EVE Information Portal

Aggree +1.
Very bad news for non-fleet miners

Repeat: "How can i turning off the new Module mouseover enhancement ???"
This is horrible,big and the textboxes stuck on screen in fleet in 0.0 when the system lags in Tidi.
GOD SAKE PLS AN OPTION FOR TURNING THIS FEATURE.

Thank you for that, but it started way before tyrannis, cause i had this problem when i had 4 drones II bpo's and it drove me insane then cause i had to put build in special orders if didnt do that i whould fall short of ram due to the amount runs i was doing (30d production cycle) and thus i had to have several thousand ram.- tools but i had other bpo's using same and if i did them first i whould fall short. even though technical i had more than enough. well thats what my memory says, although i might be wrong, but i remember about 4-5 years ago some sort of rounding change was introduced into building/buying etc, and for while that rounding bug made it more expensive to build large quanteties, but only by a little bit, and then that was change again, i belive it was here that the original change was made, but maybe i'm wrong and its only been a bug for 2 years. but i'm certain its longer, cause i sold the drones and mining crystal about 3-4 years ago thats when i had to bother with it alot....

Can we please get the Market Search tab back? Please?

The main reasons people almost always use the Search and not Browse are because 1) Browse categories are counterintuitive and the tree too deep and 2) to not have to click individual subnodes open to see all the items. Now instead of fixing the Browse you broke the Search...

Both on market work and on fitting ships the old way was better than the new way. The only way you could have made it better was to make it filter-as-you-type instead of type-four-letters-in-the-middle-and-try-to-guess-how-many-are-enough-to-limit-the-result-set-to-view.

But ultimately, having to _always_ reach for a mouse and click tree nodes open just to see search results is, well, clumsy.

For example: when fitting energized EM membrane, you need to figure which of them would be perfect compromise between price and performance. As this is not so hot item, some deadspace/faction variations could be cheap enough, making sense to check them, too. So, you type "ed em" to the search; the minimal length string to restrict the result set to <40 items. Now, what you get is _five_ nodes which you need to individually click open..

What's wrong with just displaying the results right away?

The old Search tab could very well still be there; the new search is part of the old Browse tab, so just adding back the old search tab would fix this.

BTW, fixing the Browse categories might make sense even if you add the old Search back. Like, making all titans, or dreads, be in the same subnode; it's a bit silly you need to click five times to see names of all titans _and_ you can only see one of them at a time.

found it.....



after this the amount of rams.- in bpos with 65% usage or below and more than 3 runs a mismatch between required in the build quota window and the real amount used started. prolly due to ram.-tool procentage is being coverted from a % to a integer and thus rounded up. - speculation only on my part. but doesnt change the is inconsistence in between amount required and amount being used to actually be allowed to click build. mostly effect t2 drones bpo's t2 ammunition bpo's and large portion of t2 modules bpo's and 2007 - 2012 ..... is long time and i'm sure i'm not the only one who petition back then, and i know several other t2 bpo's who did back then. but alas that huge crack in petition system maybe thats more importen to fix first than this problem.


edit : 55% was wrong its 65% or less cause 3x65% of 1 is 195% of 1 wich is converted is 1.95 but build quota window will require 3 but only 1.95 will be using so 1 whole left and 1 with 95% dmg .... so i guess to be exact its anything below 66.33333333333% where the bug enters, and it must be because the either procentage gets rounded or coverted to a integer and then rounded. either way same result = a bug.

Excuse me? Could I have the mining bonuses for the Skiff and the Mackinaw put back, please? I mean they had a purpose to begin with. You did not need to muck with them as you have.

Funny how this was asked for....from the first day it was on SiSi....oh ooops, we weren't spossed to give that secret away were we?

And all this talk about "we listen to your feedback and take it into account"....when really you mean, test all you want on SiSi...but we won't change anything till ppl complain about it on TQ...makes me wonder why i ever give SiSi feedback anymore.

How do you think that those of use who put time into the Inventory UI re-vamp felt when CCP Soundwaffe blew off SISI based feedback until that troubled functionality went live on TQ and CCP's wider customer base expressed their dislike?

My best guess is that CCP has their development personnel so over-assigned on work that they have no budgeted time for a proper UAT cycle once the code is up on SISI.

That or CCP's code version control system is holding their developers back from executing on fixes until the next version and the code is unlocked again.

So when is the ORE Frigate coming out? I would have expected it to flank the release of revamped mining barges, especially since the Amarr actually lack a mining frigate.

Well keep the little changes like this coming.

Sometimes it's the little things that make the biggest difference.

Thanks again CCP Punkturis.