These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

My EVE

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Trans Gamers of EvE - TGoE

First post
Author
Lilliana Stelles
#41 - 2012-08-18 07:30:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Lilliana Stelles
Obviously it has nothing to do with winning the support of niche groups' votes for CSM. Blink

Not a forum alt. 

Xolani1990
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2012-08-18 10:49:39 UTC
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
Obviously it has nothing to do with winning the support of niche groups' votes for CSM. Blink


The couple of dozen or so who might vote based on this are sure to swing the polls.
Nex apparatu5
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#43 - 2012-08-18 18:46:00 UTC
Xolani1990 wrote:
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
Obviously it has nothing to do with winning the support of niche groups' votes for CSM. Blink


The couple of dozen or so who might vote based on this are sure to swing the polls.


Listen buddy, just because non-cis gendered people are not a majority in this game doesn't mean they're any less important. I suggest you check your cis privilege at the door. You don't know how hard it is to be anything other than a straight white male in today's society.
Lilliana Stelles
#44 - 2012-08-18 20:41:12 UTC
Nex apparatu5 wrote:
Xolani1990 wrote:
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
Obviously it has nothing to do with winning the support of niche groups' votes for CSM. Blink


The couple of dozen or so who might vote based on this are sure to swing the polls.


Listen buddy, just because non-cis gendered people are not a majority in this game doesn't mean they're any less important. I suggest you check your cis privilege at the door. You don't know how hard it is to be anything other than a straight white male in today's society.


Are you really going to play the race card?

If you say you're proud to be straight, or proud to be white, everyone gets offended and everyone views you as a supremacist.

If you say you're proud to be part of any minority, trans, black, etc, people think you're some sort of equality activist. The last 50 years haven't just seen civil rights and equality, but also exploiting the majority's guilt has taken it several steps to far. Minority communities don't deserve any special treatment.

That's why groups like this annoy me. Having a trans group seems equivalent to having a straight and white group. Wouldn't that bother you?

Not a forum alt. 

Transmaritanus
Exergy.
#45 - 2012-08-19 02:19:58 UTC
God damnit, my alliance sent me here and told me it was a fan club for my pvp awesomeness.

I just realized it was for transsexuals.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#46 - 2012-08-19 04:36:06 UTC
Nex apparatu5 wrote:
non-cis gendered people]

Non-cis what?

I'm Canadian. To each their own. I'm glad my country allows same-sex marriage ... but what is with all the acronyms?

Someone should form a group for those people that identify as metrosexual.
Xolani1990
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#47 - 2012-08-19 10:05:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Xolani1990
Lilliana Stelles wrote:

If you say you're proud to be straight, or proud to be white, everyone gets offended and everyone views you as a supremacist.


If you are straight and white, you haven't grown up to experience any additional life hurdles related to institutionalised shaming of who you are. You haven't grown up being made to feel a sense of "otherness" about yourself, and thus you can't relate. To quote Eric Zorn in the Chicago Tribune, "the expression "Straight Pride" can only be read as a gratuitous and contemptuous response to the suggestion that gay people not be marginalized."

Quote:

If you say you're proud to be part of any minority, trans, black, etc, people think you're some sort of equality activist. The last 50 years haven't just seen civil rights and equality, but also exploiting the majority's guilt has taken it several steps to far. Minority communities don't deserve any special treatment.


Equal treatment isn't special treatment. See, again, you're unable to relate because you've never grown up with the hurdles you encounter if you're minority. Ethnic minorities still often encounter hate crime. LGBT people still encounter institutionalised discrimination in the form of bullying in schools (which is endemic and teachers often fail to deal with), denial of legal recognition of relationships and the rights that go with it, and stigmatisation and ostracism in public up to and including the threat of violence if it's apparent you're a same-sex couple or a transsexual.

Quote:

That's why groups like this annoy me. Having a trans group seems equivalent to having a straight and white group. Wouldn't that bother you?


Yes, because I'll repeat it, "the expression "Straight Pride" can only be read as a gratuitous and contemptuous response to the suggestion that gay people not be marginalized."

The idea of a trans* group is great. But not led by Xenuria.
Lilliana Stelles
#48 - 2012-08-19 15:27:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Lilliana Stelles
Xolani1990 wrote:
-snip-

Ultimately, this seems to be a nice big post of you trying to justify why minorities are entitled to special treatment. How about we judge people based on their merits or accomplishments instead? Honestly, you can't say that straight white people haven't experienced any additional hurdles related to institutionalized shaming, because that just isn't the case. It's entirely possible for minorities to be raised in supporting environments, and it's entirely possible for a straight white child to be hated for any number of reasons. Some parents just hate their kids. Some kids just hate other kids. You don't have to have any specific skin color, income bracket, or sexual preference to be bullied or hated.

I can say, specifically, that saw a great deal of bullying growing up. Your point on bullying is entirely invalid, since non-LGBT people encounter it too. Maybe you were one of the luck few to never get your head slammed into a locker or shoved down the stairs. Lucky you.

What I can say about bullying though, was it was occasionally directed at students of various sexuality, but usually it was just directed at whoever didn't fit in, regardless of their sexual orientation or skin color. More often than not it'd be based on your parent's income or the clothing you wore, not your race or your sexuality. Kids pick out what's most obvious, and schools today are far too integrated for race to be a factor. If they were 99% white it'd be one thing... but in my state Caucasians are only 66% of the population, and african americans are 28%. There's virtually no distinguishable difference between being raised one or the other. If 2/3rds of the class in highschool is white, 1/3rd is black, and no one knows anyone's sexual orientation (because most people don't care to parade what they do in bed), then kids are just going to pick on whoever sticks out the most. Usually, that's based on what someone wears, how they talk, or who their friends are. Things that visibly make them unpopular.

In cities near where I live it's also become common place for hate crimes to occur against rich straight white individuals. You're obviously not familiar with "yuppie hate crime" as it's referred to, but there's just as much, if not more discrimination against the straight white group, particularly the wealthier ones. I'm not sure what type of rose-colored shades you're wearing to pretend that there isn't just as much hate crime against straight white people.

I also don't know what type of background you came from the claim that you faced "additional life hurdles", because frankly, most minorities and people of alternative sexual preference flat out won't. They'll grow up the same as anyone else. I had friends of other races, and friends of other sexual preferences, and quite a few of them had significantly less trouble than I did. So don't tell me I can't relate. All you're doing is justifying special treatment for LGBT and minorities that flat out isn't deserved. I guarantee you that if we sat down and compared how "difficult" our lives were, that we both had our hardships... and combined, no one in this thread suffered anything remotely serious, given by the fact that we're here today, literate, and have internet access, and $15 a month to spend on EVE (which puts us all in the world's wealthiest 1%).

So I'll say it again: Why can't their be a straight gamers of eve group? What's wrong with straight pride? If gay people or trans people can be proud of who they are, why can't straight people make a group where they take pride in themselves? There's no contemptuousness there; it has nothing to do with disdain or scorn of others; pride is an inward-emotion in this case, about feeling good about one's self. Gay pride and straight pride are no different; it's about feeling that what you are is fine, accepted, and needn't be changed.

Anyways, sure, there are hate crimes against minority groups out there. But it doesn't affect everyone in that group... it's just isolated cases that get overblown. The individual doesn't deserve special, or even equal treatment for that. (Equal treatment is communism!) Instead, they should earn the same rewards as any other individual, based on their own merits.

TL;DR: People hate straight people too.

And that's all I have to say. We've quickly managed to derail this entire thread, which... also isn't necessarily a bad thing, seeing as it probably wasn't the best way to start this group in the first place.

Not a forum alt. 

Xolani1990
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#49 - 2012-08-19 16:27:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Xolani1990
Oh nice, the forums ate my post.

Lilliana Stelles wrote:
Xolani1990 wrote:
-snip-

Ultimately, this seems to be a nice big post of you trying to justify why minorities are entitled to special treatment. How about we judge people based on their merits or accomplishments instead? Honestly, you can't say that straight white people haven't experienced any additional hurdles related to institutionalized shaming, because that just isn't the case. It's entirely possible for minorities to be raised in supporting environments, and it's entirely possible for a straight white child to be hated for any number of reasons. Some parents just hate their kids. Some kids just hate other kids. You don't have to have any specific skin color, income bracket, or sexual preference to be bullied or hated.

I can say, specifically, that saw a great deal of bullying growing up. Your point on bullying is entirely invalid, since non-LGBT people encounter it too. Maybe you were one of the luck few to never get your head slammed into a locker or shoved down the stairs. Lucky you.


It would be invalid if it weren't for the fact that suicide rates among LGBT youth is almost an order of magnitude higher than non-LGBT youth. I work in youth services, I see bullying every day, and there simply is no form of bullying in schools today that is as emdemic or ingrained against a specific group of people as homophobic/transphobic bullying. Stonewall in the UK has a lot of research about it, you should read it here.

Quote:

In cities near where I live it's also become common place for hate crimes to occur against rich straight white individuals. You're obviously not familiar with "yuppie hate crime" as it's referred to, but there's just as much, if not more discrimination against the straight white group, particularly the wealthier ones. I'm not sure what type of rose-colored shades you're wearing to pretend that there isn't just as much hate crime against straight white people.


Show me a single peer-reviewed document demonstrating this is an endemic problem and I'll take you seriously.

Quote:

I also don't know what type of background you came from the claim that you faced "additional life hurdles", because frankly, most minorities and people of alternative sexual preference flat out won't. They'll grow up the same as anyone else. I had friends of other races, and friends of other sexual preferences, and quite a few of them had significantly less trouble than I did. So don't tell me I can't relate. All you're doing is justifying special treatment for LGBT and minorities that flat out isn't deserved. I guarantee you that if we sat down and compared how "difficult" our lives were, that we both had our hardships... and combined, no one in this thread suffered anything remotely serious, given by the fact that we're here today, literate, and have internet access, and $15 a month to spend on EVE (which puts us all in the world's wealthiest 1%).


Yes, anyone who can afford to play EVE obviously has never had any kind of serious hardship in their life, I totally agree.
Laktos
Perkone
Caldari State
#50 - 2012-08-19 17:23:37 UTC
Lilliana Stelles wrote:


:snip:



Your naivety is astounding.

In a perfect world there would be no need for any sort of "gay pride" or "black pride" group, because there would be no discrimination.

But we don't live in that world, we live in a world that is flooded with discrimination and hate based on race, gender and sexuality, and almost none of it is directed at straight white males. Sure there is some retaliatory discrimination, but in a country like the US or Australia (where I am from) it is far from anything that would be considered a problem. Straight, white men do not need a "straight white man pride" group because they have not been the targets of discrimination on any serious scale in recent western history, they have been the ones doing the discriminating. A primary school history education can tell you that.

Btw, how do you think African Americans gained the rights they have in the USA in the first place? Oh yeah, they formed a protest group based on their race.

Latest PVP Video: Perseverance

Sard Caid does not endorse this message.

God's Apples
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#51 - 2012-08-19 20:18:30 UTC
Considering after the first page the thread has nothing to do wtih the channel or EvE in anyway, shouldn't this be moved to OOPE or just locked?

"Hydra Reloaded are just jealous / butthurt on me / us because we can get tons of PVP action in empire while they aren't good enough to get that." - NightmareX

Lilliana Stelles
#52 - 2012-08-19 23:33:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Lilliana Stelles
According the FBI hate crime statistics for 2010:
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-victims
I'm not going to copy/paste the whole thing here, but I'd like to point out some of the hate crimes against commonly accepted groups:
Quote:
Racial bias
Among the single-bias hate crime incidents in 2010, there were 3,949 victims of racially motivated hate crime. A closer examination of these victim data showed that:

70.0 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-black bias.
17.7 percent were victims of an anti-white bias.


