These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Interested in the state of Faction Warfare? Listen to our recent Round Table discussion....

First post
Author
Generals4
#61 - 2012-07-11 15:04:24 UTC
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Cearain wrote:
If you are trolling, I admit I am biting. I am very curious what the loophole is. I am aware of some things that some might consider a loophole. But I don't think they are anything that big of a deal.


Not trolling, just admitting there is a massive screw up which CCP has not spotted (surprising, eh?) and which might result in last shreds of FW going down the s.itters.


Can it be used for the ultimate caldari victory? Pirate

_-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. _

Princess Nexxala
Zero Syndicate
#62 - 2012-07-11 15:38:36 UTC
To all those that thinks its cheesy we are in matar and fighting on the gal front.....boo ******* hoo

Its called adapting, you gallente only pilots don't understand it, and I don't expect you to. But at least respect the kb and the plexing we do.

nom nom

Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch
#63 - 2012-07-11 15:46:45 UTC
Generals4 wrote:
Can it be used for the ultimate caldari victory? Pirate


Yes. Unfortunately unlike iconic flag picture, you would need settle into a image of Amarr/Gallente/Minmatar flags buried in a ton of horse manure with Caldari flag flying on top of the said manure pile....
Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch
#64 - 2012-07-11 17:47:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Yuri Intaki
Aylin Aslim wrote:
Do you really want to fix FW and pvp? make FW affect highsec, give some penalties on bounties and loots or something else, then there will be pvp.


Seeing that I constantly chase your corporations permarepping plex incursus, I think this whole comment has clearly been farted out of your arse and is thus utterly hilarious.
Generals4
#65 - 2012-07-11 18:13:00 UTC
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Generals4 wrote:
Can it be used for the ultimate caldari victory? Pirate


Yes. Unfortunately unlike iconic flag picture, you would need settle into a image of Amarr/Gallente/Minmatar flags buried in a ton of horse manure with Caldari flag flying on top of the said manure pile....


Why wasn't i informed we had a tool to produces lots of manure.

But yah, i'm still waiting for the huge fix FW needs.

_-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. _

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#66 - 2012-07-12 01:22:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
This was truly an excellent discussion.
I was so impressed I have promoted this discussion in this thread. Blink

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1613053#post1613053

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#67 - 2012-07-12 01:52:04 UTC
I liked the proposal to eliminate missions. They made sense when they were the only way to get LP. Now they're redundant and contribute nothing to the war effort. They also create LP out of thin air. If FW is going to be self sustaining- there needs to be some scarcity of resources. If you have only six systems in your war zone to plex, or if you have to go 20 jumps to plex, you're going to defend your system upgrades alot more fiercely.

Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#68 - 2012-07-12 02:38:56 UTC
I have to agree. Removing missioning is the way to go. Now that pilots are able to gain Lp by doing faction warfare plex's. Might even be wise to increase the lp pay out if ccp goes this route and give 1 forth the payout for doing defensive plexing.

SUPPORTED!

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

sYnc Vir
Wolfsbrigade
Ghost Legion.
#69 - 2012-07-12 03:07:34 UTC
I would like the removal of the NPC corp so people joining FW had to do so with a player corp of their own or one already in.

I would also like standing requirement set to at lease 2.0.

Sure give people LP for Defending space, why not as unless players live in a system no ones defending them.

I'd like to be able to dock in none FW stations.

I'd like upgrades that don't smack of "OMG what the **** can we give them as upgrades" cause the ones atm are awful.

I'd like some Losec space for Angels, Sep, Sansha, and Guristas so peoples could become proper pirates.

Anyone expecting anything like this to actually come?

Don't ask about Italics, just tilt your head.

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#70 - 2012-07-12 03:38:50 UTC
Major Killz wrote:
I have to agree. Removing missioning is the way to go. Now that pilots are able to gain Lp by doing faction warfare plex's. Might even be wise to increase the lp pay out if ccp goes this route and give 1 forth the payout for doing defensive plexing.

SUPPORTED!


I don't recall removing missions being presenented by anyone on the panel.

Its a bad idea. FW mission should be toned down so they are on par with plexing but they are actually the only decent way to create missions in low sec.

Payment for defensive plexing might be just as bad an idea. They are both bad. Its tough to say which is worse.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#71 - 2012-07-12 04:17:15 UTC
They were all over the place on the panel with missions. There was someone who went off on them as a leftover that didn't fit in with the new system. A few people quite honestly didn't like them. And one person did push for them to be deleted. It wasn't dwelt on for long but the point was made.

Going through the war zone over the past few days you would find mission runners in just about every system in their damn stealth bombers. Some systems were 4-5 jumps from any front. You want them to keep on? It's an all you can eat LP buffet with no risk.

The Minmatar have 65 systems to defend. 80% of them should not be hovering in a handful of systems around Kamela. There are quite a few us offensive plexing down the upgrades in the rear systems. But they don't care because LP grows on trees for them and they can spike war zone control at a whim.
Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#72 - 2012-07-12 04:40:08 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Major Killz wrote:
I have to agree. Removing missioning is the way to go. Now that pilots are able to gain Lp by doing faction warfare plex's. Might even be wise to increase the lp pay out if ccp goes this route and give 1 forth the payout for doing defensive plexing.

SUPPORTED!


I don't recall removing missions being presenented by anyone on the panel.

Its a bad idea. FW mission should be toned down so they are on par with plexing but they are actually the only decent way to create missions in low sec.

Payment for defensive plexing might be just as bad an idea. They are both bad. Its tough to say which is worse.



MIssions require time to complete. Is the aforementioned statement correct? Plexing requires time to complete. What about that statement?

If so, then its the same ret@rded and boring sh!t. I see no difference between both activities.

Ok!

Throw in Incursion like difficulty in some plex. Those plex move the needle alot. Thow in plex that can be done solo. The aforementioned plex only move the needle a little. Throw in Plex for defense of any movement of the needle against the current holder of the system. Give one fourth the payout and increase the time it takes to defend. Instead of attacking a bunker. The bunker goes offline and resets. Now your milltia has the benifit of owning the system. Whatever that may be v0v

Whatever, it can be done. I've never made isk from pve in this game (for the most part). I've only ever made isk from pvp and market jujitsu. I don't care how you get your isk. I have bank. How you make it work is up to whomever. Point is. It should bring something different and bring alot more losses more than likely. Which means more engagements will happen and increased risk v0v

f*ck it!

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

Lebaneur
Tribal Core
#73 - 2012-07-12 11:09:34 UTC
Thanks for an interesting talk. While listening the part about NPCs in the plexes I got an idea that might be worth considering.

How about the NPC loose interest in on ships that are not within capture range - you can make the rats harder and make AFK plexing impossible but as soon as you leave the button they leave you alone. That would leave plexes open for PVP as well.

PVP in plexes does not happen on button range (for the exception of last few seconds), so the rats would not imbalance the fight.

Bengal Bob
Slymsloot Enterprises
#74 - 2012-07-12 13:37:34 UTC
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Cearain wrote:
If you are trolling, I admit I am biting. I am very curious what the loophole is. I am aware of some things that some might consider a loophole. But I don't think they are anything that big of a deal.


Not trolling, just admitting there is a massive screw up which CCP has not spotted (surprising, eh?) and which might result in last shreds of FW going down the s.itters.


If you are aware of any exploits or loopholes you have a responsibility to report it to CCP.
If they still do nothing, then post details on the forums and ask publicly for them to deal with it.

Just sitting around claiming Gallente and Minmatar are probably using it because it exists is silly.
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#75 - 2012-07-12 13:47:45 UTC
Zarnak Wulf wrote:
They were all over the place on the panel with missions. There was someone who went off on them as a leftover that didn't fit in with the new system. A few people quite honestly didn't like them. And one person did push for them to be deleted. It wasn't dwelt on for long but the point was made.

Going through the war zone over the past few days you would find mission runners in just about every system in their damn stealth bombers. Some systems were 4-5 jumps from any front. You want them to keep on? It's an all you can eat LP buffet with no risk.

The Minmatar have 65 systems to defend. 80% of them should not be hovering in a handful of systems around Kamela. There are quite a few us offensive plexing down the upgrades in the rear systems. But they don't care because LP grows on trees for them and they can spike war zone control at a whim.



The reason the Minmatar are hovering around Kamela is they like the idea of taking down your last staging systems. Strategically that's the way to win the war. Kourm, Huola etc are vital forward bases for putting pressure on your staging systems. If you wanted to draw minmatar attention away from missioning then you need to organize a serious threat against Kourm that risks locking people out of their ships and equipment in the stations there.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#76 - 2012-07-12 13:54:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Jade Constantine
Bengal Bob wrote:
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Cearain wrote:
If you are trolling, I admit I am biting. I am very curious what the loophole is. I am aware of some things that some might consider a loophole. But I don't think they are anything that big of a deal.


Not trolling, just admitting there is a massive screw up which CCP has not spotted (surprising, eh?) and which might result in last shreds of FW going down the s.itters.


If you are aware of any exploits or loopholes you have a responsibility to report it to CCP.
If they still do nothing, then post details on the forums and ask publicly for them to deal with it.

Just sitting around claiming Gallente and Minmatar are probably using it because it exists is silly.


I'm guessing they are murkily referring to the fact that Gallente loyalists in the Minmatar can go and plex Caldari systems in Black Rise and get paid minmatar LPs (good loyalty point store) for opposing territorial control there.

By the same measure Amarr loyalists could join the Caldari and stay in Bleaks / Metropolis and get paid good Caldari LP's for plexing against minmatar systems.

In a way the "massive screw up" is probably that the FW system we have now means its more sensible for a losing side to swap sides to their winning ally and continue plexing in the same space so they get more valuable LP points for their labour.

In the example above say an Amarrian corp skips to the Caldari and plexes down 4 minors in Arzad. They are getting 16x more LP value for doing the same thing that a loyalist Amarrian corp that stayed Amarrian would get for doing 4 minors in Lantorn. (tier 4 caldari/ tier 1 amarr)

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#77 - 2012-07-12 14:48:06 UTC
Zarnak Wulf wrote:
They were all over the place on the panel with missions. There was someone who went off on them as a leftover that didn't fit in with the new system. A few people quite honestly didn't like them. And one person did push for them to be deleted. It wasn't dwelt on for long but the point was made.

Going through the war zone over the past few days you would find mission runners in just about every system in their damn stealth bombers. Some systems were 4-5 jumps from any front. You want them to keep on? It's an all you can eat LP buffet with no risk.

The Minmatar have 65 systems to defend. 80% of them should not be hovering in a handful of systems around Kamela. There are quite a few us offensive plexing down the upgrades in the rear systems. But they don't care because LP grows on trees for them and they can spike war zone control at a whim.


Yeah you are probably right someone may have said that but I wasn't sure if he was serious or just expressing dissatisfaction with people who come to faction war to farm missions.

After thinking about it perhaps it would be a good idea to eliminate missions altogether.

My main concern is that if you do eliminate them then the side with all the systems will then cry for lp for defensive plexing. If ccp does that then this game will just be null sec "farms and fields" garbage.

However, if they removed missions and still didn't give lp for defensive plexing then by winning you would cut most of your sources of income. Which I actually think is ok. That would mean that only the people who contributed to getting you there would be able to cash out at the higher tier! People who pile on the winning side after its winning will gain little. This would definitely help provide more balance that faction war needs.

Instead of everyone joining the winning side the losing side would naturally be the one getting new recruits because your main source of getting lp to cash out is by doing offensive plexing.

The side defending would still have an incentive to keep fighting to hold the systems as long as possible. Because they will make more isk if they have several cashouts based on market changes instead of one big one where they are left to guess. Plus they will still be picking up some lp from systems that are still owned by the losing side and through pvp. But yeah mainly through pvp.

So hopefully they would get a big influx of money and use it to try to fight off the offensive plexers. Instead of waiting for them to finish their offensive plexes and then come out to do a defensive plex after all the wartargets are gone and they can do it without pvp. The smart factions would aim to flip systems in dramatic fashion so they can reach tier 5 instead of always stagnating at tier 3-4.

I am not sure this would work when you can join any of the four militias but I am pretty sure it would.


But anyway if they keep the missions:

The fact that missions don't contribute to sov is a good thing. If they just keep doing missions then the systems will become vulnerable or close to vulnerable. Once we have enough of them vulnerable or close to vulnerable to get to tier 5 then we can start flipping them ourselves. I think this may be how this is intended to work.

That said, missions shouldn't pay more than plexing. It should only be on par with plexing. CCP originally said they were going to make plexing pay better than missions - they did not.


I don't mind that faction war offers some pvp (plexing-or at least it should be pvp) and pve (missions) mechanics. I think they did a good job with the pve - missions. They really just need to tone it a bit. The faction war missions I believe are the best idea for low sec missions that anyone ever came up with. Maybe make it so they get 2/3s the lp or something. Or eliminate them altogether but if you do then do not start giving lp for defensive plexing.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Thomas Kreshant
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#78 - 2012-07-12 14:50:35 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
Bengal Bob wrote:
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Cearain wrote:
If you are trolling, I admit I am biting. I am very curious what the loophole is. I am aware of some things that some might consider a loophole. But I don't think they are anything that big of a deal.


Not trolling, just admitting there is a massive screw up which CCP has not spotted (surprising, eh?) and which might result in last shreds of FW going down the s.itters.


If you are aware of any exploits or loopholes you have a responsibility to report it to CCP.
If they still do nothing, then post details on the forums and ask publicly for them to deal with it.

Just sitting around claiming Gallente and Minmatar are probably using it because it exists is silly.


I'm guessing they are murkily referring to the fact that Gallente loyalists in the Minmatar can go and plex Caldari systems in Black Rise and get paid minmatar LPs (good loyalty point store) for opposing territorial control there.

By the same measure Amarr loyalists could join the Caldari and stay in Bleaks / Metropolis and get paid good Caldari LP's for plexing against minmatar systems.

In a way the "massive screw up" is probably that the FW system we have now means its more sensible for a losing side to swap sides to their winning ally and continue plexing in the same space so they get more valuable LP points for their labour.

In the example above say an Amarrian corp skips to the Caldari and plexes down 4 minors in Arzad. They are getting 16x more LP value for doing the same thing that a loyalist Amarrian corp that stayed Amarrian would get for doing 4 minors in Lantorn. (tier 4 caldari/ tier 1 amarr)



I thought someone said you can't shoot your allies iHub which in that case as you'll not ever take your local systems eventually you'll just end up stalemating the zone with systems stuck and vuln never flipped and never dplexed back down.

It would make more sense to swap to Caldari and then go to Caldari space anything else still requires a healthy FW side willing to work for bad LP and willing to flip systems back and forth.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#79 - 2012-07-12 14:53:43 UTC
Major Killz wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Major Killz wrote:
I have to agree. Removing missioning is the way to go. Now that pilots are able to gain Lp by doing faction warfare plex's. Might even be wise to increase the lp pay out if ccp goes this route and give 1 forth the payout for doing defensive plexing.

SUPPORTED!


I don't recall removing missions being presenented by anyone on the panel.

Its a bad idea. FW mission should be toned down so they are on par with plexing but they are actually the only decent way to create missions in low sec.

Payment for defensive plexing might be just as bad an idea. They are both bad. Its tough to say which is worse.



MIssions require time to complete. Is the aforementioned statement correct? Plexing requires time to complete. What about that statement?

If so, then its the same ret@rded and boring sh!t. I see no difference between both activities.

Ok!!


There is an important difference. Plexing helps your miltia maintain its tiers. Missions do not.

Your point about both taking time is correct though and also important. If a side spends time running missions instead of plexing they will lose sovereignty.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#80 - 2012-07-12 14:57:43 UTC
Thomas Kreshant wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
Bengal Bob wrote:
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Cearain wrote:
If you are trolling, I admit I am biting. I am very curious what the loophole is. I am aware of some things that some might consider a loophole. But I don't think they are anything that big of a deal.


Not trolling, just admitting there is a massive screw up which CCP has not spotted (surprising, eh?) and which might result in last shreds of FW going down the s.itters.


If you are aware of any exploits or loopholes you have a responsibility to report it to CCP.
If they still do nothing, then post details on the forums and ask publicly for them to deal with it.

Just sitting around claiming Gallente and Minmatar are probably using it because it exists is silly.


I'm guessing they are murkily referring to the fact that Gallente loyalists in the Minmatar can go and plex Caldari systems in Black Rise and get paid minmatar LPs (good loyalty point store) for opposing territorial control there.

By the same measure Amarr loyalists could join the Caldari and stay in Bleaks / Metropolis and get paid good Caldari LP's for plexing against minmatar systems.

In a way the "massive screw up" is probably that the FW system we have now means its more sensible for a losing side to swap sides to their winning ally and continue plexing in the same space so they get more valuable LP points for their labour.

In the example above say an Amarrian corp skips to the Caldari and plexes down 4 minors in Arzad. They are getting 16x more LP value for doing the same thing that a loyalist Amarrian corp that stayed Amarrian would get for doing 4 minors in Lantorn. (tier 4 caldari/ tier 1 amarr)



I thought someone said you can't shoot your allies iHub which in that case as you'll not ever take your local systems eventually you'll just end up stalemating the zone with systems stuck and vuln never flipped and never dplexed back down.

It would make more sense to swap to Caldari and then go to Caldari space anything else still requires a healthy FW side willing to work for bad LP and willing to flip systems back and forth.


I've no idea to be honest on the IHUB issue. But I do know its still apparently possible to plex (and get paid for plexing) when a system is in vulnerable state so I guess it wouldn't make much actual difference to the "strategy".

Anyway this is what I imagine Damar's alt is going on about.







The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom