These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Two serious questions for the "Highsec Carebear"

Author
loard doktor
tradersbear
#641 - 2012-07-04 11:43:40 UTC  |  Edited by: loard doktor
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


1. What exactly is a reasonable amount of risk? In other words, at which point would losing your most expensive ship (NPCs or Players, no matter) result in you going "Yep, I truly deserved to lose that ship and I can only blame myself". Showing emotion - sadness or rage - for such a lose is understandable; such is the nature of the game. So please, an honest response.



Ive only been in the game for about 2 months this time around (last time I had to leave after 3 months due to my on board video card not being good enough for the game but obvc's are always cow droppings) but ive already lost "my most expensive ship" (lol). It was one of the cruisers I got for the aniversary gift. I lost it due to a foolish mistake in one of the soe missions. Obviously i had no one but myself to blame. I just went out and bought a new one after blowing off steam at the situation (had to yell at it not being fair before I could admit that life isnt meant to be fair).

Thor Kerrigan wrote:



2. What exactly is a reasonable amount of profit you should be allowed to make? What is the maximum and the minimum isk/hour that should be available when you perform said activities under you ideal risk/reward ratio you thought of when answering question 1.



Personally, id say, make as much as you can. Your going to lose a good chuck of it at some point. In just under two months Ive gone from newb trial to 1.5 billion in assests and thats with paying for 3 plexes so far from this account. Im a merchant by aptitude, but I wouldnt hesitate to use a q ship to blow away a few gankers if they had one.
Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#642 - 2012-07-04 11:58:45 UTC
Tippia wrote:

Delen Ormand wrote:
If I go the shop and buy a loaf of bread, that's not me versus anyone. That's me buying some bread.
No, it's you denying the next customer some amount of bread (or, more accurately, ore).


I'm not denying them anything. Intent is implied in denial, and I don't have that intent.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#643 - 2012-07-04 12:03:37 UTC
Delen Ormand wrote:
I'm not denying them anything. Intent is implied in denial, and I don't have that intent.
No. Denial can occur just fine without intent. If you drunkenly fall asleep half-way into the elevator, blocking the door, you've denied everyone else in the building the use of said elevator even though all you intended to do was get home.

So by mining the ore, regardless of your reason and intent, you're denying others access to the same ore.
Amaron Ghant
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#644 - 2012-07-04 12:04:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Amaron Ghant
"A reasonable amount of isk"

is as much as I can make before someone tries to stop me.... you know, just like Apple and Rim technologies try to do in real life

Its all PvP, just some bits arn't that shooty
Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#645 - 2012-07-04 12:25:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Delen Ormand
Tippia wrote:
Delen Ormand wrote:
I'm not denying them anything. Intent is implied in denial, and I don't have that intent.
No. Denial can occur just fine without intent. If you drunkenly fall asleep half-way into the elevator, blocking the door, you've denied everyone else in the building the use of said elevator even though all you intended to do was get home.

So by mining the ore, regardless of your reason and intent, you're denying others access to the same ore.


I think you may be confusing definitions. If I deliberately stop someone from getting something, then I am denying them that thing. If my actions inadvertantly remove the possibility of that person acquiring the thing, that's different. It's the difference between "I denied them" and "they were denied". The agency in the second statement can be different to that in the first. It could be that they were denied "by circumstances", for example. I may well have had a hand in creating those circumstances, but without the intent to deny, the statements are still different.

Take the dictionary definition (Oxford one, pasted after). Every definition is tied to the word "refuse". Refusal again requires intent.

Anyway, when an argument gets to the point of dictionary definitions, it's a good sign that it won't ever be won without more time and effort than it's worth (Ormand's Law), so I'm butting out now. Because you're obviously not stupid, I'll hope you see my point even if you disagree with it. If you don't, then it doesn't really matter much anyway.



deny

Pronunciation: /dɪˈnʌɪ/
verb (denies, denying, denied)

1 [with object] state that one refuses to admit the truth or existence of: both firms deny any responsibility for the tragedy
refuse to admit the truth of (a concept or proposition that is supported by the majority of scientific or historical evidence): an anti-environmentalist campaign group that denies climate change

2 [with two objects] refuse to give (something requested or desired) to (someone): the inquiry was denied access to intelligence sources
(deny oneself) refuse to let oneself have something that one desires: he had denied himself sexually for years
[with object] archaic refuse access to (someone): the servants are ordered to deny him
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#646 - 2012-07-04 12:37:44 UTC
Delen Ormand wrote:
I think you may be confusing definitions.
No, I'm simply using words the way they are used.

Whether intentional or not, you're the agent of people not having access to the same ore, just like you'd be the agent of people not being able to use the aforementioned elevator. In each case, you've denied others access to the ore/elevator.

Regardless, your intent is irrelevant: you've made sure that others cannot get the ore. In the competition over limited resources, you came out ahead. The only way for you not to compete is not to take part. Since everything in EVE is subject to competition, not taking part will have exactly one outcome: you do nothing* and end up with nothing.


* …well, close enough — you could engage in charity: mine the ore and abandon it, letting others have it without doing the actual work themselves. Somehow, I doubt this is what you mean when you mention non-PvP mining.
Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#647 - 2012-07-04 13:35:18 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Delen Ormand wrote:
I think you may be confusing definitions.
No, I'm simply using words the way they are used.


wrongly? P
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#648 - 2012-07-04 13:37:24 UTC
Delen Ormand wrote:
wrongly? P
No.
Alaya Carrier
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#649 - 2012-07-04 14:21:18 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Alaya Carrier wrote:
You are generalizing about stuff you don't seem to totally know about.


You're the one that brought up other games that no one really cares about in a thread that is all about EVE. Using that logic, you're the one that is generalising. You're not giving your arguemtn any credibility by bringing up what happens in other games. I wish you would understand this, but you have shown yourself incapable.


I am not the one making nonsensical statements about how everything is PvP centered (to justify other arguments) by bringing in examples of totally regular activities available in other games. I just happened to bring counter examples of those games that show how these are not PvP elements since are readily available in pure PvE games.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#650 - 2012-07-04 14:26:28 UTC
Alaya Carrier wrote:
I am not the one making nonsensical statements about how everything is PvP centered (to justify other arguments) by bringing in examples of totally regular activities available in other games.
How is it nonsensical?
You have yet to show that the activities in question are not PvP.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#651 - 2012-07-04 14:36:23 UTC
Delen Ormand wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Delen Ormand wrote:
I'm not denying them anything. Intent is implied in denial, and I don't have that intent.
No. Denial can occur just fine without intent. If you drunkenly fall asleep half-way into the elevator, blocking the door, you've denied everyone else in the building the use of said elevator even though all you intended to do was get home.

So by mining the ore, regardless of your reason and intent, you're denying others access to the same ore.


I think you may be confusing definitions. If I deliberately stop someone from getting something, then I am denying them that thing. If my actions inadvertantly remove the possibility of that person acquiring the thing, that's different.


No it isn't. If I blow up the house next to your house & it damages your house severly so you can't live there for several months, whether by intention or not I've denied you access to your house. (Since we're on the real life comparison bandwagon)

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Alaya Carrier
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#652 - 2012-07-04 15:20:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Alaya Carrier
Tippia wrote:
Alaya Carrier wrote:
I am not the one making nonsensical statements about how everything is PvP centered (to justify other arguments) by bringing in examples of totally regular activities available in other games.
How is it nonsensical?
You have yet to show that the activities in question are not PvP.


Nope. You have yet to show that the activities in questions are a foundation of EvE as a PvP game. While I am trying to prove that even PvE games have them and they have your 3 criteria too and thus they are not something of a distinction PvP factor.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#653 - 2012-07-04 15:31:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Alaya Carrier wrote:
Nope. You have yet to show that the activities in questions are a foundation of EvE as a PvP game.
…and why would I have to show that? I've never said anything of the kind.

I'm saying that every activity in EVE is PvP. You are (apparently) arguing that this is not the case, but haven't been able to explain why.

Quote:
While I am trying to prove that even PvE games have them
…which is entirely irrelevant to their being PvP activities in EVE.
StuRyan
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#654 - 2012-07-04 15:35:34 UTC  |  Edited by: StuRyan
people go to null sec becuase they want to kill people legally without police being on there arse.

bring those same rats and plexes into high sec and you won't see much change...

a truely dynamic null sec should involve echo systems where each echo system has its rewards and differentiations.

It was kinda started with the technetium buff but as far as i am concerned thats not a echo system -

i still do not understand why poeple who pay to play eve in high sec are percieved as the cancers of the game when 90% of the population of eve play the game in high sec...and the remaining 10% depend on high sec.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#655 - 2012-07-04 16:07:34 UTC
StuRyan wrote:
i still do not understand why poeple who pay to play eve in high sec are percieved as the cancers of the game when 90% of the population of eve play the game in high sec...and the remaining 10% depend on high sec.


You may be missing the objective of the perceived contempt. It's not against all people that play EVE in highsec.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Alaya Carrier
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#656 - 2012-07-04 16:08:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Alaya Carrier
Tippia wrote:
[quote=Alaya Carrier]Nope. You have yet to show that the activities in questions are a foundation of EvE as a PvP game.


I have just invited 5 people in my Orca fleet to give everybody mining boost.

I suppose I am PvPing them hard.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#657 - 2012-07-04 16:10:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Alaya Carrier wrote:
I have just invited 5 people in my Orca fleet to give everybody mining boost.

I suppose I am PvPing them hard.
Not them, specifically, but the lot of you are team-PvP:ing against other groups (and if the miners are not organised, then they're still competing against each other as well as everyone else, and you're helping them compete better).

StuRyan wrote:
i still do not understand why poeple who pay to play eve in high sec are percieved as the cancers of the game when 90% of the population of eve play the game in high sec...and the remaining 10% depend on high sec.
Hard to tell. It might have something to do with their propensity for making use of completely made up numbers and “facts” to support their fantasy claims.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#658 - 2012-07-04 16:12:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Mallak Azaria
Alaya Carrier wrote:
Tippia wrote:
[quote=Alaya Carrier]Nope. You have yet to show that the activities in questions are a foundation of EvE as a PvP game.


I have just invited 5 people in my Orca fleet to give everybody mining boost.

I suppose I am PvPing them hard.


Good job on quickly editing out the part where you said "I've been trying to tell you that every activity in EVE is PvP all along". Great way to completely contradict yourself.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Alaya Carrier
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#659 - 2012-07-04 16:14:51 UTC
Tippia wrote:

I'm saying that every activity in EVE is PvP. You are (apparently) arguing that this is not the case, but haven't been able to explain why.


I am not arguing that it's not the case. I am arguing that you seem to construct the "everything in EvE is PvP" when "everything in most MMOs is PvP" instead. Therefore the veiled distinction you make about EvE vs the rest of the universe is feeble to non existant (when the other games too have player killing).
Alaya Carrier
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#660 - 2012-07-04 16:15:32 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Alaya Carrier wrote:
Tippia wrote:
[quote=Alaya Carrier]Nope. You have yet to show that the activities in questions are a foundation of EvE as a PvP game.


I have just invited 5 people in my Orca fleet to give everybody mining boost.

I suppose I am PvPing them hard.


Good job on quickly editing out the part where you said "I've been trying to tell you that every activity in EVE is PvP all along". Great way to completely contradict yourself.


If you check the post above that, I had misquoted something typed by Tippia not me. Re-read better.