These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is

Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#221 - 2012-06-27 16:23:40 UTC
Dave stark wrote:


ccp are promoting the ability for players to influence the game, which is one of the reasons people love it. players make a difference.


Well, that's the popular mantra among the more dense among the single digit I.Q. basement dwellers from SA, anyway.

The real real reason is that events like the 'geddons give CCP free press. Period.

But the question is, is it becoming bad press as time goes on? From what I'm reading in the various MMO forums, it is. I believe it's costing CCP more subs than it's gaining.

Mr Epeen Cool
Dave Stark
#222 - 2012-06-27 16:24:48 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
you just said you didnt lose mining ships lol.

you had it easy. look at you even now in a corp trying to defend the right to grief people in a way that didnt happen to you.

you just said it yourself.


congratulations, you can read.

i had it easy? i had it exactly the same as you, as i just pointed out. what does my current corp have to do with the situation? correct, it didn't happen to me because i made sure it didn't.

i said what myself? that you lost your ship because you decided not to protect it, i know, i've said it several times.
Dave Stark
#223 - 2012-06-27 16:27:00 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Dave stark wrote:


ccp are promoting the ability for players to influence the game, which is one of the reasons people love it. players make a difference.


Well, that's the popular mantra among the more dense among the single digit I.Q. basement dwellers from SA, anyway.

The real real reason is that events like the 'geddons give CCP free press. Period.

But the question is, is it becoming bad press as time goes on? From what I'm reading in the various MMO forums, it is. I believe it's costing CCP more subs than it's gaining.

Mr Epeen Cool


*shrug* i like that goons like to **** things up with their oversized stockpiles of isk. is it good for the game? probably not. does it make it a more interesting an fun game? yes it does.

a lot of people these days are too used to be handed everything on a plate without having to think (see the guy i'm attempting to converse with in this thread)
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#224 - 2012-06-27 16:31:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
you are the wow player, in a corp being spoon fed help every day, who has just admitted that you didnt even lose mining ships, who is defending your right to grief people because it happened to you, even though it didnt happen to you.

this whole thread actually turned around into you being spoonfed easy mode while trying to defend the right to kill those who havent.

how long did you actually spend taking risk in high sec before you went and surrounded yourself in safety?

do you think you have reached a point where you could fight players who are not a year behind you? and going through "what you went through back then yada yada"
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#225 - 2012-06-27 16:46:58 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
you are the wow player, in a corp being spoon fed help every day, who has just admitted that you didnt even lose mining ships, who is defending your right to grief people because it happened to you, even though it didnt happen to you.

this whole thread actually turned around into you being spoonfed easy mode while trying to defend the right to kill those who havent.

how long did you actually spend taking risk in high sec before you went and surrounded yourself in safety?

do you think you have reached a point where you could fight players who are not a year behind you? and going through "what you went through back then yada yada"

This whole thread has turned into you repeating the same incorrect statement over and over, ignoring anyone who tries to respond. In short, trolling.

Now please stop.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#226 - 2012-06-27 16:50:16 UTC
didnt you make a post saying i was trolling earlier?

isnt that just repeating the same incorrect statement over and over.

wait, youre projecting again. i see.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#227 - 2012-06-27 16:51:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
Corina Jarr wrote:
Reech Yvormes wrote:
i find this all very revealing.

im not sure what to make of it really, all the safe people who know they are safe in a no security zone, defending the right to gank newbies miners who think they are safe but are not, in a high security zone.

im starting to understand why people are so admant to defend things and keep them just like it is.

You clearly are trolling. Since you are just ignoring everyone to spout misinformed drivel.


do try not to just repeat yourself.

i think you guys should be trying to reduce the hypocrisy on this forum and in this thread.

its not doing you any favours.

i shall look forward to you when you post again in a little while, saying that i am trolling and just repeating myself

(do you post this on the hour?)
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#228 - 2012-06-27 16:54:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Corina Jarr
Reech Yvormes wrote:
didnt you make a post saying i was trolling earlier?

isnt that just repeating the same incorrect statement over and over.

wait, youre projecting again. i see.

It was rather correct,


You say they are safe in null sec. You should try it, find out how safe it really is.

The only reason null sec systems have any safety is because they work at it. They spend hours keeping potential invaders out, and it doesn't always work.


Meanwhile you and me in high sec, we can just mine aligned and warp off before a ganker could even come out of warp. We can mine in 100% safety, never worrying about a gank.
Some, like you, choose not to, and die because you don't take measures (the same measures you would need to use in null sec) to keep safe.

