These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is it time for Technetium to crash?

Author
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#81 - 2012-07-21 22:01:07 UTC
sorry, i don't speak voodoo

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#82 - 2012-07-21 22:27:36 UTC
you see, i predicted exactly what would happen, if you ignore half my coin-flip predictions
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#83 - 2012-07-21 22:49:46 UTC
EvilweaselSA wrote:
you see, i predicted exactly what would happen, if you ignore half my coin-flip predictions


Link?
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#84 - 2012-07-25 01:11:40 UTC
So, new estimated tech prices:
- at an absolute absurd minimum around 50k (based on "everything I get myself is almost free and my time is barely worth anything" calcs),
- close to maximum around 90k (ingredients at halfway decent value and also plenty of alchemy reaction profitability to make wide adoption likely),
- most likely settling somewhere around 75k-85k before any further changes, a bit higher than the midpoint based on the idea that volume demand for T2 items will also pick up due to lowered prices

Let's call that tech going down to about 80k per unit soon.
That's a nice value, lower than its value for most of this year so far, but not by much.
Closer to the situation about a year and a half, maybe two years ago.
Decent enough, for now, I guess.
Airto TLA
Acorn's Wonder Bars
#85 - 2012-07-25 01:56:11 UTC
I am pretty sure 70k or lower in the short run:

two reasons a certain number of people will "try it out", "want to stick it to the goons", and "wow I can make my own tech and be rich" and oversupply the market.

And

From reading this nonsence in this thread I have a sneaking suspicion the Goons had excess inventory they could not dump at the price they wanted and the mad dump is coming (maybe wrong here).

THe one question is where the heck POS fuel ends up at, More supply (catalyst proof ice barges) vs more demand (alchemy towers).

But in the the long term with no changes Akita seems in range. But, TImes are a CHanging.
Ravenclaw2kk
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#86 - 2012-07-25 04:07:29 UTC
Akita T wrote:
So, new estimated tech prices:
- at an absolute absurd minimum around 50k (based on "everything I get myself is almost free and my time is barely worth anything" calcs),
- close to maximum around 90k (ingredients at halfway decent value and also plenty of alchemy reaction profitability to make wide adoption likely),
- most likely settling somewhere around 75k-85k before any further changes, a bit higher than the midpoint based on the idea that volume demand for T2 items will also pick up due to lowered prices

Let's call that tech going down to about 80k per unit soon.
That's a nice value, lower than its value for most of this year so far, but not by much.
Closer to the situation about a year and a half, maybe two years ago.
Decent enough, for now, I guess.



Price is already down to 56k p/u .... massive dumps since the latest announcement. Whether this is the bottom or not remains to be seen, but i imagine there are massive stockpiles and people are getting nervous. We're definetly going to be in for a wild ride and there will be plenty of profit to be made for those brave enough.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#87 - 2012-07-25 04:54:01 UTC
Ravenclaw2kk wrote:
Akita T wrote:
So, new estimated tech prices:
- at an absolute absurd minimum around 50k (based on "everything I get myself is almost free and my time is barely worth anything" calcs),
- close to maximum around 90k (ingredients at halfway decent value and also plenty of alchemy reaction profitability to make wide adoption likely),
- most likely settling somewhere around 75k-85k before any further changes, a bit higher than the midpoint based on the idea that volume demand for T2 items will also pick up due to lowered prices

Let's call that tech going down to about 80k per unit soon.
That's a nice value, lower than its value for most of this year so far, but not by much.
Closer to the situation about a year and a half, maybe two years ago.
Decent enough, for now, I guess.



Price is already down to 56k p/u .... massive dumps since the latest announcement. Whether this is the bottom or not remains to be seen, but i imagine there are massive stockpiles and people are getting nervous. We're definetly going to be in for a wild ride and there will be plenty of profit to be made for those brave enough.


I am laughing quite hard at those who bought Tech at 180k+ like it was the new cow level and now have the short straw in their hands. It's finally like a RL market, if you lose, you lose hard and you lose in an irrecoverable way.
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#88 - 2012-07-25 06:03:16 UTC
Panic fluctuations are quite understandable, no doubt. I fully expect to see several heavy ups and downs until it settles eventually.
Desmont McCallock
#89 - 2012-07-25 10:34:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Desmont McCallock
So, guys, am I the only one who is reading the dev blogs? According to CCP Fozzie post Platinum Technite (which requires Platinum and Technetium in normal reaction to produce) will be possible to produce via Alchemy, using Cobalt and Platinum. Have a look at the prices of those moon goo. Their prices are sky rocketing (especially Cobalt).

I will have the laugh of my life if only CCP postpone those changes. Twisted
Ohh Yeah
Jerkasaurus Wrecks Inc.
Sedition.
#90 - 2012-07-25 17:42:01 UTC
Desmont McCallock wrote:
So, guys, am I the only one who is reading the dev blogs? According to CCP Fozzie post Platinum Technite (which requires Platinum and Technetium in normal reaction to produce) will be possible to produce via Alchemy, using Cobalt and Platinum. Have a look at the prices of those moon goo. Their prices are sky rocketing (especially Cobalt).

I will have the laugh of my life if only CCP postpone those changes. Twisted


Cobalt itself is nearly worthless. The inflated prices are only due to speculation. There are about 1200 cobalt moons, which is more than enough to drive down prices if people decide they are high enough to warrant mining those moons.
Dramaticus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#91 - 2012-07-25 17:51:43 UTC
Ohh Yeah wrote:
Desmont McCallock wrote:
So, guys, am I the only one who is reading the dev blogs? According to CCP Fozzie post Platinum Technite (which requires Platinum and Technetium in normal reaction to produce) will be possible to produce via Alchemy, using Cobalt and Platinum. Have a look at the prices of those moon goo. Their prices are sky rocketing (especially Cobalt).

I will have the laugh of my life if only CCP postpone those changes. Twisted


Cobalt itself is nearly worthless. The inflated prices are only due to speculation. There are about 1200 cobalt moons, which is more than enough to drive down prices if people decide they are high enough to warrant mining those moons.


There's much more than 1200 cobalt moons. Anyone serious about tech alchemy is going to stumble drunkenly for 3 minutes until they hit a cobalt moon and use it instead of buying cobalt in Jita. So, cobalt is going to be effectively free, POS fuel is going to fall like a ************ and platinum isnt exactly rare either. In short, tech craaaaaaaaaaaaaash

The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal

The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#92 - 2012-07-25 22:18:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Desmont McCallock wrote:
So, guys, am I the only one who is reading the dev blogs?Twisted

Since we've been discussing them, obviously not. But you have to go more than the first page to see it.

Ohh Yeah wrote:
Cobalt itself is nearly worthless. The inflated prices are only due to speculation.

Possibly, but not guaranteed. At a 10:1 replacement ratio, the most valuable combos would be those closer to hubs or platinum moons (one plat moon for 10 cobalt ones though, in the long run, but with some heavy starting buffer needed), which somewhat restricts the range of interesting cobalt moons. So, while the current price of cobalt might indeed be unsustainable, to call it completely worthless is a bit of an exaggeration. Although, granted, its price will most likely only influence tech price by probably 5k-10k tops.

Also, it's not like tech alchemy is a no-effort thing.
Alchemy is a pain in the ass due to the need to ship the stuff to a station to refine it (anything else would be madness), so that also reduces the range of "useful" moons.

Dramaticus wrote:
POS fuel is going to fall

The ice stuff part, possibly, due to more survivable barges. But the PI parts, not so much. In fact, those might actually end up going up quite a bit.
So, I'm not so sure the fuel prices will see such a steep decline - some decline almost certainly, but how drastic, too early to tell.

Plus, again, alchemy is not a low-effort thing, due to the annoyances it presents. Alchemy reaction operators will probably expect better profits than regular reaction operators, and that also adds to the likely price of tech.

...

Of course, that still does translate into a heavy tech price drop. But again, just how "heavy", too early to wager on.
Anything between 50k to 90k is within the realm of "likely", and even more extreme values could be possible.
And that's before any further changes to T2 production, which are coming too, eventually, very likely dropping it even further when they eventually get announced.
But that's just long-term equilibrium we're talking about.
Until the change actually goes live, the price of tech could see some heavy-duty fluctuations in both directions. Could drop below 40k temporarily, or could even rise back over 100k briefly. Short-term fluctuations is nothing I could possibly tell anything about, and VV's so-called-by-some "voodoo" is actually better suited for such short-term estimates (obviously not 100% accurate, but better than gut feeling guesses anyway).
Liberty Eternal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2012-07-25 23:26:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Liberty Eternal
What about increase in aggregate demand/supply? Won't that just create a new bottleneck other than technetium? I don't mean Cobalt/platinum, but something else that is restricted.

Ah, meant to put this in the other thread gorramit
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#94 - 2012-07-25 23:41:09 UTC
Akita T wrote:
Short-term fluctuations is nothing I could possibly tell anything about, and VV's so-called-by-some "voodoo" is actually better suited for such short-term estimates (obviously not 100% accurate, but better than gut feeling guesses anyway).


In an environment prone to rapid speculative swings I'd have to imagine that VV's voodoo is worse than useless. But I'm not a practitioner, so what do I know.

Liberty Eternal wrote:
What about increase in aggregate demand/supply? Won't that just create a new bottleneck other than technetium? I don't mean Cobalt/platinum, but something else that is restricted.

Ah, meant to put this in the other thread gorramit


Twisted

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Callduron
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#95 - 2012-07-26 00:15:34 UTC
Liberty Eternal wrote:
What about increase in aggregate demand/supply? Won't that just create a new bottleneck other than technetium? I don't mean Cobalt/platinum, but something else that is restricted.

Ah, meant to put this in the other thread gorramit


Most things are still made of Tech. Jester blogged a couple of months ago that 70% of a Hulk's value was tech and that won't come down all that much.

What else are you thinking might be a bottleneck? Mining is likely to surge with the new hulks, PI is in glut. Ice maybe, another ice interdiction is not only possible but would hurt people trying to damage goon profits by setting up poses to react in. That's offset though by the mining barge changes.

I write http://stabbedup.blogspot.co.uk/

I post on reddit as /u/callduron.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#96 - 2012-07-26 00:24:49 UTC
corestwo wrote:
Akita T wrote:
Short-term fluctuations is nothing I could possibly tell anything about, and VV's so-called-by-some "voodoo" is actually better suited for such short-term estimates (obviously not 100% accurate, but better than gut feeling guesses anyway).


In an environment prone to rapid speculative swings I'd have to imagine that VV's voodoo is worse than useless. But I'm not a practitioner, so what do I know.


Weekly charts to get trend direction and daily charts for trade entries in that direction.
If there's a weekly pin bar then you have a maximum delay of 6 days before price reacts accordingly (average is 2-3 days).

The above assuming using the WPD-WPG method, which is just one of the 3 (4 in the future) that is used. The 2nd method is called "Daily" and I leave to you to guess what time frame it caters to.