These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Time to re-balance ores yet?

Author
Frying Doom
#21 - 2012-08-11 23:33:33 UTC
Droxlyn wrote:
I have a chart with a suggested set of changed values:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av49RIDL-V7zdHNyVzQxOGRUVDZDeUc3czVsN0dJVVE#gid=4

The high-end ores need lots of low end minerals to ensure their value.

Drox

So your talking about flooding the market with low-end minerals and removing mining for Hi-sec.

There would be no purpose to mining in Hi-sec as with the current Null sec miners the hi-end minerals have already over saturated the market place (Why they are worth so little) and now you are proposing the same for the low end minerals.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#22 - 2012-08-11 23:38:39 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
As for nullsec being safer - it is. But it's not magically safer. We MAKE it safer.


It doesn't matter why nullsec is safer, just that it is safer.
Jimmy Gunsmythe
Sebiestor Tribe
#23 - 2012-08-11 23:42:29 UTC
Zifrian wrote:
stoicfaux wrote:
Mining barehanded in the dark a mile (1.6 km) below ground in a Chinese mine for granite is also risky, the rewards should be greater.

You need to do better than that to troll my thread.

You've trolled your own thread by merely writing it.

This is cause and effect, and it's made manifest by the market. But by all means, if all the reward is in hisec, then come and join the hundreds of thousands of players making their fortunes there.

John Hancock

James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#24 - 2012-08-11 23:47:45 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
As for nullsec being safer - it is. But it's not magically safer. We MAKE it safer.


It doesn't matter why nullsec is safer, just that it is safer.

I disagree. If you have territory and you protect it, you're entitled to the benefits. Likewise, if you fail to protect your space and lose access (as has happened to countless empires countless times), then you suffer the consequences. Also, I'd argue that if you can lose your space, it wasn't really "safe" to begin with. Smile
Alexzandvar Douglass
Motiveless Malignity
Deepwater Hooligans
#25 - 2012-08-11 23:48:05 UTC
A lot of rocks get mined regardless of value because all they go towards is making Ships. Many mins never reach the market and are simply traded around internally by Corps or between Industry corps.

To throw out a guess, a good 70% of all minerals mined in Null sec never reaches the open market.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#26 - 2012-08-11 23:50:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
Zifrian wrote:
We going to get Spod looked at? Ie Spodzilla in the hidden belts? Hard to want to flip a belt when you have to mine that crap rock for a day.


Spod could be "fixed" by taking out the tritanium and sticking in a couple of hundred Zydrine per refine batch (and perhaps a trace of Nocxium). Omber could be "fixed" by taking out tritanium and putting in some Mexallon. I'd also "fix" Pyrox by adding a little Pyerite and taking out the Noxcium — that mineral should not be present in static belts in hisec.

Teensy little tweaks: no sledgehammer of gamechanging doom required.
Alexzandvar Douglass
Motiveless Malignity
Deepwater Hooligans
#27 - 2012-08-11 23:56:06 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Zifrian wrote:
We going to get Spod looked at? Ie Spodzilla in the hidden belts? Hard to want to flip a belt when you have to mine that crap rock for a day.


Spod could be "fixed" by taking out the tritanium and sticking in a couple of hundred Zydrine per refine batch (and perhaps a trace of Nocxium). Omber could be "fixed" by taking out tritanium and putting in some Mexallon. I'd also "fix" Pyrox by adding a little Pyerite and taking out the Noxcium — that mineral should not be present in static belts in hisec.

Teensy little tweaks: no sledgehammer of gamechanging doom required.


Best way to make Spod wanted: make it give a crap load megaciyte. It is not wanted for low yield, not to mention the fact it gives nothing else useful.

Everyone skips for the ABC's so make it give a little mega than those.
Frying Doom
#28 - 2012-08-11 23:59:35 UTC
James 315 wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
As for nullsec being safer - it is. But it's not magically safer. We MAKE it safer.


It doesn't matter why nullsec is safer, just that it is safer.

I disagree. If you have territory and you protect it, you're entitled to the benefits. Likewise, if you fail to protect your space and lose access (as has happened to countless empires countless times), then you suffer the consequences. Also, I'd argue that if you can lose your space, it wasn't really "safe" to begin with. Smile

Yes and one of the benefits of making it safer is that you run the risk of being able to over supply minerals.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Alexzandvar Douglass
Motiveless Malignity
Deepwater Hooligans
#29 - 2012-08-12 00:01:10 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
James 315 wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
As for nullsec being safer - it is. But it's not magically safer. We MAKE it safer.


