These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Retriever loadout advice.

Author
Kadargo Terona
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-08-13 23:06:04 UTC
I'm new to Eve. I have a retriever with 2 strip miners. I have a small shield booster in the med power slot but am wondering what I should fit on the lower slots.

I will be mining in high sec at the moment but at some point may venture into lowsec, I will have a combination of mining drones and hobgoblins depending on where I'm mining.

I was looking at thee possible modules.

Warp stabilizer. Could be useful if I'm solo mining in lowsec. I noticed that stabilizers reduce scanning range and max targeting range. Neither is a problem for mining barges (in my opinion). However would the max targeting range penalty apply to drones?

Mining upgrade module. Which ones apply to strip miners?

Armour upgrades. Which ones would be best?

Thanks in advance.
Chris Slayter
Perdition
#2 - 2012-08-14 00:52:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Chris Slayter
Kadargo Terona wrote:
I'm new to Eve. I have a retriever with 2 strip miners. I have a small shield booster in the med power slot but am wondering what I should fit on the lower slots.

I will be mining in high sec at the moment but at some point may venture into lowsec, I will have a combination of mining drones and hobgoblins depending on where I'm mining.

I was looking at thee possible modules.

Warp stabilizer. Could be useful if I'm solo mining in lowsec. I noticed that stabilizers reduce scanning range and max targeting range. Neither is a problem for mining barges (in my opinion). However would the max targeting range penalty apply to drones?

Mining upgrade module. Which ones apply to strip miners?

Armour upgrades. Which ones would be best?

Thanks in advance.



First of all: forget about the warpstabs idea. At least in Highsec noone will attempt to point you, the only thing you should be prepared for in High is getting alphastriked - thus you either survive until Concord kicks in or you die anyway.

Second: Depending on what you mine you can choose between MLUs or IHU. The latter are specifically for icemining.

[Retriever]

Internal Force Field Array I
Mining Laser Upgrade II
Mining Laser Upgrade II

Adaptive Invulnerability Field II

Modulated Strip Miner II
Modulated Strip Miner II

Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I


Hobgoblin II x5

This loadout gives you a good balance between tank and mining yield. Switch to Ice-rigs and IHUs if youre planning on icemining.

Cheers, Chris


Edit: Any MLU applies to Stripminers. Just to clarify your question there.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-08-14 10:22:33 UTC
I would not suggest you use tech 2 strip miners if you're new to mining, even if you're able to fit them. They are a lot more expensive and might just be a money drag if you accidentally lose a couple barges while learning. Tech 1 strip miners are more than adequate.

For maximum mining yield, you can definitely put on two mining laser upgrades, possibly even three. But you can also better resist suicide ganks by using a damage control and a couple of armor hardeners or energized adaptive nano membranes.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4 - 2012-08-14 12:33:52 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
I would not suggest you use tech 2 strip miners if you're new to mining, even if you're able to fit them. They are a lot more expensive and might just be a money drag if you accidentally lose a couple barges while learning. Tech 1 strip miners are more than adequate.

For maximum mining yield, you can definitely put on two mining laser upgrades, possibly even three. But you can also better resist suicide ganks by using a damage control and a couple of armor hardeners or energized adaptive nano membranes.


Armor tanking Retriever... Lol

20k EHP and decent yield.

[Retriever]

Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
Mining Laser Upgrade II
Damage Control II

Medium F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction

Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II

Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I



Jason TheDragon
Doomheim
#5 - 2012-08-14 12:34:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jason TheDragon
Due to the slots, there's not a lot of ways to tank your Retriever. Here's a few tips:

- Forget any kind of armor tanking. Your base armor is the lowest of shield/armor/hull, you can't fit a plate bigger than 200mm because of the grid, and even if you went all Trimark rigs to max out your armor buffer, you're still lagging behind a shield setup. Anything armor is also low slots, which means less potential MLU's, which means less yield. If you're concerned about EHP above all else, just fly a Procurer. You can get the same yield with a 3-4x better tank at the cost of the massive ore bay.