Quote:
Religious bias
Of the 1,552 victims of an anti-religion hate crime:

4.2 percent were victims of an anti-Catholic bias.
3.0 percent were victims of an anti-Protestant bias.


Quote:
Sexual-orientation bias
Of the 1,528 victims targeted due to an offender’s sexual-orientation bias:

1.4 percent were victims of an anti-heterosexual bias.


How is this not a problem?

You're calling me naive? There are hard statistics here. You don't have to be transgender, of a minority skin color, or of an alternative sexual preference for people to hate you. People just hate each other. Whites, straights, christians, etc, deserve just as much special treatment as any other group, because they're just as subject to hate crimes. There may be less of them, at current, for any number of reasons, but they still exist and are quite frequent. No group deserves to have more pride or to feel persecuted that much more, as long as hate crimes are being targeted at everyone.

So I'll ask, once again, what makes this group any more valid than the straight group, or a white group?

Not a forum alt. 

Laktos
Perkone
Caldari State
#53 - 2012-08-20 06:15:26 UTC
I never said white straight christians were never victims of hate, I said they aren't subjected to hate based on their ethnicity, sexuality, gender or religion nearly enough to warrant forming a "straight white christian pride" group or some such thing. And those statistics you just linked seem to back up exactly what I'm saying.

"70.0 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-black bias."
"17.7 percent were victims of an anti-white bias."

"67.0 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias."
"12.7 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias."
"9.1 percent were victims of a bias against other religions (anti-other religion)."
"4.2 percent were victims of an anti-Catholic bias."
"3.0 percent were victims of an anti-Protestant bias."


"57.3 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-male homosexual bias."
"27.5 percent were victims of an anti-homosexual bias."
"11.8 percent were victims of an anti-female homosexual bias."
"1.9 percent were victims of an anti-bisexual bias."
"1.4 percent were victims of an anti-heterosexual bias."


You want to know why a gay pride group is more valid than a straight pride group?

Because when (according to the FBI's crime statistics, it's not an academic sociological study but it's what you seem to want to work with to back up your argument) 98.5% of all hate crimes based on sexual orientation are targeted at people who are homosexual or bisexual, and only 1.4% is targeted at heterosexuals, to form a straight pride group is an insult to the LBGT community. It demeans the group they have formed to try to fight the oppression they face and tries to make a mockery of it.

The hate white, straight, christian men face is incredibly low compared to minority groups. Just about all of recent history tells you that. To deny that fact based on your own personal, subjective experience is both anti-scientific and anti-intellectual.

Latest PVP Video: Perseverance

Sard Caid does not endorse this message.

Lilliana Stelles
#54 - 2012-08-20 07:24:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Lilliana Stelles
Sure, hate crimes against the LGBT community are more common, that doesn't make them more significant, and it certainly doesn't make them more important. It certainly don't think we can invalidate any concern or hate crime just because it's less frequent.

There were still 21 hate crimes against heterosexuals, 111 hate crimes against Christians, and a staggering 699 hate crimes against whites in the US during 2010. Just because there were more hate crimes against other groups doesn't make the crimes that were committed against these groups any less important.

If one of those 21 straight individuals to a stand for himself, or herself, would you really tell them not to seek support from a group, because showing any "pride" would belittle the validity of LGBT groups? If anything, what you're suggesting is demeaning to LGBT groups, simply because you're painting them as inconsiderate of the issues that effect straight people.

Besides, the OP didn't say "Persecuted trans gamers of Eve", so your requirement that a group face additional hardship to be valid is somewhat moot in the first place. There are plenty of people who could potentially join TGOE who may have had a perfectly cushy life with no gender-identity related persecution whatsoever. So them getting an exclusive pride group while straight people can't certainly doesn't make sense.

Additionally, my point in posting these statistics was to prove that these hate crimes are a very real issue; not to compare "who has the bigger issue", because hate crimes are an issue regardless of how frequent they're occurring, simply by the fact that they are occurring.

