These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Nullsec Local Delay

Author
Womyn Power
Broski Bad End
#1 - 2012-06-25 16:30:19 UTC
Will there ever be a Local Delay (or complete removal of local) in Nullsec?

As of current mechanics it's pretty much impossible to catch any ratter who isn't taking a **** or making food away from the keyboard or something. This means null has literally no risk for anyone competent enough to stay near the computer while 'playing' or competent enough to have a third party program that makes a noise whenever someone enters local (extremely common and easy to find btw lol!)

Does CCP ever plan to address this issue?
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-06-25 16:30:52 UTC
This idea is brand new and has never been suggested before. Bravo, you win +1 nobel prizes.

Dodixie > Hek

Womyn Power
Broski Bad End
#3 - 2012-06-25 16:32:19 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
This idea is brand new and has never been suggested before. Bravo, you win +1 nobel prizes.


It hasn't been changed, no thread on the front page about it, why not keep one up until it gets changed?
Ephenos
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#4 - 2012-06-25 16:36:48 UTC
TLDR: People suggest it, people get laughed at by smart people, but continue to protest it would be a good idea, ccp ignores them.

Just go read any of the threadnaughts on this subject.

But no, it's a terrible idea, 0.0 players are often pvp players. but 0.0 players who live only in 0.0 still need a way to be able to make isk, and delayed local+ cloaks = impossible to rat or mine or plex with any degree of safety.

Who exactly will you be looking to shoot if nobody is ratting or mining in null cause double the isk income of highsec isn't worth always staying aligned and spamming dscan ?
Womyn Power
Broski Bad End
#5 - 2012-06-25 16:42:17 UTC
Ephenos wrote:
TLDR: People suggest it, people get laughed at by smart people, but continue to protest it would be a good idea, ccp ignores them.

Just go read any of the threadnaughts on this subject.

But no, it's a terrible idea, 0.0 players are often pvp players. but 0.0 players who live only in 0.0 still need a way to be able to make isk, and delayed local+ cloaks = impossible to rat or mine or plex with any degree of safety.

Who exactly will you be looking to shoot if nobody is ratting or mining in null cause double the isk income of highsec isn't worth always staying aligned and spamming dscan ?


You're right, free infinite income sources are completely balanced just like tech, and having no possible way to have this income taken from you is in the best interest of nullsec.

I mean, unless you happen to go afk in space in a site there's no way you can die, enjoy the 'double the income of highsec' with no risks.

Why isn't everyone out here?
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#6 - 2012-06-25 16:46:42 UTC
Ephenos wrote:

But no, it's a terrible idea, 0.0 players are often pvp players. but 0.0 players who live only in 0.0 still need a way to be able to make isk, and delayed local+ cloaks = impossible to rat or mine or plex with any degree of safety.



Sure is a PITA when you can't be safe in nullsec eh.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Ghost Xray
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2012-06-25 16:47:32 UTC
Ephenos wrote:
TLDR: People suggest it, people get laughed at by smart people, but continue to protest it would be a good idea, ccp ignores them.

Just go read any of the threadnaughts on this subject.

But no, it's a terrible idea, 0.0 players are often pvp players. but 0.0 players who live only in 0.0 still need a way to be able to make isk, and delayed local+ cloaks = impossible to rat or mine or plex with any degree of safety.

Who exactly will you be looking to shoot if nobody is ratting or mining in null cause double the isk income of highsec isn't worth always staying aligned and spamming dscan ?

Marconus Orion
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2012-06-25 16:49:06 UTC
In before nullbear rage...
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2012-06-25 16:52:44 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Removing local would be stupid, because then all alliances would have to do is invest some small amount of money on alts to stay camped, cloaked, on gates in specific systems and watch for people coming and going. The end result would be almost exactly the same as it is now.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-06-25 16:53:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
prolly not because the entire reward aspect of 0.0 would have to be revamped from the ground up to account for the change in risk; you should go try pvping in wormholes, get some firsthand experience fighting in a no-local environment
hth
Marconus Orion
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2012-06-25 16:57:28 UTC
High sec will give up NPC corps if null gives up local. Deal? lol
Ephenos
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#12 - 2012-06-25 16:58:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Ephenos
Womyn Power wrote:
Ephenos wrote:
TLDR: People suggest it, people get laughed at by smart people, but continue to protest it would be a good idea, ccp ignores them.

