These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Angle ships

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sable Blitzmann
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2012-07-06 07:17:25 UTC
I bet you're a sad person IRL. I pity you.

To the devs, I don't think it's expressed enough how much we appreciate your work. Don't let people like the OP get you down. PR mishaps aside, you guys rock my world. \o/
Dex Tera
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#42 - 2012-07-06 14:32:19 UTC
ahahahaha op is a loser! ahahahaha no v3 for you ahahahahahaTwisted
Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
#43 - 2012-07-06 16:26:56 UTC
MotherMoon wrote:
setting quite a few new people to block....


The problem with this is, it still shows you the threads a blocked person has created...thus negating much of the impact on the forums.
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#44 - 2012-07-07 18:30:24 UTC
I hope angel ships get size alterations too.

Make the Mach comparable in size to the Raven, rather than a goddamned carrier. I can believe something Raven sized with potential Jove technology onboard could be that fast and agile. Right now the Mach is just ridiculous. Stop it.
Morgan North
Dark-Rising
Wrecking Machine.
#45 - 2012-07-08 10:13:17 UTC
Given the ammount of good stuff we've been shown, I wouldn't be surprised if reskinning ships takes a while, especially since the current angel skins are already top notch.

The artwork team may be working on:

1. WiS assets for their current WiS avatr project, that's been slowed down but not culled. (yay)
2. New Tactical screen icons.
3. New Battle damage effects.
4. AND MORE!

So... I wouldn't mind if angel skins come next winter.
m3talc0re X
The Motley Crew of Disorder
The Gorram Shiney Alliance
#46 - 2012-07-09 01:48:31 UTC
Aglais wrote:
I hope angel ships get size alterations too.

Make the Mach comparable in size to the Raven, rather than a goddamned carrier. I can believe something Raven sized with potential Jove technology onboard could be that fast and agile. Right now the Mach is just ridiculous. Stop it.


I gotta agree Aglais here. It's stupid that a ship that size can outmaneuver ships half its size...
Ganthrithor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#47 - 2012-07-09 11:00:14 UTC
Aglais wrote:
I hope angel ships get size alterations too.

Make the Mach comparable in size to the Raven, rather than a goddamned carrier. I can believe something Raven sized with potential Jove technology onboard could be that fast and agile. Right now the Mach is just ridiculous. Stop it.


Oh no you didn't.

P much the coolest thing about Machs is watching something the size of a stargate take off. It looks like it's going slow until you glance at your overview and realize its doing 2.5km/s. It's awesome.


Thanks for :words:, paradox. Looking forward to these and to new capital textures / shaders!
Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
#48 - 2012-07-12 09:44:55 UTC
nat longshot wrote:
Aaron Barton wrote:
CCP Zorba wrote:
Yup, those 'other' factions are on our list and I suspect they'll get done for the winter expansion. Unfortunately we only have so many artists, fortunately our tools are getting better and better and make this whole process much, much easier.


That's good to hear. Will the Daredevil get the same paintjob as the Vigilant and the Vindicator? It's been kinda bothering me ever since the Caldari and Gallente V3.


it should have Angel paint given is a Angels ship not SERP. ship.


Actually, it's Serpentis, the Dramiel is Angel.

You seem to be well informed and intelligent, why have you not coded your own V3 since you love them so much? I'm sure it would take you much less than a year to overhaul every single art asset in the game.
CCP Paradox
#49 - 2012-07-12 16:02:19 UTC
You guys should probably check out the Angel ships on Sisi now... just sayin'

CCP Paradox | EVE QA | Team Phenomenon

Space Magician
Hannott Thanos
Squadron 15
#50 - 2012-07-12 16:17:35 UTC
CCP Paradox wrote:
You guys should probably check out the Angel ships on Sisi now... just sayin'

OH LAWDS

while (CurrentSelectedTarget.Status == ShipStatus.Alive) {

     _myShip.FireAllGuns(CurrentSelectedTarget);

}
Makari Aeron
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#51 - 2012-07-12 16:18:22 UTC
CCP Paradox wrote:
You guys should probably check out the Angel ships on Sisi now... just sayin'



In the immortal words of Admiral Ackbar, "It's a trap!"

CCP RedDawn: Ugly people are just playing life on HARD mode. Personally, I'm playing on an INFERNO difficulty.

CCP Goliath: I often believe that the best way to get something done is to shout at the person trying to help you. http://goo.gl/PKGDP
Hannott Thanos
Squadron 15
#52 - 2012-07-12 16:41:50 UTC
Would be cool if it was possible to run Eve on singularity -.-
Can't start the game. Launcher looks derped, with the Play button in the top right corner, and no toolbar to close it on top.

while (CurrentSelectedTarget.Status == ShipStatus.Alive) {

     _myShip.FireAllGuns(CurrentSelectedTarget);

}
gfldex
#53 - 2012-07-12 17:37:26 UTC
Pretty - angel - ships.

If you take all the sand out of the box, only the cat poo will remain.
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2012-07-12 17:42:27 UTC
Hannott Thanos wrote:
Would be cool if it was possible to run Eve on singularity -.-
Can't start the game. Launcher looks derped, with the Play button in the top right corner, and no toolbar to close it on top.


same here :(

any workaround ? eve.exe also brings up the launcher :(
Hanathor
El Gremio Segundo
#55 - 2012-07-12 18:37:12 UTC
Gilbaron wrote:
Hannott Thanos wrote:
Would be cool if it was possible to run Eve on singularity -.-
Can't start the game. Launcher looks derped, with the Play button in the top right corner, and no toolbar to close it on top.


same here :(

any workaround ? eve.exe also brings up the launcher :(


Just run Exefile in bin directory
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#56 - 2012-07-12 18:54:47 UTC
Morgan North wrote:
Given the ammount of good stuff we've been shown, I wouldn't be surprised if reskinning ships takes a while, especially since the current angel skins are already top notch.

The artwork team may be working on:

1. WiS assets for their current WiS avatr project, that's been slowed down but not culled. (yay)
2. New Tactical screen icons.
3. New Battle damage effects.
4. AND MORE!

So... I wouldn't mind if angel skins come next winter.


lol, new ships are done now

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#57 - 2012-07-12 20:00:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Roll Sizzle Beef
CCP Paradox wrote:
You guys should probably check out the Angel ships on Sisi now... just sayin'

Honestly, they look very similar to Gurista camo. They look nice... but the whole desert pattern has been done before.

The hull texture static on the Mach still makes it a dirty mess compared to the Cyna Dare and Dram

I can only see the hint of a snake skin on the Dramiel hull which looks wicked awesome, But I can only really see it at max zoom in just the right direction.
But why snake pattern? seems more of a serpentis gig and even they don't get an awesome underlying scale bevel. Why two snake patterns? I know they work together but I just expected different for Angels.

I really hope they are incomplete as the Dramiel seems to be the only one close to done.
Hannott Thanos
Squadron 15
#58 - 2012-07-12 23:30:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Hannott Thanos
CCP Paradox wrote:
You guys should probably check out the Angel ships on Sisi now... just sayin'

Hey, can you give CCP Zorba a small whip and tell him Hannott is asking about the Myrmidon? He will know.

while (CurrentSelectedTarget.Status == ShipStatus.Alive) {

     _myShip.FireAllGuns(CurrentSelectedTarget);

}
Jackie Fisher
Syrkos Technologies
#59 - 2012-07-13 11:47:06 UTC
m3talc0re X wrote:
Aglais wrote:
I hope angel ships get size alterations too.

Make the Mach comparable in size to the Raven, rather than a goddamned carrier. I can believe something Raven sized with potential Jove technology onboard could be that fast and agile. Right now the Mach is just ridiculous. Stop it.


I gotta agree Aglais here. It's stupid that a ship that size can outmaneuver ships half its size...

Mach is clearly made from Polystyrene.

Explains both low mass and large size whilst being an advanced Angel development of Minmatar 'crap we found in a skip' technology.

Fear God and Thread Nought
Gloredon
zzzNightmarezzz
#60 - 2012-07-13 16:00:24 UTC
So the Mach has shrunk significantly. I like that, the guns will look better on it if they scale large to fit the new, smaller hull. Honestly it could go down even a little smaller. I like the pattern on it and the lights.

The Dramiel, Cynabal and Daredevil look good as well, but I'm not liking the camo pattern on them as well as the Mach. It seems, well, a little like someone just splashed a dull paint in splotches all over. Yeah, that's basically what camo is, but maybe a little more irregularity to the splotch patterns might help.

The lights are great and it's fun to finally see my favorite set of ships get the V3 treatment.

BTW, still not happy about losing the Cop-car look on the Navy Comet. I rarely fly it anymore, it's just not as much fun.

And where are our Wings on the Vagabond? Still not seen a dev response to the lack of the best visual feature of that hull. C'mon guys, at least tell us why you did it, we might understand if we had a reason. Dead silence hasn't helped.