These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

You really want to "revitalize null", "boost low"... then ball it up

Author
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#1 - 2012-06-23 20:07:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
Let's remove dependency on gates. All ships dial in warp system to system, distance based on power? Modules? Whatever?


Want more people in null? Let people make incursions deep into it with system-to-system dialed in warp ala Star Trek/Star Wars. Don't like it? Then all you want are targets in your gate camp. Don't want people out there not under your control? Then all you want is cannon fodder for your NAPped up ISK fountain. Admit it.

Want more small fleet engagement? Then let's replace the bubble camp with the combat patrol and make the combat probe more useful than the warp bubble. Don't like the idea? Then sitting on a gate is as dysfunctional as mining all day, and admit that you are just as semi-afk as those miners. What kind of game is that? And stop calling it PVP.

In the world of gunfighting a door is often referred to as a "fatal funnel" where anybody watching it can have a very easy time shooting anybody who comes through. Gates are fatal funnels. These comprise a "Great Wall of Carebear".

So let's man up a bit and admit how dumb it is to complain on the forums about how dead low/null is while killing everything that comes through the fatal funnel. Let everybody dial in a warp from system to system. How? Mechanics? Who cares.

Nothing would stir things up more than this. The NAPfest? Meaningless. Deserted 0.0 systems? Ripe for the picking. Gate camps? Gone. Blob warfare? History.

Until this changes, we might as well all be playing a game of wet biscuit and pretending it's something to be proud of.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#2 - 2012-06-23 20:35:51 UTC
lrn2scout I guess.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#3 - 2012-06-23 20:35:58 UTC
Well, Herzog, I've seen some pretty bizarre ideas come from your keyboard, but this isn't one of them.

EVE does need some shaking up and I think you are on to a good start for how it might be done. Space right now consists of gates and stations. Kinda boring in my opinion.

Lose the gates. Or add to them via a skill and module for a personal Cyno and things would certainly get interesting again.

Mr Epeen Cool
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#4 - 2012-06-23 20:37:27 UTC
Its called a titan jump bridge.
Montmazar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-06-23 20:39:38 UTC
Gates are pretty clearly an imperfect way of doing a space MMO but at this point removing gates from EVE would be like removing jumps from a Mario.
Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-06-23 20:40:40 UTC
Simi Kusoni wrote:
lrn2scout I guess.

Sure, let me go get a second account so i can make sure whats ahead. Thats a definition of hardcore, and no it's not "just a game" for you if you have more than 1 account.

Here's an idea, maybe we don't want to be "hardcore" ? Stop trying to pull us towards your kind.
Tallianna Avenkarde
Pyre of Gods
#7 - 2012-06-23 20:42:17 UTC
I like your thinking, but IMO probes are a tad to easy as is.

I think gates should still exist, but should dump you at some random point in the next system, rather then gate to gate. While your "every ship jump capable" idea is good in theory, how do you suggext getting from region to region, i.e Y-2 in fountain to ZXB in delve?

So yeah, systems still have out gates, but jumps you to random point in target system.

And a sudden plunge in the sullen swell. Ten fathoms deep on the road to hell.

Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-06-23 20:47:04 UTC
Tallianna Avenkarde wrote:
I like your thinking, but IMO probes are a tad to easy as is.

So yeah, systems still have out gates, but jumps you to random point in target system.


I like this.
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#9 - 2012-06-23 20:52:12 UTC
Would we just go to having nothing but station camps?

Also, more than "get rid of gates" is needed. From where can a star jump be initiated from? Do you have to get far away from a station or planet first? Where do you end up after the jump?

Are only certain stars accessible from any given star? For example we could have that you can only jump over the same routes we can now with star gates, you just do not use gates. Or would we want to allow new routes, or free movement over all of the the star system?

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Ryoken McKeon
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#10 - 2012-06-23 20:59:16 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Spitfire
Please refrain from personal attacks. Spitfire
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#11 - 2012-06-23 21:07:28 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Simi Kusoni wrote:
lrn2scout I guess.

Sure, let me go get a second account so i can make sure whats ahead. Thats a definition of hardcore, and no it's not "just a game" for you if you have more than 1 account.

Here's an idea, maybe we don't want to be "hardcore" ? Stop trying to pull us towards your kind.

Having friends has its benefits I guess.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
#12 - 2012-06-23 21:08:27 UTC
I agree that gates are a crappy game mechanic. In terms of changes I would like to see without having to rely on CCP having to do too much work...

Increase the point at which a ship jump into a new system from a gate from ~15K to randomly 15-150K 360 degrees around the gate. This means gates can only really be camped on the side you activate the gate to jump, and therefore gives a traveler the opportunity to DScan and take other precautions without having to be dependent on things like scouts via multiple accounts.

Radically increase the number of wormholes that go from known space to known space. Perhaps make them a new class of signature from other wormholes so as not to burden explorers with more scanning.

Pirate/smuggler Gates from NPC Nullsec to Lowsec that are only usable by players with High Standings to the NPCs in question.


Vincent Athena wrote:
Would we just go to having nothing but station camps?


No, Local Chat Intel needs to be removed. Fights could then occur more frequently off gates and stations at points of resource access (aka PvE)
Ituhata
Killboard Padding Services
#13 - 2012-06-23 21:13:12 UTC
Real world wars are not typically fought over chokehold points but rather over strategically valuable locations. Not sure why the same couldn't work in EvE, if you hold something valuable people will come find it and fight for it and there shouldn't be a need for chokehold points to force a fight.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2012-06-23 21:13:54 UTC
six years in the game and still can't get past a gatecamp lol
Pix Severus
Empty You
#15 - 2012-06-23 21:19:20 UTC
I'm a high-sec miner/mission runner, If the changes the OP proposed were to take place, and thus remove gate camps, I would go into low/null a lot more often.

I don't see any reason to complain over this idea.
High-sec people get to see more of the universe without getting insta-ganked as soon as they enter low-sec.
Low/Null-sec people get more targets.

Where's the problem?

MTU Hunter: Latest Entry - June 12 2017 - Vocal Local 5

MTU Hunting 101: Comprehensive Guide

Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-06-23 21:20:49 UTC
Pix Severus wrote:
I'm a high-sec miner/mission runner, If the changes the OP proposed were to take place, and thus remove gate camps, I would go into low/null a lot more often.

I don't see any reason to complain over this idea.
High-sec people get to see more of the universe without getting insta-ganked as soon as they enter low-sec.
Low/Null-sec people get more targets.

Where's the problem?


The problem is that it will require effort from the low/null peeps to get their kills then.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2012-06-23 21:24:37 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Pix Severus wrote:
I'm a high-sec miner/mission runner, If the changes the OP proposed were to take place, and thus remove gate camps, I would go into low/null a lot more often.

I don't see any reason to complain over this idea.
High-sec people get to see more of the universe without getting insta-ganked as soon as they enter low-sec.
Low/Null-sec people get more targets.

Where's the problem?


The problem is that it will require effort from the low/null peeps to get their kills then.

No it'll mean getting kills would be easier then ever, getting into an enemy system would be so easy even OP could do it.
Russell Casey
Doomheim
#18 - 2012-06-23 21:28:25 UTC
IMO I'd like to see an increase in frequency of K-space-to-K-space wormholes , having used wormholes to get into null and low past the chokes plenty of times. They're too random to replace cynos and jump portals for dedicated logistics, but they're great for farming in someone's back yard or even raiding behind where their normal surveillance is and avoiding intel channels.
Ituhata
Killboard Padding Services
#19 - 2012-06-23 21:28:54 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Pix Severus wrote:
I'm a high-sec miner/mission runner, If the changes the OP proposed were to take place, and thus remove gate camps, I would go into low/null a lot more often.

I don't see any reason to complain over this idea.
High-sec people get to see more of the universe without getting insta-ganked as soon as they enter low-sec.
Low/Null-sec people get more targets.

Where's the problem?


The problem is that it will require effort from the low/null peeps to get their kills then.

No it'll mean getting kills would be easier then ever, getting into an enemy system would be so easy even OP could do it.


How do you make getting kills easier when you remove the chokepoint system?
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#20 - 2012-06-23 21:33:37 UTC
If coming in through gates is using the front door, then black ops bridges are coming in through the window and titan bridges are coming in through the living room wall. Your idea has problems:

  • Makes no lore sense. If your ship has trouble warping 200 AU, what makes you think it will have less trouble warping entire light years?
  • Minimizes the importance of jump bridges, titan bridges, etc. I'm all for eliminating these, because they make movement too easy, but this makes movement even easier.
  • Makes movement too easy. The "defense" is supposed to have some "terrain advantage", but when the enemy can simply warp into a safe spot in your system, what's the point? What's the point of owning a blockade runner or jump freighter for resupply when you can probably just safely barge right into 0.0 with a friggin freighter?


So... no.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)

123Next pageLast page