Just go read any of the threadnaughts on this subject.

But no, it's a terrible idea, 0.0 players are often pvp players. but 0.0 players who live only in 0.0 still need a way to be able to make isk, and delayed local+ cloaks = impossible to rat or mine or plex with any degree of safety.

Who exactly will you be looking to shoot if nobody is ratting or mining in null cause double the isk income of highsec isn't worth always staying aligned and spamming dscan ?


You're right, free infinite income sources are completely balanced just like tech, and having no possible way to have this income taken from you is in the best interest of nullsec.

I mean, unless you happen to go afk in space in a site there's no way you can die, enjoy the 'double the income of highsec' with no risks.

Why isn't everyone out here?


Did you just compare a 15 bil a month auto isk printer with an activity that people have to actually spend time at the computer and micromanage in order to make money?

No possible way to take it from someone? Afk cloakers, roaming gang, taking over their space, awoxing them, logoff traps in grav sites... I do it, it works, somehow, catch them at gates, bubble their station warpins, jump in and blitz the belts and anoms..

But implementing delayed local in it's current form is ridiculous. Say I'm in an alliance with too many damn titans for their own good (oh look, I am!) and can set up a titan in staging system, and another 3-4 at the edge of bridge range.

Now suddenly, I can project an entire gang/fleet to anywhere within 14 LY of my starting position without warning the instant my unseen in local, unseen on dscan cloaky recon drops a cyno. Mining op? you even have a protection fleet and scouts in adjacent systems? Not good enough. 20man gang of BC? Get hotdropped. Ratting in anything larger than a drake? Get hotdropped.

Watch local? oh it's useless. Watch dscan? Cant see the cyno arazu coming until It's too late. Get protection? not damn likely.

Result: nobody mines, or rats, in nullsec.

Nobody mines or rates, nobody has ships when it comes time to throw big lumps of people at each other.
PvP suffers when pve suffers.
Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2012-06-25 16:58:20 UTC
Ephenos wrote:
TLDR: People suggest it, people get laughed at by smart people, but continue to protest it would be a good idea, ccp ignores them.

Just go read any of the threadnaughts on this subject.

But no, it's a terrible idea, 0.0 players are often pvp players. but 0.0 players who live only in 0.0 still need a way to be able to make isk, and delayed local+ cloaks = impossible to rat or mine or plex with any degree of safety.

Who exactly will you be looking to shoot if nobody is ratting or mining in null cause double the isk income of highsec isn't worth always staying aligned and spamming dscan ?



Sounds like someone needs to HTFU. Also just for the record CCP has said local is NOT working as intended, it was never meant to be an infallible intel tool.

The OP is right, and it doesn't matter if it is not an original idea, it's still a great idea. If you can't run missions or Plex unless you are in 100% safety, well Eve is probably not the game for you. Eve shouldn't be so safe, especially in nul-sec, but it is. It is impossible to die PvE'ing in Nul unless you are just dumb or very AFK.

Also you do know missions and most Plexs have gates. So you can watch your D-scan and see if enemy probes go out, in which case you dock. You sir just sound bad at Eve.

Ephenos
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#14 - 2012-06-25 17:08:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Ephenos
Lucy Ferrr wrote:
Ephenos wrote:
TLDR: People suggest it, people get laughed at by smart people, but continue to protest it would be a good idea, ccp ignores them.

Just go read any of the threadnaughts on this subject.

But no, it's a terrible idea, 0.0 players are often pvp players. but 0.0 players who live only in 0.0 still need a way to be able to make isk, and delayed local+ cloaks = impossible to rat or mine or plex with any degree of safety.

Who exactly will you be looking to shoot if nobody is ratting or mining in null cause double the isk income of highsec isn't worth always staying aligned and spamming dscan ?



Sounds like someone needs to HTFU. Also just for the record CCP has said local is NOT working as intended, it was never meant to be an infallible intel tool.

The OP is right, and it doesn't matter if it is not an original idea, it's still a great idea. If you can't run missions or Plex unless you are in 100% safety, well Eve is probably not the game for you. Eve shouldn't be so safe, especially in nul-sec, but it is. It is impossible to die PvE'ing in Nul unless you are just dumb or very AFK.

Also you do know missions and most Plexs have gates. So you can watch your D-scan and see if enemy probes go out, in which case you dock. You sir just sound bad at Eve.





A: Sure that works if your in a plex, which are a very small amount of nullsec income overall. As for missions, those are restricted to small pockets of nullsec. Most income for the average nullsec grunt comes from belt ratting, anoms, or mining, all of which people can find without decloaking, speaking in local, or deploying probes.

B: CCP has said local is not working as intended, but if their intent was to place in delayed local, they would have done so, they want to reduce the amount of effortless intel received, but they will have to replace it with a method whereby the residents, though module, or infrastructure, or scanner, can somehow detect enemies before they appear and light a cyno for 20 bombers.

C: CCP has enough economic analysts to know what a massive cut in nullsec income would do to thier game, where large scale nullsec pvp is their advertising flagship and where a disproportionate number of active players live.
Bootleg Jack
ACME Mineral and Gas
#15 - 2012-06-25 17:16:32 UTC
The nullbears are too afraid of PvP to remove local, just go WH and forget about null/low...

I'm an American, English is my second language...

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#16 - 2012-06-25 17:31:39 UTC
Is it whine day for the Gank bears?


"EvE is too hard, make it easier for me to sneak up on defenseless carebears...."

Signature removed - CCP Eterne

Ephenos
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#17 - 2012-06-25 17:32:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Ephenos
Bootleg Jack wrote:
The nullbears are too afraid of PvP to remove local, just go WH and forget about null/low...



Notice everyone who disagree's with any statement in opposition of delayed local is obviously a nullsec carebear?
No, I'm not. I dont rat, or plex, or do anoms or missions. All my tengu's are fleet fit and all my machariels are for pimp BS fleets. I admit I have a spare carrier for jewing lowsec Lv V's, but thats lowsec and outside the scope of this argument. Everything I say is from the point of someone who logs in, roams, hotdrops, or in general, shoots other people.

I PvP, and you seem to be missing the most important facts of PvP.

1: YOU NEED SOMEONE TO SHOOT. If all the nullbsears sod off to high, I cant shoot any of them, not even the stupid ones.

2: The people I enjoy shooting more, specifically other gangs that shoot back, wont have the isk to be able to casually throw ships in from of my gang if they cant make money easily.

So now I have no stupid miners or plexers to shoot, no idiot plexers not paying attention to intel channels, no gangs of badly fit locals to be thrown in front the meat grinder of an equal sized more competent gang.


TLDR: Leave the nullbears alone, I want to have someone to shoot, and if they spent 75% of their time on their highsec alt making chump change, they are not throwing their pvp mains at me.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#18 - 2012-06-25 17:33:48 UTC
Since this thread has in fact been done before i am going to leave this here as I have done in similar threads about the same topic:

Hidin in EVE - Why we cloak

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-06-25 17:37:02 UTC
I've always liked the idea, but a lot of people who actually live in nullsec think it's terrible. Perhaps it's because I don't live in nullsec, and haven't for years - the only place without security I've been recently is wormhole space, and to be honest I always found wormhole space more fun due to the lack of politics.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2012-06-25 17:50:08 UTC
Marconus Orion wrote:
High sec will give up NPC corps if null gives up local. Deal? lol

Awfully tempting... hmm..
123Next pageLast page