These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Barge Fairy Tale

First post First post
Author
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1381 - 2012-07-27 19:00:07 UTC
Suqq Madiq wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
The only reason it can be profitable is that Miners refuse to tank their ships.


Not true. Proven many times over. 10 Catalysts can gank a Hulk and still make a profit, but gankers are doing it with far fewer. But even if it was true, too bad. That's their choice. Profitability in ganking is your delusion.


No they cant.
Suqq Madiq
#1382 - 2012-07-27 19:01:33 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Suqq Madiq wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
The only reason it can be profitable is that Miners refuse to tank their ships.


Not true. Proven many times over. 10 Catalysts can gank a Hulk and still make a profit, but gankers are doing it with far fewer. But even if it was true, too bad. That's their choice. Profitability in ganking is your delusion.


No they cant.


Yes, they can.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#1383 - 2012-07-27 19:01:35 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:

The only reason it's a usually profitable thing is that Hulks don't bother to fit tanks.


Well you gank ships for their cargo or their mods.

If the ship has 2M worth of cargo and T1 mods it's your fault for picking it instead of the one with a deadspace small shield booster.
Dave stark
#1384 - 2012-07-27 19:01:54 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
and then it's you mine or you tank


I find it unsurprising that you're unaware that you can actually mine AND tank just fine the ways things are now.


and this is where we go around in circles but i'll answer it; the point is you HAVE to give up your mining bonuses to fit a tank on your mining ship. your combat ships don't have to give up their damage mods; they can give up the utility mods instead.
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
#1385 - 2012-07-27 19:03:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Herr Wilkus
Suqq Madiq wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:
See, no, you missed the DEV announcement - they are redefining 'profitable' - just for the ganking profession!

For anyone else on the planet, 'profitable' is defined as 'ending up with more ISK than when you started'.

But for gankers, apparently, 'profitable' is now 'losing less than your victim'. And everything must be rebalanced along that principle.

Because we can buy new ships with tears, right?



You can buy more ships just like everybody else; by putting effort into it. You think your brand of "PVP" should pay for itself and then some. You're wrong.


I'm perfectly content with 'losing less than the victim', to a point.

How much less (or even potential for actual profitability) should be as it is now: determined by the Exhumer's choice of fit.
CCP is largely taking those choices out of miner's hands - because they always take the risky choice, and cry when that risk goes badly for them.

A 'ganker must lose more than the victim' standard of balancing is utterly stupid.
Do people typically use 15 Tornados to pop random empty Freighters or Orcas? If not, why not?

"You have to put effort into it now."
Nonsense - people just aren't going to do it, and further more - you know it. The risk, therefore is removed, and miners are free to AFK.

Gankers will gank for a profit, and they'll gank for a laugh if they can inflict disproportionate damage on the target.
But requiring a group of 3 Tornados to grind up 300M ISK to simply attempt to kill a 180M ISK Mackinaw with a midslot tank?

Its just not going to happen unless someone has a personal score to settle.
(Heck, and even then - the victim can point and laugh at the gankers for wasting all that ISK....don't see much tear potential there...)
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1386 - 2012-07-27 19:03:40 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Suqq Madiq wrote:


Yes, they can.


We tested this, they cant. You break even by the time you hit 3 catalysts
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#1387 - 2012-07-27 19:09:31 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Gankers will gank for a profit, and they'll gank for a laugh if they can inflict disproportionate damage on the target.
But requiring a group of 3 Tornados to grind up 300M ISK to simply attempt to kill a 180M ISK Mackinaw with a midslot tank?


Do you gank and empty freighter?
Do you gank a transport with 2M worth of contents?
Do you gank an empty indy because it fits an experimental cloak?
Do you gank the T1 fitted Drake or the meta 4 fitted CNR?

If the reply is: "yes I do it for a profit" then you are hopeless.


Now, why should you gank an empty or T1 fit exhumer and feel entitled you must "do it for a profit" again?
Suqq Madiq
#1388 - 2012-07-27 19:10:20 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Gankers will gank for a profit, and they'll gank for a laugh if they can inflict disproportionate damage on the target.
But requiring a group of 3 Tornados to grind up 300M ISK to simply attempt to kill a 180M ISK Mackinaw with a midslot tank?


