Test Server Feedback

Machariel was, and still is with the change a bit too big. the old size (1900) makes the ship LARGER than some carriers, and frankly thats a bit ridiculous. This gave the ship specific advantages in game, like making it easier to bump enemy ships, but really throws off the overall scale of the different ships in eve. I know that fitting them on grid would be ridiculous if they reflected their true lengths and signature radii' and all, but battleships and carrier same size was bad.

I support this change.

I agree, Mach was big, but it should remain the biggest BS in the game.
Its made from Jove designs, so its advanced tech somewhat. Big, fast and agile.
Seeing Mach in action next to other ships is awesome, now resized its like all other BSs, not so imposing.
So resize all or restore Mach to 1.9km CCP, please.

Scaling ingame is a old problem, 2km long Provi can dock in the station and any SC cant, Nyx and Wyvren are only 3.2-3.3km long. Not much of a difference for docking (since i see a lot of empty space next to my docked Provi :)
Hell, Archon is 3286m long and can dock, Wyvren is 3226 and cant dock, funny aint it. So a regular carrier is bigger than a super carrier.....WTF here? Gonna resize Wyvren and Nyx then or downsize Archon? Fix all or dont bother at all.

Turrets look like insanely big cannons on frigates, on BS they look like toys, not scaled at all properly.

Fitting 2 BS in a carrier is a old stupid problem, how can a carrier barely few hundred meters bigger than 1 BS, fit 2 in its hangar? The carrier should be then 4 times the size at least to fit two 1km long BS inside.

Sig sizes and weight aside, titans should then be ~30km, SC 10-13km, and carriers around at least twice the current size to get any sense of scale.

Yeah, well sizes are not set in stone, just keep the scale somewhat working.
Titans should dwarf anything, so being double the size of a SC is IMHO kinda small, x3 the size maybe?

Honestly i forgot about dreads, some like Nag are bigger than SCs and can still dock, they are the size of SC anyway, so bumping them to 7-8km and SC to 10-13.

The mach was fine in size, its the capitals that are way too small... also the rifter needs to go down in size or at least make the guns bigger :/ its ridiculous...

Yes true that it was the biggest, but maybe the material it was made from, due to the Jovian+Angel nature, it just had the properties of being very agile and fast. Size doesn't always mean slower/faster. But thrasher is lol yeah.

yeah please please restore the previous size
now is smaller than hyperion and apocalypse :/.... he always had that size why reduce it now ??
he's the biggest BS, that's what makes it unique.

I think some of the rescaling was do to fitting the new launchers on ships.

The Rifter is huge now, it went from 56m to 139m... kinda ridiculous. I think they over did it on some ships.

Would really like to see some uniformity with ship sizes based on their class.

ok, this explains why when i undocked in my dramiel to check out its newer much darker textures i could barely see the turrets... i was thinking, did they shrink the turrets that much? it just feels way too big

but in this case must be changed the unpackaged size he's the only BS who take 595K m3 before it makes sense...

That was what i was referring to, Sizes from Capitals are to small, in relation to the noncapital ships, so technically the downsizing from the Machariel wasn't necessary, just a scale up in sizes for the Carriers and Super Carriers would've done the job just saying.

sincerly

Carola Kessler