These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tech Rebuff

Author
EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#61 - 2012-07-26 00:16:50 UTC
its evereplicant

he probably thinks "the northern coalition" is the same as nc.
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2012-07-26 00:23:47 UTC
I see the idea of moon depletion being bounced around. It sounds a lot the old game of "kill the guy with the ball". Whoever has the tech moons has a high probability of being attacked for ownership of said resource. The mechanic is continual hunting for the fresh moons and deploying forces. That, on the surface, seems like it would stimulate conflict. Some have said that the T2 prices will go up radically if this happens. But the graph in the Dev Blog shows prices have gone up radically in the current situation.

It just seems if you need a reasn to fight, kill the guys with the ball is as good as any.
Tarsus Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#63 - 2012-07-26 00:24:01 UTC
Pubbie filth yet again whining to the developers instead of trying to fix the problem themselves. The Tech moons are there, they don't move around. Go take them if you want them. If you're too much of a coward to do that, then live with the boot-heel of those that could stomping on your face.

This is your fault.

You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.

Tarsus Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#64 - 2012-07-26 00:25:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarsus Zateki
Dear CCP,

Why did you put a bunch of valuable resources in one spot? My frightened pubbie mind can't handle the thought of resource motivated warfare and diplomacy. Please spread the technitium out so that everyone can have a fair and equitable share.

Signed,

Pubbie Filth

You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#65 - 2012-07-26 00:25:57 UTC
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Dear CCP,

Why did you put a bunch of valuable resources in one spot? My frightened pubbie mind can't handle the thought of resource motivated warfare and diplomacy. Please spread the technitium out so that everyone can have a fare an equitable share.

Signed,

Pubbie Filth


"additionally, we want to mine tech moons in hisec"

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Tarsus Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#66 - 2012-07-26 00:28:46 UTC
CCP, want to help curb inflation and market pressures in game? We have more money than god, let's destroy it. Let us buyout Concord. Let O-Tech drop the largest most controversial bribe in the history of corruption and grant us the ability to do whatever we want to the whimpering masses of sub-human garbage that pollute high-sec. Carebear genocide.

You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.

John Rando
Tax Evaders Un-Incorporated
#67 - 2012-07-26 00:28:52 UTC
All space is not equal. Nor should it be. Otherwise what is the point?
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#68 - 2012-07-26 00:30:26 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Dear CCP,

Why did you put a bunch of valuable resources in one spot? My frightened pubbie mind can't handle the thought of resource motivated warfare and diplomacy. Please spread the technitium out so that everyone can have a fare an equitable share.

Signed,

Pubbie Filth


"additionally, we want to mine tech moons in hisec"


Oh dear. That reminds me of some random guy last month who I managed to convince I had a Tech moon for sale. He wouldn't buy it because it wasn't in highsec.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Tarsus Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#69 - 2012-07-26 00:30:57 UTC
John Rando wrote:
All space is not equal. Nor should it be. Otherwise what is the point?


The folks that make posts like the OP can't actually comprehend a post like yours. They don't get that Eve is a conflict-centric video game that lets you cause actual economic harm. They won't be content until Eve-Online is a consequence free game.

You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#70 - 2012-07-26 00:37:54 UTC
^ Seems like that would cause you actual economic harm though. Perhaps it should be done.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Tarsus Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#71 - 2012-07-26 00:40:58 UTC
rodyas wrote:
^ Seems like that would cause you actual economic harm though. Perhaps it should be done.


A pubbie failing to recognize the difference between player driven conflict and content creation... and developer interference.

You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.

EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#72 - 2012-07-26 00:52:06 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:

Oh dear. That reminds me of some random guy last month who I managed to convince I had a Tech moon for sale. He wouldn't buy it because it wasn't in highsec.

nm
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#73 - 2012-07-26 01:22:32 UTC
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
rodyas wrote:
^ Seems like that would cause you actual economic harm though. Perhaps it should be done.


A pubbie failing to recognize the difference between player driven conflict and content creation... and developer interference.


I see the victim of a nerf bat clearly, and the whining that ensues. You guys always wanted tech nerf, and I knew you would hate it when it did. You guys can always make your own server ya know.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Ezra Tair
Doomheim
#74 - 2012-07-26 01:47:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Ezra Tair
Richard Desturned wrote:
Ezra Tair wrote:
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:
Have you tried taking the moons for yourself? Cause i can guarantee thats how goons did it.



