Player Features and Ideas Discussion

I think, not straight isk for sec status... but maybe Low Sec Conchord agents who have anti-pirate missions.... instead of getting isk and lp for rewards, you get straight sec status.

So therefore, you mission in low sec with Conchord agents, killing pirates.. and get Sec Status rewards instead of isk or LP. I think it works. You're kinda proving ot Conchord that you're willing to kill pirates, and make up for your wrongs.

The sec status also shows other players what kind of opponent they're dealing with. You're looking for the easiest way out to look innocent. If you wanna have good standings: work for them!

No, it doesn't. Killboards do that. Sec status is absolutely meaningless when determining what sort of opponent you're up against. A person with negative sec status may be a pirate. But in certain cases they may not.

A really common example is a pirate with a clone in 0.0. He will jump to his bear clone and rat for ISK, getting his sec status to 2.0 or more, then when he comes back how do you judge what opponent you're up against?

My intentions are as stated in the OP. Don't try to put words in my mouth by telling me what my intentions are.

The current sec-gaining system really makes little sense. It forces grinding on the population which primarily does not want to grind i.e. PvPers.

I would prefer that the source of sec-loss is addressed, but something like this wouldn't be too bad either.

EDIT: erps.

Redundant ideas are... well... redundant.



[...]for 1 or 2 weekends[...]

fixed it for you.



If you realy think doing missions is the way to get your sec status up... you´re dynamic is beaten by a brick.

Prove it. Go get -10 and rat for 2 weekends, we'll see how far you get. And Fridays aren't part of the weekend.

No. Your idea has been brought up before, shot down before and gone away before.

EvE is a game which has consequence to your actions. What you're suggesting is effectively pay to win. If you want to act like a **** you can but you have to pay for it in negative sec status. The negative sec status and everything that comes with it is the direct consequence of you attacking people illegally.

Any argument of "but I can do this now" falls flat on it's face because you can but the chain of consequence still exists at the moment. In order to do something about your negative sec status you need to put in actual effort. If you were allowed to remove your sec status with isk you're removing the consequence of your actions. You're suggesting allowing people to bypass the consequence chain by buying isk with real money and using the isk to remove the consequence of being a ****.

You might be stupidly rich and not have to use actual real money but if the system is changed for you that is precisely what you are allowing others to do.

No to P2W. No to allowing people to avoid the sensible consequences of their actions. No to stupid ideas.

Suggests but isn't limited to. You're paying for an unfair advantage over other players. You're paying isk (and by that very nature it could well be real money) to avoid the consequences of illegal actions. Just because you might have billions in the bank it doesn't mean that your suggested change wouldn't mean some broke ass guy could just gank to his heart's content and pay to mitigate the consequences with real life money. I know what P2W means thanks, you just don't have the mental faculties to consider it in any other context than the one you read on Wikipedia.

So you're saying that a carebear should be able to pay for immunity from PvP? Because at the moment you're saying you should be able to pay to be immune from the consequence of illegal actions. Where's the difference? You want to be immune from the consequence why shouldn't the carebear be able to pay to be immune from the consequence of being shot?



Whether PLEX is a good or a bad thing isn't what's being debated here. Don't try to change the subject. You just want to aboid consequence. That's the point you were trying to make. Be a man and admit it.

Whether I complain about using neutral alts is irrelevant to this discussion. Whether I complain about the use of PLEX is irrelevant to this discussion. Please stay on topic.



You're obviously deaf then. I just don't like people demanding selfish things that are purely designed so they can avoid having to actually play the game. People like you post these ultra selfish posts that haven't considered the implications of their demands to the game as a whole because they're too self-absorbed to be able to consider anything from outside their selfish little bubbles. It's just a "I WANT I WANT I WANT" childish approach to things. You don't give a crap whether your demands will affect other people playing the game adversely or whether it would break anything else in the game. You just want to avoid the consequences of your actions.

As to my killboard, lol. Some of us aren't killboard whores on our non pvp characters. Some of us use one or more of our characters to play semi afk in WHs in cheap ships as the net gain is huge for little effort but inevitably lose a lot of cheap ships. Some of us couldn't give a **** about that.

What constitutes a qualified opinion here then? The opinion of someone whining on the forums that they can't avoid the consequences of their actions? Yeah, right. Good one.

Someone with a -5 security status in lowsec is far more likely to be in a ship trying to hunt me than someone with a security status of 3. It doesn't tell you perfectly, but it gives you an idea.