These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

ITS TIME TO CHANGE SOMTING WHICH WAS LEFT FROM THE BEGINING !

Author
Zurrdok
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-07-22 06:53:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Zurrdok
SOME SUGGESTIONS

: REMOVE ALL PASIVE MODULES AND SHIP RIGING -- CREATE HOLE NEW SHIP MODIFYING SYSTEM WICH SHOULD ALOW CHANGE EVERY % and BY LIMITED LIKE CALIBRATION, EVERY + to same atribute should BY LIKE
+1 (1%) +2(1.9%) 3(1.8%) AND SO ON WITH NEGATIVE EFECT LIKE (+1(1%) SHIELD -1%HULL)
PLAYERS SHOULD BY ABLE MODYFY EVERYTHING LIKE CONSIDERABLE ADD TO DRONE SPEED LOSING SOME DAMAGE.
REDUCING MISLE RANGE in exchange INCREASING MISLE DAMAGE AND SO ON.

: WHY 8 modules max (wich u try to compensate giving ship insane like +100% turet damage).

: ALOW CHANGE CAP CONSUMTION OFF MODULES LIKE AFTERBURNERS SHIELD ARMOR BOSTERS WICH SHOLD WORK LIKE THAT in afterburner case ( 100 cap +100%, 110 cap +108%, 120 cap +115%
and 90 cap +89% 80 cap +76%). 100cap +100% DEFAULT FROM WICH U START .

: EVEN THINKING HOW TO COULD COST U HEDACHE ,BUT MUST BY DONE CURRENT TURRETS SYSTEM ALOW TO ATACK TARGET ANYWHERE WITH AS MANY TURRETS AS U HAVE ON FITTING SCREEN WICH IS MAKE ANOTHER KICK TO SHIPS BUILDING+MODIFYING (VIZUAL+PROPERTYS(SHIELD,SPEED,RANGE.....) TOOL CREATION WICH SHOULD BY EGZISTED LONG TIME AGO INSTED U UPGRADE CHARACTER PORTRAIT CREATION ALSO WICH MAKE THIS LOOK LIKE EPISODE FROM MOVIE IDEOCRACY. GIVING SHIPS BIG LIKE DREDNOUGH 3 GUNS IS ANOTHER BOUNHEAD MOVE WHEN EVERYONE WOLD LIKE UNLYSH TRUE HELL WITH IT SUGESCION : MAKE FEW TURETS SECTIONS WITH ABILITY TO KEEP ONLY ONE ACTIVE AT A TIME SWICHING DELAY LIKE 50 s .
EVERYTHING SHOULD LOOK LIKE LARGE SHIPS COULD NOT HAVE SAME AMAUNT OFF TURETS EVERYWHERE PERHAPS HAVE SOME BLIND SPOTS OR EVEN WEAKER SHIELD REZISTANCE AT SOME SPOT IFF U WOULD ATEMT TO IMPROVE OLD EGG SYSTEM .
EVERYTHING TURET SETUP, SHIELDING(STRONG,WEAK) SPOTS, SENSORS (PERHAPS SHIP COULD SEE 150KM TO ONE AND 20KM TO OTHER SIDE) SET BY PLAYERS THEMSELVES .

IFF U KEEP PULING BUNYS FROM HAT PLAYERS GOING TO BECOME BORED.

TH FOR READING MY POOR ENGLISH TEXT.
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#2 - 2012-07-22 07:04:55 UTC
I'm not reading that.
Gerrick Palivorn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-07-22 07:33:04 UTC
With a feeble attempt to understand all caps. I got out of it that he wants completely customizable ships. An interesting concept but only from the inception of the game. If you want this, make your own game, compete with EVE and see how it goes; Eve is so terrible you just might beat them at they're own game.

It would take too much balancing and changes to the core gameplay to make a change like this feesable.

MMOs come and go, but Eve remains.  -Garresh-

Dave stark
#4 - 2012-07-22 08:38:27 UTC
oh my eyes! how they bleed! :(
Shereza
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-07-22 08:49:43 UTC
Zurrdok wrote:
SOME SUGGESTIONS

: REMOVE MODULES AND -- CREATE HOLE NEW MODIFYING WICH SHOULD ALOW CHANGE EVERY % BY LIKE , EVERY + to same atribute should BY LIKE
+1 (1%) +2(1.9%3(1.8%) AND NEGATIVE EFECT LIKE (+11%) SHIELD -1%HULL)
PLAYERS SHOULD BY ABLE EVERYTHING LIKE ADD TO DRONE SPEED LOSING SOME DAMAGE.
REDUCING MISLE in INCREASING DAMAGE AND SO ON.

: WHY 8 modules max (wich u try to compensate giving ship insane like +100% turet damage).

