armadas of t1 figates running majors.

What is the point of fighting for core systems, whatever you think that means, when the war is going to be won by the alt army?

I will ask you the same thing I asked vordak. What percent of plexes do you think were capped by t1 frigates?

I mean we can keep using relative terms all we want. I can say "too much" of it is farm alts. You can say things like "the real war was won with pvp."

But what are the actual numbers?

Post inferno what sort of ships capped what sort of plexes for each faction. How many majors did amarr capture using a single frigate? How many majors did minmatar capture using this? Etc. I would Love to see a break down of this. Because I think it will show that over seventy percent of plexes minmatar captured were in frigates.

But before we get these actual numbers what do you think a legitimate spread would be?

I think a legitimate spread would be that minors are run by frigates and destroyers and account for at least 1/3 of the total plexes. Mediums would be run by cruisers fifty percent of the time and by afs about thirty percent and the rest can be frigate destroyers. Mediums should account for about 1/3 of plexes run. Majors Run by BSes bcs or hacs about fifty percent of the time thirty percent by cruisers and the rest smaller ships the 2 types of majors will account for about the remaining 1/3 of pelxes. I also think there should be somone scrammed or blown up in at least every other plex run if we want to call this a pvp mechanic.

That is what I think is a legitimate win. Instead I think we will find that the minmatar ran many more majors in frigates than amarr did. I think we will find that no one fought in eighty percent of the plexes run. Most plexing involves hiding from the enemy and orbiting the button. I think we will find that Minmatar ran at least seventy percent of their plexes in frigates and destroyers. Winning at this is not something to be proud of unless you are proud of your carebearing.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Pinky Feldman
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#171 - 2012-08-20 14:15:04 UTC
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:
FIRST GENERAL wrote:
Generally we are and were nonchalent as you put it very well towards FW, how could we be anything else considering how broken the mechanics were and still are. (I'm presuming we agree that FW mechanics are still broken, regardless of the undeniable truth that Inferno brought a lot of activity back into the area).


Yes the mechanics are a disaster, while the millions of plexing alts do help us in the sov war, its of course not something I would have chosen, they are probably almost as much of a pain to us as you. I hope soon(TM) CCP will realise the disaster that as Inferno and give us a sensible FW system back

All my post was trying to say was through all of this we have lost some (real) targets to shoot, but I don't think that is entirely down to our poor WT managing (which was a consideration).

In simplest terms from my point of view: it wasn't worth trying to keep a place for you in FW (READ - through letting up on the boring stuff and working to keep it fun, NOT - OMG we can could kick you out whenever we want with our L33t PvP) when FW seemed to be a secondary concern for you at the time. Why go to the effort when it wasn't yielding the GFs for us at the time.

Of course I'm sure Kourmonen the other night reminds us why we joined FW and why we would be sad to lose you, which is oddly nothing to do with FW and if CCP are to be believed the opposite of what they want from it (e.g. no caps). Of course I hope fights like that will continue to happen regardless of who is in FW. I am gutted to have missed it. Inferno should have focused on fights like that rather than rifters.


I think the biggest issue is the tiering of the rewards and how they scale. When theres a wave of immersion killing realization across your militia that you would be stupid not to farm Tier 5 while you can, versus going out of your way to push tier 2-3 at best on your own side, its hard for your side to keep taking FW seriously. It definitely kills a lot of the PVP immersion and makes things feel very RvB-esque. I hope Agony is able to keep fighting the good fight, but I have the feeling they too will hit an inevitable point of realization that they're sitting on a goldmine with a finite timeline (winter patch).
Lord BryanII
#172 - 2012-08-20 14:15:49 UTC
do you people honestly think that if farmers were reduced, by say 50%, that all of a sudden, FW will fill up with pure PVP players?
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#173 - 2012-08-20 14:21:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
roigon wrote:
joins FW [BADLUCK BRIAN] Gets locked out of home system /o\ Big smile

Just had my first day in FW, and what a day it was. Very different from what I'm used to in nullsec.
We like our environments target rich and so far FW certainly delivered in that respect. But we are new to this, the meta, the mechanics, etc.. So please bear with me, while we all collectively get used to faction war.

As for working with other amarr faction corps/alliances. I'm not leadership but as far as I know that's certainly something we are interested in, but this was like literally our first day :P Give it some time.




Great to have you in faction war. I think you will find it to be the best venue for small scale pvp in eve. Now is one of the times where the amarr militia is going through some changes. I think we will be sticking around. Feel free to contact a diplo of my corp to get the scoop. I'm looking forward to the upcoming months.

Here is a good guide:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=124940&find=unread

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Crimper
Shadow State
Goonswarm Federation
#174 - 2012-08-20 14:29:27 UTC
So ive read through this thread and have heard whining, trolling, anger, frustration and disappointment but nothing that reembles a solution. I spoke recently with Some friends that had issue with a decision that was made and I'll say here what I said to them. If you have a problem with something, then you must have an idea for a solution so formulate that into a suggestion supported by logic.

