These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hulk nerf

Author
CorInaXeraL
The Dresdeneers
#81 - 2012-08-09 20:03:49 UTC
moronv wrote:
It's OK guys, I GOT THIS.



Roger that.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#82 - 2012-08-09 20:08:44 UTC
Mr Beardsley wrote:
The only rigs worth using on it were cargo rigs


Cargo rigs have been worst rigs for barges/exhumers from day one.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2012-08-09 21:48:56 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Derath Ellecon wrote:
Mr Beardsley wrote:
CCP needs to offer some sort of rig buy-back program when they do major changes like this. The Hulk was the ONLY mining ship for any purpose but ice mining. The only rigs worth using on it were cargo rigs, because the ones that boost a single type of mineral yield are only good for a small number of nullsec gangs. Add to that the loss you'll take trading a Hulk for a Mack and miners just got taken sans lube. Again.



Haha.





I think he's serious.

... which makes it all the funnier.Lol


Yea Boo hoo. When the drone amps came out I had to break some pricey sentry damage rigs to optimize my fits too. Stuff happens.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#84 - 2012-08-09 21:57:12 UTC
I'm mining the same amount as before in my Hulk, and it has more EHP now, so I don't agree it was nerfed.

It would be more accurate to state it wasn't buffed as much as the others.
Cold Fury
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2012-08-09 21:57:14 UTC
Wow. Really? This ruins my solo experience quite a bit. I barely have time to play and when I do I just mine with my Hulk and now my cargo space is raped to nothing. Fantastic. Thanks CCP.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#86 - 2012-08-09 23:47:47 UTC
Cold Fury wrote:
Wow. Really? This ruins my solo experience quite a bit. I barely have time to play and when I do I just mine with my Hulk and now my cargo space is raped to nothing. Fantastic. Thanks CCP.


Such little vision.

Buy Mack

Mine almost as good as a hulk. Better afk with a 35k ore bay.

Aud Actori
Ciomach Oibriche
#87 - 2012-08-10 08:45:40 UTC
moronv wrote:
Well just sold 3 hulks and bought 3 macks at a loss of about 27 mill. shame i never bought them yesterday at 3 for 270 mill. I pity people that have manufactured hulks who will want to buy them now?


Hulks still have a niche; its just you that hasn't found it.
Aud Actori
Ciomach Oibriche
#88 - 2012-08-10 10:37:10 UTC
Mr Beardsley wrote:
CCP needs to offer some sort of rig buy-back program when they do major changes like this..


ROFL!
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#89 - 2012-08-10 10:40:25 UTC
Last time I flew a mining ship was in 07 or so.

I think I can fly up to a covetor but can't uses exhumers.... Or maybe I can. At the moment can't login to check. I have and fly an orca though. But I doubt the skills would be the same for exhumers.

Anyhow... did they only change exhumers? Or are barges different too? Is it worth dusting off my covetor?
Julien Brellier
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#90 - 2012-08-10 11:57:06 UTC
Hulk gets more HP, more PG, more CPU and still outmines anything else.

Hulk pilots start dozens of TEARZ threads.

I don't understand.........Roll
moronv
Doomheim
#91 - 2012-08-10 12:07:26 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
moronv wrote:
Well it looks like my playing days have just been revived, The Hulk has finally been nerfed. Max Ore cargo 8,500 m3 cant expand it any bigger
so now i switch to macks with a fantastic 35k m3 ore hold thankyou ccpOops


and less yield.. it's a trade off.


No not less yield more yield much more yield, reason is i kine to a pos so my hulks had cargo expanders etc... My macks with there 35k m3 ore holds allow me to fit 3 mining laser upgrades so much more yield infact i am mining 25-30 mill more per hour with 2 macks boosted by a fully maxed out orca stationed in pos.
xxzartanxx
Doomheim
#92 - 2012-08-10 12:19:28 UTC
Mr Beardsley wrote:
CCP needs to offer some sort of rig buy-back program when they do major changes like this..



[/quote]


They should do the same with the subscription fees and the GTC's when they go free to play at some point hahaha.
vyshnegradsky
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#93 - 2012-08-10 13:22:04 UTC
Caruleum Ursa wrote:
MINERS WERE DECEIVED by promo for the INFERNO RELEASE !

