Warfare & Tactics

This thread amuses me.

Well Hans, Just putting to words what is apparent from all CSM stances on issues. Case in point incarna with Mittani all for incarna prior to it being released. (see his ten ton hammer article regarding Incarna before it was released).

But you can put all of this to light if you came out with a clear A, B C agenda and what you proposed, what you will propose etc. Because as of now you have no one to blame for being what you said you are in your above post. No one to blame but yourself. Com out and be clear and straight forward. Otherwise it is up to guess and theories.

I mean you do plan on revisiting the things you claimed in your 'elect me' thread and compare what happened versus what didnt dont you? dont you?

In other words Hans.

Give me the standard to compare you doing well versus you doing not so well. So I know that my vote was well placed or if I need it to change next time around. Dont get me wrong I have nothing against you....yet.

The reason I cannot be against you or with you though is you did not highlight what you did etc. what you succeded in what you failed in. Just make it clear for us and then see how you will be judged based on your actions not some tinfoil hat theories.

It might be nice if this campaign ad could spell "Gallente" correctly.

I read all the forums, I read all the CSM minutes, I still have no ideea what Hans sugested, what was accepted or rejected out of those sugestions, etc.

Either I have a reading problem or the guy is a waste of an airplane ticket to Iceland. When you compare him to ppl like Seleene, Mittens, Elise, Meissa, etc, he looks like a kid with a broomstick trying to fight in WW II.

I hacked your PC :)

Jk, I was reffering to the summary someone posted on EN24 (Seleene ?) . But yeah didn;t even have a clue CCP is mostly on vacation or that will be a month or so till a new developement cycle starts, you'd prove yourself very useful keeping us up to date with **** like that.

No problem, happy to help. If you ever need to get ahold of me, dont be afraid to send me a convo in-game or an evemail. I'll even give you all my skype name so you can hit me up anytime, I have it on at work and at home:

Hans.Jagerblitzen

Especially when I get busy, like with the minutes project, I may seem a little quiet on the forum front but I always try to make time for anyone that wants to chat about this stuff, most that have approached me can attest to that.

And I appreciate your understanding. To be honest, I'm not particularly worried about threads like this. There's always going to be a few that refuse to pay attention to what's going on and end up making the type silly claims that were in those pics linked in the OP. (Those that were watching the forums and listening to me know that I endorsed a full reset of the warzone pre-inferno, and took hell from my friends as a result. And contrary to the moneybags stereotype, I actually made a whopping 85,000 LP before the big cashout.)

As far as visibilty goes, I don't know what everyone expects, to be honest. I can't pop up in every single Faction Warfare thread that exists, there's simply too many and the goal should be to have it in as *few* threads as possible anyways, if you want my attention or CCP's attention.

I think what people also don't always understand is that all the time spend posting in the forums, is time taking away from discussing things from CCP, or in the case of the last few weeks, doing my job preparing the minutes. CSM work just pulls you a lot of different ways - and personally I would rather spend my time doing the work where CCP is concerned, than spending my time trying to groom my PR image because people don't read my posts or take the time to convo me if they have questions or concerns.

Getting issues like the plexing bug resolved, and the e-war removal that was release last week, have been recent efforts that speak for themselves in terms of success - these were objectives I was both clear about, and delivered upon. I've also been quite clear about the next set of immediate concerns - chiefly NPC rebalancing, ending all non-combat alt farming, and addressing some of the core motivational issues regarding the plex system. I could make even more threads to reiterate the stuff I've already said about these issues in other threads, but if people aren't reading my posts to begin with it just becomes another waste of time and forum space.

What does that last bit mean? Link to a post or something would be fine.

Well I agree on the plex by plex level.

But on the system by system level you seem to contradict yourself. Gaining control of the systems for getting cheap lp gear is a huge reason to control systems. Why do you think we need more reason than the war zone control points?





Why do you think joining other militias is bad? I think ccp should just help us identify our allied militias and the problem is solved. Are you surprised that the militias that have the easiest rats to fight in their home system are winning the war and therefore everyone is joining them?


I also don't see anything wrong with the current situation where you upgrade and flip systems in order to cash out in the lp store. It means people actually have to use strategy on when they will flip systems and when they will leave them vulnerable. Instead of just charging ahead like a wild pig and taking every system as soon as they can. More strategy is good not bad.

Its not because we have a low morale that we don't invest in upgrades to a system unless we want to cash out. Its because we are using our brains.

Hans
The only time I heard you talk about this was in relation to Susan Black's horribly biased idea that people should get lp for defensive plexing. You are not actually thinking of proposing that to ccp are you? That idea has come up several times and it gets shot down every time.