It doesn't matter why nullsec is safer, just that it is safer.

I disagree. If you have territory and you protect it, you're entitled to the benefits. Likewise, if you fail to protect your space and lose access (as has happened to countless empires countless times), then you suffer the consequences. Also, I'd argue that if you can lose your space, it wasn't really "safe" to begin with. Smile

Yes and one of the benefits of making it safer is that you run the risk of being able to over supply minerals.


Every Capital and Super Capital construction corp like mine would kill to have the risk of "An over supply of minerals" it's just that theres little to no incentive to sell raw mins rather than make it into something.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#30 - 2012-08-12 00:02:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
James 315 wrote:
If you have territory and you protect it, you're entitled to the benefits.


The benefit of protecting territory is that it is protected. That's a no brainer. So you're actually agreeing with me.
Zifrian
The Frog Pond
Ribbit.
#31 - 2012-08-12 00:02:37 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Droxlyn wrote:
I have a chart with a suggested set of changed values:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av49RIDL-V7zdHNyVzQxOGRUVDZDeUc3czVsN0dJVVE#gid=4

The high-end ores need lots of low end minerals to ensure their value.

Drox

So your talking about flooding the market with low-end minerals and removing mining for Hi-sec.

There would be no purpose to mining in Hi-sec as with the current Null sec miners the hi-end minerals have already over saturated the market place (Why they are worth so little) and now you are proposing the same for the low end minerals.


I would like to see the majority of mining happening in nullsec yes.

Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour!

Import CCP's SDE - EVE SDE Database Builder

Frying Doom
#32 - 2012-08-12 00:03:10 UTC
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
James 315 wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
As for nullsec being safer - it is. But it's not magically safer. We MAKE it safer.


It doesn't matter why nullsec is safer, just that it is safer.

I disagree. If you have territory and you protect it, you're entitled to the benefits. Likewise, if you fail to protect your space and lose access (as has happened to countless empires countless times), then you suffer the consequences. Also, I'd argue that if you can lose your space, it wasn't really "safe" to begin with. Smile

Yes and one of the benefits of making it safer is that you run the risk of being able to over supply minerals.


Every Capital and Super Capital construction corp like mine would kill to have the risk of "An over supply of minerals" it's just that theres little to no incentive to sell raw mins rather than make it into something.

There must be some incentive, otherwise the market would not be so saturated atm.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Garreth Vlox
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2012-08-12 00:05:10 UTC
Zifrian wrote:
http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/5084/image2qls.jpg

So 3 high sec ores are better than all lowsec and nullsec ores? Most null/low ores are at the bottom? Miners in nullsec or low sec take more risks and have to deal with things like poor refining rates (not to mention station tax). Risk goes up, reward should go up.

We going to get Spod looked at? Ie Spodzilla in the hidden belts? Hard to want to flip a belt when you have to mine that crap rock for a day.


If you have a small belt upgrade there's no reason not to get to the next indy level and then you have 2 belts. You keep doing this until you have level 5 then you just mine around the big ******* rock and after stripping that belt you go to the next and mine around the big ******* rock and you keep doing this because there is no way you should be able to mine out all of the belts in a system before the first one you stripped respawns a fresh belt. If you haven't figured out how to time your belt cycling this long after those changes its no wonder your in drone space.

The LULZ Boat.

Zifrian
The Frog Pond
Ribbit.
#34 - 2012-08-12 00:05:48 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Zifrian wrote:
We going to get Spod looked at? Ie Spodzilla in the hidden belts? Hard to want to flip a belt when you have to mine that crap rock for a day.


Spod could be "fixed" by taking out the tritanium and sticking in a couple of hundred Zydrine per refine batch (and perhaps a trace of Nocxium). Omber could be "fixed" by taking out tritanium and putting in some Mexallon. I'd also "fix" Pyrox by adding a little Pyerite and taking out the Noxcium — that mineral should not be present in static belts in hisec.

Teensy little tweaks: no sledgehammer of gamechanging doom required.


Right, small tweaks not massively upending the system like removing drone poo..What?

As far as null sec being safer, I mined in high sec for probably 5 years and never once got ganked. Can't say the same for null.

Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour!

Import CCP's SDE - EVE SDE Database Builder

Zifrian
The Frog Pond
Ribbit.
#35 - 2012-08-12 00:07:14 UTC
Garreth Vlox wrote:
Zifrian wrote:
http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/5084/image2qls.jpg

So 3 high sec ores are better than all lowsec and nullsec ores? Most null/low ores are at the bottom? Miners in nullsec or low sec take more risks and have to deal with things like poor refining rates (not to mention station tax). Risk goes up, reward should go up.