They promoted this new release as an IMPROVEMENT for MINING, but...
CCP SHRUNK THE SIZE OF HULK CARGO HOLDS FROM ~1000+ to ~350k.
HULK PILOTS cannot even keep replacement sets of mining lasers in their Cargo Holds, anymore.

HULK is now essentially WORTHLESS for multi-purpose mining.
There is no reason to train for HULK, anymore, imho.

IMHO, this will be remembered as one of the biggest nerfs in the history of EvE.

Who would ever even want to buy a HULK, anymore?
It doesn't even have HOLD big enough for the MINING CRYSTALS!
Oh, wai... it's ALSO supposed to MINE STUFF? OMG OMG OMG.

But, fear not,... YES, they buffed the smaller versions so you can now go into combat with your SKIFF and MACKINAW.
HA HA HA - I get the joke. But, it's a cruel joke for those who earn isk by mining.

Time to SELL YOUR MINING CHAR!
[Or, I guess you could buy a MACK and improve it with some T/P TECH.]

BAH, HUMBUG!
So much time WASTED in training up for the NOW WORTHLESS HULKS!


Oh he mad

This one's a bit over the edge guys.

Locked for breaking... well, pretty much all the rules.

  • CCP Falcon
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#94 - 2012-08-10 13:37:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Vincent Athena
nat longshot wrote:


WAAAA cant carry 30 crystal's any more meaning you have to plan out what you mine cry some more!!


Actually, you can get 30 crystals in a hulk, at least for your trip to the mining site.

What Im thinking of here is the case where you are going to a mining op many jumps away and want to bring as many crystals as possible. What you do is

Strip the lows and add expanded cargoholds
Load in small and medium cans
Fill said cans with crystals and your old low modules
Fly to the designated system
Dock up, trade your extra crystals to the hauler (its a fleet op, theres going to be a hauler)
Refit your lows
Go mine

The issue is this is alot of extra steps for hulk pilots that they use to not have to do. But it can be done.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Idris Helion
Doomheim
#95 - 2012-08-10 14:21:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Idris Helion
Dave stark wrote:
Bad Axe wrote:
Toroup wrote:
Wow, ok. So if you want the marginally better yield of the Hulk then jetcan it and have a hauler. If you want to solo mine then use the Mack. No reason to be so over dramatic about it. Hulks have better yield but you have to haul to make it work. It's a change, you adapt.

For me personally, I have always jetcanned so it really doesn't matter.



Really?Ugh


every one with a braincell jetcan mines, before today no ships had a big enough capacity to justify not jetcan mining.


QFT

If you were solo mining in a Hulk without a dedicated hauler or an Orca nearby, you were wasting your Hulk's yield on trips back to station. (In Eve as in RL, time is money. Time you spend running back to station to offload is time you're not spending in the belt burning up roids, hence less ISK in your pocket.) If you were running a cargo-maxed Hulk, you sacrificed MLU's in your lows, which meant that you were sacrificing up to 10% of your per-cycle yield...essentially for nothing, because simply having a hauler nearby and jetcanning your ore is not only more efficient and faster, it also allows you do ditch the cargo expanders and fit MLU's in your lows (or armor tank of some kind). And instead of spending a ridiculous amount of money on cargo rigs, you can get armor/shield rigs instead and keep your Hulk properly tanked.

The new Ret/Mack may finally make jetcanning less efficient than storing the ore onboard in some scenarios.

People crying about "losing" their high-cost cargo rigs need to remember two things: 1) it's only a loss if you sell or re-rig your Hulk; and 2) the rigs still expand your (smaller) cargo bay.

Also, I wish all the whiners would actually read the patch notes -- a Mack will produce damned near the same yield your Hulk did prior to the patch, have nearly as big a tank, and a ginormous ore hold (35K m3) that puts even your old cargo-maxed Hulk to shame. The only downside is that you can't carry three different sets of every mining crystal in creation, but doing this was FAIL even before the patch. Your Orca or hauler should be carrying spare crystals out to you. 1 spare set on board for your high-value types works just fine. (And you can anchor some secure containers around the belt and warehouse more crystals if you're afraid you'll run low while there's no support ship around.)

