These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Since mining barge ore olds are larger - orca/rorq
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Denidil
Cascades Mountain Operatives
#1 - 2012-07-29 16:36:32 UTC
orca/rorq need a major ore hold buff (do not nerf the barge holds!)

Tedium and difficulty are not the same thing, if you don't realize this then STFU about game design.
Dave stark
#2 - 2012-07-29 16:47:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
no they don't.
the hulk lost 150m3 of space.
the skiff has the same space a fully extended hulk had
and you won't be using an orca/rorq if you're using a mack [because if you did have an orca or a rorq you'd be in a hulk] so it's irrelevant that the mack has 31k cargo space.
Denidil
Cascades Mountain Operatives
#3 - 2012-07-29 16:51:28 UTC
Dave stark wrote:
no they don't.
the hulk lost 150m3 of space.
the skiff has the same space a fully extended hulk had
and you won't be using an orca/rorq if you're using a mack [because if you did have an orca or a rorq you'd be in a hulk] so it's irrelevant that the mack has 31k cargo space.


the orca - being a mining support ship - should have significantly more ore bay than an actual barge. it doesn't matter that you would be using hulks with an orca.

Tedium and difficulty are not the same thing, if you don't realize this then STFU about game design.
Dave stark
#4 - 2012-07-29 17:12:16 UTC
Denidil wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
no they don't.
the hulk lost 150m3 of space.
the skiff has the same space a fully extended hulk had
and you won't be using an orca/rorq if you're using a mack [because if you did have an orca or a rorq you'd be in a hulk] so it's irrelevant that the mack has 31k cargo space.


the orca - being a mining support ship - should have significantly more ore bay than an actual barge. it doesn't matter that you would be using hulks with an orca.


it does have significantly more.
it has over 180k cargo space.
that's roughly 6x the space of a mackinaw.
that's roughly 10x the space of a skiff.
that's roughly 24x the space of a hulk.

24x the hulk, if that's not significant... i honestly don't know what is.
Denidil
Cascades Mountain Operatives
#5 - 2012-07-29 23:37:47 UTC
Dave stark wrote:
Denidil wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
no they don't.
the hulk lost 150m3 of space.
the skiff has the same space a fully extended hulk had
and you won't be using an orca/rorq if you're using a mack [because if you did have an orca or a rorq you'd be in a hulk] so it's irrelevant that the mack has 31k cargo space.


the orca - being a mining support ship - should have significantly more ore bay than an actual barge. it doesn't matter that you would be using hulks with an orca.


it does have significantly more.
it has over 180k cargo space.
that's roughly 6x the space of a mackinaw.
that's roughly 10x the space of a skiff.
that's roughly 24x the space of a hulk.

24x the hulk, if that's not significant... i honestly don't know what is.


a fair point, i saw the ore bay and forgot about the other olds.

Tedium and difficulty are not the same thing, if you don't realize this then STFU about game design.