These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Interested in the state of Faction Warfare? Listen to our recent Round Table discussion....

First post
Author
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#1 - 2012-07-10 16:25:15 UTC
Many thanks to Spence from The Tactical Entertainment Network for his willingness to host us this weekend, it was a great chance for everyone to talk about their experiences with the new changes and to bounce ideas off each other on how we can improve things moving forward.

Thanks too for the guests that came on from each of the four militias, it was a very civil and productive discussion overall and I can't wait for Spence to invite us back for another round in the future, there was no way we could cover it all in a single talk!

Here is the link for those of you that would like to listen:

TEN EVEning News Roundtable #1: Faction Warfare

Feel free to use this thread to discuss what you heard, and add your thoughts and feedback!

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#2 - 2012-07-10 16:29:30 UTC
You all sound like nerds. just saying... [Reset] Amarr/Minmatar factional warfare.

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#3 - 2012-07-10 16:40:13 UTC
Major Killz wrote:
You all sound like nerds. just saying... [Reset] Amarr/Minmatar factional warfare.


If you only knew....

Sorry I missed the roundtable but I lost power.

Kinda wished you guys would've trolled each other more like you do on forums and keeping to the "spirit" :)

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#4 - 2012-07-10 16:54:34 UTC
You what's sad about factional warfare pilots? They complain alot. How many times have I read and heard in this disscussion that some dude wants to force others to fight.

It's like when I was a full time pirate. I often heard from terrible pilots who were pirates who were mad because people had the ability to warp away and they wanted more ways to force people to either fight or die.

Crying like children who don't get their way. Resources are fought over and outlaws hunt pilots exploiting resources. This is like the mofracking animal kingdom. African lion hunting and eating gazelle savanna sh!t

Plex are the resource that can be exploited. That brings pilots to the area. Pilots are willing to fight each other over the resoruce (defend or attack).

What's most important is that CCP makes sure that the ships needed to exploit the resouce is expensive or atleast not just a afterburning frigate. There would be levels of difficulty kinda like Incursions. Some that need a fleet and others that can be done solo.

As long as thier targets in an area a person can pvp. They can camp and force people to either fight or try to run away or explode.

Forcing pvp is arena/ring bullsh!t and is lame. If I wanted to see arena pvp I would watch the alliance tournament alot more. That sh!t is wack and so is the crying about forcing pilots to engage.

The resource brings pilots there. You as a solo pvp or small gang have to try to catch those b!tches.

Alot of these dudes have been in faction warfare to long and don't know how convenient they have it compared to pirates or those who solo or roam in small gangs in 0.0.

That's why almost no corporation/alliance ever makes it after leaving faction warfare. Factional warfare is hand holding and easier for pilots to do solo or in small gangs and find targets. Compared to pirating or 0.0

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#5 - 2012-07-10 17:07:30 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
LOL, I mentioned during the production that these things always turn into whinefests (like on these forums) because they always focus on plexing mechanics, missions, and other features that are not fully functional.

The best thing about FW is the free war dec and the massive number of fights available on a consistent basis. During the break when there was no topic for us to whine about, we has a great discussion about the virtues of sniper cormorants and how they are superior to the other destroyers even though CCP thinks they are lacking. And that it was great that many more different shiptypes get used in FW that simply aren't used elsewhere.

My experience is that most corporations don't make it outside of FW because the rest of Eve moves at such a gawd awful slow and boring pace.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#6 - 2012-07-10 17:23:07 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
Kinda wished you guys would've trolled each other more like you do on forums and keeping to the "spirit" :)


Thank god we didn't. The trolling directly impedes the process of improving the system. Take, for instance, the plexing bug. There's been threads on it for ages - and every single one of them turned into ridiculous factional finger pointing and were so heavily biased its no surprise the devs assumed it was just FW folk being dickheads to each other.

"They're winning the war by cheating!! No, YOU are the one's who cheating! Oh yeah? well at least we don't cheat as much as YOU do. " If someone wants to talk s**** about the other faction, GREAT. But we have a lot of work to do in a short amount of time, and those that have been helpful in this process have been the ones that can curb the childish bickering and have an objective conversation about the game mechanics.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Julius Foederatus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2012-07-10 17:35:24 UTC
Major Killz wrote:
You what's sad about factional warfare pilots? They complain alot. How many times have I read and heard in this disscussion that some dude wants to force others to fight.

It's like when I was a full time pirate. I often heard from terrible pilots who were pirates who were mad because people had the ability to warp away and they wanted more ways to force people to either fight or die.

Crying like children who don't get their way. Resources are fought over and outlaws hunt pilots exploiting resources. This is like the mofracking animal kingdom. African lion hunting and eating gazelle savanna sh!t

Plex are the resource that can be exploited. That brings pilots to the area. Pilots are willing to fight each other over the resoruce (defend or attack).

What's most important is that CCP makes sure that the ships needed to exploit the resouce is expensive or atleast not just a afterburning frigate. There would be levels of difficulty kinda like Incursions. Some that need a fleet and others that can be done solo.

As long as thier targets in an area a person can pvp. They can camp and force people to either fight or try to run away or explode.

Forcing pvp is arena/ring bullsh!t and is lame. If I wanted to see arena pvp I would watch the alliance tournament alot more. That sh!t is wack and so is the crying about forcing pilots to engage.

The resource brings pilots there. You as a solo pvp or small gang have to try to catch those b!tches.

Alot of these dudes have been in faction warfare to long and don't know how convenient they have it compared to pirates or those who solo or roam in small gangs in 0.0.

That's why almost no corporation/alliance ever makes it after leaving faction warfare. Factional warfare is hand holding and easier for pilots to do solo or in small gangs and find targets. Compared to pirating or 0.0


Sounds like someone didn't really listen very carefully. No one wants to force pvp. But if you join Faction Warfare, why the **** else should you be there? What we don't like are mechanics that affect warzone control and allow people to make it harder for us to fund our pvp by competing with us for item prices, without ever actually risking their ships. FW is supposed to be driving pvp. When a bunch of farmers come in, it doesn't drive ****. It's about bad mechanics, not people "whining" over kills. I got around 200 kills last month, I'm not struggling. What we complain about is silly mechanics that are supposed to drive pvp, and don't actually do that. If CCP wanted to make a farmers paradise, they could just advertise it as such. FW is advertised as a PVP environment, so why are the mechanics so friendly to farmers?
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#8 - 2012-07-10 17:55:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Veshta Yoshida
*Sadness*

Bunch of pew carebears talking about exploits incentives .. where is that which launched FW and involved everyone, causing much grief, laughs and just plain old Good Times™ .. RP.

You should have tried getting Ms. Constantine, Admiral Rodj Blake or some such to at least have it represented.

PS: Just started podcast, so above content mention is merely a hunch Smile
Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#9 - 2012-07-10 18:07:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Major Killz
@ Julius Fed

I detect Madz*

There was 40min spent chatting about forcing pilots to pvp. It was only untill someone who had some sense redirected the argument, with regard to forcing pilots to pvp. Also! You cry alot. Wipe your tears and drink from your bottle.


@ X Gallente

I was in 2 faction warfare corporations/alliances that left factional warfare. 1 was very successful outside of factional warfare for awhile (No Mercy). The other alliance had wolfsbrigade and shadows of the federation. Both went back to factional warfare. Most of thier pilots were lost outside of factional warfare and the few who weren't were solo pvpers who also pirated. Those pilots accounted for less than 5% of the alliance/corporation.

Even now I don't allow this corporation to recruit to many pilots from factional warfare and when we do they are pirates or had alot of experience living in 0.0


- Long day @ work and bored..

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#10 - 2012-07-10 18:25:13 UTC
Veshta Yoshida wrote:
*Sadness*

Bunch of pew carebears talking about exploits incentives .. where is that which launched FW and involved everyone, causing much grief, laughs and just plain old Good Times™ .. RP.

You should have tried getting Ms. Constantine, Admiral Rodj Blake or some such to at least have it represented.

PS: Just started podcast, so above content mention is merely a hunch Smile


Pew carebears? Jumbo Shrimp? Corporate ethics? Roll

As a role player surely you sympathize with the fact that the Amarr militia corps have to switch sides in order to afford ships, many people can't fight for their chosen faction any more without relying on separate militia with alts to farm isk. There really isn't a grief, laughs, or good times if one faction can't afford ships any longer.

Likewise, there isn't much grief, laughs, or good times when you're chasing those farmers out of plexes because they're not even fitting guns to their ships and there's zero incentive to stay and fight when its more efficent to just bounce around and avoid all conflict entirely.

There are some serious mechanical issues that need work to bring Faction Warfare up to its full potential, and in doing so it will enable every pilot to fly for the faction they love and believe in. You know this for a fact, because your posting for months has focused in on the broken mechanics, not so much the lack of RP going on in Faction Warfare (which the players can address themselves with or without CCP attention).

Besides, this was only the first of hopefully many round tables to come, I would get in touch with Spence from TEN and let him know you'd like to discuss RP issues in Faction Warfare. We all agreed there was much more to discuss than could fit into the allotted time.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#11 - 2012-07-10 18:51:57 UTC
The RP I am referring to is as stated "that which launched FW ..", so before your time. Ex: CCP designated a system which had to be taken in X amount of days/weeks. Result was a story detailing the efforts, win or lose and a medal for participants .. you'd be amazed at the fighting and general frolicking in local that came of something as simple as that.

People switching sides to get access to another LP store doesn't bother me as that lies squarely in the MMO part of things .. merely a way to game the system as it is, same goes for LP farmers. Both were called by us in the common sense/logic crowd prior to patch going live so .. Smile

Forty minutes in now and it has been regurgitated forum posts so far .. surprised at the amount of mechanics talk though, Had expected it to kick of with WZC modifiers and LP payouts.

As for future roundtables, could you ask CCP if they can spare one of their nerds for a bit? Some of the 'best' ideas I have read/heard would require quite some work I suspect, if they are even possible and it would be beneficial to have a horses-mouth to give direct feedback to avoid the panels going way off base.
Doesn't have to be any of the head honchos mind you, just someone with insight into what is possible/within reason.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#12 - 2012-07-10 19:22:25 UTC
Major Killz wrote:

@ X Gallente
I was in 2 faction warfare corporations/alliances that left factional warfare. 1 was very successful outside of factional warfare for awhile (No Mercy). The other alliance had wolfsbrigade and shadows of the federation. Both went back to factional warfare. Most of thier pilots were lost outside of factional warfare and the few who weren't were solo pvpers who also pirated. Those pilots accounted for less than 5% of the alliance/corporation.
I don't know where to go with this. Either I agree with you (but IMO you're mostly wrong), or I have to throw some compliments to two over zealous hot-dropping corps who came up with the worst alliance name ever (which I don't want to do). Big smile
Hurtado Soneka
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-07-10 19:30:59 UTC
so very few valid points, had to leave it an hr in lol
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#14 - 2012-07-10 19:36:26 UTC
Hurtado Soneka wrote:
so very few valid points, had to leave it an hr in lol


So be useful and post them right here, I'm listening. Lol

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#15 - 2012-07-10 19:37:49 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Major Killz wrote:

@ X Gallente
I was in 2 faction warfare corporations/alliances that left factional warfare. 1 was very successful outside of factional warfare for awhile (No Mercy). The other alliance had wolfsbrigade and shadows of the federation. Both went back to factional warfare. Most of thier pilots were lost outside of factional warfare and the few who weren't were solo pvpers who also pirated. Those pilots accounted for less than 5% of the alliance/corporation.
I don't know where to go with this. Either I agree with you (but IMO you're mostly wrong), or I have to throw some compliments to two over zealous hot-dropping corps who came up with the worst alliance name ever (which I don't want to do). Big smile



To save you from making a decision. I'll just be wrong = )

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

Generals4
#16 - 2012-07-10 19:38:21 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Hurtado Soneka wrote:
so very few valid points, had to leave it an hr in lol


So be useful and post them right here, I'm listening. Lol


You don't know how EVE forums work do you?

_-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. _

Hurtado Soneka
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#17 - 2012-07-10 19:45:28 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Hurtado Soneka wrote:
so very few valid points, had to leave it an hr in lol


So be useful and post them right here, I'm listening. Lol


Not meaning to troll but after you yourself said your against taking down npc rats in a plex and then offered a fanciful alternative CCP may/may not introduce new rat types to compensate, really? This is one aspect of the FW that is core in the problems, and can be fixed with such a simple patch.

Ofcourse perhaps not everybody agrees that rats should die but it seems to be the majority opinion, perhaps a poll would show proper public opinion. Am against elaborate fixes when simple ones would work, as for the rest, well a guy above me already said reguritating forum posts from the past few weeks.
David Clausewitz
David Clausewitz Corporation
#18 - 2012-07-10 20:08:57 UTC  |  Edited by: David Clausewitz
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Hurtado Soneka wrote:
so very few valid points, had to leave it an hr in lol


So be useful and post them right here, I'm listening. Lol


He never said he had a solution, he just said there weren't many good ones.
Simyaldee
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#19 - 2012-07-10 20:14:00 UTC
how'd they decide who was going to be a guest? was it an open invitation or something?

Member, Fighter and FC for The Great Harmon Institute of Technology 

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#20 - 2012-07-10 20:31:40 UTC
Hurtado Soneka wrote:
Not meaning to troll but after you yourself said your against taking down npc rats in a plex and then offered a fanciful alternative CCP may/may not introduce new rat types to compensate, really? This is one aspect of the FW that is core in the problems, and can be fixed with such a simple patch.

Ofcourse perhaps not everybody agrees that rats should die but it seems to be the majority opinion, perhaps a poll would show proper public opinion. Am against elaborate fixes when simple ones would work, as for the rest, well a guy above me already said reguritating forum posts from the past few weeks.


There's no poll necessary, I've said many times that this is clearly what the majority of players are asking for, which is why I've already talked about it to CCP. In fact, this is at least the 4th or 5th time I've posted in the forums that I've already talked to CCP about the fix. It's just not very simple, and I doubt it would happen before Winter anyways. "Force us to shoot the rats" started in response to the removal of E-war, and was offered as a quick fix to tide us over until the Winter expansion. If the holdover isn't going to happen till Winter anyways, I just want us to be careful about slapping it in carelessly with whatever other changes are made.

I've also been quite clear in saying that while I don't like arbitrary forced PvE in Faction Warfare, that if the majority of players want it, I'll keep pushing it through. I've questioned the decision, and asked for dissenting opinions to come forward, because I want to everyone to be perfectly aware of what they're asking for before the inevitable "But I just want to PvP, why do i have to shoot rat to take space??" whinefest comes down the road. I hear every day that Sovereignty should be about PvP and not about PvE, yet ironically it's forced PvE that players are asking for.

I, too, am very much against elaborate fixes, but you also have no idea how often complaint about NPC imbalance has come up over the years. CCP's heard this loud and clear, and are looking at overhauling the rats, and are asking for everyone's opinion on the matter. I don't think "the rats are just fine, leave them alone" works any better for the community at this point.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

123Next pageLast page