- One mid makes your shield choices pretty limited. 3x CDFE's is the way to go for rigs (dropping one for an ice mining rig loses you ~1k EHP). For the mid, you'll be best off with a T2 invuln, but beware you'll need some amount of cap skills to make this stable (EFT it for sure to see if it works for you). If you can't use T2 invulns, a named T1 invuln gives you ~700 less EHP. A named is better to use than T1, as it has lower cap usage. Really though, just train for T2 invulns, it just neesd a single Level IV skill.

Also RE: Shields, a Shield Booster of any kind is just an awful idea. Even a small eats too much cap to stay stable, which means either devoting rigs or lowslots to cap recharge, which means you'll lose tank in the end. A shield extender isn't a terrible idea, but you'd need a Medium to be in the same ballpark as a T2 Invuln, and that means a MAPC for powergrid, which means 1 less MLU. If youv'e got the cap skills, a T2 invuln is the better choice. If you don't, though, a best named MSE and a T1 MAPC is a good option as well until you get those cap skills trained up.

- Fit a Damage Control. 6k EHP on a ship that won't break 20k is huge, and going with 3x MLU's would require either a 6% CPU implant or a +CPU rig (at the cost of a CDFE and thus even more tank) at Max Fitting Skills. You'll need a 2% CPU implant at All V's if you use a T2 DC, but a best named fits without any implants.

- Hull tanking isn't really going to do much. T2 Bulkhead adds ~1k EHP at the cost of a MLU (since you need a Damage Control to make any kind of Hull tank work at all) assuming you keep the In

What you end up with is this:

[Retriever, T2 Strip Barge]
Mining Laser Upgrade II
Internal Force Field Array I (or DC II, see below)
Mining Laser Upgrade II

Adaptive Invulnerability Field II

Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I

Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

For Drones, you can do 1x flight of mining drones, or 1x of combat. Go with your heart.

19.3k EHP with the best named DC, 19.8k with the T2 DC (2% implant needed). Cap Stable with Cap skills at IV. T1 strips can be substituted for the T2 strips easily if you need (they need less fitting), just less yield obv.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-08-14 13:12:13 UTC
Here's a 31k EHP (with my skills) fit you can try:
(beware, it's approximately 31K against most attacks but much lower against hybrids, also not cap stable)

Damage Control II
Armor EM Hardener II
Armor Thermic Hardener II
-
Kinetic Deflection Field II
-
Strip Miner I
Strip Miner I
-
Medium Anti-Explosive Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Explosive Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Thermic Pump I

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Jason TheDragon
Doomheim
#7 - 2012-08-14 13:34:42 UTC
I just fired that fit in to see how truly bad it looks, and EFT only gives me 16k EHP (Uniform Damage profile) at All V's. Not sure how you got 31k.
Whang'Lo
Cosmically Irrelevant
#8 - 2012-08-14 19:08:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Whang'Lo
Who's gonna suicide gank a retriever? As far as I know never gonna happen.

Solo Mining in low sec doesn't really make any sense in terms of risk/reward.

The thing is if your solo mining in low sec it's just a matter of time before some
pirates find you. Doesn't really matter what your flying.

[u]A Paranoid is just someone with all the facts - William Burroughs[/u]

Traedar
InterStellar Trading Syndicate
#9 - 2012-08-14 19:11:45 UTC

The best way to tank your Retriever is to use a Procurer instead.

Roll
Idris Helion
Doomheim
#10 - 2012-08-14 19:44:43 UTC
Traedar wrote:

The best way to tank your Retriever is to use a Procurer instead.

Roll


QFT

Don't take a Retriever (or a Mack, for that matter) to lowsec or null unless you have a lot of armed escort or are behind a blue firewall. The Procurer/Skiff hull is the go-to ship for these situations -- good yield, decent ore bay, gigantic tank for the size.

Rigging a Retriever is kind of a waste of money, IMO. Two strips up top, three MLU's in the lows, and either a roid scanner or a shield in the mid. Throw some Hobs in the drone bay for taking out belt rats. You can tank rats in any system down to .5 in a Retriever, but you'll be nothing but gank-bait in lowsec or null with that loadout.
tsuggerpuppe
Doomheim
#11 - 2012-08-24 09:17:29 UTC
Looking for a Retriever fit for WH C1.

Is it possible to tank the sleepers, spawning in a gravimetric site in a Retriever or do I have to change to BC and kill the sleepers before continueing with the mining?

I am asking because I have no clue about the damage income of Sleepers in C1. It's just a plan at the moment.
Piugattuk
Litla Sundlaugin
#12 - 2012-08-24 20:22:06 UTC
OMG, OK go ahead to low sec with it if you want it blown up, fitting warp stabs your not getting away and the cheap HP on a retriever is not going to cut it, 2. there are no roids worth the trouble. but if you want to mine the high end ores then join a null bear corp, otherwise give up the dream of sucking up jaspet and spud just not worth it the cycle time will get you killed before you even get 1 cycle done. if you mine Veldspar in .6 system roids are up the to 125,000 units per roid up to 175 k in .5 system so you will fill up with 270 k worth of veld, X that by the local demand price ~ 16.30 isk and the you'll see your profit per hour by how much you can get per hour, at current prices you can fill that retriver with prox about 4 mil+ per haul. don't go to low sec. fitting should be 1. DCU in low 2 mining upgrades, mid, just put a roid analyzer no shield booster is gonna help if you get suicide gabled and you're rigs you can beef up EM resistance and explosive because they will most likely be using arties against you. if you have the skill a ecm drone "MIGHT" help its a long shot but why not. any way....
Cap James Tkirk
Baba Yagas
The Initiative.
#13 - 2012-08-24 23:19:50 UTC
tsuggerpuppe wrote:
Looking for a Retriever fit for WH C1.

Is it possible to tank the sleepers, spawning in a gravimetric site in a Retriever or do I have to change to BC and kill the sleepers before continueing with the mining?

I am asking because I have no clue about the damage income of Sleepers in C1. It's just a plan at the moment.



have your combat team clear the spawn of sleepers and tehy never respawn in the belt again. on another note if a player catches you mining tank is the least of your worries
Shereza
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-08-25 00:12:10 UTC
[Retriever, Low-Skill]
Damage Control I
Reinforced Bulkheads II
Micro Auxiliary Power Core I

Medium Shield Extender I

Ice Harvester I
Ice Harvester I

Medium Ice Harvester Accelerator I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

14.3k EHP at low skills.

[Retriever, High-Skill]
Damage Control II
Power Diagnostic System II
Reinforced Bulkheads II

Medium Shield Extender II

Ice Harvester II
Ice Harvester II

Medium Ice Harvester Accelerator I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

Just shy of 20.7k at maximum skills.

Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Here's a 31k EHP (with my skills) fit you can try:
(beware, it's approximately 31K against most attacks but much lower against hybrids, also not cap stable)

Damage Control II
Armor EM Hardener II
Armor Thermic Hardener II
-
Kinetic Deflection Field II
-
Strip Miner I
Strip Miner I
-
Medium Anti-Explosive Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Explosive Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Thermic Pump I


That build only gets 17,254 EHP in EFT at level 5 skills and has no HP buffer whatsoever for off-sides damage, and with only 12.5% shield EM and 23.5% armor explosive holes it's going to get off-side damage like there's no tomorrow. Against a ganker with any sort of capacity to understand the need to change damage types, and the ability to do so or the willingness to expend multiple ships in a sequenced attack, your build is worse than useless.

[Retriever, New Setup 4]
Damage Control II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II

Adaptive Invulnerability Field II

[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]

Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

That at least would get you 21,190 EHP at maximum skills. Swapping out the ice rig for a T2 EM shield resistance rig on the second build I posted would net you 21,941 EHP.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-09-03 04:17:40 UTC
Jason TheDragon wrote:
I just fired that fit in to see how truly bad it looks, and EFT only gives me 16k EHP (Uniform Damage profile) at All V's. Not sure how you got 31k.

You have to look at the amount for each type of damage. It's around 31k average between lasers, all projectile ammo except for depleted uranium and proton, and any single damage type. It's weak to anything that deals a significant amount of EM or thermal along with a significant amount of kinetic or explosive.

It works for ganks because most people just fit one ammo type. Most highsec mining barge suicide gankers seem to use either a destroyer or a tier 3 battlecruiser, and the weapons they use tend to either be small blasters or large artillery. Neither one of these is reasonably capable of finishing off the retriever fit I gave with any ammo type, even with tech 2 weapons.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Herr Hammer Draken
#16 - 2012-09-03 05:55:09 UTC
Whang'Lo wrote:
Who's gonna suicide gank a retriever? As far as I know never gonna happen.

Solo Mining in low sec doesn't really make any sense in terms of risk/reward.

The thing is if your solo mining in low sec it's just a matter of time before some
pirates find you. Doesn't really matter what your flying.



I have seen a guy dual boxing with cats suicide retty's and Macks. His motivation obviously is not Isk. But he has been doing it regular for the last week. Of course the secret with him at least is to be able to tank 2 cats, long enough for him to get concorded.

His main target is Hulks or Macks, but I have seen him take out retty's.

Maybe he made lots of barges prepatch and is using that cash profit to offset loses from the ganks.

Maybe he is just rich and does it for fun.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Boomhaur
#17 - 2012-09-03 07:15:18 UTC
If you mine in low sec watch local, it's easier that way to avoid all enemies. If it's not a friendly it's an enemy, I would just dock up or warp between safesports (moons, something) for the minute or so to see if they pass through the system if they don't you definately need to dock up NOW. Warp stabs are something I am not even sure I would consider, even for travel fits. As for trabel fits I rather use the MWD + Cloak trick, and as long as you watch local no one should be able to scram you, as you want a quite EMPTY system.

At end of the day I am not sure if low sec be worth the trouble, i may be, it may not be. I never mined so I can't tell you.

Welcome to Eve. Everyone here is an Evil Sick Sadistic Bastard who is out to get you. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either trying to scam you or use you.

Jack Mayhem
Kaer Industries
#18 - 2012-09-06 11:37:53 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Jason TheDragon wrote:
I just fired that fit in to see how truly bad it looks, and EFT only gives me 16k EHP (Uniform Damage profile) at All V's. Not sure how you got 31k.

You have to look at the amount for each type of damage. It's around 31k average between lasers, all projectile ammo except for depleted uranium and proton, and any single damage type. It's weak to anything that deals a significant amount of EM or thermal along with a significant amount of kinetic or explosive.

It works for ganks because most people just fit one ammo type. Most highsec mining barge suicide gankers seem to use either a destroyer or a tier 3 battlecruiser, and the weapons they use tend to either be small blasters or large artillery. Neither one of these is reasonably capable of finishing off the retriever fit I gave with any ammo type, even with tech 2 weapons.


Please GTFO and stop misguiding new player.

You should never armor tank a mining barge or exhumer. Also the most popular ganking ship is catalyst, and your fit is the weakest against it.

To summarize good tips from this thread:

  1. Don't go to to low- or null-sec.
  2. Best fit is: DCU, 2x MLU, Adaptive Invulnerability Field (named or T2), 2x mining turrets and 3x core extender rigs.
  3. You can also drop rigs as they are relatively expensive to hull price and won't protect you against gankers anyway.

stoicfaux
#19 - 2012-09-07 23:08:49 UTC
EHP: ~20,000
~25% chance of at least one of the ECM drones working against a Catalyst.

[Retriever, New Setup 1]
Reinforced Bulkheads II
Reinforced Bulkheads II
Damage Control II

Residual Survey Scanner I

Strip Miner I
Strip Miner I

Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I


Hobgoblin I x2
Hornet EC-300 x3

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#20 - 2012-09-07 23:39:06 UTC
stoicfaux wrote:
EHP: ~20,000
~25% chance of at least one of the ECM drones working against a Catalyst.

[Retriever, New Setup 1]
Reinforced Bulkheads II
Reinforced Bulkheads II
Damage Control II

Residual Survey Scanner I

Strip Miner I
Strip Miner I

Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I


Hobgoblin I x2
Hornet EC-300 x3


You are an evil and devious person.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

12Next page