These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

So what would it take to suicide gank this?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2012-07-24 22:53:43 UTC
Grumpymunky wrote:
Afk mining becomes even more afk?


not a problem unless there is botting... afk is a zero gain pursuit.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-07-24 22:55:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Barbara Nichole
Lady Spank wrote:
Knowing high-sec kiddy pool mentality you will just see bumping as an effective "asset denial act of attrition" used as a 'tactic' should these things prove ungankable.


They won't be ungankable.. they will just require more equally expensive ships to gank. and you donlt really expect fully tanked ships ... do you?

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]
Daemon Ceed
Ice Fire Warriors
#23 - 2012-07-25 00:32:58 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Lady Spank wrote:
Knowing high-sec kiddy pool mentality you will just see bumping as an effective "asset denial act of attrition" used as a 'tactic' should these things prove ungankable.


They won't be ungankable.. they will just require more equally expensive ships to gank. and you donlt really expect fully tanked ships ... do you?


More equally expensive? Ahahahaha! I can still take out one of these uber-tanked Hulks with 4-5 T1 fitted 5mil Cattys. So you tell me, 20mil potentially lost for a 250mil kill? How is that equally as expensive, again? My maths sometimes aren't that good.
Caviar Liberta
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2012-07-25 02:29:31 UTC
replace one of the mid slots with a medium Ancillary Shield Booster perhaps?
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-07-25 03:02:00 UTC
It's more fun to get a 100mn MWD stabber and bump miners off grid of belts anyway :)

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Pipa Porto
#26 - 2012-07-25 03:29:16 UTC
Daemon Ceed wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Lady Spank wrote:
Knowing high-sec kiddy pool mentality you will just see bumping as an effective "asset denial act of attrition" used as a 'tactic' should these things prove ungankable.


They won't be ungankable.. they will just require more equally expensive ships to gank. and you donlt really expect fully tanked ships ... do you?


More equally expensive? Ahahahaha! I can still take out one of these uber-tanked Hulks with 4-5 T1 fitted 5mil Cattys. So you tell me, 20mil potentially lost for a 250mil kill? How is that equally as expensive, again? My maths sometimes aren't that good.


The Skiff's going to easily have a ~100k EHP buffer. That's a pretty expensive tank to suicide through.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
Taraxon Taranogas
Doomheim
#27 - 2012-08-03 20:25:09 UTC
Daemon Ceed wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Lady Spank wrote:
Knowing high-sec kiddy pool mentality you will just see bumping as an effective "asset denial act of attrition" used as a 'tactic' should these things prove ungankable.


They won't be ungankable.. they will just require more equally expensive ships to gank. and you donlt really expect fully tanked ships ... do you?


More equally expensive? Ahahahaha! I can still take out one of these uber-tanked Hulks with 4-5 T1 fitted 5mil Cattys. So you tell me, 20mil potentially lost for a 250mil kill? How is that equally as expensive, again? My maths sometimes aren't that good.


Your spelling is not up to par either.
Previous page12