These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Cloak's and afk cloakers

Author
Apo Lyptica
Absolute Order XVIII
Absolute Will
#1 - 2012-08-04 00:29:44 UTC
I think we pretty much agree that afk cloakers are a problem. So how about this-

Compounding capacitor use per cycle.

Example- 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450 cap use

Now you ask what about ships who are supposed to use cloaks? Add in a bonus, either flat or per t2 skill. But at the same time, balance it out so a ship that is SUPPOSED to cloak can do so for about an 1.5 hours with out specialized fitting.

Sound good?
Cloe Mitchell
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-08-04 00:31:26 UTC
Another thread about AFK cloakers? Isn't this the billionth thread about this? Deal with it, you risk averse nancy.
Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Doomheim
#3 - 2012-08-04 00:31:28 UTC
New and exciting.

HTFU.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#4 - 2012-08-04 00:32:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarryn Nightstorm
Apo Lyptica wrote:
I think we pretty much agree that afk cloakers are a problem. So how about this-

Compounding capacitor use per cycle.

Example- 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450 cap use

Now you ask what about ships who are supposed to use cloaks? Add in a bonus, either flat or per t2 skill. But at the same time, balance it out so a ship that is SUPPOSED to cloak can do so for about an 1.5 hours with out specialized fitting.

Sound good?


No, they're not, and no it doesn't.

Contract your stuff and/or ISK to me, un-install the client, and go pay-to-win in Black Prophecy or LotRO, it's clearly more your speed.

0.0000...05/10.

Next!


E:

Gas thread, ban OP for spamming/trolling.

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Apo Lyptica
Absolute Order XVIII
Absolute Will
#5 - 2012-08-04 00:34:40 UTC
Lol, at this time I'm the one who's cloaked. I'm staring at my capacitor recharging and thought to myself why can I set here and do this with out penalty.
Rengerel en Distel
#6 - 2012-08-04 00:36:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Rengerel en Distel
Perhaps start a new alt, go run missions in jita. You'll get used to seeing neutrals in local. You'll get used to how to deal when people you don't know are even trying to, probe you down and warp to you. You'll realize the people you never see, and never interact with you, really don't change your play one little bit.

edit: OP feels stupid for posting, then claims to be the afk cloaker wanting to be self-nerfed.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-08-04 00:38:29 UTC
You don't apostrophise when you pluralise.

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Doomheim
#8 - 2012-08-04 00:39:48 UTC
Apo Lyptica wrote:
Lol, at this time I'm the one who's cloaked. I'm staring at my capacitor recharging and thought to myself why can I set here and do this with out penalty.


Your in a wormhole alliance.
Frying Doom
#9 - 2012-08-04 00:39:54 UTC
If you have a problem with afk cloakers.

Just minimize local, then you won't have to be scared of someone who is not at there computer.

Easily fixed

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Gabrielle Lamb
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-08-04 00:43:51 UTC
AFK Cloaking is great, it's the only mechanic in the game that makes PVE possible in hostile space without spending hours warping from safespot to safespot to save ship. Meaning we still have ninja-explorers / ninja-ratters and wormhole ninjas in the game.

Keep it, just as it is.
Soundwave Plays Diablo
Doomheim
#11 - 2012-08-04 00:44:08 UTC
Apo Lyptica wrote:
I think we pretty much agree that afk cloakers are a problem. So how about this-

Compounding capacitor use per cycle.

Example- 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450 cap use

Now you ask what about ships who are supposed to use cloaks? Add in a bonus, either flat or per t2 skill. But at the same time, balance it out so a ship that is SUPPOSED to cloak can do so for about an 1.5 hours with out specialized fitting.

Sound good?


No, we most certainly not all agree that AFK cloakers are a problem.

AFK cloakers cant do **** to you, they can't even actively report intel on you.

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2012-08-04 00:45:32 UTC
Cloaks are working as intended. Move on and find something else to do.
Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
#13 - 2012-08-04 00:48:13 UTC
Meanwhile, there's this little known button says directional scan.

"This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro"

Garreth Vlox
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2012-08-04 00:54:23 UTC
Apo Lyptica wrote:
I think we pretty much agree that afk cloakers are a problem. So how about this-

Compounding capacitor use per cycle.

Example- 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450 cap use

Now you ask what about ships who are supposed to use cloaks? Add in a bonus, either flat or per t2 skill. But at the same time, balance it out so a ship that is SUPPOSED to cloak can do so for about an 1.5 hours with out specialized fitting.

Sound good?


no
bad example
no
and your an idiot.

The LULZ Boat.

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-08-04 00:56:30 UTC
get. the. fk. over. it.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

AFK Cloaker
Matari Exodus
#16 - 2012-08-04 00:56:44 UTC
.
Chatte Noire
PepperPark Deep Space Operations
#17 - 2012-08-04 01:02:51 UTC
As a pubbie, I have to ask: is this fuzz about afk-cloakers just about seeing a non-blue name in local and fearing that every second, this cloaker could come back to the keyboard and stalk you? Honest question.
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
#18 - 2012-08-04 01:05:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Shizuken
Apo Lyptica wrote:
I think we pretty much agree that afk cloakers are a problem. So how about this-

Compounding capacitor use per cycle.

Example- 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450 cap use

Now you ask what about ships who are supposed to use cloaks? Add in a bonus, either flat or per t2 skill. But at the same time, balance it out so a ship that is SUPPOSED to cloak can do so for about an 1.5 hours with out specialized fitting.

Sound good?


How about something easier and less detrimental to regular cloak users? Add a tachyon probe for probe launchers that lets you scan down cloaked ships. Long scan time and low signature strength so people on the move are fine, but those at rest for long periods are sitting ducks...

/solveproblem
/stopwhine
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2012-08-04 01:09:59 UTC
That reminds, my AFK cloaking alt is almost done training.

Which system needs additional surveillance?

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2012-08-04 01:16:26 UTC
what system are you getting afk cloaked in?

i will go take care of the afk cloakers by counter-afk cloaking them

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

123Next pageLast page