These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is

Author
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#241 - 2012-06-27 17:40:46 UTC
that you have actually got it easier and less risk than the newbies and miners who are trying to survive in high sec.
Dave Stark
#242 - 2012-06-27 17:44:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
Reech Yvormes wrote:
that you have actually got it easier and less risk than the newbies and miners who are trying to survive in high sec.


you can be shot anywhere, at any time, by anyone. the risk is greater for nobody. whether or not some one chooses to shoot you is all down to you. evidently you didn't try hard enough to deter people from shooting you.

in fact; why do you feel that you should be safe to begin with?
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#243 - 2012-06-27 17:47:12 UTC
Dave stark wrote:


you can be shot anywhere, at any time, by anyone. the risk is greater for nobody. whether or not some one chooses to shoot you is all down to you. evidently you didn't try hard enough to deter people from shooting you.

in fact; why do you feel that you should be safe to begin with?


i should have been in carebear mode like you.
Dave Stark
#244 - 2012-06-27 17:48:31 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
Dave stark wrote:


you can be shot anywhere, at any time, by anyone. the risk is greater for nobody. whether or not some one chooses to shoot you is all down to you. evidently you didn't try hard enough to deter people from shooting you.

in fact; why do you feel that you should be safe to begin with?


i should have been in carebear mode like you.


well if you're mining then you're hardly in armed to the teeth mode, are you?
Ghost Xray
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#245 - 2012-06-27 18:02:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Ghost Xray
Reech Yvormes wrote:
that you have actually got it easier and less risk than the newbies and miners who are trying to survive in high sec.


I'll give this one more shot. I'm not near as persistent as Dave.

Well, maybe the first lesson you should have learned is "High Sec != safe". It's a well known EvE fact. There are usually way too many people coming and going.

If you want to reduce your chance of gankage, then you need to find a less traveled back end system. Once in that system, find a good belt that allows you to get a reliable directional scan on anyone entering. Someone enters local hit your d-scan, if you see destroyer safe up. If you see anything expensive, chances are you're safe, but be ready.

Other tools at your disposal? Check the website http://evemaps.dotlan.net/ and you can see what sort of gankage activity is going on in your system, or systems around it. It may help you identify regular gankers in the area who you can add your contacts and set them red so if they enter your system, it'll help you be prepared.

Or, take the offensive. Get in your own destroyer and start hunting other destroyers. Anytime I see a destroyer in high-sec, my assumption is they are hunting for easy prey. Suicide into them and laugh at them in local or whatever you want.

The world is open for you to do anything you like. If you like mining, then mine. But do it smart. Make a game plan, a backup plan, actually play the game instead of mindless going to an asteroid belt and pushing your function keys.

The whole premise of EvE is that you aren't safe anywhere and if you want to make it you'll have to use your head a bit and get creative.
Dave Stark
#246 - 2012-06-27 18:04:30 UTC
Ghost Xray wrote:
Reech Yvormes wrote:
that you have actually got it easier and less risk than the newbies and miners who are trying to survive in high sec.
I'm not near as bored as Dave.


ftfy :)
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#247 - 2012-06-27 18:10:54 UTC
the lesson i should have learned really was this.

high sec is more dangerous than getting spoonfed **** for you by a null sec corp.
Dave Stark
#248 - 2012-06-27 18:12:17 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
the lesson i should have learned really was this.

high sec is more dangerous than getting spoonfed **** for you by a null sec corp.


not sure what's more delicious, the tears, the envy, or the butthurt.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#249 - 2012-06-27 18:16:34 UTC
the lesson i did learn was this.

this game only wants people who want their **** spoonfed to them in safety in nullsec.
Dave Stark
#250 - 2012-06-27 18:18:14 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
the lesson i did learn was this.

this game only wants people who want their **** spoonfed to them in safety in nullsec.


we've narrowed it down to butthurt and envy!
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#251 - 2012-06-27 18:20:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Bugsy VanHalen
Reech Yvormes wrote:
what version of eve are you playing because mine has half of your 45k online.

obviously your big battles of thousands of players are delivering so much that the population doubled since my last post.

peak times often hit well over 45,000 players online. I have often seen over 50,000 players online.
often when these big battles happen, friends are calling each other telling them to get on, we need you.
I am sure if you check during one of these 2-3,000 player battles you will see a spick in the number of online players.
I recall noticing once the number of online players was at about 56,000 and then later realized there was a huge battle I missed.
Maybe you just play at the wrong time.
Ghost Xray
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#252 - 2012-06-27 18:24:21 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
the lesson i should have learned really was this.

high sec is more dangerous than getting spoonfed **** for you by a null sec corp.


Yep, which is why guys like Dave sought out a corp soon after playing. But is it a surprise to you that it's easier if you make friends?

Some of the biggest carebears live in null. Lord Veldspar himself even operated a station in null until Dave's alliance got space jelly (because he alone is cooler then their entire alliance) and took it from him Lol. Such is the way things go in EvE, and we wouldn't want it any different.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#253 - 2012-06-27 18:25:15 UTC
Dave stark wrote:
Reech Yvormes wrote:
the lesson i did learn was this.

this game only wants people who want their **** spoonfed to them in safety in nullsec.


we've narrowed it down to butthurt and envy!


believe me, im not envy of you.

i would agree. i am butthurt about losing all my **** to such a backwards system. instead of just begging for my **** to be spoonfed to me.
Dave Stark
#254 - 2012-06-27 18:26:10 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
Reech Yvormes wrote:
the lesson i did learn was this.

this game only wants people who want their **** spoonfed to them in safety in nullsec.


we've narrowed it down to butthurt and envy!


believe me, im not envy of you.

i would agree. i am butthurt about losing all my **** to such a backwards system. instead of just begging for my **** to be spoonfed to me.


what's backward about it? you didn't prepare for the situation and you failed horribly at whatever it was you were trying to do. sounds pretty standard to me.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#255 - 2012-06-27 18:27:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
you dont see how you being safer in null sec than a non corped 1 month old player in high sec is backwards.

mmmkay. yes we are back to my ineptitude to get myself spoonfed **** in a more secure null sec.
Dave Stark
#256 - 2012-06-27 18:32:33 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
you dont see how you being safer in null sec than a non corped 1 month old player in high sec is backwards.

mmmkay. yes we are back to my ineptitude to get myself spoonfed **** in a more secure null sec.


you don't see how much effort goes in to securing our areas of space in comparison to your "i did nothing and i got concord being my bff"?

we deserve the security because we've made it secure. why do you even deserve concord?
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#257 - 2012-06-27 18:35:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
well its called high security, is it not? high security should mean more security than null security?

understand that?

not only is there some danger, there is more danger there. than where all of your hypocrites are speaking from.
Danks
Fat Angry Toe Tappin Inbreds
#258 - 2012-06-27 18:36:16 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
you dont see how you being safer in null sec than a non corped 1 month old player in high sec is backwards.

mmmkay. yes we are back to my ineptitude to get myself spoonfed **** in a more secure null sec.


Yeah people are friggin' crazy for playing with other people in a multiplayer game and thinking that's the way to get ahead....
Dave Stark
#259 - 2012-06-27 18:36:45 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
well its called high security, is it not? high security should mean more security than null security?

understand that?



which, it is, you have concord.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#260 - 2012-06-27 18:41:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
concord does nothing in 0.5 obviously. they turn up after ive unsubscribed.

this makes 0.5 the true null sec. and all the time the newer player falls for this trap.

and all the while you guys are laughing as people get griefed out of your game.

all because it was really hard for you, or it wasnt, but it could have been.