If you really want to tell those 699 white people that the crimes committed against them don't matter as much as the crimes committed against another community, then go right ahead. But you really don't have the right to make that call.

These aren't incredibly low numbers. Comparing 7.2% (christian) to 12.7% Islam or 9.1% other, these numbers are all relatively close to each other on the overall scale... are you going to say that Christians or Muslims suffering persecution don't have the right to stand up for themselves simply because MORE Jewish people suffer persecution? That doesn't seem fair.

Sure, there's only one hate crime against whites in the US for every 3-4 hate crimes against blacks... but that's still within an order of magnitude. White's are still the second-most persecuted race within the US. And they have every bit as much pride as any other group.

Not a forum alt. 

Xolani1990
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#55 - 2012-08-20 08:50:20 UTC
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
Sure, hate crimes against the LGBT community are more common, that doesn't make them more significant, and it certainly doesn't make them more important. It certainly don't think we can invalidate any concern or hate crime just because it's less frequent.

There were still 21 hate crimes against heterosexuals, 111 hate crimes against Christians, and a staggering 699 hate crimes against whites in the US during 2010. Just because there were more hate crimes against other groups doesn't make the crimes that were committed against these groups any less important.


Of course nobody is saying that these crimes should be treated as any less serious on an individual basis, but to pretend they are part of a pervasive problem on the same scale as hate crimes against minorities is either delusional or disingenuous. If you are a straight, white male you almost certainly don't have to live your daily life afraid of being a victim of hate crime. This isn't to say people never get attacked because of anti-white bias or whatever, but the rate at which it occurs, and the proportion of white people who experience it, is far lower than the minority groups for whom hate crime legislation was introduced in the first place.

Quote:

If one of those 21 straight individuals to a stand for himself, or herself, would you really tell them not to seek support from a group, because showing any "pride" would belittle the validity of LGBT groups? If anything, what you're suggesting is demeaning to LGBT groups, simply because you're painting them as inconsiderate of the issues that effect straight people.


What issues, on a societal level, do straight people experience on the basis of them being straight? This is absurd.

Quote:

Besides, the OP didn't say "Persecuted trans gamers of Eve", so your requirement that a group face additional hardship to be valid is somewhat moot in the first place. There are plenty of people who could potentially join TGOE who may have had a perfectly cushy life with no gender-identity related persecution whatsoever. So them getting an exclusive pride group while straight people can't certainly doesn't make sense.


Transgendered people experience additional hardships in life, independent of persecution from others. It just so happens that persecution from others is usually also an ingredient in those hardships. Your ignorance of this is reflective of your broader and profound ignorance of LGBT issues in general.

Quote:

Additionally, my point in posting these statistics was to prove that these hate crimes are a very real issue; not to compare "who has the bigger issue", because hate crimes are an issue regardless of how frequent they're occurring, simply by the fact that they are occurring.


Your refusal to acknowledge endemic problems of bigotry and bias in society is astounding.

Quote:

If you really want to tell those 699 white people that the crimes committed against them don't matter as much as the crimes committed against another community, then go right ahead. But you really don't have the right to make that call.

These aren't incredibly low numbers. Comparing 7.2% (christian) to 12.7% Islam or 9.1% other, these numbers are all relatively close to each other on the overall scale... are you going to say that Christians or Muslims suffering persecution don't have the right to stand up for themselves simply because MORE Jewish people suffer persecution? That doesn't seem fair.

Sure, there's only one hate crime against whites in the US for every 3-4 hate crimes against blacks... but that's still within an order of magnitude. White's are still the second-most persecuted race within the US. And they have every bit as much pride as any other group.


The proportion of whites experiencing hate crimes is also far lower, due to blacks being a minority group. If you are black, or gay, or Jewish, or transgendered, you are far more likely to experience hate crime, simply due to the fact that there are fewer of you in the population but more hate crimes occurring against your group.
Capqu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#56 - 2012-08-20 16:35:15 UTC
Xolani1990 wrote:

The proportion of whites experiencing hate crimes is also far lower, due to blacks being a minority group. If you are black, or gay, or Jewish, or transgendered, you are far more likely to experience hate crime, simply due to the fact that there are fewer of you in the population but more hate crimes occurring against your group.


ah don't worry mr straight, white, christian man. you may have been a victim of a horrific hate crime, but at least it's not commonplace! lets tackle the real issues here, a small group of people want to go against nature and biology are being called freakish for promoting their views in public!
Capqu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#57 - 2012-08-20 16:39:34 UTC
Adam Junior wrote:
Capqu wrote:
if you want to support such a radical viewpoint as having a ***** and not being a man/male, you should probably be tolerant of people with the viewpoint that who have a ***** are men/male

just saiyan, intolerance works both ways Xenuria you massive hypocritical bigot


"whaa whaa why doesn't everyone conform to my worldview"
That is to say, contrary to popular belief, that lots of opinions are wrong.


I for one endorse more safe spaces in online communities, anyone who's offended really needs to find better things to be upset about such as transphobia.


im not asking you to conform to my world view you absolute ham sandwich

im asking you to tolerate it, and not shove your lgbt drivel down my throat
Laktos
Perkone
Caldari State
#58 - 2012-08-20 17:03:34 UTC
Capqu wrote:
Xolani1990 wrote:

The proportion of whites experiencing hate crimes is also far lower, due to blacks being a minority group. If you are black, or gay, or Jewish, or transgendered, you are far more likely to experience hate crime, simply due to the fact that there are fewer of you in the population but more hate crimes occurring against your group.


ah don't worry mr straight, white, christian man. you may have been a victim of a horrific hate crime, but at least it's not commonplace! lets tackle the real issues here, a small group of people want to go against nature and biology are being called freakish for promoting their views in public!


Nature and Biology has no purposeful will, nor intent. You cannot go "against" something that has no actual purpose or will in the first place.

Btw, you and Lilliana are missing the entire picture here. We are talking about a group formed to support a minority that faces extreme levels of intolerance on a large scale. Of course any hate crime is just as important as another hate crime no matter who the victim is, even if they were a white straight man... on a personal level. We're not talking about the personal here, we are talking about societal wide issues. 1.4% of sexuality related hate crime targeted at heterosexuals (as referenced from the FBI statistics) is hardly a societal issue.

People don't form gay pride or "TGoE" groups because a small number of them were victims of hate. They are formed because a lot of LBGT people face discrimination in some form or another every day.

Besides, TGoE isn't even a protest group, its merely a chat channel. So the idea that this is somehow hostile and offensive towards non-transexual people is utterly ridiculous.

Latest PVP Video: Perseverance

Sard Caid does not endorse this message.

Capqu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#59 - 2012-08-20 17:41:21 UTC
yeah laktos i understand what you are saying, and if it was as you say, i would have no problem with it.

but the people in that channel have extreme intolerance towards any view outside of their own. i've tried to explain how some people don't accept the idea of having a penis and not being male, and i got shouted down and told i was being a bigot. that kind of hypocrisy and irony makes me hella mad, and is the main reason i probably appear to have an agenda against these people. when a group that strives so hard to be tolerated is completely intolerant of the majority of peoples views, they honestly don't deserve the time of day
Xolani1990
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#60 - 2012-08-20 18:11:05 UTC
Capqu wrote:
yeah laktos i understand what you are saying, and if it was as you say, i would have no problem with it.

but the people in that channel have extreme intolerance towards any view outside of their own. i've tried to explain how some people don't accept the idea of having a ***** and not being male, and i got shouted down and told i was being a bigot. that kind of hypocrisy and irony makes me hella mad, and is the main reason i probably appear to have an agenda against these people. when a group that strives so hard to be tolerated is completely intolerant of the majority of peoples views, they honestly don't deserve the time of day


The thing is, you're going into their space, that they've set up to be apart from the daily bullshit they have to go through where people invalidate their identity and tell them they aren't really men, or aren't really women, to impose your view on them there. There are times and places for that kind of debate, but going into someone's home turf for it isn't the best approach, surely you can understand that.