You complain that CCP is to blame, that nullsec influence is too great and that an RPing CSM has had too much impact in the current state of FW. Well then you need to present a better solution; a better plan. A few ideas were presented at fanfest by us that perhaps a dev would be willing to comment on; I know he wrote them down.

I know we (Lost Obsession) having left FW now are happily done with button spinning, but we still live in Kamela and will be around for the fighting, so I hope to see you all on the battlefield.
Lord BryanII
#175 - 2012-08-20 14:43:21 UTC
If Minimatar did not have their geography advantage and did not get that super boost that they did from the goons, would it be fair to say that the Amarr/Minimatar war would be much closer than it is now? If the answer is yes, then would we still be talking about farmers as much as we are now?

I don't think farmers are the issue tbh
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
#176 - 2012-08-20 14:53:35 UTC
Lord BryanII wrote:
If Minimatar did not have their geography advantage and did not get that super boost that they did from the goons, would it be fair to say that the Amarr/Minimatar war would be much closer than it is now? If the answer is yes, then would we still be talking about farmers as much as we are now?

I don't think farmers are the issue tbh


Goonswarm did nothing, they probably never even captured a single plex, all they did was exploit a load of LP for themselves, which probably hurt the minmatar as it meant our LP items were less valuable.
Lord BryanII
#177 - 2012-08-20 14:59:18 UTC
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:
Lord BryanII wrote:
If Minimatar did not have their geography advantage and did not get that super boost that they did from the goons, would it be fair to say that the Amarr/Minimatar war would be much closer than it is now? If the answer is yes, then would we still be talking about farmers as much as we are now?

I don't think farmers are the issue tbh


Goonswarm did nothing, they probably never even captured a single plex, all they did was exploit a load of LP for themselves, which probably hurt the minmatar as it meant our LP items were less valuable.


I hope you are really not this naive. Them making millions and millions of LP is what helped Minimatar quickly and easily upgrade their systems to T5 over and over. People started seeing Minimatar getting rich and joined up on the Minmatar side. I personally know about 15-20 people that joined Minimatar because of this

And regarding LP items being less valuable, have you ever heard of stockpiling them until the market improves?
Vordak Kallager
Descendance.
GoonSwarm.
#178 - 2012-08-20 15:04:49 UTC
Lord BryanII wrote:
If Minimatar did not have their geography advantage and did not get that super boost that they did from the goons, would it be fair to say that the Amarr/Minimatar war would be much closer than it is now? If the answer is yes, then would we still be talking about farmers as much as we are now?

I don't think farmers are the issue tbh


The Geography is an issue, but it is not insurmountable. As was clearly demonstrated, Nulli moved into Metro and quickly conquered the vast majority of it. It just takes some dedication to make the move and commit. There aren't a lot of Amarr groups who are interested in doing that.

Goons did nothing except take advantage of existing circumstances in order to make a lot of money and subsequently get it confiscated by CCP. Lol

Sa souvraya niende misain ye.

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#179 - 2012-08-20 15:14:49 UTC
Crimper wrote:
So ive read through this thread and have heard whining, trolling, anger, frustration and disappointment but nothing that reembles a solution. I spoke recently with Some friends that had issue with a decision that was made and I'll say here what I said to them. If you have a problem with something, then you must have an idea for a solution so formulate that into a suggestion supported by logic.

You complain that CCP is to blame, that nullsec influence is too great and that an RPing CSM has had too much impact in the current state of FW. Well then you need to present a better solution; a better plan. A few ideas were presented at fanfest by us that perhaps a dev would be willing to comment on; I know he wrote them down.

I know we (Lost Obsession) having left FW now are happily done with button spinning, but we still live in Kamela and will be around for the fighting, so I hope to see you all on the battlefield.


See my signature. People who want the occupancy war to be pvp have been asking for it since fw came out.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Mardrus
Perkone
Caldari State
#180 - 2012-08-20 15:22:58 UTC
Vordak Kallager wrote:
Lord BryanII wrote:
If Minimatar did not have their geography advantage and did not get that super boost that they did from the goons, would it be fair to say that the Amarr/Minimatar war would be much closer than it is now? If the answer is yes, then would we still be talking about farmers as much as we are now?

I don't think farmers are the issue tbh


The Geography is an issue, but it is not insurmountable. As was clearly demonstrated, Nulli moved into Metro and quickly conquered the vast majority of it. It just takes some dedication to make the move and commit. There aren't a lot of Amarr groups who are interested in doing that.

Goons did nothing except take advantage of existing circumstances in order to make a lot of money and subsequently get it confiscated by CCP. Lol


I tend to agree with the fact that Goons wern't part of the minmatar crushing the Amarr. They picked the side with the more systems / highest probability to hit T5 due to minnis already dominating Amarr and blew up freighters. They might of helped with the t5 pushes which might have been shorter / less frequent without them but as for system occupation I doubt they had a real impact.

As we plan to stay in Kamela the geographics remain a concern for me and I would love to see an extra route or two into the minmatar systems because minnis being like everyone else the moment they see your cruiser gang go through hof they get a camp up and you are often stuffed (I hate high sec travel).

This will probably not change the occupation but would make the warzone more fun imho.