These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

ObamaCare Passes SCOTUS

Author
Renturu
In Glorium et Decorum
#61 - 2012-06-29 04:57:16 UTC
Same here Eddie, We have to change caregivers b/e of new mandates that are in place. Some doctors are being forced to refuse any insurance and not just medicaire/Medicaide as it is discriminitory.

What I don't understand is, If I pay a cheaper car insurance rate b/c I don't have a ton of fender benders in my car, Why do I pay the same rate for Healthcare Insurance as a fat-a$$ eating 5 Big Macs s day Neck Beard who hasn't seen the light of day since he left the womb?

I understand the needs of those with genuine health issues - Cancer, Major surgeries. That is a need and is more rarely utilizing of insurance than the common cold or STD's for being stupid. I don't think insurgence should go up for those uses but instead for the aforementioned fat-a$$es that don't care enough to take care of themselves... THEY should pay more.

By the orders of PlunderBunny: ☻/ /▌ / \ This is Bob, post him into your forum sig and help him conquer the forums.

Jada Maroo
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#62 - 2012-06-29 06:18:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Jada Maroo
Eddie Monaghan wrote:
This will result in people and employers that would rather pay the fines than pay the 10x cost of Insurance today. This will cause Insurance Companies to go out of business and we'll be forced to rely on Government Health Care, which from my experience with Veterans Affairs I can honestly tell you first hand that it's crap.


I believe this was the plan all along. It's going to backfire if it's held in place, though. Faced with the collapse of the healthcare system and given that Americans don't want socialized medicine and Democrats won't want to fight the battle again so soon (and will likely be out of power), the choices are going to be:

1. IRS penalties made much more draconian to prevent the exploit at the behest of private insurer lobbying

2. The law is repealed

Nullification by the states is also possible. You can bet in the coming months you're going to see state statutes barring the enactment of Obamacare. But you don't even have to go that far - the states can simply refuse to enforce it. The precedent has been set by Obama himself on the issue of immigration, and with sanctuary cities that refused to comply with immigration laws. If enough governors simply say "That's a fancy law you got there. Too bad we're not going to enforce it for you" I really don't think the Feds can do anything. And once Romney is office, they surely won't.
Eddie Monaghan
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#63 - 2012-06-29 08:08:22 UTC
I don't think Romney will really do much here, remember, the Obamacare Model is based off of Romney's failed Romneycare model in Mass. as Governor there. It may have been tweaked, but it's there.

I urge people to look past political labels and see the entire picture as it really is, and to me at least, it is scary. It's WAY bigger than health care.

Check this one out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27uM25FvXrE

Really? First Amendment Rights can be terminated. Fourth Amendment as well, as I understand it. Many have been under attack against the First and Fourth Amendments. The loss of our Country, figuratively speaking, has been under way for a long, long time I am afraid. No Conspiracy Theory needed for this, it's simply Mathematically impossible to climb out of the debt we now have, and that isn't the result of Obama, but the result of MANY Presidents over the years, no matter what "Party" they belong to. Obamacare pushes this further I am sad to say.

The United States, I think, will go the way of Greece, only much, much worse due to the position we've been in for so long. And this is NOT to minimize or belittle what Greece is going through, I feel for them, Really I do. They have a right to be angry.

I don't know how things will look next year for us, or if there'll be a next year. Rather than creating solutions, we are creating greater and greater debt. And folks can't say that we, or any country, elects the greatest quality of leaders, or even mediocre ones, because some of the most brilliant people I've met were right here on Eve. So if in THIS community, which by the way, as if y'all didn't know, is international, then think of all the greatness we have on this planet of something like 5 billion. I hope after the dust and smoke clears after the things that may/may not happen over the next few years, such brilliance will emerge from The People, and not those appointed by Government.

I was once a Soldier for the United States Army, and while I speak ONLY for myself, I have to say, with things as they are now, I'd not lift a finger to save it if it is to be saved for what things are now. Of course, if for the better, it's worth fighting for, preferably peacefully.

I say prepare for the worst, and this means putting some food away and considering things you may do in case of... Whatever. If nothing else, you'll have a lot of food to eat. But at least you'll have SOME buffer if things go badly in this Country.

