These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Barge Fairy Tale

First post First post
Author
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#961 - 2012-07-27 04:17:33 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
ah you have yet to hear about my new crusade against npc corps...


MeBiatch
Republic University

Minmatar Republic


yes and guess what this char is used for?!?!?

avoiding wars by beign in an npc corp so i can haul stuff to my low sec waypoint and use my thanny to move stuff to 0.0 for me... plus he is also a cyno alt...

hey i am going to use the feature as long as its here...

i am just saying its stupid and should be removed...

risk free is silly if you ask me...

Good job using an NPC corp alt in highsec :)

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#962 - 2012-07-27 04:18:39 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
yes and guess what this char is used for?!?!?

avoiding wars by beign in an npc corp so i can haul stuff to my low sec waypoint and use my thanny to move stuff to 0.0 for me... plus he is also a cyno alt...

hey i am going to use the feature as long as its here...

i am just saying its stupid and should be removed...

risk free is silly if you ask me...


empire freighter alts are so 2007, pubbies will haul your freighter-sized loads for peanuts these days

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#963 - 2012-07-27 04:22:26 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
yes and guess what this char is used for?!?!?

avoiding wars by beign in an npc corp so i can haul stuff to my low sec waypoint and use my thanny to move stuff to 0.0 for me... plus he is also a cyno alt...

hey i am going to use the feature as long as its here...

i am just saying its stupid and should be removed...

risk free is silly if you ask me...


empire freighter alts are so 2007, pubbies will haul your freighter-sized loads for peanuts these days


perhaps but a cyno alt never goes out of style...

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

pussnheels
Viziam
#964 - 2012-07-27 04:33:37 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Wow what an over statement.


let's see

crimewatch, which will prevent you from ganking a freighter or an officer-fit faction battleship because otherwise looting it means that anyone can shoot you and bring all the neutral RR they want and you can't shoot at their RR

this unnecessary change catering to afk miners who feel entitled to profit while only alt-tabbing from their movie to move ore to their orcas

yeah, welcome to a risk-free hisec. a new game enhancement - err, experience!


i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#965 - 2012-07-27 04:33:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Richard Desturned wrote:
empire freighter alts are so 2007, pubbies will haul your freighter-sized loads for peanuts these days


10 mil / m3
1 mil / jump

Deal?

And btw, I only accept 970k+ m3 loads.
Herr Hammer Draken
#966 - 2012-07-27 04:34:53 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:


Poor choice of words. The ganker is not supposed to be able to profit from killing miners when fitted for their role.
They are not war ships never intended to be war ships. But after this change I can see them getting used for some war ship type roles. Again unintended for EVE but then that never stopped most of the posters in this thread.



"Killing miners when fitted for their role"

translates to

"I don't have to tank because I don't believe Exhumers were meant to tank. Therefore it is unfair when a Catalyst blows one up for a minimal cost..."

Sorry, not a compelling argument.




It does not matter one bit if you do not agree. That is what is happening.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#967 - 2012-07-27 04:36:28 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Wow what an over statement.


let's see

crimewatch, which will prevent you from ganking a freighter or an officer-fit faction battleship because otherwise looting it means that anyone can shoot you and bring all the neutral RR they want and you can't shoot at their RR

this unnecessary change catering to afk miners who feel entitled to profit while only alt-tabbing from their movie to move ore to their orcas

yeah, welcome to a risk-free hisec. a new game enhancement - err, experience!


i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic

You don't understand moon mining at all if you think it's effortless income.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
#968 - 2012-07-27 04:38:50 UTC
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:


As an example I was only ganked once and I was in a retriever at the time. A destroyer took me out. Then he abandoned his wreck, turned it blue. I recovered my wreck and his without even getting a timer on me for looting his wreck. I made out enough to outfit almost two retrievers. He lost far more than I did and yet he still made the choice to do what he did with no input from me at all. He did not even get insurance but I did.
This is the kind of players EVE has for the vast majority. You guys making these arguments represent almost nobody else except your selves when you say these things that are completely rediculous statement in the extreme. The vast majority of EVE players are no where near this level of play. They will still do it because it is fun. Even if it is costly.


Errr, you realize that he didn't 'abandon' his wreck, right?

Now I'm pretty sure you are nowhere near 'this' level of play, either.

You seem to think ganking should only be the province of the idle rich, as if they were out on a pheasant hunt or an exotic safari.

I, being a man of the people....believe that the young, the up and coming, should be encouraged to partake in our noble cause....

Imposing large punitive costs removes a large % of players from the 'ganker' pool.
Forcing gankers exclusively into large groups of destroyers, cuts down on variety and leads to boring tactics, as well as cutting out those players in odd time zones, or those without a large alliance to back them up.

And the insipid requirement that gankers lose more than the target?

1. Gankers will jump at a chance to gank for a profit.
2. And they will often accept a personal loss if they have an opportunity to inflict disproportionate damage to the victim.

But they almost NEVER gank when the 'cost to gank' is higher than the total value of the target.

Thats why you don't see people ganking, say - Bantams or Retrievers with Tornados.
Its just stupid to waste a 70-100M ISK ship to kill something that costs a mere fraction of that.

Just as it would be stupid to gank a 120M ISK Skiff with 10 Tornados, or a 180M ISK Mackinaw with 5 or 6?

And because gankers are not irrational, these types of ganks do not and will not happen, except in the most exceedingly rare of cases. Its the same reason that people rarely gank Orcas - the effort costs more than the reward - or even the loss to the victim....




Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#969 - 2012-07-27 04:44:29 UTC
pussnheels wrote:

i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic


Because they are Goons. What else is there to say.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Ambassador Crane
Hellhound Productions
#970 - 2012-07-27 04:48:36 UTC
Wow! Nearly 50 pages now of the same arguments being repeated over and over and over and over and over.........

I actually read through about 30 pages before I got bored reading the same basic moans and groans, just rephrased in a colorful rainbow of wording. The whining flows heavily in this thread from both industrialists and gankers alike, although (and I'm personally not suprised) more so from the ganker side.

But what really tickles me reading through this drudge is when I hear gankers arguing over the numbers game in terms of costs. I mean, lets be real here and admit. Most of those who gank mining ships are not doing it for the easy isk (which it definitely is). No, most of them are doing it purely for the "tears". I mean, lets look at the very name of the corp for the OP. Ahh the shear irony of someone part of a corp focused on collecting tears and yet coming to the forums shedding his own. Roll The changes haven't even been implemented yet and what? Business already so slow you gotta make and collect your own??

Then I 'lol'd at the people who claim that miners have been crying and CCP is "stooping down" to give them a buff. How many times have we heard nullsec pvpers (and yeah, I am one) complain that this or that needs to be buffed or nerfed. Or throw in faction warfare. Or throw in war decs. I say cheers to the miners for finally getting a bit of attention from CCP.

What I also think is comical about most people in this thread is that they claim you should fit a hulk for tanking in High Sec. That people shouldn't be capable of AFK mining. I say until CCP makes mining more interesting (and even the pvpers admit mining is incredibly boring though I doubt many of them have done it for more then perhaps 30mins), can you REALLY blame them for doing it at least semi-afk?? I've mined ore and i'm generally thinking. "omg....I'm so bored! Please ganker shoot me so I can have an excuse to end my miserable existance!" And then I tried mining ice....I think that's when i thankfully learned what ctrl-q (or I guess alt-shft-q now) really did!

So again, I tip my hat to you full time miners in finally getting some much needed love from CCP. In my opinion, it's not really that much but it's certainly well deserved attention. And gankers, before you kill that miner, which I'm sure you'll do even after the changes, be sure to thank that miner for supplying the materials to build that very same ship your about to kill him with.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#971 - 2012-07-27 04:51:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Imposing large punitive costs removes a large % of players from the 'ganker' pool.
Forcing gankers exclusively into large groups of destroyers, cuts down on variety and leads to boring tactics, as well as cutting out those players in odd time zones, or those without a large alliance to back them up.


