These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Pay to win

First post
Author
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#241 - 2012-07-17 13:37:22 UTC
Degren wrote:
The argument I don't get is "Paying for plex is ok. Paying for standings isn't."

You would be paying for an in game advantage, is why.

PLEX is not an advantage since you can acquire the same amount of ISK legitimately. You can't convert ISK into standings.

Now, if you could simply hand PLEX into an agent to get better standings, that would be fine.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

DrSmegma
Smegma United
#242 - 2012-07-17 13:38:02 UTC  |  Edited by: DrSmegma
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Degren wrote:
The argument I don't get is "Paying for plex is ok. Paying for standings isn't."

You would be paying for an in game advantage, is why.

PLEX is not an advantage since you can acquire the same amount of ISK legitimately.

Now, if you could simply hand PLEX into an agent to get better standings, that would be fine.


You can acquire standings legitimately too..... When will you realize that in your mind, thinking works this way:
- Assume Eve is not P2W
- Bend your arguments based on that belief contrary to all logic, risk looking like a fool but don't ever let your initial belief crumble

It doesn't matter whether you
1.) Buy PLEX for 15 USD
2.) Give PLEX to agent
3.) Get standings of 10.0

or
1.) Give 15 USD to agent
2.) Get standings of 10.0

It is the same. THE SAME.

Eve too complicated? Try Astrum Regatta.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#243 - 2012-07-17 13:46:46 UTC
There's nothing you can do with an alt that you can't do with a single account and some friends / allies / hired help.

There's nothing you can purchase after selling PLEX that you can't purchase without it.

"Pay to win" implies that you pay extra money to receive perks that are completely unavailable to those not willing to pay the extra cash. If you can't see the problem with that, get outta my Eve.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#244 - 2012-07-17 13:50:11 UTC
DrSmegma wrote:
1.) Buy PLEX for 15 USD
2.) Give PLEX to agent
3.) Get standings of 10.0

or
1.) Give 15 USD to agent
2.) Get standings of 10.0

It is the same. THE SAME.

No, it's not.

I can buy a PLEX on the market and cash it in with the agent.

I can't buy $15 on the market and give it to the agent.

Do you see the difference? With PLEX being the *sole* method of RMT in Eve, it allows those who don't use RMT to still gain access to all the same features, by purchasing PLEX from those who *do* RMT.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Yeep
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#245 - 2012-07-17 14:15:04 UTC
See CCP, this is what happens when you put ISK amounts on killmails, people start to think they're important.
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#246 - 2012-07-17 14:15:31 UTC
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
At least one forum poster here has said he funds his big corp's pvp with RL money. I.e. by buying isk (PLEX). That's pretty pay to win, no?

It's really simple.

The concept of "pay to win" is that you can chose to pay, and get an ingame advantage (gold ammo, special ships, whatever).

Since EvE has no such items, and indeed you cannot pay for them, there is no ability to pay to win.

You can spend $30 on your PVP battleship and I will spend 1bil ISK and you have absolutely no advantage to it at all.

I still don't see how that's not paying to win. Consider as an example a wardec situation between corps. Attrition has wiped out each side's best ships. Corp A spends $100 RL money to buy isk (PLEX). It equips a new insta-fleet. Corp B's members are poor instant ramen eaters with no extra cash to spend on EVE. The can only fly the ships they still have, which are their crappier ones.
Who's going to have the advantage in this war? And where did it come from? In-game skill, or out-of-game cash? That sounds like pay to win to me.
Mathicluanna
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#247 - 2012-07-17 14:22:40 UTC
Yeep wrote:
See CCP, this is what happens when you put ISK amounts on killmails, people start to think they're important.


Oh hey I posted on an alt too I guess I'm paying 2 win this forum argument.
Signal11th
#248 - 2012-07-17 14:23:55 UTC
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
At least one forum poster here has said he funds his big corp's pvp with RL money. I.e. by buying isk (PLEX). That's pretty pay to win, no?

It's really simple.

The concept of "pay to win" is that you can chose to pay, and get an ingame advantage (gold ammo, special ships, whatever).

Since EvE has no such items, and indeed you cannot pay for them, there is no ability to pay to win.

You can spend $30 on your PVP battleship and I will spend 1bil ISK and you have absolutely no advantage to it at all.

I still don't see how that's not paying to win. Consider as an example a wardec situation between corps. Attrition has wiped out each side's best ships. Corp A spends $100 RL money to buy isk (PLEX). It equips a new insta-fleet. Corp B's members are poor instant ramen eaters with no extra cash to spend on EVE. The can only fly the ships they still have, which are their crappier ones.
Who's going to have the advantage in this war? And where did it come from? In-game skill, or out-of-game cash? That sounds like pay to win to me.



All that does is equip them with a fleet does not provide any said skill in the fleet. Yes it provides an advantage in replacements but it's still not anything a corp cannot do in game without using RL cash.

No offence but any corp should be able to rustle up money for replacements fleets or you dock up , hire mercs etc etc.

You think your 20 man corp has unlimted amounts of RL cash to spend on plex, you're still not going to beat the likes of GSF/TEST no matter how much money you spend at it. FA you might have a chance against though. Blink

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#249 - 2012-07-17 14:26:53 UTC
EpicFailTroll wrote:
- Before PLEX existed, was EvE P2W, since many people supported multiple alts, just as now?
No, just as now.

Quote:
- Since time is money and grinding takes time, isn't grinding a form of P2W?
No.

Quote:
- If the free iteration of a formerly paying mmo does now forbid what was -when it wasn't free- allowed before , i.e. simultaneously logged alts that provide an extra edge without requiring interaction, what does it say about the impact the use of simultaneous logged alts have on the game's revenue, and its gameplay?
It could say a host of things. How are they relevant to EVE?

Quote:
- Do offgrid boosting alts, and static scouts alts require any interaction other than looking at their respective client?
Irrelevant.

Quote:
- You can fund those alts through isk, but can't you also fund them through RL money, which is faster, funnier, and more efficient in the vast majority of cases?
Irrelevant.
EpicFailTroll
Doomheim
#250 - 2012-07-17 14:28:40 UTC
Khanh'rhh wrote:
"Since time is money and grinding takes time, isn't grinding a form of P2W?"
Time is money is a useless idiom, and not a statement that supports anything. Again, all you are saying is you can pay to avoid spending time in game to acquire it. We agree on this. It is not "winning" however, and offers no advantage.


So time is not a precious commodity, and spending less of it to achieve the same goals, on the same skill level, is not advantageous?

Khanh'rhh wrote:
"If the free iteration of a formerly paying mmo does now forbid what was -when it wasn't free- allowed before , i.e. simultaneously logged alts that provide an extra edge without requiring interaction, what does it say about the impact the use of simultaneous logged alts have on the game's revenue, and its gameplay?"
Why don't you ask this on the game forums? It is not relevant to EvE no matter how many times you ask the same question. I may as well ask "Shouldn't the fact Second Life bans all non consensual PVP and bumping mean EvE should do the same?"
You're discussing two wholly different things.


Is Second Life a PvP mmo? DAOC is.

Khanh'rhh wrote:
"Do offgrid boosting alts, and static scouts alts require any interaction other than looking at their respective client?"
No, not usually. However, they are not an advantage you can only acquire through paying so it is not pay to win.


But they can be paid for, which takes much less time, and is more convenient, and generally funnier -keeping the isk in your wallet-?

Khanh'rhh wrote:
"You can fund those alts through isk, but can't you also fund them through RL money, which is faster, funnier, and more efficient in the vast majority of cases?"
I acquire all my ISK by scamming and stealing from other players, and have loads of fun doing it. Does this mean I am "griefing to win"? It doesn't matter how I acquired what I use to perform the action, since what I acquired is the same whether I paid for it or not, therefore it cannot be pay to win.


Paying with RL money, and keeping the isk in your wallet, to have more power ingame: faster, funnier, and more efficient. That's what people with above average salaries do.


Khanh'rhh wrote:
"In Derkastan, you can get a high post in the government, either through giving money to the president (corruption), or working your way up: what is the state of the regime? Is it corrupt? Is it not corrupt? Is the regime the cat of Schrödinger?"
This is paying to win, as what you are acquiring (shorter time, no actual input) is not replaceable with that which you do not pay for. The analogy doesn't hold up.


But you can work your way up, you don't have to grease hands. You can achieve the same thing as a corrupt official. What is the state of the regime? Corrupt, not corrupt, Schrödinger's cat?


-Before PLEX existed, was EvE P2W, since many people supported multiple alts, just as now?
"You would have more case for it, and it was against the rules before PLEX. PLEX and alts were legalized which didn't create a pay to win environment. You could certainly "pay to win" before, but it was against the rules, thus within the rules of EvE there was never pay to win"

It was never against the rules to run multiple accounts. So it was P2W before, but then with PLEX, it is not anymore?


"You need to show us how you can turn money (payment) into a scenario where you are more likely to win than if you had not spent money."

Any time everyone uses an alt which he has paid for using RL money. Whether or not it can be acquired through ingame means is irrelevant, because you can also acquire it through RL money, moreover, it's the preferred means of anybody with a more than average salary.


Now, this still asks why you lot have a problem with EvE being P2W. You excitedly endorse all kinds of dodgy gameplay and vicious meta, yet resent this meta: that a RL poorbutt welfare loser is at a disadvantage when playing this game.

Too harsh and cold for you or what?
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#251 - 2012-07-17 14:35:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
EpicFailTroll wrote:
"You need to show us how you can turn money (payment) into a scenario where you are more likely to win than if you had not spent money."

Any time everyone uses an alt which he has paid for using RL money.
…except that he could have had the same “win” without paying. So no, that is not P2W since the payment isn't what determines the win.

Quote:
Now, this still asks why you lot have a problem with EvE being P2W.
No, it just raises the question of why you're so determined that it must be, even though you can't provide any examples where paying gives any special advantages.
Yeep
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#252 - 2012-07-17 14:39:32 UTC
EpicFailTroll wrote:

Now, this still asks why you lot have a problem with EvE being P2W. You excitedly endorse all kinds of dodgy gameplay and vicious meta, yet resent this meta: that a RL poorbutt welfare loser is at a disadvantage when playing this game.

Too harsh and cold for you or what?


This thread isn't about play to win at all, its one guy mad at offgrid boosting alts trying to rally people to his cause by trying to misrepresent it as something more serious.
Signal11th
#253 - 2012-07-17 14:42:06 UTC
Tippia wrote:
EpicFailTroll wrote:
"You need to show us how you can turn money (payment) into a scenario where you are more likely to win than if you had not spent money."

Any time everyone uses an alt which he has paid for using RL money.
…except that he could have had the same “win” without paying. So no, that is not P2W since the payment isn't what determines the win.

Quote:
Now, this still asks why you lot have a problem with EvE being P2W.
No, it just raises the question of why you're so determined that it must be, even though you can't provide any examples where paying gives any special advantages.



I feel like your banging your head against a brick wall Tippia.

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

EpicFailTroll
Doomheim
#254 - 2012-07-17 14:43:23 UTC  |  Edited by: EpicFailTroll
Tippia wrote:
He could have had the same “win” without paying. So no, that is not P2W since the payment isn't what determines the win.


But he can have it through paying, which is faster, more convenient, and funnier, since he gets to keep his isk and spend it on ingame stuff. So this is in such case P2W


Tippia wrote:
Quote:
Now, this still asks why you lot have a problem with EvE being P2W.
No, it just raises the question of why you're so determined that it must be, even though you can't provide any examples where paying gives any special advantages.


The special advantage of not having to spend time, and time is a precious commodity.


Tippia wrote:
EpicFailTroll wrote:
- Before PLEX existed, was EvE P2W, since many people supported multiple alts, just as now?
No, just as now.


But before you couldn't fund those alts through isk, only RL money
The clear advantage they gave couldn't be acquired through ingame means -we're talking about a even playfield, same number of RL players vs. same number of RL players-. Still it wasn't P2W?


"Irrelevant no irrelevant no how is this relevant"

Analogies between PvP mmos and their treatment of advantage-providing alts according to whether said mmos get revenue through the use of those alts, the fact that in EvE it is much more convenient to pay for them through RL means, faster and funnier -you get to spend your isk on ingame stuff-, this is all very much relevant, yes


Also, in Derkastan, you can get a high post in the government, either through giving money to the president (corruption), or working your way up: what is the state of the regime? Is it corrupt? Is it not corrupt? Is the regime the cat of Schrödinger?
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#255 - 2012-07-17 14:44:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Signal11th wrote:
Tippia wrote:
EpicFailTroll wrote:
"You need to show us how you can turn money (payment) into a scenario where you are more likely to win than if you had not spent money."

Any time everyone uses an alt which he has paid for using RL money.
…except that he could have had the same “win” without paying. So no, that is not P2W since the payment isn't what determines the win.

Quote:
Now, this still asks why you lot have a problem with EvE being P2W.
No, it just raises the question of why you're so determined that it must be, even though you can't provide any examples where paying gives any special advantages.



I feel like your banging your head against a brick wall Tippia.

EpicFailTroll is certainly living up to his name. Smile

Tippia doesn't mind, he rather likes playing with them on the off chance that someone is stupid enough to actually think the troll has a point.

They are fairly amusing. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#256 - 2012-07-17 14:50:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
EpicFailTroll wrote:
Analogies between PvP mmos and their treatment of advantage-providing alts according to whether said mmos get revenue through the use of those alts, the fact that in EvE it is much more convenient to pay for them through RL means, faster and funnier -you get to spend your isk on ingame stuff-, this is all very much relevant, yes
Was that so hard?

Now, what benefits do those alts provide in DAOC? In what kinds of settings? What alternatives are there?

In EVE, the benefits aren't all that special and you can have them without paying for them, so it's not P2W around here. Maybe the problem is that DAOC doesn't offer the same kind of alternatives and that this is why they've been outlawed.

You see, you still haven't shown that there is any P2W in EVE, and your analogy doesn't show anything of the kind either.

Quote:
But he can have it through paying
Irrelevant. “Can” ≠ ”must”, thus no P2W.
Quote:
The special advantage of not having to spend time, and time is a precious commodity.
As luck would have it, that's not a special advantage that creates any kind of win. In fact, it doesn't even remove the need to spend time — it just shuffles it around.
Quote:
But before you couldn't fund those alts through isk, only RL money
…which doesn't (and didn't) matter since payment didn't (and doesn't) provide any special advantages that can't be had through other means.
eddie valvetino
Bi-Polar Bears
#257 - 2012-07-17 14:52:18 UTC
classified data wrote:
How is the EVE community so against 'paying to win' gameplay and yet alts are fine Question


all the time CCP allow the selling of PLEXes for isk, it is a pay to win game, wake up morons.

p.s. Selling PLEX
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#258 - 2012-07-17 15:00:04 UTC
eddie valvetino wrote:
p.s. Selling PLEX
…doesn't provide any advantage that can't be had without paying, and definitely does not provide any kind of “win”.
EpicFailTroll
Doomheim
#259 - 2012-07-17 15:14:04 UTC  |  Edited by: EpicFailTroll
-Analogies between PvP mmos and their treatment of advantage-providing alts according to whether said mmos get revenue through the use of those alts, the fact that in EvE it is much more convenient to pay for them through RL means, faster and funnier -you get to spend your isk on ingame stuff-, this is all very much relevant, yes
"Was that so hard?

Now, what benefits do those alts provide in DAOC? In what kinds of settings? What alternatives are there?

In EVE, the benefits aren't all that special and you can have them without paying for them, so it's not P2W around here. Maybe the problem is that DAOC doesn't offer the same kind of alternatives and that this is why they've been outlawed.

You see, you still haven't shown that there is any P2W in EVE, and your analogy doesn't show anything of the kind either."


This all has been answered for ten pages at least. The only hard part is repeating it over and over, in the dim hope of drowning your "Question? Question question? Question? Question, question?", which is an efficient, if ********, way of trolling and bottom feeding on likes.


-But he can have it through paying
"Irrelevant. “Can” ≠ ”must”, thus no P2W"

It can be P2W, so there's no P2W ? What about the fact that funding alts with RL money is more efficient, faster, funnier -you get to keep the isk and spend it ingame-?


-The special advantage of not having to spend time, and time is a precious commodity.
"As luck would have it, that's not a special advantage that creates any kind of win. In fact, it doesn't even remove the need to spend time — it just shuffles it around"

Shortcuts are very much win. Going from a state to another more desired state, without having to spend as much time as some other person, this is very much win.


-But before you couldn't fund those alts through isk, only RL money
"…which doesn't (and didn't) matter since payment didn't (and doesn't) provide any special advantages that can't be had through other means."

Alts couldn't be funded through plex, only RL money. The clear advantage they gave couldn't be acquired through ingame means -we're talking about a even playfield, same number of RL players vs. same number of RL players-. Still it wasn't P2W?


Also, in Derkastan, you can get a high post in the government, either through giving money to the president (corruption), or working your way up: what is the state of the regime? Is it corrupt? Is it not corrupt?
Fidelium Mortis
Minor Major Miners LLC
#260 - 2012-07-17 15:22:56 UTC
EpicFailTroll wrote:
Tippia wrote:
EpicFailTroll wrote:
But I had already addressed that point, that not all games are P2W, let me quote EFT:
…except that for your argument to hold true, you must strictly equate numbers with payment. Otherwise, it's not payment that is a factor, but numbers.

Numbers win in the scenarios you've presented — payment had nothing to do with it.

If you equate the two to make payment a factor, then guess what? All games are P2W because numbers (≡ payment) wins the day in all games. If you dissociate numbers from payment, then your scenarios no longer prove anything about P2W.


Numbers stem from accounts which have to be paid and funded. That's called payment.

Not all games are P2W, because, as says EFT:
"In twitch-based mmos, you can't really get the upper hand through alts, because you've got to move and spam skills. Well, you can multi-box the same setup and trigger the same action on all of them at once, but then it's really obvious for the opponent that he's facing Team Wizzy or 25 shamen. In EvE, you can have an offgrid boosting alt, and just let your falcon alt/remote repping alt orbit your ship, press F1 Fx once and you're done."


"Dissociating numbers from payment": what you really mean is, "bring more friends". But then those friends can multibox as well, and your opponents can do too.

It then all boils down to who can fund and field the most alts. But then again it's not P2W because you said so.



Personally, I think falcon alts can be pretty hilarious, since they usually just hit F1 and forget about piloting, which makes for an easy KM. The same thing with boosters, I've made some decent cash probing down booster alts and relieving them of their juicy DG co-processors and sisters probe launchers. Usually these guys are one-trick ponies so it's pretty easy to find a counter or trap.

ICRS - Intergalactic Certified Rocket Surgeon