Edit to add in your next post:
That was after several posts of you ignoring people to post your semirant filled with incorrect statements.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#229 - 2012-06-27 17:03:54 UTC
yeah they work at it like dave, just walks in without suffering a set back in his high sec life and gets **** done for him. gets a safer place to be than any high sec system.

you are really funny.

and hypocrites.
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#230 - 2012-06-27 17:09:02 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
yeah they work at it like dave, just walks in without suffering a set back in his high sec life and gets **** done for him. gets a safer place to be than any high sec system.

you are really funny.

and hypocrites.

You still don't get it.

No Null sec system is safer than a HS system. Even with 100 corpies in system with you, someone could sneak in and cyno a fleet of 200.
Null is only "safe" because they have to work hard to keep it that way.


How much work do you do to keep yourself safe in HS?

Set up an intel network 3 systems out?
Check dscan regularly?
Mark potential hostiles in local?
Fly carefully, using insta BMs and being situationally aware?

Do you do, or even need to do, any of these?
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#231 - 2012-06-27 17:16:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
mark potential hostiles in local. wow people even tell you when someone dangerous is about?

this gets better.

how else is it easier in null sec?
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#232 - 2012-06-27 17:19:10 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
mark potential hostiles in local. wow people even tell you when someone dangerous is about?

this gets better.

You going to bother answering my questions? Or are you going to prove yourself a troll so that I can leave this up to CCP and crew.
Dave Stark
#233 - 2012-06-27 17:19:38 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
you are the wow player, in a corp being spoon fed help every day, who has just admitted that you didnt even lose mining ships, who is defending your right to grief people because it happened to you, even though it didnt happen to you.

this whole thread actually turned around into you being spoonfed easy mode while trying to defend the right to kill those who havent.

how long did you actually spend taking risk in high sec before you went and surrounded yourself in safety?

do you think you have reached a point where you could fight players who are not a year behind you? and going through "what you went through back then yada yada"


sigh, you were doing so well at the whole reading and understanding english thing.

what games i play are beyond the point. i'm suited to them all.
in a corp that hasn't spoon fed me a single thing, in fact i do more things with people outside my corp rather than the players within my corp.
correct, i didn't lose mining ships.
yeah i'm defending my right to shoot whoever i want wherever i want, the game allows it so why not?
correct, it didn't happen to me.

and what was i spoon fed? [ignore everything else and answer this one, the answer will be hilarious, i guarantee it].

sure i could fight them, would i win? perhaps not, but would i be scared of losing a ship to them? no. i have no issue throwing away a rifter, a merlin, etc. i live in null sec, i've lot plenty of ships all in the effort to keep hold of our sov.
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#234 - 2012-06-27 17:20:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
well maybe i should have been doing those things to survive in high sec because thats what you want.

what police force concord was never there.


concord was not telling me a -10 security player was in the area.

concord didnt instant warp to protect me.

how else is it easier for you in null?
Dave Stark
#235 - 2012-06-27 17:21:12 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
yeah they work at it like dave, just walks in without suffering a set back in his high sec life and gets **** done for him. gets a safer place to be than any high sec system.

you are really funny.

and hypocrites.


nothing like a good bit of penis envy, freud would be pitching a tent and making observations about your relationship with your mother and father.
Dave Stark
#236 - 2012-06-27 17:22:28 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
well maybe i should have been doing those things to survive in high sec because thats what you want.

what police force concord was never there.


concord was telling me a -10 security player was in the area.

concord didnt instant warp to protect me.

how else is it easier for you in null?


that's because you were in a 0.5 system, the concord response time is dictated by the security rating of the system. that's how they class it as "more dangerous".

did you not pay attention to the tutorial?
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#237 - 2012-06-27 17:28:40 UTC
yeah no response in 0.5 compared to your little helpers response in null?

this is pretty clear that you have it easier in null than i did in the time i was in 0.5
Dave Stark
#238 - 2012-06-27 17:30:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
Reech Yvormes wrote:
yeah no response in 0.5 compared to your little helpers response in null?

this is pretty clear that you have it easier in null than i did in the time i was in 0.5


having friendly players in system does not mean i have my own personal fleet at my beck and call.

incorrect.

also, concord did respond, but you were dead by then. aww, diddums.

edit: also, nice that you ignored the only question i prompted you to answer. :(
Reech Yvormes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#239 - 2012-06-27 17:32:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Reech Yvormes
oh you dont get little helpers telling you when some danger is about in local?

pfft liars playing down your own easy position.

so my high security responds after im dead and podded. yeah, keep confirming exactly my suspicions
Dave Stark
#240 - 2012-06-27 17:38:53 UTC
Reech Yvormes wrote:
oh you dont get little helpers telling you when some danger is about in local?

pfft liars playing down your own easy position.

so my high security responds after im dead and podded. yeah, keep confirming exactly my suspicions


and what stops you joining a chat channel where other high sec players can warn you of known gankers movements? tip: the answer is nothing.

and what suspicion is that?