We could call it natural selection, right?
EVE Online is a MMO, not a singleplayer Call of Duty copy.
Get your ganker friends and gank in groups. That's how this game is played in nullsec. Teamwork.
pussnheels
Viziam
#972 - 2012-07-27 04:52:47 UTC  |  Edited by: pussnheels
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:


As an example I was only ganked once and I was in a retriever at the time. A destroyer took me out. Then he abandoned his wreck, turned it blue. I recovered my wreck and his without even getting a timer on me for looting his wreck. I made out enough to outfit almost two retrievers. He lost far more than I did and yet he still made the choice to do what he did with no input from me at all. He did not even get insurance but I did.
This is the kind of players EVE has for the vast majority. You guys making these arguments represent almost nobody else except your selves when you say these things that are completely rediculous statement in the extreme. The vast majority of EVE players are no where near this level of play. They will still do it because it is fun. Even if it is costly.


Errr, you realize that he didn't 'abandon' his wreck, right?

Now I'm pretty sure you are nowhere near 'this' level of play, either.

You seem to think ganking should only be the province of the idle rich, as if they were out on a pheasant hunt or an exotic safari.

I, being a man of the people....believe that the young, the up and coming, should be encouraged to partake in our noble cause....

Imposing large punitive costs removes a large % of players from the 'ganker' pool.
Forcing gankers exclusively into large groups of destroyers, cuts down on variety and leads to boring tactics, as well as cutting out those players in odd time zones, or those without a large alliance to back them up.

And the insipid requirement that gankers lose more than the target?

1. Gankers will jump at a chance to gank for a profit.
2. And they will often accept a personal loss if they have an opportunity to inflict disproportionate damage to the victim.

But they almost NEVER gank when the 'cost to gank' is higher than the total value of the target.

Thats why you don't see people ganking, say - Bantams or Retrievers with Tornados.
Its just stupid to waste a 70-100M ISK ship to kill something that costs a mere fraction of that.

Just as it would be stupid to gank a 120M ISK Skiff with 10 Tornados, or a 180M ISK Mackinaw with 5 or 6?

And because gankers are not irrational, these types of ganks do not and will not happen, except in the most exceedingly rare of cases. Its the same reason that people rarely gank Orcas - the effort costs more than the reward - or even the loss to the victim....






you not ganking retrievers and bantams because you know you NOT going to hurt the other player or that the victim is a new player and you might get accused of harrassing new players
Your opinion about ganking has nothing to do about profit , only hurting people and if you can hurt them in their RL pockets aswell even better ,
Don't get me wrong there is nothing wrong with ganking nor do i or most of the players do not want a risk highsec , but people like you are getting me pissed off IT IS NOT YOUR BLOODY GAME , game belongs to CCP and when CCP decides to change something you don't like well deal with it get over it , there has been several changes in the past i didn't like , but i am still here
deal with it and stop crying

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
#973 - 2012-07-27 04:56:10 UTC
pussnheels wrote:


i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic


Here's your answer...

You ARE allowed to AFK mine.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#974 - 2012-07-27 05:00:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Desturned
i sat down and looked at some other ships that are of prices comparable to hulks, let's start

a Vigilant costs about the same as a Hulk in Jita and it has more base HP, but inferior resists (being a faction ship) and at all level Vs, unfit, it has 11k EHP. fit for its most common role, dealing HAC-like damage with dual 90% webs, it will only have 20k EHP. a brick tanked heavy tackle fit would increase its EHP to 63k, but it gives up a substantial amount of DPS. also, with dual fed navy webs, its cost goes up to ~400m. add a faction point (which is not uncommon in these ships) and you're looking at close to 500M.

a Devoter isn't much cheaper than a Hulk (difference is like 20M in Jita) and it only has a few thousand more EHP unfit, although this is due to its resist bonus - which is necessary, considering that it tends to be the primary especially when supers are on the field. fit for its primary role, being a brick tanked bubbler, it can field a massive tank - 215k EHP with Damnation bonuses. it also tends to have an entire blob of ships shooting at it.

both of these ships are used in combat and the vigilant's tanking abilities aren't terribly impressive even compared to a hulk. oh and they're generally not AFK in a belt and they're not that great for making ISK.

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#975 - 2012-07-27 05:01:48 UTC
pussnheels wrote:

i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic


Bravo.

Down with moongoo botters!

To the statues!

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#976 - 2012-07-27 05:02:05 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Imposing large punitive costs removes a large % of players from the 'ganker' pool.
Forcing gankers exclusively into large groups of destroyers, cuts down on variety and leads to boring tactics, as well as cutting out those players in odd time zones, or those without a large alliance to back them up.


