These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

T2BPO why they should be removed and how.

First post
Author
CorInaXeraL
The Dresdeneers
#741 - 2012-07-19 21:16:13 UTC
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
I'd be happy if invention was buffed beyond T2BP or if invention actually made items beyond T2 ie T2-B items that had slightly better stats or fitting requirements than current T2. This would allow bitter vets to keep their free hand out while making them irrelevant for inventors.



While we're at it...the Adrestia is too powerful and was never properly seeded in the game. It only went to AT winners. So did a large number of other ships that make my poor T2 ships OBSOLETE and not worth flying.


Let's get rid of all that stuff too.

WTB rifters with snowball launchers.
Pipa Porto
#742 - 2012-07-19 22:07:31 UTC
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
I'd be happy if invention was buffed beyond T2BP or if invention actually made items beyond T2 ie T2-B items that had slightly better stats or fitting requirements than current T2. This would allow bitter vets to keep their free hand out while making them irrelevant for inventors.


Invention is a far better investment than T2 BPOs.

Give me the 100b that a Hulk BPO costs (and the 8b of materials to produce 32 Hulks for the month) and I'll make much more than the 2.5b a month that the Hulk BPO can return (assuming ME 100, PE 50).

For instance, in the same time period, with the same capital (110b), I could run 2 characters inventing and building Hulks, making 520 Hulks for around a 14 Billion Isk profit (accounting for invention and Plex costs). (Actually, I run out of materials after 410 Hulks and a profit of 11 Billion ISK, so the month ends 5 days early)

That's 4 times the profit of the BPO.

If I owned a T2 BPO the first thing I'd do is sell it.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#743 - 2012-07-19 22:10:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
I'd be happy if invention was buffed beyond T2BP

Really ? So the only ever so slight advantage of T2 BPOs should be convenience AT A HIGHER PER UNIT COST ? What the heck are you smoking ?
Quote:
or if invention actually made items beyond T2 ie T2-B items that had slightly better stats or fitting requirements than current T2.

Oh, you mean the (eventually) upcoming T3 things ?
Quote:
This would allow bitter vets to keep their free hand out while making them irrelevant for inventors.

Seriously, still on with that nonsense ?
Most of the current owners bought the BPOs fair and square with cold hard ISK.
How exactly is any of that a free handout ?
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#744 - 2012-07-19 22:11:50 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
If I owned a T2 BPO the first thing I'd do is sell it.


Why? You would get huge profit using it.
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#745 - 2012-07-19 22:16:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
If I owned a T2 BPO the first thing I'd do is sell it.

Why? You would get huge profit using it.

The same reason I'm not buying any T2 BPOs even if I could easily afford (over 0.2 trillion unused liquid ISK right now) to buy several of those that keep constantly popping up for sale (and DO get sold) - because you would get an even greater profit with less running around required by using the amount of money the BPO is currently worth to do something else (oh, say, large-scale trading), that's why.
T2 BPOs are NOT the only investments possible. In fact, T2 BPOs are amongst the worst performing investments in terms of RoI you can make in EVE right now - with breakevens in the range of 3 to 10 years (and most of them 5+), that's a paltry 0.83%-2.77% per month (without recapitalization), while SEMI-CASUAL (still less effort than T2 manufacture) short-term "daytrading" can easily yield over 10% per month (that CAN be re-capitalized) even at large total amounts involved.
Make your money back in 5 years of constant effort, or make 15 times the cash in 2 years of mostly waiting after some predictive effort, guess which one is better from where I'm standing.

Getting a non-recapitalized 1.66% of the initial investment per month while also needing quite a bit of trading effort on the side either way is simply not worth bothering with, from my viewpoint.
Hell, I charge 2% per month by LOANING ISK TO PEOPLE I KNOW IN RL (so I am fairly certain they won't try to scam me), and that requires ZERO effort.
Most public loans charge over 5% per month, and that's with good collateral.

T2 BPOs are a horrible financial investment at their current prices.
The wise choice would be to sell them ASAP if you have any... and do ALMOST ANYTHING ELSE with that ISK.
Pipa Porto
#746 - 2012-07-19 22:24:47 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
If I owned a T2 BPO the first thing I'd do is sell it.


Why? You would get huge profit using it.


You could try reading the rest of my post.

I could make 2.5b building 30 Hulks a month with a BPO, or I could use the same capital and make 10-15b building a few hundred through invention. Or, I could use it for even more lucrative investments.

2.5% a month is pretty crappy profit for Eve.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#747 - 2012-07-19 23:17:10 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
You could try reading the rest of my post.

I could make 2.5b building 30 Hulks a month with a BPO, or I could use the same capital and make 10-15b building a few hundred through invention. Or, I could use it for even more lucrative investments.

2.5% a month is pretty crappy profit for Eve.


That's same profit I get. Could be higher if I could get materials faster to build more.

You calculated it wrong.
Pipa Porto
#748 - 2012-07-19 23:23:24 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
You could try reading the rest of my post.

I could make 2.5b building 30 Hulks a month with a BPO, or I could use the same capital and make 10-15b building a few hundred through invention. Or, I could use it for even more lucrative investments.

2.5% a month is pretty crappy profit for Eve.


That's same profit I get. Could be higher if I could get materials faster to build more.

You calculated it wrong.


No, I didn't.

A T2 BPO can run through 8b worth of materials in a month producing some 30 Hulks. Total profit for 110b invested, 2.5b.

An Inventor can churn through 110b worth of materials in that same month, producing some few hundred Hulks. Total profit for 110b invested, some 11b.

Just because you're bad at something doesn't mean it's broken.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#749 - 2012-07-19 23:25:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Could be higher if I could get materials faster to build more.

Here's a "novel" thought : how about buying them from the market ?
If it's not profitable to buy them from the market, why do you even invent at all, just build the components and sell THOSE on the market, since apparently that's where YOU get most of the actual profit from, component manufacture.
Plus, you don't need over 100 bil of ISK invested initially if you're doing invention. You're doing smaller batches anyway. You could easily get away with under 20b worth of materials.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#750 - 2012-07-19 23:27:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Akita T wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Could be higher if I could get materials faster to build more.

Here's a "novel" thought : how about your BUY THEM FROM THE MARKET ?


Even less profit at these prices.

For BC hull profit is around 2% per hull if I buy everything from market.
Pipa Porto
#751 - 2012-07-19 23:32:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Akita T wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Could be higher if I could get materials faster to build more.

Here's a "novel" thought : how about your BUY THEM FROM THE MARKET ?


Even less profit at these prices.


11b a month sounds like a pretty good profit to me.


By the way, Copying a Titan BPO is a better use of 100b ISK than a Hulk BPO (and they're only ~80b, so you get 20b back before you even start), even with the drastic fall in Titan BPC prices.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#752 - 2012-07-19 23:32:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Even less profit at these prices.

Oh, yeah, because somehow magically something that you make yourself has a lower value than the exact same thing you get from the market... that's sarcasm, by the way.
If a big portion of your profit actually comes from manufacturing components, why do you even bother with invention at all to begin with and not just scale up your component production capabilities instead ?
Or maybe it actually comes from trading the materials needed for the production of the components ? Then do THAT more instead.

Each step is either profitable, or it isn't, all by itself. Do whatever's the most profitable, and do it more. Then buy whatever else you actually need with the extra ISK you've made.

Jorma Morkkis wrote:
For BC hull profit is around 2% per hull if I buy everything from market.

Manufacture profit is best expressed in terms of ISK/slot per units of time, not in percent of ISK added to material costs.
If you can make 270 BCs in a month and you could actually recapitalize at each step at no extra cost (you can't, due to slot limits and due to other factors that might be partially mitigable, so mostly because of slot limits), that would actually end up as a more than 200-fold increase in initial capital, or more precisely, a 20891% profit.
As you can easily see, % per unit profit has very little meaning here. You need to do ISK/slot/time.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#753 - 2012-07-20 01:39:20 UTC
Akita T wrote:
If a big portion of your profit actually comes from manufacturing components, why do you even bother with invention at all to begin with and not just scale up your component production capabilities instead ?


If I want to manufacture most of the components, why I'm not allowed to do that?
Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#754 - 2012-07-20 02:15:27 UTC
Akita T wrote:

NOT renting an office in whatever system you put the POS up is bordering on totally stupid


I'm not understanding the logic of this. How is it stupid? Someone's going to wardec me for unknown blueprints that I'm just going to move out of the system within 24 hours? pshh.....and? Is there something more that I'm missing?
shar'ra matcevsovski
Doomheim
#755 - 2012-07-20 02:36:16 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Akita T wrote:
If a big portion of your profit actually comes from manufacturing components, why do you even bother with invention at all to begin with and not just scale up your component production capabilities instead ?


If I want to manufacture most of the components, why I'm not allowed to do that?

Did he say your not allowed to, or anything about permission?

@Smohq Anmirorz
you cant access the prints remotely when inside of a lab to begin with... also, some ppl actually do work or are not able to log every 24 hours in, so a war might not getting noticed. Not that big of a deal, true, but if u can avoid it that so easy why dont rent a offcie for 10.000 isk (if its not crowded)? I personnly share akitas opinion that a smart person would just rent that office

shar'ra phone home

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#756 - 2012-07-20 02:57:20 UTC
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:

@Smohq Anmirorz
you cant access the prints remotely when inside of a lab to begin with... also, some ppl actually do work or are not able to log every 24 hours in, so a war might not getting noticed. Not that big of a deal, true, but if u can avoid it that so easy why dont rent a offcie for 10.000 isk (if its not crowded)? I personnly share akitas opinion that a smart person would just rent that office


Well, that's not stupid, then...just inconvenient.
Katerwaul
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#757 - 2012-07-20 03:10:50 UTC
Brewlar Kuvakei, why are you still telling people how to build castles in their sandbox?

Who owns T2BPOs? The same types of people who have BPOs that have ME & PE research already completed on them:

1. Players who worked to get them while they were available.
2. Players who ganked them out of ships or stole them from corp while unlocked.
3. Players who have WORKED for them & purchased them from players who had them already.

Players who purchased them illegally using RMT should and do have their accounts punished for the action, just like all RMT is punished.
The players who received them in an unauthorized fashion had them removed.

How do you even substantiate "They were simply handed as assets in secret to certain players by CCP" as a way that any of the t2 BPOs were seeded? Is there a reason they were handed out? (Reward for a contest? Noticed a bug in the game & determined that the players should have received the BPOs but didn't? Just felt like it?)


It's fair to say that EVERYTHING in the game is slanted so that players who have been playing longer can have an advantage...it's kind of how doing ANYTHING longer works. You are more experienced, more proficient, and more capable of doing anything you've done for an extended period of time.
Working with everyone to improve New Eden -- Internet Spaceships Iz Serious Business.
Pipa Porto
#758 - 2012-07-20 03:17:40 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Akita T wrote:
If a big portion of your profit actually comes from manufacturing components, why do you even bother with invention at all to begin with and not just scale up your component production capabilities instead ?


If I want to manufacture most of the components, why I'm not allowed to do that?


Where did Akita say you weren't allowed to? She said that it's not the most efficient use of your time. If you're not worried about the most efficient use of your time, and prefer to do things less efficiently, you don't get to complain when people reduce your profits by being more efficient than you.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

shar'ra matcevsovski
Doomheim
#759 - 2012-07-20 03:29:41 UTC
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:

Well, that's not stupid, then...just inconvenient.

easy avoidable and pointless inconveniences are kindoff stupid per Definition.

shar'ra phone home

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#760 - 2012-07-20 03:54:06 UTC
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:

Well, that's not stupid, then...just inconvenient.

easy avoidable and pointless inconveniences are kindoff stupid per Definition.



I was just trying to figure out if there was something I was missing. You're not talking about something inherently stupid, just situationally stupid. If all you're doing is copying T1 BPOs and inventing, how is there even that much risk? Copying takes a bit so if you're away for over 24 hours I suppose those might be at risk. Invention doesn't take that long and if you're successful you just take it with you. It just doesn't seem risky when, for many people, their structures are the biggest hit the owner will feel, not the few million in T1 BPO's he was working with. So for many it would seem to be pointless to worry about locking BPO's in a station just because 'everyone says so'.