These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Angle ships

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#61 - 2012-07-13 23:44:51 UTC
Soi Mala wrote:
nat longshot wrote:
Aaron Barton wrote:
CCP Zorba wrote:
Yup, those 'other' factions are on our list and I suspect they'll get done for the winter expansion. Unfortunately we only have so many artists, fortunately our tools are getting better and better and make this whole process much, much easier.


That's good to hear. Will the Daredevil get the same paintjob as the Vigilant and the Vindicator? It's been kinda bothering me ever since the Caldari and Gallente V3.


it should have Angel paint given is a Angels ship not SERP. ship.


Actually, it's Serpentis, the Dramiel is Angel.

You seem to be well informed and intelligent, why have you not coded your own V3 since you love them so much? I'm sure it would take you much less than a year to overhaul every single art asset in the game.


And then she never posted again, out of shame

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg
Ganthrithor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#62 - 2012-07-14 03:55:21 UTC
CCP Paradox wrote:
You guys should probably check out the Angel ships on Sisi now... just sayin'


All my hearts, bro.

Except to whoever decided to shrink the Mach. They get fewer hearts.

The new Dram / DD / skins look sick. The new cynabal one is p good. The mach one looks like the old skin, but darker and with some recycled PI icon or something spinning around on that engine pod thing on the left side. I'm not sure how awesome it is. It's ok I guess. Please unshrink the ship before release though, I liked how my Mach was the same size as my Thanatos.

Also, re-shrink the Chimera so its the size of a Rokh, because that was also the best.
Unezka Turigahl
Det Som Engang Var
#63 - 2012-07-14 06:35:17 UTC
Guess I'm alone in not liking them. They are dark and sleek and sexy on Tranquility. On the test server the camouflage, over-saturated lights, and headlights make them gaudy and cartoony. The frigates suffer the most.
TakeTheCannolis
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#64 - 2012-07-17 22:29:02 UTC
The new color scheme on SISI is just a bit too... brown. Somewhere between the gray/blue/green Gallente and rusty Minmatar, kind of like what's on TQ already, would be more fitting given the Gallente/Minmatar history of Angel Cartel. As it stands now, the color scheme looks like what I'd expect to find on a dirty Minmatar ship... if such a thing is possible.

Also, what's with the glowing, rotating bit on the Machariel? It looks like a red-hot car cigarette lighter. Oh, and you're shrinking it? To the point of being smaller than a Maelstrom? For shame. I know people have made complaints about it being roughly the size of a carrier, but the size is part of the novelty of it. If anything, the Mach being so close in size to carriers and supers says more about how small carriers and supers are than how big the Mach is. If anything, carriers should be scaled to roughly the size of what supers currently are, and supers roughly half the size of titans.
Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
#65 - 2012-07-17 23:08:02 UTC
TakeTheCannolis wrote:
the Mach being so close in size to carriers and supers says more about how small carriers and supers are than how big the Mach is. If anything, carriers should be scaled to roughly the size of what supers currently are, and supers roughly half the size of titans.



This. Big ships need to get bigger, as do stations. These things should feel colossal and intimidating.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#66 - 2012-07-18 04:50:07 UTC
Aaron Barton wrote:
CCP Zorba wrote:
Yup, those 'other' factions are on our list and I suspect they'll get done for the winter expansion. Unfortunately we only have so many artists, fortunately our tools are getting better and better and make this whole process much, much easier.


That's good to hear. Will the Daredevil get the same paintjob as the Vigilant and the Vindicator? It's been kinda bothering me ever since the Caldari and Gallente V3.


while youre at it, please change the daredevil icon background to the gallente one.
SS ships are gallente at heart, not minmatard.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Xercodo
Cruor Angelicus
#67 - 2012-07-19 00:02:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Xercodo
Jack Miton wrote:
Aaron Barton wrote:
CCP Zorba wrote:
Yup, those 'other' factions are on our list and I suspect they'll get done for the winter expansion. Unfortunately we only have so many artists, fortunately our tools are getting better and better and make this whole process much, much easier.


That's good to hear. Will the Daredevil get the same paintjob as the Vigilant and the Vindicator? It's been kinda bothering me ever since the Caldari and Gallente V3.


while youre at it, please change the daredevil icon background to the gallente one.
SS ships are gallente at heart, not minmatard.


It's an angel ship.

http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Guardian_Angels
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Serpentis

The Drake is a Lie
Mioelnir
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#68 - 2012-07-19 00:43:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Mioelnir
I applaud the art team on using the correct faction logo for the angel ships on their first try.

The minmatar ones are still wrong for the 3 tech 2 manufacturers though.

Thukker Mix is not Thukker Tribe (close one though).
Boundless Creation is not Brutor Tribe.
Core Complexion is not Sebiestor Tribe.

PS: the Cynabal will from now until the end of time be known as "Rudolph, the red nosed faction cruiser".
Helsdottir
Black Mountain Research Inc.
#69 - 2012-07-20 00:28:19 UTC
Unezka Turigahl wrote:
Guess I'm alone in not liking them. They are dark and sleek and sexy on Tranquility. On the test server the camouflage, over-saturated lights, and headlights make them gaudy and cartoony. The frigates suffer the most.


I totally agree with you on that.
The new G.I.Joe action figurine like design completely undermines Angel Cartel history and ancestry. Former scarring/tattooing
as found through much if not all of pirate history traded for cheap standard desert trooper's military camo.
No more semi-mythological, jovian and almost sleeper-like coloration and materials, no more breathtaking
and superior speed and flexibility despite its disturbing size that bespoke its reputation as a predator from times of yore when
giants and angels walked among the people of new eden, at least with those that lived to tell about it.
Instead more shiny fresh from the box.
Unfortunately, as with many projects designers get tasked with, not the small, intricate and authenticity-substantiating, but the
gaudy changes that are easily distinguishable for most do sell, and selling them they must.

Good thing about new V3 designs is the Cynabal propulsion coloration fitting better with the rest of the hull, which is a very good
first step, giving it's prow a less chipmunkaesk outlook though would be a nice follower.
Furthermore thumps up for new light-beams (: have them shine a little more gloomy like having to break through a fog as seen with the new minmatar scimitar, and you're making it golden...).
Tarn Kugisa
Kugisa Dynamics
#70 - 2012-07-20 05:17:22 UTC
wat
ships need more angles?

Be polite. Be efficient. Have a plan to troll everyone you meet - KuroVolt
Kaycerra
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2012-07-20 06:28:21 UTC
@ Title

What kinda angles are we talking about? There seems to be a stark contrast between thread title, and thread subject matter.
I for one, support all ships being acute angle triangles!
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#72 - 2012-07-20 08:54:41 UTC
remove topic they did the v3 delete please

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Lyron-Baktos
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#73 - 2012-07-20 18:14:15 UTC
I would still like a solid answer on why the Amaar gold was destroyed
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#74 - 2012-07-20 21:17:26 UTC
Soi Mala wrote:
TakeTheCannolis wrote:
the Mach being so close in size to carriers and supers says more about how small carriers and supers are than how big the Mach is. If anything, carriers should be scaled to roughly the size of what supers currently are, and supers roughly half the size of titans.



This. Big ships need to get bigger, as do stations. These things should feel colossal and intimidating.


yup, the mach wasn't too big honestly, They could put it back up to 1900 becuase the mealstrom is also carrier sized.

CArriers should be a LOT BIGGER than a battleship in eve. seriously :/ Also titansshouldarriers. A nxyn't be quite as much bigger than carrier.

I would like to see 2 nyx be about as long of a titan.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#75 - 2012-07-20 21:19:08 UTC
Lyron-Baktos wrote:
I would still like a solid answer on why the Amaar gold was destroyed


you must not have logged in resently then gold has a slick gold shader on it. IT's not the whole ship anymore, the parts that are gold are like WOW GOLD!

Take oe into station or into space. They are a bit too dark in the preview window. The gold was AMPED UP. There is just less of it on the ships.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#76 - 2012-07-21 01:18:47 UTC
Dram still has a snake skin like texture bevel on its center fuselage that the others don't have.
If the Angels look more like snakes than even serpentis, atleast they would start to look better.