We could call it natural selection, right?
EVE Online is a MMO, not a singleplayer Call of Duty copy.
Get your ganker friends and gank in groups. That's how this game is played in nullsec. Teamwork.

~blobbing~

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#977 - 2012-07-27 05:02:35 UTC
Ambassador Crane wrote:
Wow! Nearly 50 pages now of the same arguments being repeated over and over and over and over and over.........

I actually read through about 30 pages before I got bored reading the same basic moans and groans, just rephrased in a colorful rainbow of wording. The whining flows heavily in this thread from both industrialists and gankers alike, although (and I'm personally not suprised) more so from the ganker side.

But what really tickles me reading through this drudge is when I hear gankers arguing over the numbers game in terms of costs. I mean, lets be real here and admit. Most of those who gank mining ships are not doing it for the easy isk (which it definitely is). No, most of them are doing it purely for the "tears". I mean, lets look at the very name of the corp for the OP. Ahh the shear irony of someone part of a corp focused on collecting tears and yet coming to the forums shedding his own. Roll The changes haven't even been implemented yet and what? Business already so slow you gotta make and collect your own??

Then I 'lol'd at the people who claim that miners have been crying and CCP is "stooping down" to give them a buff. How many times have we heard nullsec pvpers (and yeah, I am one) complain that this or that needs to be buffed or nerfed. Or throw in faction warfare. Or throw in war decs. I say cheers to the miners for finally getting a bit of attention from CCP.

What I also think is comical about most people in this thread is that they claim you should fit a hulk for tanking in High Sec. That people shouldn't be capable of AFK mining. I say until CCP makes mining more interesting (and even the pvpers admit mining is incredibly boring though I doubt many of them have done it for more then perhaps 30mins), can you REALLY blame them for doing it at least semi-afk?? I've mined ore and i'm generally thinking. "omg....I'm so bored! Please ganker shoot me so I can have an excuse to end my miserable existance!" And then I tried mining ice....I think that's when i thankfully learned what ctrl-q (or I guess alt-shft-q now) really did!

So again, I tip my hat to you full time miners in finally getting some much needed love from CCP. In my opinion, it's not really that much but it's certainly well deserved attention. And gankers, before you kill that miner, which I'm sure you'll do even after the changes, be sure to thank that miner for supplying the materials to build that very same ship your about to kill him with.

The entire point is that miners haven't done anything to earn this buff. As I said earlier an appropriate buff would be purely to the fitting stats of the ships, not their EHP. Buffing the fitting stats would allow them to fit a respectable tank without too much sacrifice to yield, but no, we can't even help miners help themselves, we have to do everything for them!

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

pussnheels
Viziam
#978 - 2012-07-27 05:03:16 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
pussnheels wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Wow what an over statement.


let's see

crimewatch, which will prevent you from ganking a freighter or an officer-fit faction battleship because otherwise looting it means that anyone can shoot you and bring all the neutral RR they want and you can't shoot at their RR

this unnecessary change catering to afk miners who feel entitled to profit while only alt-tabbing from their movie to move ore to their orcas

yeah, welcome to a risk-free hisec. a new game enhancement - err, experience!


i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic

You don't understand moon mining at all if you think it's effortless income.

it is effortless once you own the system only thing you need to do is set up a pos start the proces after that it is only a question of refueling and empty the storage bins so don't give me that crap that moongoo is hard work and involves hours upon hours of boring yourself to death watching the lights on your pos
well i am pretty pissed off at any of your nullsec wankers , death sick of your comments how people should play your game all the while you cry and whine about anything that has the remote chance of pulling down your own little carebear sandcastle

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#979 - 2012-07-27 05:06:03 UTC
Asuka Solo wrote:
moongoo botters


nobody can be this clueless

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#980 - 2012-07-27 05:06:30 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
it is effortless once you own the system only thing you need to do is set up a pos start the proces after that it is only a question of refueling and empty the storage bins so don't give me that crap that moongoo is hard work and involves hours upon hours of boring yourself to death watching the lights on your pos
well i am pretty pissed off at any of your nullsec wankers , death sick of your comments how people should play your game all the while you cry and whine about anything that has the remote chance of pulling down your own little carebear sandcastle


you should ask Pandemic Legion about owning systems that they run moon mining towers in

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration