These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

high sec ice ?

First post
Author
Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#81 - 2011-10-12 20:52:11 UTC
Sure this may make some move to nullsec yet again, but for others, no matter what they do, they won't go. If they really want to get a lot back to 0.0, unnerf the anons..lol Plus a few other things and will have another mass exodus to 0.0.
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#82 - 2011-10-12 20:54:09 UTC
Sarrgon wrote:
Sure this may make some move to nullsec yet again, but for others, no matter what they do, they won't go. If they really want to get a lot back to 0.0, unnerf the anons..lol Plus a few other things and will have another mass exodus to 0.0.


Yeah why not get it done an make the whole game like 0.0
Get rid of CONCORD. If the Ice interdiction has showed anything, theyre useless anyways

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#83 - 2011-10-12 20:56:34 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
Yeah why not get it done an make the whole game like 0.0
Get rid of CONCORD. If the Ice interdiction has showed anything, theyre useless anyways

Excellent ideas. I will mention them to Chairman For Life The Mittani.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#84 - 2011-10-12 21:09:30 UTC
How about this, larger the alliance, more bounty concord places on them in 0.0, make pvp semi profitable and promote more PVP. And larger the alliance is, more of a target you will beBig smile
Khamal Jolstien
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#85 - 2011-10-12 21:14:25 UTC
Sarrgon wrote:
How about this, larger the alliance, more bounty concord places on them in 0.0, make pvp semi profitable and promote more PVP. And larger the alliance is, more of a target you will beBig smile


Do this, and I can assure you I'll enjoy podding my alts every day.
EVE Stig
Doomheim
#86 - 2011-10-12 21:15:07 UTC
Sarrgon wrote:
How about this, larger the alliance, more bounty concord places on them in 0.0, make pvp semi profitable and promote more PVP. And larger the alliance is, more of a target you will beBig smile


and unlimitedly sized alliances as well.
allow alliances to get as big as they want

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#87 - 2011-10-12 21:20:45 UTC
No bounties on pods, but on the ships they fly, kinda like it is on ratting, just on 0.0 alliances Cool
Harold Tuphlos
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#88 - 2011-10-12 21:25:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Harold Tuphlos
shoot purples errday?


because we would want the people undocking noobships not to get payed.
EVE Stig
Doomheim
#89 - 2011-10-12 21:43:07 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
Yeah why not get it done an make the whole game like 0.0
Get rid of CONCORD. If the Ice interdiction has showed anything, theyre useless anyways

Excellent ideas. I will mention them to Chairman For Life The Mittani.


Given that all the things in the winter expansion were supposedly their ideas, wonder if this'll be in the Spring one

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

Kiran
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#90 - 2011-10-12 21:45:58 UTC
The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.

1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.

2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)

3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.

If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox.
Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#91 - 2011-10-12 21:50:22 UTC
Well like ratting, bigger the ship higher the bounties, smaller the ship smaller the bounties and small like in ratting so it wouldn't nearly cover the cost of the ship to avoid abuse.
Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2011-10-12 22:08:40 UTC
Kiran wrote:
The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.

1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.

2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)

3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.

If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox.



Exactly THIS....will happen and then CCP can slowly go over to kiss Eve good bye and if the trolls on the Forums doesn't will believe it remove Hisec ice and Eve REALLY will die horrible and slow dead.
The Apostle
Doomheim
#93 - 2011-10-12 22:21:53 UTC
Kiran wrote:
The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.

1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.

2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)

3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.

If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox.

As much as I "carebear" these days and run POS's etc. this is not quite true.

The only thing a high-sec POS effectively allows is for you to work on BPO's/BPC's and copies. ALL of which can be done in stations - albeit, waiting 3 months for a slot. This can be easily remedied at the flick of a switch by CCP.

All production on any item that can be done in a highsec POS can also be done in station.

It will mean a rationalization of highsec POS's at worst but will it force 0.0 alliances to mine their own ice and this alone makes them very, very vulnerable. This can only be a good thing.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Terminal Entry
New Fnord Industries
#94 - 2011-10-13 02:36:12 UTC
Akara Ito wrote:
Terminal Entry wrote:
Just remove all Ice from the game and have POSes powered from a reactor, just like the capacitor is in ships.

The less 'Logistics-Online' the better.



Guess what the reactors would be fuelled with ?Roll


Exactly the same thing as ship reactors are of course! Roll

You seem to be wedded to the idea that POSes need to be fueled and that there isn't another way to balance them.

Kiran
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#95 - 2011-10-13 10:33:23 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Kiran wrote:
The removal of Ice from high sec will do one of a few things to Eve.

1) The prices of items will go through the roof, you wont buy a Rifter for under 5 million isk. Because ice for the POS's in high sec will cost to much because the null sec alliances will have a strangle hold on it.

2) Industry in high sec will suffer overall as small industry corps shut down and leave the game. (Some people do not wish to play in low sec or null sec.)

3) High sec will become empty as people either leave the game or become null sec mining slaves.

If you wish to kill the markets and industry in New Eden then remove Ice from high sec. And then the game stops being a sandbox.

As much as I "carebear" these days and run POS's etc. this is not quite true.

