These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

After that nerf CCP must allow motherships docking

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
eVRiAL
Reveka.
Bad-Touch
#1 - 2011-10-10 21:22:41 UTC
Applying to the changes, there is only one way to use motherships in a role how it was originally conceived is allow docking them.
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2 - 2011-10-10 21:30:37 UTC
wrong, moron

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.
iKill Giants
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2011-10-10 21:33:29 UTC
You know, the point of nerfing is to decrease the capabilities of the ship where needed so they fit into their role better. Adding a major boon of being untouchable, if trapped, after a session timer is kind of counter-purpose here.

Basically, no.
Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2011-10-10 21:34:54 UTC
I looked at the details, carefully weighed up either side... Turns out you are wrong...

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#5 - 2011-10-10 21:35:04 UTC
eVRiAL wrote:
Applying to the changes, there is only one way to use motherships in a role how it was originally conceived is allow docking them.


Don't fly what you can't afford to lose.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#6 - 2011-10-10 21:37:39 UTC
Not really, no.
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#7 - 2011-10-10 21:38:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Nova Fox
The following needs to happen first before I agree.

Dock Jammers

Being able to look outside from inside a station.

Dock speed based on size.

Better BUMPING mechanics that where explored and never fully realized before QA threw them out for throwing a POS out of system becuase QA spawned 32 titans on it. I would love to have a super capitol just plow though a sub cap fleet and the only person who can really bump him is probably another capitol-super capitol.

While we are at it, Self Destruct Timers based on ship size just to hush up those kill mailers.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#8 - 2011-10-10 21:39:21 UTC
I don't think SCs should be allowed to dock, but they should receive their respective racial CQ as a compensation for the removal of their drone bays.

You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Djakku
U Subbed M8
#9 - 2011-10-10 21:57:25 UTC
Has Quafe T-Shirt.
Feligast
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2011-10-10 22:01:15 UTC
eVRiAL wrote:
Applying to the changes, there is only one way to use motherships in a role how it was originally conceived is allow docking them.


No.
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2011-10-10 22:04:42 UTC
eVRiAL wrote:
Applying to the changes, there is only one way to use motherships in a role how it was originally conceived is allow docking them.

only after they fix docking games.


and even then they shouldn't be allowed to dock.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right
EnderCapitalG
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#12 - 2011-10-10 22:07:36 UTC
eVRiAL wrote:
Applying to the changes, there is only one way to use motherships in a role how it was originally conceived is allow docking them.


No.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#13 - 2011-10-10 22:08:10 UTC
This topic reeks of fear.
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Midgard Academy
#14 - 2011-10-10 22:26:33 UTC
The correct answer is of course. NO!

Why Can't I have a picture signature.

Also please support graphical immersion, bring back the art that brought people to EvE online originaly.
Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
#15 - 2011-10-10 22:36:29 UTC
I think we should be allowed to codebreak supercaps hanger arrays then dock smartbombing bs in them and blow them up from the inside.

♥ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children ♥
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2011-10-10 22:41:11 UTC
SC were designed to be big carriers

after dominion they were meant to be the anti capship tool of destruction
accidentally they became the anti everything

now that they are being fixed u want to let them dock?
fine, but only in highsec.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2011-10-10 23:03:38 UTC
I think supercaps should look like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Indanu
Cyber Collapse.
Fanatic Legion.
#18 - 2011-10-11 13:07:53 UTC
i thinks this changes only Fighter Bomber and Supercarriers
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#19 - 2011-10-11 13:17:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Samillian
eVRiAL wrote:
Applying to the changes, there is only one way to use motherships in a role how it was originally conceived is allow docking them.


Why?

SC's have not changed enough to justify docking rights as far as I can see. Please feel free to post a well thought out argument for allowing SC's to dock at some point in this thread for further consideration.

By the way "Just because!!!" does not count as a well thought out argument.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law
Qupid Stunt
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2011-10-11 13:20:51 UTC
So much whining!

This forum in now full of super rich players whining because there is now the hint of a possibility that they might lose their massively expensive super capital ships. What happened to don’t fly what you can’t afford to lose?
All the newbies (myself included) regularly spend 10, 20, 30% of all the isk we own on a ship with the sole intention of getting it blown up. If we are lucky we may get a couple of decent fights before our demise. At which point we will stat saving for another ship.
This is what EVE is all about. Why should you expect to be immune from this concept?
12Next page