We going to get Spod looked at? Ie Spodzilla in the hidden belts? Hard to want to flip a belt when you have to mine that crap rock for a day.


If you have a small belt upgrade there's no reason not to get to the next indy level and then you have 2 belts. You keep doing this until you have level 5 then you just mine around the big ******* rock and after stripping that belt you go to the next and mine around the big ******* rock and you keep doing this because there is no way you should be able to mine out all of the belts in a system before the first one you stripped respawns a fresh belt. If you haven't figured out how to time your belt cycling this long after those changes its no wonder your in drone space.

I absolutely know how to rotate the industry belts. Mining around spod isn't the point.

Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour!

Import CCP's SDE - EVE SDE Database Builder

Alexzandvar Douglass
Motiveless Malignity
Deepwater Hooligans
#36 - 2012-08-12 00:08:31 UTC
If your talking about it being saturated in High-sec, than thats not an issue with Null sec, thats an issue with high sec mining.

In Null sec almost every single mineral for less than Jita price is almost instantly vaccumed up by hungry Capital Corps.

Oh and, if you all think that destroying hulks and other mining barges makes prices go up if you live in null sec, your crazy.
Frying Doom
#37 - 2012-08-12 00:14:05 UTC
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:
If your talking about it being saturated in High-sec, than thats not an issue with Null sec, thats an issue with high sec mining.

In Null sec almost every single mineral for less than Jita price is almost instantly vaccumed up by hungry Capital Corps.

Oh and, if you all think that destroying hulks and other mining barges makes prices go up if you live in null sec, your crazy.

Actually I am talking about the prices of Null sec minerals for sale in High sec and there price being low due to over saturation of the market.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#38 - 2012-08-12 00:40:45 UTC
Garreth Vlox wrote:
You keep doing this until you have level 5


Bad, bad mistake. The minute you hit indy 5, you get cloaky campers 24/7.
Xearal
Dead's Prostitutes
The Initiative.
#39 - 2012-08-12 01:17:51 UTC
it's simply a market effect.. it's not the ores themselves that are the problem, tweak them and you will just change prices around a bit.

Due to permageddon, a lot of high sec mining has gone boom, high sec mining is one of the prime suppliers of low end minerals in empire, as the low end ores mined in null are all used by capital production down there. The reason the price for all those low ends is going up is simply because supply cannot keep up with demand for them.

I'm a high sec manufacturer myself, and while I can easily get my hands on all the high ends I need, tritanium, pyerite and mexalon ( and isogen to a degree ), are much harder for me to get in sufficient quantities to have my operations run smoothly.
I'm quite sure I'm not the only manufacturer with this problem. The reason being that demand for high end minerals are much lower than the low end minerals when it comes to amounts, combine this with a massive surplus of these high ends going to market in empire by the bucketload from nullsec mining ops, and you get an oversupply of these, while low ends are still not catching up.

The last blog on mining was that it had gone up somewhat in highsec, a little more in low, and massively up in nullsec.
As miners in null sec generally go for the ABCs, as that's supposed to be the most valuable ore, they oversupply the markets with their high end minerals, killing their own prices. Meanwhile due to gankage, high sec mining is lacking behind in supplying the required low end minerals for manufacturers to crank up their production further, thus creating this 'imbalance'.
Also note, that afaik, the low end minerals also are available in null sec to mine. It's not like high sec is the only place to mine these. But due to their low value per m3, shipping these to empire isn't worth a lot.
I know some miners of low ends that see the prices in Jita which are higher than in our region, but they do the math, and having them exported by jumpfreighter costs them more than the difference in price, so it's not worth it for them to export them to Jita.
instead, they are sold/used locally by manufacturers, my guess is that this happens even more in nullsec where those mienrals would be very usefull in manufacturing capital ships and whatnot.

you can't simply wave a magic wand, invent some new ores/tweak current ones, and this 'problem' will go away. this would simply shift prices around a bit, until another equilibrium is reached. As mining in null is at the moment more prolific than in high, whatever this new equilibrium would be, would still favor high sec minerals, simply because they are mined less, and exporting the low end minerals is simply not profitable.

Does railgun ammunition come in Hollow Point?

Bootleg Jack
ACME Mineral and Gas
#40 - 2012-08-12 01:23:39 UTC
dupe post

I'm an American, English is my second language...