You're exaggerating wildly. If 3 T1 Catalysts can gank a tanked Hulk now (which they easily can) it won't take 3 T3 Battlecruisers to do the same thing after this rebalance. Remove the ability to make profit from your ganking calculations. It doesn't belong.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1389 - 2012-07-27 19:11:20 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:


Do you gank and empty freighter?
Do you gank a transport with 2M worth of contents?
Do you gank an empty indy because it fits an experimental cloak?
Do you gank the T1 fitted Drake or the meta 4 fitted CNR?

If the reply is: "yes I do it for a profit" then you are hopeless.


Now, why should you gank an empty or T1 fit exhumer and feel entitled you must "do it for a profit" again?


Because at the moment you do make a profit if they dont fit a tank.
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
#1390 - 2012-07-27 19:12:56 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Suqq Madiq wrote:


Yes, they can.


We tested this, they cant.


And besides, assembling a large group of gankers imposes an array of costs beyond just ISK.

-not everyone can assemble a group like that on short notice - especially if your 'play time' is in an off peak Time Zone.
-Multiple Concord spawns to dispose of.
-much higher chance of failure if one person screws up or gets disconnected.
-sec status hits are multiplied across the entire group, not just for the 'final blow'

plus, simple lack of variety.
So, the only way to gank (without losing your ass) is to pile into Catalysts?
(nevermind that blaster ganking effectiveness falls off sharply above 0.7 space....)
Suqq Madiq
#1391 - 2012-07-27 19:13:08 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Suqq Madiq wrote:


Yes, they can.


We tested this, they cant. You break even by the time you hit 3 catalysts


This is outright bullshit. 3 Tech 1 fit Catalysts can gank a Hulk now at a cost of under 10mil ISK. If a Hulk drops half it's mods and even a modest amount of Salvage those 3 Catalyst pilots have just doubled their ISK. And that's not counting the 10mil ISK/Exhumer bounty that Jihadageddon has added to the profitability. That amount of profit is imbalanced. Plain and simple.
MIrple
Black Sheep Down
Tactical Narcotics Team
#1392 - 2012-07-27 19:13:44 UTC
Dave stark wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
and then it's you mine or you tank


I find it unsurprising that you're unaware that you can actually mine AND tank just fine the ways things are now.


and this is where we go around in circles but i'll answer it; the point is you HAVE to give up your mining bonuses to fit a tank on your mining ship. your combat ships don't have to give up their damage mods; they can give up the utility mods instead.


Please tell me how a Gal or Amarr ship doesn't give up Damage Slots for tank?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1393 - 2012-07-27 19:14:16 UTC
Suqq Madiq wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Gankers will gank for a profit, and they'll gank for a laugh if they can inflict disproportionate damage on the target.
But requiring a group of 3 Tornados to grind up 300M ISK to simply attempt to kill a 180M ISK Mackinaw with a midslot tank?


You're exaggerating wildly. If 3 T1 Catalysts can gank a tanked Hulk now (which they easily can) it won't take 3 T3 Battlecruisers to do the same thing after this rebalance. Remove the ability to make profit from your ganking calculations. It doesn't belong.


A well fitted hulk will not die to 3 catalysts and does require the firepower of 3-4 tornado to kill it.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#1394 - 2012-07-27 19:15:18 UTC
Ohanka wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Stuff.....


Again, you are wrong, as usual. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong all the time?
Really? Please pray tell of why this is so.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Sarik Olecar
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#1395 - 2012-07-27 19:18:15 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Because at the moment you do make a profit if they dont fit a tank.

I think that's the problem. You wouldn't gank a bare tengu because it the salvage wouldn't pay for it. Why should a hulk give 30mil in intact armor plates if it only costs 3mil to kill it? If the hulk is blinged out with 500mil officers strips or whatever, then it should be a valid target, the same as a bling tengu... Otherwise its disproportional to the rest of the game.

Hows my posting? Call 1-800-747-7633 to leave feedback.

Suqq Madiq
#1396 - 2012-07-27 19:19:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Suqq Madiq
baltec1 wrote:
Suqq Madiq wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Gankers will gank for a profit, and they'll gank for a laugh if they can inflict disproportionate damage on the target.
But requiring a group of 3 Tornados to grind up 300M ISK to simply attempt to kill a 180M ISK Mackinaw with a midslot tank?


You're exaggerating wildly. If 3 T1 Catalysts can gank a tanked Hulk now (which they easily can) it won't take 3 T3 Battlecruisers to do the same thing after this rebalance. Remove the ability to make profit from your ganking calculations. It doesn't belong.