The only thing a high-sec POS effectively allows is for you to work on BPO's/BPC's and copies. ALL of which can be done in stations - albeit, waiting 3 months for a slot. This can be easily remedied at the flick of a switch by CCP.

All production on any item that can be done in a highsec POS can also be done in station.

It will mean a rationalization of highsec POS's at worst but will it force 0.0 alliances to mine their own ice and this alone makes them very, very vulnerable. This can only be a good thing.


Before POS's was released we had the same amount of industry slots in stations as we do today and with even less people playing you still had to wait 3 months for a slot.
I can not see CCP giving high sec stations more industry slots.

I remeber I had to move to a 0.4 system to get any industry slots and this was in the time when 0.4 was still under concord protection. But with high sec now smaller than it use to be factory slots in empire are a lot less.
loser mclame fatty
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2011-10-13 11:02:26 UTC
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:

You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.

Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again.


holy **** do you also live in nigeria and have a large quantity of money you need me to help you move in exchange for a 20% cut but first you need a $5,000 tracking fee
Alain Kinsella
#97 - 2011-10-13 11:03:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Alain Kinsella
The suggestion I had made in the old thread was to remove Ice completely (as a mining mechanic) and redo as P2 planet products (for the core products anyway - Stront would be made in the same reaction chambers that you do boosters in, giving a boost to Low). The Mackinaw would become a gas miner, though it would require some tank adjustment.

I still think this would be a reasonable idea, and would not take much dev work; Everything is there already, just extend to replace.

"The Meta Game does not stop at the game. Ever."

Currently Retired / Semi-Casual (pending changes to RL concerns).

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2011-10-13 11:29:52 UTC
loser mclame fatty wrote:
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:

You Sir seems not gotten the point i wanted to bring up aside from the large impact Hiseciceremoving will have not only on infrastructure, market and economy it also will FORCE....i repeat me agein FORCE technically players to leave hisec to go to either lowsec or 0.0 to get what they need.....please understand there are peoples DOESN'T want to go there at all....they simply decided to stay in hisec cause of beeing saved before the stress low and 0.0 sec activity can cause....stress which if it really gets bad and hard kills every relaxing amount this game can and had for them.

Remember, some peoples are coming home from a stressfull day at work and loggin in to eve to have a bit relaxing activities here and enjoying their stay with some friends they have here as well....if this goes away....those players will go away ( leave ) as well and that Sir....is a promise which will happen if CCP is not finally ligthens up and starts to think a bit themselfes again.


holy **** do you also live in nigeria and have a large quantity of money you need me to help you move in exchange for a 20% cut but first you need a $5,000 tracking fee


STFU and learn to read!!
pussnheels
Viziam
#99 - 2011-10-13 11:30:38 UTC  |  Edited by: pussnheels
Basicly the whole idea of moving people into low sec is flawed with the current alliance pvp only mentallity and politics

At the moment ,how i see it is is actually easier and cheaper for nullsec alliance just to mine the abc ores and exploit moons for moo goo , take what they need for their own use and sell the rest in high sec and buy their low end minerals and ice products there and still end up with a huge profit, which makes sense

It is not that there aren't any opportunities for a ondustrial in nullsec, just the mentallity isn't there to expand a alliance industrial base and to become selfsufficient
What hardcore pvp pilot would want to babysit over a bunch of iceminers while he could do plexes and earn a few 100 millions
Second most ex nullsec dwellers eventually left nullsec because they despise the politics and the drama or got sick and tired being treated as second rat e citizen or ending up as target practice by a alliance that is actually blue to the sov holding alliance they belong or rent from

Alot of people who are into industry or mining i know in high sec really want to have a go in nullsec but sadly like i said before the mentallity and current sov mechanics making this very hard if not impossible

And removing high sec ice will certainly not get more people into null sec

just my thoughts

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2011-10-13 11:35:56 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
Basicly the whole idea of moving people into low sec is flawed with the current alliance pvp only mentallity and politics

At the moment ,how i see it is is actually easier and cheaper for nullsec alliance just to mine the abc ores and exploit moons for moo goo , take what they need for their own use and sell the rest in high sec and buy their low end minerals and ice products there and still end up with a huge profit, which makes sense

It is not that there aren't any opportunities for a ondustrial in nullsec, just the mentallity isn't there to expand a alliance industrial base and to become selfsufficient
What hardcore pvp pilot would want to babysit over a bunch of iceminers while he could do plexes and earn a few 100 millions
Second most ex nullsec dwellers eventually left nullsec because they despise the politics and the drama or got sick and tired being treated as second rat e citizen or ending up as target practice by a alliance that is actually blue to the sov holding alliance they belong or rent from

Alot of people who are into industry or mining i know in high sec really want to have a go in nullsec but sadly like i said before the mentallity and current sov mechanics making this very hard of not impossible

And removing high sec ice will certainly not get more people into null sec

just my thoughts


Pretty much this i agree to....and technically all pro's and con's allready have been said....so i think it's about time CCP makes realy a final statement about the whole topic in regards to removing ice completely from hisec.

Come on CCP....lets hear your voice its about time NOW!!