And speaking on screwed up things such as Economic woes.... This IS a Global problem, not just a few countries, but I know you guys are all smart enough to know that already. Personally, I blame the Banks. But I'm straying off topic a bit, so I'll finish my point, this Health Care law will put an incredible tax on The People, the largest increase in world history I believe, in an economy that's shrinking by the minute, and you can't tax those that have no money. Have you seen the huge increase of homelessness? My brother is living with me because he's out of work and can't get a job that has 3-400 applicants. No, this Law is not good at all. Insurance and the fines will bleed us dry before the Insurance Companies dry up and full on Government Health Care

- Lo they do call to me. They bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla. Where the brave may live forever.

Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#64 - 2012-06-29 08:43:22 UTC
I may well have not entirely understood the constitution, but I'm still 100% certain that handing over the health and welfare of your entire nation to a bunch of greedy capitalist insurance companies has done nothing good for a large proportion of you. Whether or not someone lives or dies should not be a matter of insurance.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Eddie Monaghan
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#65 - 2012-06-29 09:03:39 UTC
No, that's no good either. And Capitalism itself is not the issue, it's the perversion of it. Capitalism is only for the very, very few. The idea is a good one, bust your butt, create or improve upon ideas, market them, reap the rewards. But, that is now taken up by the very large entities, who think that a Corporation is a Person, and every law, every tax, every profit, is for and by those elite.

Socialism isn't an answer either, as it's proven to fail time and again. Maybe there is a better solution.

This all goes with Insurgence Companies as well. No, Life or Death should not hang on whether you have insurance or not.

Health and Welfare of The People does not belong to Government. It belongs to the People Alone. That said, there COULD be a MUCH better system for those that can not afford Insurance, although like fuel ought to be, I think there should be a cap on how much the Medical/Insurance Companies can extort. I think, honestly, that should be THE solution right there, make it actually affordable.

But, then, that kills the concept of Capitalism. Theoretically, if I am innovative and create a product that becomes high in demand because I busted my butt to get it out there, I should reap ALL of the rewards that come with that. Telling folks you have to put a cap on their profits kills all motivation right there. If you're not looking to shoot for the top, what's the point?

People in general are greedy. I am, we all are, to a point anyhow. It's human nature to want it all. To have the best. This is something that has to be seriously considered, as with Health Care lives ARE on the line.

- Lo they do call to me. They bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla. Where the brave may live forever.

Jett0
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#66 - 2012-06-29 09:24:34 UTC
I can't recall voting for this...

Occasionally plays sober

Renturu
In Glorium et Decorum
#67 - 2012-06-29 09:34:56 UTC
Eddie Monaghan wrote:
No, that's no good either. And Capitalism itself is not the issue, it's the perversion of it. Capitalism is only for the very, very few. The idea is a good one, bust your butt, create or improve upon ideas, market them, reap the rewards. But, that is now taken up by the very large entities, who think that a Corporation is a Person, and every law, every tax, every profit, is for and by those elite.

Socialism isn't an answer either, as it's proven to fail time and again. Maybe there is a better solution.

This all goes with Insurgence Companies as well. No, Life or Death should not hang on whether you have insurance or not.

Health and Welfare of The People does not belong to Government. It belongs to the People Alone. That said, there COULD be a MUCH better system for those that can not afford Insurance, although like fuel ought to be, I think there should be a cap on how much the Medical/Insurance Companies can extort. I think, honestly, that should be THE solution right there, make it actually affordable.

But, then, that kills the concept of Capitalism. Theoretically, if I am innovative and create a product that becomes high in demand because I busted my butt to get it out there, I should reap ALL of the rewards that come with that. Telling folks you have to put a cap on their profits kills all motivation right there. If you're not looking to shoot for the top, what's the point?

People in general are greedy. I am, we all are, to a point anyhow. It's human nature to want it all. To have the best. This is something that has to be seriously considered, as with Health Care lives ARE on the line.


Treat it like car insurance... but in this case, major surgeries/operations and treatments (Chemo) are exempt from instances that effect the policy. If you go to the ER for every sniffle or cold and you exceed x number of visits for "stupid ****," your rate (if you are a private insurance holder) goes up. Kind of like when a car insurance company gets tired of fixing your stupid fender benders... they raise your rates.

Add to this that a once a year physical is required to set a baseline for your level of health. If you are healthy, you pay cheaper premiums. If your a lazy 12 cheeseburger eating fat-ass neck-beard that visits the doc b/c you are getting symptoms of type-2 diabetes, you should pay a higher rate.

Now, I know those who cannot afford private insurance wouldn't be able to do this. So, since they are sucking on big mama gumment's tit, they should meet the annual physical requirements to maintain health.... If they want the gov't to take care of their healthcare needs, they should take care of themselves to avoid overtaxing the system - sort of how the military works; you get "free" healthcare in the military, provided you, as the military member, maintain a standard of health. You get too fat, they kick you out.

By the orders of PlunderBunny: ☻/ /▌ / \ This is Bob, post him into your forum sig and help him conquer the forums.

Eddie Monaghan
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#68 - 2012-06-29 10:25:50 UTC
Could be that, too. It's not unreasonable for people to take care of themselves. When I was a kid, I spent all day, from sun up to sun down, outside. If it was raining, we spent our time in a fort we built drinking Budweiser (American **** basically, I'll take a Guinness any day of the week over that, or Beamish), if not, we were running all over the place. We played football, actual football not a video game, and even though most of us were poor, we were rather healthy. That was considered normal. Now days, kids (people in general) spend most of their time chillin inside eating cheetoes and drinking hundreds of Redbulls per year. No Bueno.

Even now, although I am in pain much of the time these days, I stay fairly active. I just need to quit tobacco, which is a *****.

My health Problems, those created by myself, are my problems. Not my Governments. If I have cancer (I don't yet) it is both my fault, and my problem. I see it the same way for everyone else. I'll be happy to pay my taxes to help those that can't afford Insurance at all, but have major health issues such as accidents.

- Lo they do call to me. They bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla. Where the brave may live forever.

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#69 - 2012-06-29 11:10:16 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Ivoto wrote:
too lazy to make my links work.

Personally I dont like Barry and Co. mandating that I need private, for-profit health insurance



Just clarified that a little for ya, there, bru.


In the interest of full disclosure I am a fiscal conservative. I am also a social liberal.

The two greatest reasons for the obnoxious cost of healthcare are 1) Insurance companies being for-profit and 2) Healthcare providers that use marketing.

I live in one of the only civilized countries where health insurance companies are for-profit businesses. This is a faulty model and needs to be addressed.

I also despise hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and other healthcare entities advertising. How much of their revenue is spent on marketing and advertising. Imagine if the hospital in my city did not advertise and I had a heart attack. Isn't it unlikely that I am going to die because I don't know where to go? No. Stop spending money on advertising - it's ******* stupid.

Same thing with the cost of prescription medication - how much of that cost is used to market their product? ******* stupid.

Being a fiscal conservative, I was at first skeptical of Obamacare. I do think that healthcare needs to be a right and not a privilege but how the **** are we going to pay for it? The more I think about it it will cost less than what I have to pay to cover an individual without healthcare coverage. Additionally. the more people on the books at the insurance companies the lower the rates for all. It will be interesting whether we see that savings or whether the for-profit insurance companies will just hoard that money and not discount any policies.

[/rant]

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Agaetis Byrjun Endalaust
#70 - 2012-06-29 11:52:15 UTC
sorry if I'm getting curious about such details, but HOW MUCH will you have to pay for this? I mean, is it 500$ per year, 2000, 50, 20??? is it a fixed amount or does it depend on your social status (how much you paied in taxes the year before) or on your actual work contract?

in any case, respect Eddie, that's speaking like a real man. Seriously, no joke meant. I guess everyone can see the difference between your reasoning and those who from time to time (usually when a "socialist" speaks) light their sole neuron and scream.

__________________________ just because you're paranoid it doesn't mean they're not after you

Sidus Isaacs
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2012-06-29 12:04:09 UTC
Master Gotama wrote:
personally as an employed, tax paying citizen, i don't like paying for freeloaders to get their healthcare at my expense.



Personally as an employed, tax paying citizen, I happily pay my taxes that go towards our free healthcare system, because that is the one of reasons my country is one of the best in the world.

Yours is an narrow attitude of ignorance. You completely fail too analyze the social system in which you live.
stoicfaux
#72 - 2012-06-29 13:04:14 UTC
Jada Maroo wrote:
The precedent has been set by Obama himself on the issue of immigration, and with sanctuary cities that refused to comply with immigration laws.

Stop getting your news from FoxNews. Turns out that every president since Reagan has used executive privilege to selectively enforce immigration laws, so it's a well established precedent.

More importantly, FoxNews straight up lied about the whole "Obama said that selectively enforcing immigration law was unconstitutional." It's one thing for a professional news organization to have a political bias or slant, but what FoxNews did can only be described as outright lying.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/20/jon-stewart-fox-news-obama-tape-edit_n_1611735.html Watch the video clip from 'The Daily Show.' To see a popular, professional news organization willfully and deliberately act in such a manner is disturbing.

So, if you're basing your ObamaCare opinion on facts from FoxNews, you may want to double check your information against other sources.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Genei
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#73 - 2012-06-29 13:47:06 UTC
Sidus Isaacs wrote:
Master Gotama wrote:
personally as an employed, tax paying citizen, i don't like paying for freeloaders to get their healthcare at my expense.



Personally as an employed, tax paying citizen, I happily pay my taxes that go towards our free healthcare system, because that is the one of reasons my country is one of the best in the world.

Yours is an narrow attitude of ignorance. You completely fail too analyze the social system in which you live.


I'm sorry, but I have to say it...

He's not the one who fails to understand this system. The US is sort of like EVE, in a way. The constitution and the intent behind it was to create a sandbox (like how I tied it into internet spaceships?) where you can basically do what you want within a limited set of rules. Those rules, at a fundamental level, let us do what we want as long as it isn't impacting others rights. That's the general idea without getting too nitty gritty on it.

One very important thing that our founding fathers were getting away from was the idea that you owed your country. It's the other way around. Redistribution of wealth is something that was to be avoided at all costs. The government could operate on taxes (import/export, taxes on companies, etc) and lower taxes would be incentive for trade to stay in the country. But the idea of taking forcibly from one person and giving to another is socialism. We are wrapping it up to make it look like this is some kind of good deed, but all we are doing is taking from one and giving it to the other.

Take this healthcare thing at an economic level. The only thing that government intervention in the healthcare business (yes, it's a business) has done is to drive costs WAY up. Back as recently as the 80's, I could go to the doctor for a checkup... a REGULAR checkup and it would cost 20 bucks. Now, 20 bucks is the copay on the 400 dollar visit. The FDA makes drugs ridiculously expensive and we cannot even self-medicate if we wanted to take matters into our own hands. When the 2008 housing bubble collapse, what happened? Costs on EVERYTHING went down, except for healthcare and higher education. Funny that they're two of the most highly government-influenced markets.

The point is, all of this government bureaucracy has driven up costs, forces us to fully rely on health insurance and props up the health-care middleman.

I know that's a long post, but folks are making decisions with only a glimpse of the picture. This post is only a glimpse, but I hope it gets folks thinking rather than jumping onto bandwagons. Because once your on, it's hard to get off.

Cheer folks. Much respect to everyone for caring one way or the other.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#74 - 2012-06-29 16:25:54 UTC
Master Gotama wrote:
nice, now i don't have to pay for those that use our health care system without coverage.

Can't tell if serious...

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Rara Yariza
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#75 - 2012-06-29 16:28:35 UTC
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
I will never understand the logic behind handing over the health of a nation to a group of people who see you as a way to make a profit. Decent levels of healthcare should be available to everyone.


Everyone who cares enough about their health. I say obese people shouldn't have any healthcare because they're fat


Damn right, also those crybaby army types shouldn't get health care just cuz 'wah, wah i was scared while at war, wah' they all should grow up and take responsibility for going in the army, ffs.
Renturu
In Glorium et Decorum
#76 - 2012-06-29 17:10:28 UTC
Eddie Monaghan wrote:
Could be that, too. It's not unreasonable for people to take care of themselves. When I was a kid, I spent all day, from sun up to sun down, outside. If it was raining, we spent our time in a fort we built drinking Budweiser (American **** basically, I'll take a Guinness any day of the week over that, or Beamish), if not, we were running all over the place. We played football, actual football not a video game, and even though most of us were poor, we were rather healthy. That was considered normal. Now days, kids (people in general) spend most of their time chillin inside eating cheetoes and drinking hundreds of Redbulls per year. No Bueno.

Even now, although I am in pain much of the time these days, I stay fairly active. I just need to quit tobacco, which is a *****.

My health Problems, those created by myself, are my problems. Not my Governments. If I have cancer (I don't yet) it is both my fault, and my problem. I see it the same way for everyone else. I'll be happy to pay my taxes to help those that can't afford Insurance at all, but have major health issues such as accidents.


+1 Just cuz your a Guinness man. hehe.

I agree. The PEOPLE need to start taking RESPONSIBILITY for THEIR health. Not let the gov't. That just introduces all kinds of scarey issues; Rationing (definitely will come as the money runs out), Eugenics (cut down on the weak by killing them off when they are too sick.

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have,"
-Gerald R. Ford, address to a joint session of Congress on August 12, 1974.

By the orders of PlunderBunny: ☻/ /▌ / \ This is Bob, post him into your forum sig and help him conquer the forums.

Renturu
In Glorium et Decorum
#77 - 2012-06-29 17:12:45 UTC
Agaetis Byrjun Endalaust wrote:
sorry if I'm getting curious about such details, but HOW MUCH will you have to pay for this? I mean, is it 500$ per year, 2000, 50, 20??? is it a fixed amount or does it depend on your social status (how much you paied in taxes the year before) or on your actual work contract?

in any case, respect Eddie, that's speaking like a real man. Seriously, no joke meant. I guess everyone can see the difference between your reasoning and those who from time to time (usually when a "socialist" speaks) light their sole neuron and scream.


For me and my family who rarely, if ever go to the Doctor (other than going for annual check ups), It will raise my insurance from $250 per paycheck to over $350... wait... It ALREADY DID; my employer already enforced the legislation so that they would be compliant BEFORE 2014. *******!

By the orders of PlunderBunny: ☻/ /▌ / \ This is Bob, post him into your forum sig and help him conquer the forums.

Alara IonStorm
#78 - 2012-06-29 17:23:20 UTC
Renturu wrote:

I agree. The PEOPLE need to start taking RESPONSIBILITY for THEIR health. Not let the gov't. That just introduces all kinds of scarey issues; Rationing (definitely will come as the money runs out), Eugenics (cut down on the weak by killing them off when they are too sick.

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have,"
-Gerald R. Ford, address to a joint session of Congress on August 12, 1974.

Hearing Americans discuss death panels and eugenics when it comes to Health Care...

Well it just makes me wonder if either they are overreacting or if the United States really just can't make a Government Health Care System without accidentally becoming the 3rd Reich.

Pres. Obama: Also we should reduce wait times in emergency rooms.
CoS Jacob Lew: When the rooms get overcrowded we could pump in poison gas.
Pres. Obama: Hey that's a good... Wait. No, no, no! We are Hitlering it up again.
CoS Jacob Lew: Darn, we keep doing that. What if we priorities them by number of gold teeth.
Pres. Obama: **** this. Call the Canadian Prime Minister see if he has any tips.

Five minutes later.

PM Stephen Harper: Yeah we make those mistake too. Just over prescribe morphine and no one will notice.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#79 - 2012-06-29 17:27:15 UTC
Master Gotama wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Master Gotama wrote:
personally as an employed, tax paying citizen, i don't like paying for freeloaders to get their healthcare at my expense.


Im willing to bet that any cancer treatment will cost more than the money you have payed into your insurance pot.


thus the need to have more healthy people covered. i'm not really sure what point you're trying to make, are you?


Be it via taxes or via insurance, you end up paying for the treatment of others. Also either way the American system is way more expensive than it needs to be so you are gonna get screwed no matter what happens.
Sidus Isaacs
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#80 - 2012-06-29 17:52:33 UTC
Genei wrote:
Sidus Isaacs wrote:
Master Gotama wrote:
personally as an employed, tax paying citizen, i don't like paying for freeloaders to get their healthcare at my expense.



Personally as an employed, tax paying citizen, I happily pay my taxes that go towards our free healthcare system, because that is the one of reasons my country is one of the best in the world.

Yours is an narrow attitude of ignorance. You completely fail too analyze the social system in which you live.


I'm sorry, but I have to say it...

He's not the one who fails to understand this system. The US is sort of like EVE, in a way. The constitution and the intent behind it was to create a sandbox (like how I tied it into internet spaceships?) where you can basically do what you want within a limited set of rules. Those rules, at a fundamental level, let us do what we want as long as it isn't impacting others rights. That's the general idea without getting too nitty gritty on it.

One very important thing that our founding fathers were getting away from was the idea that you owed your country. It's the other way around. Redistribution of wealth is something that was to be avoided at all costs. The government could operate on taxes (import/export, taxes on companies, etc) and lower taxes would be incentive for trade to stay in the country. But the idea of taking forcibly from one person and giving to another is socialism. We are wrapping it up to make it look like this is some kind of good deed, but all we are doing is taking from one and giving it to the other.

Take this healthcare thing at an economic level. The only thing that government intervention in the healthcare business (yes, it's a business) has done is to drive costs WAY up. Back as recently as the 80's, I could go to the doctor for a checkup... a REGULAR checkup and it would cost 20 bucks. Now, 20 bucks is the copay on the 400 dollar visit. The FDA makes drugs ridiculously expensive and we cannot even self-medicate if we wanted to take matters into our own hands. When the 2008 housing bubble collapse, what happened? Costs on EVERYTHING went down, except for healthcare and higher education. Funny that they're two of the most highly government-influenced markets.

The point is, all of this government bureaucracy has driven up costs, forces us to fully rely on health insurance and props up the health-care middleman.

I know that's a long post, but folks are making decisions with only a glimpse of the picture. This post is only a glimpse, but I hope it gets folks thinking rather than jumping onto bandwagons. Because once your on, it's hard to get off.

Cheer folks. Much respect to everyone for caring one way or the other.


US might have been intended to be this, or that. That does not change what it currently is. All in all, no reforms will save it, it is going down the drain whether we like it or not. I am just sad that it will affect so many, and I just hope the people will finally stand up for itself and say enough is enough.

The problem in the US is not too much government bureaucracy, but too much corporate power. After all the government is somewhat accountable to the people, corporations are not.

Taxes are not really a problem for most people, the purchasing power after taxes tends to stay somewhat the same even if it is raised. After all, I pay about 33% taxes, yet I got a pretty decent purchasing power after that. More then able to get a housing loan if I wanted too, and still have plenty for food, cloths, electronics, and recreation.

Government is spending that tax money on things that people need, like schooling, roads,fire service, health-care. Stuff that generally are not "profit generators". Private corporations tend not to care too much about stuff that is not making them profit.

Oh, I also got a free education. All my five years of college was free. It is nice to not be drowned by debt once I am finished with college. That time I really needed to go to the doctor, it was also free, no questions asked about insurance or anything. So you see, I pay my taxes happily, I have benefited from it in a tremendous way, and I want to help other do the same. The entire country has benefited form it actually, because it creates a much better security for everyone living there.

The problem in the US, is that the government is affected far too much by corporate and private power. In other words, they are corrupt and rotten to the core. Ever stopped to think about who you elect into office, and where they come form? And who they take with them and appoint into other positions? Hint; they tend to be rich, and tend to have already established connections and power. You really think they care about you, or maybe they care more about the money they get from lobbyist and "sponsors"?

Of course, not everything is an utopia here in Norway. We got corruption and other bad stuff as ell. But it is a big improvement from the US at least.