A well fitted hulk will not die to 3 catalysts and does require the firepower of 3-4 tornado to kill it.


More bullshit. Your definition of "well fitted hulk" involves the Hulk sacrificing every bit of yield for tank. This is unrealistic. No other ship in the game is expected to sacrifice every one of it's tools and slots in order to maximize it's tank just to exist. The average Hulk with a decently sized tank and only a Survey Scanner to assist it's yield can still easily be ganked by 3 T1 Catalysts.
Pipa Porto
#1397 - 2012-07-27 19:20:19 UTC
Suqq Madiq wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Gankers will gank for a profit, and they'll gank for a laugh if they can inflict disproportionate damage on the target.
But requiring a group of 3 Tornados to grind up 300M ISK to simply attempt to kill a 180M ISK Mackinaw with a midslot tank?


You're exaggerating wildly. If 3 T1 Catalysts can gank a tanked Hulk now (which they easily can) it won't take 3 T3 Battlecruisers to do the same thing after this rebalance. Remove the ability to make profit from your ganking calculations. It doesn't belong.


Only if you don't bother to tank the Hulk.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1398 - 2012-07-27 19:20:27 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Suqq Madiq wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Suqq Madiq wrote:


Yes, they can.


We tested this, they cant. You break even by the time you hit 3 catalysts


This is outright bullshit. 3 Tech 1 fit Catalysts can gank a Hulk now at a cost of under 10mil ISK. If a Hulk drops half it's mods and even a modest amount of Salvage those 3 Catalyst pilots have just doubled their ISK. And that's not counting the 10mil ISK/Exhumer bounty that Jihadageddon has added to the profitability. That amount of profit is imbalanced. Plain and simple.


50% of mods will be blown up on a good kill, then the salvage will not always produce the best results. Over the long term you will lose isk by ganking ships that require 4-10 catalysts. In order to make a good profit you need to use one or two ships per gank.

Goons waged war on high sec miners and lost isk on the ship ganks themselves. My corp turned that into a profit making war on ship hulls when we did our own interdiction and invented the gank destroyers you see today. However if you wish to prove that we are wrong then by all means do what we did and use 10 catalysts per gank and then come back to us with your results. I garentee you that you will make a loss.
Dave stark
#1399 - 2012-07-27 19:20:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
MIrple wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
and then it's you mine or you tank


I find it unsurprising that you're unaware that you can actually mine AND tank just fine the ways things are now.


and this is where we go around in circles but i'll answer it; the point is you HAVE to give up your mining bonuses to fit a tank on your mining ship. your combat ships don't have to give up their damage mods; they can give up the utility mods instead.


Please tell me how a Gal or Amarr ship doesn't give up Damage Slots for tank?


because you can fit a shield tank. no you don't get bonuses for it; but that's beyond the point. pretty sure with the introduction of the drone damage mods a fair few gal ships went for shield tanks in order to make the most of their drone bonuses?

again with a combat ship you can choose which slots to put the tank in and what you want to give up; in an exhumer you can't pick which you give up. an exhumer doesn't have the cpu to fill the mid slots with shield tank and also fit mlus. conversely if you fit hull or armour tank in the lows then you just have mid slots hanging around as an exhumer doesn't have utility mods. [maybe survey scanner but you know what i mean] you either fill it with tank, or you put yield mods on. trying to fit shield mods and dropping 1 of the two mlus is probably the best compromise but you've effectively just lost yield for half a tank that means you're still going to get ganked so... why fit the tank to start with unless you're going to fit the whole one?
Pipa Porto
#1400 - 2012-07-27 19:21:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Suqq Madiq wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Suqq Madiq wrote:


Yes, they can.


We tested this, they cant. You break even by the time you hit 3 catalysts


This is outright bullshit. 3 Tech 1 fit Catalysts can gank a Hulk now at a cost of under 10mil ISK. If a Hulk drops half it's mods and even a modest amount of Salvage those 3 Catalyst pilots have just doubled their ISK. And that's not counting the 10mil ISK/Exhumer bounty that Jihadageddon has added to the profitability. That amount of profit is imbalanced. Plain and simple.


Only if the Hulk doesn't bother to fit any tank.

If the Hulk fits a Tank, the gankers can, at best, in a 10 man, special snowflake situation, break even. But the tanked Hulk in a .7 or higher and it's game over for gankers and anything near breakeven.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto