These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

6 Pages of trolls

First post First post
Author
Taranius De Consolville
Doomheim
#81 - 2012-08-14 10:52:56 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
A small vocal majority on the forums leading the game while the rest of us suffer because your to stupid to know when to stop.
…and you have something statistics-like to back that up, presumably?

Quote:
If you dont want a pvp game full on
We do. That's why we play EVE.
If people have no interest in PvP, maybe it was a bit suboptimal to choose to play a PvP-centric game.


Sod off mate, your a well know forum troll who sits there trying to cause arguments
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#82 - 2012-08-14 10:55:05 UTC
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
Sod off mate
So you have nothing to back your assertions up.

Well, good. Then we can safely conclude that they're nonsense.
Taranius De Consolville
Doomheim
#83 - 2012-08-14 10:59:36 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
Sod off mate
So you have nothing to back your assertions up.

Well, good. Then we can safely conclude that they're nonsense.


You can sit there and pretend to be *educated* and use *big words*. However, that being said, simply looking over your forum history, you troll any thread you can post in, simply because you can, yet your borderline troll, which means you never personally attack or are abusive, and by that reasoning cannot be banned from the forums.

This is an issue in how CCP negates the responsibility of reprehensible behaviour in damaged individuals who spend all there time being pedantic and abusive, hurtful etc.

And this ofc is were you come in to the fore is it not?

Bottom line is, all pvpers whine they want carebears in null and low, why, because its easy kills, there is no other reason, there is no other point, it is simply that

Now you go ahead and multi quote and pick that apart :) No doubt u shall find a flaw all my sentences.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#84 - 2012-08-14 11:07:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
You can sit there and pretend to be *educated* and use *big words*.
I don't have to pretend, and no big words are used.

The simple fact remains: you are apparently unable to back up your assertions. The burden of proof is on you. Until you provide such evidence as to back up those assertions and make them believable, we can safely conclude that they are nonsense.

Quote:
Bottom line is, all pvpers whine they want carebears in null and low, why, because its easy kills, there is no other reason
…and you have something to back that claim up, presumably?

Anyway, first of all, the most common reason you'll hear is balance. So already there, you're wrong. Second of all, what they want is fewer carebears, in null, low, and highsec, and more people who don't suffer the illusions about the game that characterise the general carebear. What they want is more people to shoot. The nature of those people is completely inconsequential.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#85 - 2012-08-14 11:09:55 UTC
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
No doubt u shall find a flaw all my sentences.


One does not have to be a Tippia to find a flaw in your nonsense.

This is by far the stupidest thread of 2012.

.

Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#86 - 2012-08-14 11:10:36 UTC
Andski wrote:
so if I decide to undercut whatever you're building at greater quantity, at a price lower than what you can afford to sell, and dump it on the market, what is that?


Probably an alt from big alliance manipulating the market against another alt from another big alliance, witch in the end doesn't count Lol

brb

Pipa Porto
#87 - 2012-08-14 11:14:16 UTC
Roime wrote:
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
No doubt u shall find a flaw all my sentences.


One does not have to be a Tippia to find a flaw in your nonsense.

This is by far the stupidest thread of 2012.



Nah. There are plenty of worse threads than this. Not all of them are by TDC.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Danks
Fat Angry Toe Tappin Inbreds
#88 - 2012-08-14 11:18:25 UTC
Taranius De Consolville wrote:


*educated* ... *big words*


Look at this guy, he doesn't even know how to "air quote".

Also, I think he's confusing Carebear with Industrialist. Common mistake.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#89 - 2012-08-14 11:18:53 UTC
Links or those threads didn't happen!

I mean just re-read the OP :S

.

Taranius De Consolville
Doomheim
#90 - 2012-08-14 11:19:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Taranius De Consolville
Tippia wrote:
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
You can sit there and pretend to be *educated* and use *big words*.
I don't have to pretend, and no big words are used.

The simple fact remains: you are apparently unable to back up your assertions. The burden of proof is on you. Until you provide such evidence as to back up those assertions and make them believable, we can safely conclude that they are nonsense.

Quote:
Bottom line is, all pvpers whine they want carebears in null and low, why, because its easy kills, there is no other reason
…and you have something to back that claim up, presumably?

Anyway, first of all, the most common reason you'll hear is balance. So already there, you're wrong. Second of all, what they want is fewer carebears, in null, low, and highsec, and more people who don't suffer the illusions about the game that characterise the general carebear. What they want is more people to shoot. The nature of those people is completely inconsequential.


Your speak in circles and your sentences have no meaning what so ever

It's clever and half the dimwits on here think your very smart and clever

If your going to make a point, trying to speak coherently when typing sentences, not using a bunch non/null semantic sentences trying to make the rest of your post look coparsetic. (cant spell this word, never could)

Okay? Tah v much, all of your posts are nonsense. Round and round sentences designed to confuse the person you are trolling.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#91 - 2012-08-14 11:21:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
Your speak in circles and your sentences have no meaning what so ever
Sure they do. It's just not a meaning you like. The meaning is: you have nothing to back up your claims. The point doesn't become any clearer or more coherent than that. Your evasions doesn't change that or the fundamental point.

There are no circles. There's just this very simple point.
Aruken Marr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2012-08-14 11:24:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Aruken Marr
See I thought this guy was a troll but now I'm convinced he's just stupid. Really, really stupid.
CCP Goliath
C C P
C C P Alliance
#93 - 2012-08-14 11:31:22 UTC
"lets change EVE to pure PVP sov games, no industry, no mining, no missions, no incursions..."

This is basically Singularity's environment. I concur that EVE as a whole is far greater than any specific part of EVE.

CCP Goliath | QA Director | EVE Illuminati | @CCP_Goliath

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#94 - 2012-08-14 11:39:37 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Seriously all the NULL seccers "NERF ALL HI SEC INCOME" whine treads threads are tiresome. NULL SEC is a desert because it is populated with such whiney asshats.


Just hold that thought for a second there and tell us why hisec should have isk faucets that exceed those of null.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Taranius De Consolville
Doomheim
#95 - 2012-08-14 11:40:26 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
"lets change EVE to pure PVP sov games, no industry, no mining, no missions, no incursions..."

This is basically Singularity's environment. I concur that EVE as a whole is far greater than any specific part of EVE.


Awsum, even a dumbass dev doesnt understand the forum post

great, no wonder eve is screwed up
Kiandoshia
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#96 - 2012-08-14 11:40:38 UTC
Taranius De Consolville wrote:
So

Apparently us high sec dwellers are cowards and never do any pvp, we run from conflict and we hide doing missions and mining and according to pvp pilots, we are ruining the game and we never stop complaining.

Okay, let's fix it CCP, let's try it for a week, let's put the server into what im calling a ghost phase. Here is what you will need to do.

All industrial ships will need to be removed
All blueprints will need to be removed
All star bases will need to run on PI only goods, no wait, ud need blueprints for that, no, remove starbases fuel needs.
Change all empire 0.5-0.9 except for RENS/AMARR/DODXIEI/JITA and leave those as 1.0 systems for market hubs

You will need to seed all ships/modules at set prices.

You will need to remove refining as industry is no longer needed.

And Then we will see how this will go down with your *real* player base, not the 25% vocal majority

So CCP, lets try it out, lets do what they want, lets change EVE to pure PVP sov games, no industry, no mining, no missions, no incursions, nothing that makes ISK *easily* and make everything hard and serious *RISK VERSES REWARD* and see what happens.

Personally

EvE = Dead game

But, lets give it a try, lets do what they want, im being dead serious, lets do it, lets really do it, lets show them how screwed up the game would be if it was pure PVP based with no carebears, SHOW THEM

Insults so far:

Troll
Fail
*******
Man living in his mums basement
No clue about eve at all
Stupid
Should be war decced non stop (simply because i posted a forum idea)

Please feel free to add, i am simply highlighting the reprehensible behaviour of eve players.


Go to the test server =3
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#97 - 2012-08-14 11:43:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
CCP Goliath wrote:
"lets change EVE to pure PVP sov games, no industry, no mining, no missions, no incursions..."

This is basically Singularity's environment. I concur that EVE as a whole is far greater than any specific part of EVE.
…and funnily enough, it's also that other environment that is described in a later post: a game where there is no PvP and where, if you have no interest in it, you can play without it.

You guys should apply for some kind of quantum research grant for that server. Blink
Josef Djugashvilis
#98 - 2012-08-14 11:47:35 UTC
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
People pay to play. If you pay for my account I will gladly play the way you ask. Untill then I will pay my $14.99 per month and play the game how I choose not you. Carebares dont force manufacturing on you so why force pvp on those who dont want it?

To each is own. If I dont like it then I stop paying.


Nonsense.

Eve without nonconsensual pvp would be...well, another theme park game.

A sort of Sim City with the bad events turned off.

I can only assume the op posted first and sobered up/thought later.

This is not a signature.

Zera Kerrigan
The 420th Token
#99 - 2012-08-14 11:48:55 UTC
Everyone and I mean EVERYONE knows how stupid the general PvP pilot when it comes to diplomatic stuff or see the wider picture.

When they got more expensive ships because mineral prices and speculations they whined like hell man!
Now when the mineral prices and ship prices go down they whine even more. Big smile
Aruken Marr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2012-08-14 11:49:16 UTC
I get more and more embarrassed when it becomes increasingly apparent that I share this idiot's nationality... :S