: ALOW CHANGE CAP OFF MODULES LIKE AFTERBURNERS SHIELD BOSTERS WICH SHOLD WORK LIKE THAT in afterburner case ( 100 cap +100%110 cap +108%, 120 cap +115%
and 90 cap +89% 80 cap +76%). 100cap +100% DEFAULT FROM WICH U START .
: EVEN HOW TO COST U HEDACHE ,BUT MUST BY DONE SYSTEM ALOW TO ATACK TARGET WITH AS MANY TURRETS AS U HAVE ON SCREEN WICH MAKE ANOTHER KICK TO +MODIFYING (,SPEED,RANGE.....) SHOULD BY EGZISTED LONG TIME AGO INSTED U UPGRADE CHARACTER PORTRAIT CREATION ALSO WICH MAKE THIS LOOK LIKE FROM MOVIE IDEOCRACY. GIVING SHIPS BIG LIKE DREDNOUGH 3 GUNS IS ANOTHER BOUNHEAD MOVE WHEN EVERYONE LIKE UNLYSH TRUE WITH IT : MAKE FEW TURETS SECTIONS WITH ABILITY TO KEEP ONLY ACTIVE AT A TIME SWICHING DELAY LIKE 50 s .EVERYTHING SHOULD LOOK LIKE LARGE SHIPS COULD NOT HAVE SAME AMAUNT OFF TURETS EVERYWHERE HAVE SOME BLIND SPOTS OR EVEN SHIELD REZISTANCE AT SOME SPOT IFF U WOULD ATEMT TO OLD EGG SYSTEM .
EVERYTHING TURET SETUP, SHIELDING(STRONG,WEAK) SPOTS, SENSORS (PERHAPS SHIP COULD SEE 150KM TO ONE AND TO OTHER SIDE) SET BY PLAYERS THEMSELVES .

IFF U KEEP PULING FROM HAT PLAYERS TO BECOME BORED.

TH FOR READING MY ENGLISH TEXT.


Don't thank us for reading something we can't read. Due to your caps lock being on I can't even understand that mess that's being quoted. I'm not even going to try.

I learned long ago that when folks type in all caps my brain skips words, and the post I quoted is exactly what I would have read had I tried to read yours. If you can't make sense of your post after I quote what I would have read then you need to re-type it. With the caps lock off.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#6 - 2012-07-22 08:51:06 UTC
Paikis wrote:
I'm not reading that.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Ganthrithor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-07-22 11:04:05 UTC
Is the thing your caps lock key?
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#8 - 2012-07-22 11:08:30 UTC
Came expecting nerf local thread, left disappointed.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

DarkAegix
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2012-07-22 12:29:07 UTC
LOUD NOISES
Plaude Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-07-22 13:20:25 UTC
Thanks for the headache. Just what I needed to make this day perfect...

I didn't understand what your idea was, but next time, switch off your Caps Lock.

New to EVE? Want to learn? The Crimson Cartel will train you in the fields of _**your **_choice. Mainly active in EU afternoons and evenings. Contact me for more info.

Deena Amaj
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2012-07-22 13:43:02 UTC
Strangely, he gets more attention than those who type normal :D.

I tried reading the OP through nonetheless.
While I can cover an eye for the capslock, it is indeed to hard to understand. I suppose this is may be a troll post but I'd still ask "What's your main language then @ OP".

There are too many wild suggestions so I will pick out the only thing I could understand, which was letting the player choose what ship bonuses he wants.
I like the idea myself, but that' about it. The rest is simply incomprehensible.

confirthisposmed

I'm probably typing on a Tablet too, which means the auto-correct is silly and fixing typos is a pain. I ain't fixing them.

Veinnail
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#12 - 2012-07-22 19:55:55 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Paikis wrote:
I'm not reading that.


ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#13 - 2012-07-22 20:01:02 UTC
I glanced at the OP and my eyes glazed over... so I said "no" on principle.

Then I went back and actually attempted to read it... what I understood I still say "no" to (because the OP obviously doesn't care about balancing issues much).
Jarl Muorin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2012-07-22 20:51:15 UTC
well.. i grabbed one thing out of that wich made some sense. Why have 8 slots as max? Why not just add more slots? Instead of a 100% bonus to turret damage, why not just add more slots ontop of them? This would be "weird" considering that for instance amarr benefit more from having 4 turrets do 200% damage then having 8 turrets and extra highslots (cap wise).
But how to sort that would be for the developers to figure out :3
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#15 - 2012-07-22 21:03:46 UTC
Jarl Muorin wrote:
well.. i grabbed one thing out of that wich made some sense. Why have 8 slots as max? Why not just add more slots? Instead of a 100% bonus to turret damage, why not just add more slots ontop of them? This would be "weird" considering that for instance amarr benefit more from having 4 turrets do 200% damage then having 8 turrets and extra highslots (cap wise).
But how to sort that would be for the developers to figure out :3

I'd hazard a guess that an upper limit was decided on purely for aesthetic and design purposes.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

killroy v2
Catskull Horizons
Grimskulls
#16 - 2012-07-22 22:45:28 UTC
Veinnail wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Paikis wrote:
I'm not reading that.



leviticus ander
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-07-23 02:03:17 UTC  |  Edited by: leviticus ander
Quote:
Some suggestions

1 : remove all passive modules and ship rigging. Create whole new ship modifying system, which should allow you to change every % and by limited like calibration, every + to same attribute should by like
+1 (1%) +2(1.9%) 3(1.8%) and so on with negative effect like (+1(1%) shield -1%hull)
players should by able modify everything like considerable add to drone speed losing some damage.
reducing missile range in exchange increasing missile damage and so on.

2 : why 8 modules max (which you try to compensate giving ship insane like +100% turret damage).

3 : allow change cap consumption off modules like an afterburner to be changed manually to get a better or more cap efficient boost
such as, you can up the cap consumption to get more speed. 100 cap = +100%, 110 cap = +108%, 120 cap = +115%
or you could lower the cap usage to be a little slower, but use less cap. 90 cap = +89%, 80 cap = +76%).

4 : even thinking how to could cause you headache, but must by done current turrets system allow to attack target anywhere with as many turrets as you have on fitting screen which is make another change to ships building+modifying (visual+property(shield,speed,range.....) Tool creation which should have existed a long time ago, instead you decided to upgrade character portrait creation which make this look like episode from movie idiocracy. Giving big ships like dreadnought 3 guns is another bonehead move when everyone would like unleash true hell with it. suggestion : make few turrets sections with the ability to keep only one active at a time, but have a switching delay like 50 seconds.
everything should look like large ships could not have same amount off turrets everywhere perhaps have some blind spots or even weaker shield resistance at some spot, maybe you could attempt to improve old system .
Everything turret set up, shielding(strong,weak) spots, sensors (perhaps ship could lock out to 150km to one and 20km to other side) would be set up by players themselves .

If you keep puling bunnies from hat players going to become bored.

Thank for reading my poor English text.


for those of you whining about all caps.
just so you know, that took me about 15 seconds to do. copy into a text editor, use the change case button.
EDIT: give me a bit and I'll translate what I can into reasonably understandable English.
that fourth point was pretty cryptic in some places, so I couldn't change too much without possibly changing his original intentions.
Feligast
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2012-07-23 06:12:28 UTC
leviticus ander wrote:
Quote:
Some suggestions

1 : remove all passive modules and ship rigging. Create whole new ship modifying system, which should allow you to change every % and by limited like calibration, every + to same attribute should by like
+1 (1%) +2(1.9%) 3(1.8%) and so on with negative effect like (+1(1%) shield -1%hull)
players should by able modify everything like considerable add to drone speed losing some damage.
reducing missile range in exchange increasing missile damage and so on.

2 : why 8 modules max (which you try to compensate giving ship insane like +100% turret damage).

3 : allow change cap consumption off modules like an afterburner to be changed manually to get a better or more cap efficient boost
such as, you can up the cap consumption to get more speed. 100 cap = +100%, 110 cap = +108%, 120 cap = +115%
or you could lower the cap usage to be a little slower, but use less cap. 90 cap = +89%, 80 cap = +76%).

4 : even thinking how to could cause you headache, but must by done current turrets system allow to attack target anywhere with as many turrets as you have on fitting screen which is make another change to ships building+modifying (visual+property(shield,speed,range.....) Tool creation which should have existed a long time ago, instead you decided to upgrade character portrait creation which make this look like episode from movie idiocracy. Giving big ships like dreadnought 3 guns is another bonehead move when everyone would like unleash true hell with it. suggestion : make few turrets sections with the ability to keep only one active at a time, but have a switching delay like 50 seconds.
everything should look like large ships could not have same amount off turrets everywhere perhaps have some blind spots or even weaker shield resistance at some spot, maybe you could attempt to improve old system .
Everything turret set up, shielding(strong,weak) spots, sensors (perhaps ship could lock out to 150km to one and 20km to other side) would be set up by players themselves .

If you keep puling bunnies from hat players going to become bored.

Thank for reading my poor English text.


for those of you whining about all caps.
just so you know, that took me about 15 seconds to do. copy into a text editor, use the change case button.
EDIT: give me a bit and I'll translate what I can into reasonably understandable English.
that fourth point was pretty cryptic in some places, so I couldn't change too much without possibly changing his original intentions.


You missed the point. The point was, it's a terrible post, with terrible ideas, and he should feel terrible.
Cardano Firesnake
Fire Bullet Inc
#19 - 2012-07-23 11:18:40 UTC
I am losing my time here. But I wanted this guy to know : This post is ridiculous.

Posted - 2010.07.01 11:24:00 - [4] Erase learning skills, remap all SP. That's all.

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-07-23 13:11:02 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Paikis wrote:
I'm not reading that.


Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

12Next page