These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Do the miner bump...

Author
Minmatar Freedom
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2012-06-28 18:13:43 UTC
One of the most common complaints I see regarding why hi-sec miners are ganked is a lack of self protection; "Protect yourselves and we wouldn't kill you."

Setting aside for a moment that making most mining ships gank-resistant is not realistic (especially when you've got multiple people attacking you), this ignores the primary tactic used by gankers and it's a tactic that has a rich history in EVE.

Colliding with ships to knock them out of alignment for warping, otherwise known as "bumping." At present there is no defense against this in EVE. And with an extremely cheap frigate and rat loot, I can easily get a ship to go upwards of 3,200 m/s which is usually fast enough to hit a barge spinning up it's warp drive.

Observe:

With a basic frigate and rat loot, I can get a ship up to 3,200 m/s and I'm sure with more skills and a bigger investment, you could easily double that speed.

Your average belt is ~60km from tip to to tip

An aligned and unfitted Hulk, from a dead stop, takes ~17 seconds to spin up it's warp drive and go into warp. If other people have different numbers based on skills/implants/modules, feel free to post it.

Assuming the Hulk is sitting at one end of the belt and a ganker (flying the aforementioned 3,200 m/s) in a bump craft warps in at the other end, the ganker can reach the Hulk in just under 19 seconds.


So the Hulk has about three seconds to see this ship and start warping, again ignoring that a better gank fit ship can go faster. Once the Hulk has been bumped, the gank ship (which has not done anything to be flagged by CONCORD and thus can do this with impunity) sends out the call to his partner(s) who warp in and destroy the Hulk.

The bumper keeps the Hulk from warping and the time involved means virtually no tank a mining ship can fit will hold up. The last information I received regarding CONCORD's response time was 25-30 seconds for a .5-.6 system. If that's out of date, feel free to update.

Math is admittedly not my strong suit, so feel free to double check.



TLDR: You cant protect against bumping.
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#2 - 2012-06-28 18:16:49 UTC
Minmatar Freedom wrote:


TLDR: You cant protect against bumping.


Because shooting unarmed*, untanked ships is too hard for some people.


*And don't give me that crap about drones, by the time the drones start shooting the hulk is usually dead.
Cpt Roghie
Chemical Invasion Co.
#3 - 2012-06-28 18:18:30 UTC
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.

This could be fun.

Jayrendo Karr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#4 - 2012-06-28 18:19:09 UTC
they can just log off.
Minmatar Freedom
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2012-06-28 18:19:51 UTC
Cpt Roghie wrote:
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.


I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#6 - 2012-06-28 18:22:17 UTC
Minmatar Freedom wrote:
Cpt Roghie wrote:
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.


I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.


Enter warp before they manage to get the bump?

Also fit a tank.
Kyle Ward
Doomheim
#7 - 2012-06-28 18:25:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Kyle Ward
Minmatar Freedom wrote:
Cpt Roghie wrote:
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.


I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.


Miners aren't supposed to protect themselves, they're supposed to pay the goonies for a mining pass...

Cool

The Sandbox, you're playing it wrong!

Josef Djugashvilis
#8 - 2012-06-28 18:27:46 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Minmatar Freedom wrote:
Cpt Roghie wrote:
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.


I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.


Enter warp before they manage to get the bump?

Also fit a tank.


Please feel free to post this mythical gank proof fit for Hulks.

This is not a signature.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#9 - 2012-06-28 18:29:42 UTC
You might want to talk to James315 about that.

He's been extorting ice miners (long cycle, has to finish) by threatening to bump. Supposedly, he's made 100mil between starting and his first post about it.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#10 - 2012-06-28 18:35:35 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:


Please feel free to post this mythical gank proof fit for Hulks.


Coveter gets the same tank as most cruisers.

Hulk gets a tank in the same class as heavy assault ships.


If you cant tank these things then you have bigger issues at play here.
Andoria Thara
Fallen Avatars
#11 - 2012-06-28 18:41:06 UTC
Minmatar Freedom wrote:

I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.


Mining while aligned at 3/4 speed = instant warp when you hit the warp to button.
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#12 - 2012-06-28 20:28:41 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Minmatar Freedom wrote:
Cpt Roghie wrote:
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.


I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.


Enter warp before they manage to get the bump?

Also fit a tank.


Please feel free to post this mythical gank proof fit for Hulks.


It does not have to be gank proof, just good enough that the gankers go for someone else.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#13 - 2012-06-28 20:34:00 UTC
Siege.

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2012-06-28 20:37:26 UTC
"Bumping" should cause massive hull and armor damage proportional to the mass of the ships involved. The whole bump mechanic makes ships feel like plastic kiddie toys.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Ituhata
Killboard Padding Services
#15 - 2012-06-28 20:39:29 UTC
Minmatar Freedom wrote:
Cpt Roghie wrote:
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.


I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.


Gettin' really tired of telling people to make 4 point bookmarks around the asteroid they are mining and to just keep aligning to them in a box around your roid. You see em on overview, takes a split second and suddenly you're 320k off the belt and now you have plenty of time to align to safety.
leviticus ander
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-06-28 20:49:09 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
"Bumping" should cause massive hull and armor damage proportional to the mass of the ships involved. The whole bump mechanic makes ships feel like plastic kiddie toys.

yes, lets buff winmatar even more. and make gallente entirely useless.
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
#17 - 2012-06-28 20:58:22 UTC
Minmatar Freedom wrote:
Cpt Roghie wrote:
Uhm... I fail to see the point. Are you moaning about bumping being OP, do you want it nerfed... Are you simply stating a point? I'm lost.


I'm stating a point.

The argument that "if miners just protected themselves, they wouldn't get shot" is irrelevant because there's no way to protect yourself once bumping gets involved.


Yes there is. Mine in a gang with protection.

This game is meant to be social, and as I already proved, solo miners are better off doing mining missions anyways (And even most gangs in highsec).
Eve forums official anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pudOFG5X6uA Real men tank hull. Fake women shield-tank Gallente.
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
#18 - 2012-06-28 21:11:13 UTC
Ptraci wrote:


*And don't give me that crap about drones, by the time the drones start shooting the hulk is usually dead.


Not if they are permadeployed sentry drones and stasis drones. Wait, that would lower your mining yield? Then risk a gank and maximize yield.

Maximum yield = maximum risk is how it should always work.

The problem with all these threads is that all the problems bought up, have proven, well-worn solutions in the current mechanic for them.

In other words, the mechanics allow for a fighting chance to those who take time and skill to master them and a willing to understand and adapt to the simple idea that the more you maximize yield, the more you risk ganking.

Does it take training and skilling up? Yes.

Is it hard? Yes.

Is it doable? Yes.

I would support any change to the mechanic that unbalances the ability of a miner to defend and protect themselves from attack. What I cannot support, and keep seeing, is changes in the mechanic for which there are already solutions in the same mechanic.

In PvP, the same tradeoff is present. If you up tank, you have to lower DPS, and vice-versa. And the same type of tears are cried by PvPers who want both gank and tank.

At the core, it is about players that refuse to immerse themselves in the complexities and balances required out of the mechanic, and want everything handed to them in silver platter. And they want to always win. If we had a mechanic in which everyone won, and no one lost, there would be no game.

Think about it...
Eve forums official anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pudOFG5X6uA Real men tank hull. Fake women shield-tank Gallente.
Charles Baker
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-06-28 21:48:13 UTC
Fit an MWD to your hulk, Bump the frig first then warp-out while it tries to line up for another run, if it scrams fit modules to counter it.
Deuce of Hearts
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-06-28 22:32:00 UTC
I thought CCP was already planning to redo all the mining ships for the winter expansion, specifically to address these kinds of issues.
123Next pageLast page