These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

My EVE

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Trans Gamers of EvE - TGoE

First post
Author
Lilliana Stelles
#21 - 2012-08-15 20:05:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Lilliana Stelles
Xenuria wrote:
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:
Only bit I'm curious about...

Is this for those who are transgendered biologically (either through choice or not) or psychologically, or would you consider these equally under the purview of this new channel?



Gender is not biological, sex is.
Gender is a social construct.



This is false. Gender is the state of your sex, eg. male, female, or other.
Gender identity can be defined yourself and your society.
But gender has a definite value.


Incorrect.

Gender is not the same as your assigned sex, Gender is not static either. Female "gender" roles in the middle east for example are not the same as Female "gender" roles in the united states.


Proof?
Gender is from the latin root Genus, meaning "kind". It's a taxonomic classification, regardless of what any group defines themselves as. You can call yourself female or male and not be. The only thing that makes you is wrong.

Now, you can have a gender identity that doesn't match your gender. Or, you can physically change your gender.

But gender is not a matter of opinion.

Your gender role may change as you travel abroad, but your gender will not.

Not a forum alt. 

Xenuria
#22 - 2012-08-15 20:10:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
Shalua Rui wrote:
While I never would attend a "special" channel based on my RL person, be it gender, sexuality, social standing or whatever, I can understand why people feel the need to find other people "like them" in a virtual community like EVE... so, good luck, by all means... just make sure you know what you are doing... In my opinion, a gaming community should never be a forum to discuss or, worse consult about possible psychological conditions... that's what therapists are for.

If all you are planning to achieve is a place where transgendered people can talk about topics that concearn them besides EVE... well, I guess there will be no harm in that...

Sidenote: Beeing transgendered is NO sickness in any meaning of the word...


I understand where you are coming from. I do want the channel to have topics including but not limited to topics of interest to the trans community. I might post a link on the twitter about a legal case or some legislation, or I may post something about fashion or what kind of clothes are really nice. It all depends on what I find/ what people suggest to me.

This channel is not going to be some rigid little box where people are forced to talk about specific things. I would hope it would be just the opposite. I want to obviously provide suggestions for topics of discussion but these will be suggestions not mandatory topics.

Lilliana Stelles wrote:


Proof?
Gender is from the latin root Genus, meaning "kind". It's a taxonomic classification, regardless of what any group defines themselves as. You can call yourself female or male and not be. The only thing that makes you is wrong.

Now, you can have a gender identity that doesn't match your gender. Or, you can physically change your gender.

But gender is not a matter of opinion.

Your gender role may change as you travel abroad, but your gender will not.


Once again, you are incorrect. Gender like many words in the english language has more than one definition and those definitions change over time. For example Goon can mean an hired gun or mindless muscle in service of an authority, or it can refer to people from something awful.

Please find another place to vent your ignorant point of view, what you are saying is offensive and discriminatory.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#23 - 2012-08-15 20:23:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
As I said, I trust that you know what you are doing... it takes all sorts, as they say. Blink

I really don't see any harm in having "special" (silly wording, I know) channels like that.

and @Lilliana: Sorry, but you aren't entirerly correct there... in some cases, gender is neither defined by the birth physis, nor psychological background or social conditioning...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#24 - 2012-08-15 20:24:03 UTC
Keep it civil folks. No personal attacks or trolling.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Lilliana Stelles
#25 - 2012-08-15 20:41:02 UTC
This is exactly what I was afraid of.

It would appear you have trouble tolerating other viewpoints (including the dictionary's), yet you wish to run a clearly controversial channel.
And claim that someone quoting almost directly from the dictionary is ignorant?

Again, This seems like an attention thing, or a response to someone who identified as female but actually wasn't being denied access to wgoe.

I'm not trying to persecute you or accuse you, yet you're being defensive against my quoting the commonly accepted.

So let me, for the sake of example, be defensive:
In which case, allow me to express my own opinion. I find this channel degrading to women, due to it's similar nature to WGOE. To blindly draw an analog between "sex" as you call it (what wgoe is founded upon, and is a hard classification) and a social construct (what tgoe is founded on) lessens the meaning of the hard classification. Anyone can change their social image, but very few people have the resources to change their actual "sex", or gender, as the rest of the world refers to it.

So forgive me, but I'm offended by the grouping together of WGOE and TGOE, as it makes WGOE sound cheap and invalid.

But, that's just my /opinion/.

Not a forum alt. 

Lilliana Stelles
#26 - 2012-08-15 20:49:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Lilliana Stelles
Shalua Rui wrote:
@Lilliana: Sorry, but you aren't entirerly correct there... in some cases, gender is neither defined by the birth physis, nor psychological background or social conditioning...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002495/

It really depends on your source.
The US library of medicine clearly states that gender is defined at birth.


James Amril-Kesh wrote:
That's bull****


It's an opinion. Most of them are.

Not a forum alt. 

Xenuria
#27 - 2012-08-15 20:50:34 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
So let me, for the sake of example, be defensive:
In which case, allow me to express my own opinion. I find this channel degrading to women, due to it's similar nature to WGOE. To blindly draw an analog between "sex" as you call it (what wgoe is founded upon, and is a hard classification) and a social construct (what tgoe is founded on) lessens the meaning of the hard classification. Anyone can change their social image, but very few people have the resources to change their actual "sex", or gender, as the rest of the world refers to it.

So forgive me, but I'm offended by the grouping together of WGOE and TGOE, as it makes WGOE sound cheap and invalid.

But, that's just my /opinion/.

That's bullshit.

Agreed.

Getting back on track I would say that the idea to start this channel was not my own but that of Arancia Detto. She spoke with me at length about the benefit a channel like the one I created could have and how it would be great for the two channels to be connected to each other in function. I jumped at the idea because I have a heavy background in psychology as well as gender studies. So we both felt like I was the natural choice to start something like this.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#28 - 2012-08-15 20:50:52 UTC
Keep this up and I will have to lock the thread. Keep it civil, please.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Xenuria
#29 - 2012-08-15 20:54:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
In effort to avoid having the thread locked I am going to just ignore all the trolls and flames. I would advise everybody else to do the same, for the sake of this thread.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#30 - 2012-08-15 21:05:27 UTC
Agreed... I said what I had to say.

Good luck again! Smile

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Adalynne Rohks
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-08-15 22:07:11 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Adalynne Rohks wrote:
Well alrighty. But since we're all here, I gotsta ask...

Is there a general trans opinion on Lady Gaga? Hero? Bad example? Not related?

I swear that she's not a standardized "girl", but I couldn't really blame someone for not coming out and saying so. Rough situation to have to learn to deal with.


The idea of a "standard" for how a "girl" should act or behave is something that is heavily influenced by culture and religion.
Somebody from another country might think of lady gaga in one way in terms of female gender roles and somebody from yet another country or area may have a different opinion.

I do not speak for everybody, so I can not make a statement about lady gaga and claim that all trans people have the same opinion because trans is an umbrella term that encompasses a diverse group of people.


I wasn't referring to the how he or she acted. I just think she moves like a guy, and looks like a guy that's had work done. And I was just curious as to if she was a sort of symbol for some people. Like how gay people gravitated to Cher (for whatever reason...)
Xenuria
#32 - 2012-08-15 22:13:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
Adalynne Rohks wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
Adalynne Rohks wrote:
Well alrighty. But since we're all here, I gotsta ask...

Is there a general trans opinion on Lady Gaga? Hero? Bad example? Not related?

I swear that she's not a standardized "girl", but I couldn't really blame someone for not coming out and saying so. Rough situation to have to learn to deal with.


The idea of a "standard" for how a "girl" should act or behave is something that is heavily influenced by culture and religion.
Somebody from another country might think of lady gaga in one way in terms of female gender roles and somebody from yet another country or area may have a different opinion.

I do not speak for everybody, so I can not make a statement about lady gaga and claim that all trans people have the same opinion because trans is an umbrella term that encompasses a diverse group of people.


I wasn't referring to the how he or she acted. I just think she moves like a guy, and looks like a guy that's had work done. And I was just curious as to if she was a sort of symbol for some people. Like how gay people gravitated to Cher (for whatever reason...)


I think alot of that is intentional and part of her style, just like walking and turning with as little wasted energy as possible is my style. In practice however I look like an agent from the matrix with the way I move and walk so I try to tone that down and make my movements more fluid while still using minimal amounts of energy in comparison to a normal person.

Edit: I think the point I was trying to say is that Lady GaGa is a character, one that is cranked up to the extreme. She is like me, an intense character with benevolent goals. The intensity of her character helps her polarize audiences quickly so she can rapidly find who her real friends are and who is just being nice.

Social polarization is an old old tool and I will not be the last person to benefit from it.
Laktos
Perkone
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-08-16 03:57:39 UTC
Cool idea. Good luck with the channel.

Also props to ISD Dorrim for keeping the thread clean of little children :)

Latest PVP Video: Perseverance

Sard Caid does not endorse this message.

Capqu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#34 - 2012-08-16 10:58:43 UTC
if you want to support such a radical viewpoint as having a penis and not being a man/male, you should probably be tolerant of people with the viewpoint that who have a penis are men/male

just saiyan, intolerance works both ways Xenuria you massive hypocritical bigot
Adam Junior
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2012-08-16 23:08:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Adam Junior
Capqu wrote:
if you want to support such a radical viewpoint as having a ***** and not being a man/male, you should probably be tolerant of people with the viewpoint that who have a ***** are men/male

just saiyan, intolerance works both ways Xenuria you massive hypocritical bigot


"whaa whaa why doesn't everyone conform to my worldview"
That is to say, contrary to popular belief, that lots of opinions are wrong.


I for one endorse more safe spaces in online communities, anyone who's offended really needs to find better things to be upset about such as transphobia.
Meridith Akesia
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#36 - 2012-08-17 15:18:08 UTC
Heh. Xenuria threads.
Nex apparatu5
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#37 - 2012-08-18 03:04:33 UTC
What we really need is a channel where transphobic people can gather and express themselves without being discriminated against. It's kind of sad how their viewpoints are looked down upon these days.
Xolani1990
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2012-08-18 03:24:31 UTC
Why is Xenuria the one forming this group instead of, you know, transpeople forming a group for themselves? It seems kind of inappropriate for someone who, as far as I am aware, is a cisgendered male to be taking leadership of a transgender group for himself.
Sophaya Fortelleren
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#39 - 2012-08-18 03:30:35 UTC
Because he's basically a clagnut whose existence in EVE is mere inches from the status of Daley. Verily I do attest to his migraine inducing attempts at being worth air as he got kicked from TEST on account of being too terrible even for us. The man doth try to be visible but his greasy spots that crater his chubby jowls like the blotchy surface of mars doth so obscure him from our eyes.
Xolani1990
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2012-08-18 03:34:44 UTC
If Xenuria is forming this group for the right reasons he will quickly choose between the most responsible of the members and hand over leadership to them, fading out of relevance in the group and allowing them to stand for themselves. He has no business leading this group and claiming recognition for it unless he has a massive Moses complex.