For hisec mining, the Mack is an omg pimpmobile mining platform -- it may actually be overpowered for its role because it'll make AFK mining and botting even more prevalent now. And it'll do this for about 2/3 of what it used to cost to get a properly-fitted Hulk. I'm actually seeing places where I'd use a Retriever rather than a Mack -- at 10% of the cost of a Mack, a Ret is in the same ballpark in terms of ore capacity and yield, and it'd be perfect for higher-risk ops where you don't want to lose your expensive Mack (such as during Hulkageddon). The Hulk still has a place in fleets -- in fact, if you were jetcan mining before, your playstyle won't change at all. The Hulk is still the king of yield; it's just not the end-all be-all mining vessel it used to be. Which is a good thing, not a bad thing.

People moaning about the "nerf" to the Hulk don't understand the concpet of "opportunity cost" very well. The longer I'm in the belt running my lasers on roids, the higher my ISK/hr. Better yield from my lasers won't help if I'm running back and forth to the station every five minutes. And giving my Hulk a paper tank because I want to max my cargo is FAIL when some ganker comes along and blows up my expensive ship because I couldn't be bothered to tank it properly -- all that extra cargo space I sacrificed my tank to get now just cost me a 300M ISK ship. More tank, less gank, kids. You're never safe in EVE, even in hisec.

One more thing about tank: you can tank up a Mack to be almost as strong as an untanked Skiff, with a way bigger ore-hold. I'm glad that the Procurer/Skiff hull finally has some larger purpose in the game, but I still think that even low and nullsec players will opt for a tanked Mack rather than a Skiff except in places like WH space and contested systems in null.
Ooda
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#96 - 2012-08-10 16:02:35 UTC
The Hulk is still the best, but it has terrible effort vs reward ratio.

It takes 30 times more attention than a Mack - multiply this by 3 times and you know why I've changed to macks and started to mine ice. No crystalcrap - no roidswitching and hell - it's still awesomly good - screw the crappy ~2.5 million you lose by using macks instead of a hulk.

So all in all - hulk is dead for me.

Shayla Sh'inlux
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#97 - 2012-08-10 23:32:42 UTC
Quote:

Oh and macks have gone from 80 mill to 257 mill


Macks have never sold for 80mil...

They were 140mil a year ago, had a little stop at 160mil and were 200mil right before the patch.

I'd know becaucse I build 6 a day.
Ubiquitous Newt
The F-Bombers
#98 - 2012-08-23 23:47:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Ubiquitous Newt
I've got a Hulk, and a Mack, and I'm not thrilled with either. The Hulk requires more micromanagement, and the Mack has lousy comparative yield. Eventually I expect to settle on the Mack so that I can do work at the same time; as boring as mining is, the last thing I want to have to do is have to micromanage it too.

edit: No, correct that - the Mack requires more micromanagement than it looks, because of the faster 'roid popping from the 2 lasers instead of 3. Now we can safely say this is *all* about making you stay at the keyboard more.

Verdict? "Screw mining." It's been the worst part of Eve for years, and they just made it worse.
Zetaomega333
High Flyers
#99 - 2012-08-24 03:15:30 UTC
moronv wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
moronv wrote:
Well it looks like my playing days have just been revived, The Hulk has finally been nerfed. Max Ore cargo 8,500 m3 cant expand it any bigger
so now i switch to macks with a fantastic 35k m3 ore hold thankyou ccpOops


and less yield.. it's a trade off.


No not less yield more yield much more yield, reason is i kine to a pos so my hulks had cargo expanders etc... My macks with there 35k m3 ore holds allow me to fit 3 mining laser upgrades so much more yield infact i am mining 25-30 mill more per hour with 2 macks boosted by a fully maxed out orca stationed in pos.



Wrong, go do some math before touting unfounded stupid opnions like that. Maxed out hulk and mack with maxed out boosts sitll puts the hulk 19.5% ahead yeild wise than the mack. Jetcan mine its faster and more profitable than docking up every time you fill up like a pubbie scrub. Dont like getting canflipped? Move to nullsec no canflippers out there.
Zetaomega333
High Flyers
#100 - 2012-08-24 03:17:58 UTC
Quote:
If you were solo mining in a Hulk without a dedicated hauler or an Orca nearby, you were wasting your Hulk's yield on trips back to station. (


Im sorry but what? I dont know how empire miners survive if when they solo mine they dock up everytime thier cargohold is full. But if you do that, there is the shining reason people look at miners as retards. jetcan mine for the love of god, its faster, easyer come back every hour 45 min and scoop and gg. I spent 4 months in empire mining and not one canflipper. And if you do get canflipped go join a nullsec mining corp and stop being ******** in the empire belts.