As I recall, they had a entire region given to them.


unlike defiant legacy, a noted relevant space holding alliance

we had deklein given to us because we merged with the alliance that previously owned it, we only had 10-20 tech moons and we had to take the other 40-60 ourselves


What does my alliance's relevance to null sec have to do with Goonswarm being handed an entire region? So they handed you 10-20 3 bill a month moons. Is this the new minimum entry amount of income for nullsec? I don't know your business, but don't talk about how GSF took systems as though you did it from scratch and new comers should expect to do the same. Because you didn't.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#75 - 2012-07-26 02:04:15 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Dear CCP,

Why did you put a bunch of valuable resources in one spot? My frightened pubbie mind can't handle the thought of resource motivated warfare and diplomacy. Please spread the technitium out so that everyone can have a fare an equitable share.

Signed,

Pubbie Filth


"additionally, we want to mine tech moons in hisec"

Isn't it a bit late to ask for that since you can just react with cobalt or something now?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Kheeria
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#76 - 2012-07-26 02:06:52 UTC
RAGE QU1T wrote:
Allchemy didn't work in '08 and will not work in 2012. Please let us all give this new dev a history lesson. The major problem with tech is the allocation the R64 moon to one region (the north) in which a few select alliances can generatate infinte isk and "Win EVE". With the proposed reaction outputt of tech therre is no incentive for other allainces or corps to run muliple POS's with the added expense of fuel I would be losing money on a weekly basis. All this is just skirting around a broken problem that exsisted for years. Allchemy was removed for good reason in the first place, all I see happening is T2 gear will mos def increase, how does everyone fell about paying 3 to 4mil isk for a gyro II?

Floor is open for constructive criticism, questions or concerns

O/

You're in a NPC corp and are worrying about tech moons?
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#77 - 2012-07-26 02:10:39 UTC
Kheeria wrote:
RAGE QU1T wrote:
Allchemy didn't work in '08 and will not work in 2012. Please let us all give this new dev a history lesson. The major problem with tech is the allocation the R64 moon to one region (the north) in which a few select alliances can generatate infinte isk and "Win EVE". With the proposed reaction outputt of tech therre is no incentive for other allainces or corps to run muliple POS's with the added expense of fuel I would be losing money on a weekly basis. All this is just skirting around a broken problem that exsisted for years. Allchemy was removed for good reason in the first place, all I see happening is T2 gear will mos def increase, how does everyone fell about paying 3 to 4mil isk for a gyro II?

Floor is open for constructive criticism, questions or concerns

O/

You're in a NPC corp and are worrying about tech moons?

NPC corps are really powerful. For example, you can't even declare war on them, that's how scary they are.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Kheeria
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#78 - 2012-07-26 02:11:11 UTC
evereplicant wrote:
EvilweaselSA wrote:
three out of the four alliances you named have tech moons, and pl has more than we do you nitwit



right PL do not have more than you dont talk nonsense, secondly the only reason the others have tech moons is becuase you guys did a deal with them!

also stop taking everything so damn personal, i am actually talking about large alliances overall, just the matter of fact you guys are the biggest alliance with the most control over eve with the most moons.. so get used to people referring to you dumbass..

If the cfc wasn't the biggest it would be someone else and you'd be whining and bitching about them.
Kheeria
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#79 - 2012-07-26 02:18:51 UTC
Internet Lawyer Steve wrote:
Ivana Twinkle wrote:
You're just jealous because you haven't achieved anything on your own.


Neither has Goonswarm.

Says the 3 month old char who has all the answers and knowledge about eve and it's history.
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#80 - 2012-07-26 02:20:21 UTC
EvilweaselSA wrote:
people advocating moon rotation are, universally, friendless nobodies who hate the fact 0.0 rewards having friends
They also do not recall that it was a rejiggering by CCP in the Dominion expansion (December 2009) of the Tech 2 manufacturing inputs which, in turn, altered the demand for various moon-derived materials.

CCP knew exactly what they were doing and they sat on their hands for over 2.5 years letting this nonsense fester.

Back on-topic: Change the Tech 2 manufacturing inputs and *poof* the demand for various moon materials is altered.

+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark “Seleene” Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith.