These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP: "Griefing" policy question

Author
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#141 - 2011-10-08 21:04:38 UTC
EVE Stig wrote:
More tears please Goons, I love it. I also love the assumptions of my immaturity
Coming from you guys thats just funny

I am not sure how you posting at a third grade level is improved by you actually being older, but ********

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

EVE Stig
Doomheim
#142 - 2011-10-08 21:06:28 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
EVE Stig wrote:
More tears please Goons, I love it. I also love the assumptions of my immaturity
Coming from you guys thats just funny

I am not sure how you posting at a third grade level is improved by you actually being older, but ********


Oh come on, Ive seen you guys do better than this, this is a sad, sad, insult.
And a very bad post. Dont do it again.

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

Komen
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#143 - 2011-10-08 21:10:15 UTC
So out of idle curiousity, how goes the campaign today?

I'd hit the killboards but :effort:
The Apostle
Doomheim
#144 - 2011-10-08 21:56:40 UTC
Andski wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Lastly, all empire POS holders can just change faction. Again, no market for Gallente ice.

Yeah, and everyone that owns an Erebus would just switch to a different titan. Everyone that owns a Nyx would switch to another supercarrier. Everyone that owns a Rorqual would just use an Orca. Right?

Yeah, stop pretending to have a clue about what the **** you're talking about.

Likewise.

If you'd taken 30 extra seconds to read you would have seen that I made and covered that point. I also made the point that yes, Gallente towers have bonuses, but if the ice dried up, it just means some extra work for moongoo harvesters switching towers temporarily. You and your mates didn't see that either did you?

But really, unless you guys are prepared to lock the ice down for months and months, it will be no more than a blip for most people. The whole campaign is just kindygarten bully boy stuff and is about as exciting as watching a dog **** on a tree.

...ooo000ooo...

But hey, I accept the thread consensus on this. It was a question I was curious about and I think it was answered quite clearly.

c'est la vie

PS: Thank you to the guys that added constructive commentary.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#145 - 2011-10-08 22:05:30 UTC
EVE Stig wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
EVE Stig wrote:
More tears please Goons, I love it. I also love the assumptions of my immaturity
Coming from you guys thats just funny

I am not sure how you posting at a third grade level is improved by you actually being older, but ********


Oh come on, Ive seen you guys do better than this, this is a sad, sad, insult.
And a very bad post. Dont do it again.


I agree. No mention of your mother, no insinuations of inappropriate sexual conduct with farm animals, frankly Weaselior, we expect better.
Zirse
Risktech Analytics
#146 - 2011-10-08 22:20:52 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Andski wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Lastly, all empire POS holders can just change faction. Again, no market for Gallente ice.

Yeah, and everyone that owns an Erebus would just switch to a different titan. Everyone that owns a Nyx would switch to another supercarrier. Everyone that owns a Rorqual would just use an Orca. Right?

Yeah, stop pretending to have a clue about what the **** you're talking about.

Likewise.

If you'd taken 30 extra seconds to read you would have seen that I made and covered that point. I also made the point that yes, Gallente towers have bonuses, but if the ice dried up, it just means some extra work for moongoo harvesters switching towers temporarily. You and your mates didn't see that either did you?

But really, unless you guys are prepared to lock the ice down for months and months, it will be no more than a blip for most people. The whole campaign is just kindygarten bully boy stuff and is about as exciting as watching a dog **** on a tree.

...ooo000ooo...

But hey, I accept the thread consensus on this. It was a question I was curious about and I think it was answered quite clearly.

c'est la vie

PS: Thank you to the guys that added constructive commentary.


Here is a man who has never tried to do any reaction chains trying to talk about the EVEonomics of oxytopes.

I think the first five or so pages of this thread have consistently demonstrated your level of dumbass-- you should probably just biomass at this point.
The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#147 - 2011-10-08 22:52:43 UTC
i love threads like this, they're almost as fun as blowing up hiseccers

~hi~

The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#148 - 2011-10-08 22:54:57 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
Seriously (well yeah nothing here is serious) why DONT you guys start wardeccing their corps? The panic youd create with that, the biggest null sec corp in the game war decs their high sec carebear corp, you wanna keep them outta the belts, theres a way lol
They'll just stop undocking


we've wardecced any who try organized resistance via guarding belts, and they run and vanish immediately in terror, like you say

most ice miners are in npc corps because they're bots

~hi~

The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#149 - 2011-10-08 22:59:51 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

They don't have to do any mining. They just have to buy up all the available stocks and then stop anyone else mining them.

I rule out the economic argument as total BS. Alway have.



Argument from personal ignorance is rarely persausive.

There's a reason people use Gallente towers.

Read my post AGAIN. I said as much.


you seem kind of angry in this thread, and because i dislike you and i'm a sadist, that gives me pleasure

toodles

~hi~

Fail Sui
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#150 - 2011-10-08 23:44:28 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
the pinnacle of griefing is the eula lawyer threads, once you get those you know you done good


Not empty quoting.
Fail Sui
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#151 - 2011-10-08 23:44:43 UTC
Also this thread is horrible.
Fail Sui
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#152 - 2011-10-08 23:45:00 UTC
But I strangely love it.
The Apostle
Doomheim
#153 - 2011-10-09 00:27:26 UTC  |  Edited by: The Apostle
Zirse wrote:

Here is a man who has never tried to do any reaction chains trying to talk about the EVEonomics of oxytopes.

I think the first five or so pages of this thread have consistently demonstrated your level of dumbass-- you should probably just biomass at this point.

I ran multiple reaction chain towers in DekCo land my good fellow and ran multiple low-end goo towers in low. I know that Gallente towers have silo bonuses etc. If ice supply were a problem - in the long term - it would be a case of changing towers and working harder to achieve the same level of reactions.

Perhaps YOU need to do some research as to why it is little more than an inconvenience to most.

They would have to run this campaign for a very long time to stop moongoo and only those without appropriate reserves would feel the effects.

As for being a dumbass. Look at this face. Do I look boffered? You're just another [yawn] poster that slags off other peoples' topics without actually adding anything.

Not agreeing with someone is fine. Attacking the man is well.... Inconsequential and rather pointless. But as long as you feel good.... meh.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Anela Cistine
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#154 - 2011-10-09 00:34:29 UTC
If you are going to quote the rules, quote the whole rule, it isn't long. One line out of context distorts the rule.

Quote:
A grief player, or "griefer," is a player who devotes much of his time to making others’ lives miserable, in a large part deriving his enjoyment of the game from these activities while he does not profit from it in any way. Grief tactics are the mechanics a griefer will utilize to antagonize other players. At our discretion, players who are found to be consistently maliciously interfering with the game experience for others may receive a warning, temporary suspension or permanent banning of his account.

This should not be confused with standard conflict that might arise between two (or more) players, such as corporation wars. The EVE universe is a harsh universe largely driven by such conflict and notice must be taken of the fact that nonconsensual combat alone is not considered to be grief play per the above definition.

An example of grief play would be the so called "Can baiting" in starter systems. An experienced player drops a cargo container with some items in front of a station in a starter system and waits for a new player to take from it. The new player is flagged and promptly attacked and killed by the owner of the container. Doing the same in starter tutorial complexes is also considered grief play and will not be tolerated.


Goonswarm Federation is profiting from this action in many ways, therefore it is not griefing.


  1. We're making money manipulating the isotope market. Immediate profit.

  2. If the price spikes hard enough, it may become worthwhile to mine ice in nullsec for long term profit. Most goons have no interest in mining, but some of our member corps might. (I'm looking at you, Thunderwaffe.) Of course we have allied alliances that do like to mine, and just happen to control the right kind of ice. An amazing coincidence? No.

  3. If the interdiction is successful, it become more expensive to run gallente caps, supercaps, jump frieghters and rorquels. Potentially a major strategic and logistical advantage for any alliances that knew about it ahead of time and stocked up below 450. We're at war, if our enemies are inconvenience that is a strategic benefit for us.

  4. Secondary affects on reaction towers and T2 goods will also benefit us.

  5. Many of these ice miners are bots, and having them continue to warp back and forth between the belts and the station, mining in in their pods is pretty good evidence that they are bots. Popping miners and seeing which ones at like bots allows us to report them to CCP and hopefully get them shut down. Getting rid of bots benefits everyone.


Some goons are having a great time and don't care about the big picture at all, some of those goons might even be in our directorate. But there is a big picture, and we are getting more out of this than just tears. As long as we are getting any in-game benefit at all, the rules say it isn't griefing. Sorry.
The Apostle
Doomheim
#155 - 2011-10-09 00:37:29 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

They don't have to do any mining. They just have to buy up all the available stocks and then stop anyone else mining them.

I rule out the economic argument as total BS. Alway have.



Argument from personal ignorance is rarely persausive.

There's a reason people use Gallente towers.

Read my post AGAIN. I said as much.


you seem kind of angry in this thread, and because i dislike you and i'm a sadist, that gives me pleasure

toodles

I have no need to get angry Mittens, stop flattering yourself.

And hey, dislike me, pfft... I'm not here to win your heart darlin'...

Besides, I am very comfortable in the knowledge that I don't need 7,500 bo peeps to prop up my ego Twisted

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

The Apostle
Doomheim
#156 - 2011-10-09 00:42:31 UTC
Anela Cistine wrote:
If you are going to quote the rules, quote the whole rule, it isn't long. One line out of context distorts the rule.

Quote:
A grief player, or "griefer," is a player who devotes much of his time to making others’ lives miserable, in a large part deriving his enjoyment of the game from these activities while he does not profit from it in any way. Grief tactics are the mechanics a griefer will utilize to antagonize other players. At our discretion, players who are found to be consistently maliciously interfering with the game experience for others may receive a warning, temporary suspension or permanent banning of his account.

This should not be confused with standard conflict that might arise between two (or more) players, such as corporation wars. The EVE universe is a harsh universe largely driven by such conflict and notice must be taken of the fact that nonconsensual combat alone is not considered to be grief play per the above definition.

An example of grief play would be the so called "Can baiting" in starter systems. An experienced player drops a cargo container with some items in front of a station in a starter system and waits for a new player to take from it. The new player is flagged and promptly attacked and killed by the owner of the container. Doing the same in starter tutorial complexes is also considered grief play and will not be tolerated.


Goonswarm Federation is profiting from this action in many ways, therefore it is not griefing.


  1. We're making money manipulating the isotope market. Immediate profit.

  2. If the price spikes hard enough, it may become worthwhile to mine ice in nullsec for long term profit. Most goons have no interest in mining, but some of our member corps might. (I'm looking at you, Thunderwaffe.) Of course we have allied alliances that do like to mine, and just happen to control the right kind of ice. An amazing coincidence? No.

  3. If the interdiction is successful, it become more expensive to run gallente caps, supercaps, jump frieghters and rorquels. Potentially a major strategic and logistical advantage for any alliances that knew about it ahead of time and stocked up below 450. We're at war, if our enemies are inconvenience that is a strategic benefit for us.

  4. Secondary affects on reaction towers and T2 goods will also benefit us.

  5. Many of these ice miners are bots, and having them continue to warp back and forth between the belts and the station, mining in in their pods is pretty good evidence that they are bots. Popping miners and seeing which ones at like bots allows us to report them to CCP and hopefully get them shut down. Getting rid of bots benefits everyone.


Some goons are having a great time and don't care about the big picture at all, some of those goons might even be in our directorate. But there is a big picture, and we are getting more out of this than just tears. As long as we are getting any in-game benefit at all, the rules say it isn't griefing. Sorry.

I appreciate your WoT. Curious why you think you need to explain it all....

Nonetheless, if you took the time to look around, I've as good as said this campaign has merely flagged - to me- whether it should be allowed in the best interests of the game.

I have also stated that I have read and concede to the consenus. It's why I asked in the first place. I had my view and wanted to see what others thought. Mission accomplished.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Tyrone Cashmoney
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#157 - 2011-10-09 01:00:11 UTC
My client crashed yesterday, CCP must be griefing me.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#158 - 2011-10-09 01:19:36 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
The whole campaign is just kindygarten bully boy stuff and is about as exciting as watching a dog **** on a tree.

It's made you cry like a little girl. That alone has been enough to keep me going.

Never stop posting.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Anela Cistine
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#159 - 2011-10-09 01:51:23 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Curious why you think you need to explain it all....


luv2post.

I'm not good at witty troll posts, so I prefer to drown people in perfectly reasonable word vomit. On goonfleet.com or SA a wall of words can get you into trouble, but not here. Here I can indulge my desire to make big posts. I like big posts and a I can not lie.
VaMei
Meafi Corp
#160 - 2011-10-09 02:03:58 UTC  |  Edited by: VaMei
Tippia wrote:
They're just causing general havoc (or well… trying to, at least) and having fun (and profit) in the process, all of which is entirely legal. In fact, one might even say that they're playing EVE in its purest form. Again, they're not interfering with the game experience — they provide it...


Love it or hate it, what the Goons are doing is proof that the sandbox is alive and well, and that what we do has effects on the entire game.

This is the Butterfly Effect on steroids.