These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Idea] The ability to restrict who buys your goods

Author
Kremulous Shulzakk
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-08-18 14:20:48 UTC
Let's say that you want to have in-house manufacturing and sales of those goods, with a reduced price for your alliance/corp. You know that the one neutral guy hanging around is going to swoop in, grab the goods and re-list them for much more. I propose that you can set a minimum standing for the people that can see your goods when you list them.

What if people in my alliance/corp do the old switch-a-roo anyways? Well, since you can see who bought the goods, it's enforceable.

Opinions? Advice? Harsh realities? Has this been suggested before? Tell me what you think? Big smile
Captain Robby
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-08-18 14:41:12 UTC
use the contract system...
Kremulous Shulzakk
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-08-18 14:48:16 UTC
Captain Robby wrote:
use the contract system...



Yeah, but it isn't really as convenient as using the market. You'd have to make individual contracts for each item that you want to sell instead of making a bunch available to more than one person at once.
Sheynan
Lighting the blight
#4 - 2012-08-18 17:35:50 UTC
Secondary markets that work like the current one but have no connection to it would be awesome
Loius Woo
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2012-08-18 18:41:58 UTC
I think a better kind of solution would be to use some of the kinds of contracts that CCP are currently working on. There are some that would do exactly what you are talking about.

Say you want to sell ammo to your corp only at a special price, you can create a contract and make it available to corp and then corp members can purchase ammo at per unit prices specified in the contract, when you make the contract, the ammo goes into "escrow" and when it is exhausted, the contract is expired.

Essentially it allows you to have a secondary market via per/unit escrow contracts.

I think they talked all about it in the CSM minutes.
snake pies
Dixon Cox Butte Preservation Society
#6 - 2012-08-18 18:50:52 UTC
don't break something that's working well
GeeShizzle MacCloud
#7 - 2012-08-18 18:53:09 UTC
i think the OP is gunning more along the lines of coalition level marketing. as contracts have a possibility to be public / alliance / corp / personal. i think he's looking for a new level between public and alliance that can hitch hike on standings with which to propagate itself.
Sun Win
#8 - 2012-08-18 19:08:08 UTC
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote:
i think the OP is gunning more along the lines of coalition level marketing. as contracts have a possibility to be public / alliance / corp / personal. i think he's looking for a new level between public and alliance that can hitch hike on standings with which to propagate itself.


Like putting stuff up for sale in a station where only friendlies can dock?
Onslaughtor
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#9 - 2012-08-18 19:27:35 UTC
Sun Win wrote:
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote:
i think the OP is gunning more along the lines of coalition level marketing. as contracts have a possibility to be public / alliance / corp / personal. i think he's looking for a new level between public and alliance that can hitch hike on standings with which to propagate itself.


Like putting stuff up for sale in a station where only friendlies can dock?


In lowsec and faction null you cant control who docks. A blue market would be a really good thing in my opinion because this creates a way for lowsec and fac null industry to better thrive. As someone who lives in the enviroments that this would be most useful, +1
GeeShizzle MacCloud
#10 - 2012-08-18 19:54:56 UTC  |  Edited by: GeeShizzle MacCloud
Sun Win wrote:
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote:
i think the OP is gunning more along the lines of coalition level marketing. as contracts have a possibility to be public / alliance / corp / personal. i think he's looking for a new level between public and alliance that can hitch hike on standings with which to propagate itself.


Like putting stuff up for sale in a station where only friendlies can dock?


and with decent trading skills u can be docked in npc null in the same region and buy up all the stock in a player owned station thats red to you and re-market it for higher prices... much like the OP is annoyed with =)
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2012-08-18 22:49:21 UTC
meh...
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#12 - 2012-08-19 17:16:19 UTC
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote:
Sun Win wrote:
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote:
i think the OP is gunning more along the lines of coalition level marketing. as contracts have a possibility to be public / alliance / corp / personal. i think he's looking for a new level between public and alliance that can hitch hike on standings with which to propagate itself.


Like putting stuff up for sale in a station where only friendlies can dock?


and with decent trading skills u can be docked in npc null in the same region and buy up all the stock in a player owned station thats red to you and re-market it for higher prices... much like the OP is annoyed with =)


Why is this a bad thing???

A player that plays market games like this is risking quite a bit, as they CANT dock to access their stuff. All you have to do is keep moving more goods and relisting them cheaper than them....

I'm not opposed to a specialized, restricted market option... but I'd make it a black market with very different (and larger overall) fees (10% broker fees with maybe zero transaction tax). IMO, it should cost you extra to make your market goods restricted...