These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - Market Manipulation on a Grand Scale

First post First post First post
Author
Aryth
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1461 - 2012-06-22 19:33:02 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Xython wrote:
I really don't envy the CCP team right now. On the one hand, the temptation to do something is outrageous I'm sure. On the other hand, technically speaking Aryth and the rest of the Economic specialists in Goonswarm did absolutely nothing wrong, they just happened to do this absolutely nothing wrong to an unhealthy extreme. Or, if you prefer, a "Goonish" extreme.

On the other hand, 5 Trillion ISK isn't that much -- that's what, 2, 3 months of Goonswarm's income? I had originally heard that it was 1 Quadrillion (1000 Trillion) ISK, which gave me the strangest feeling in my happy spot.

As an aside: It's kinda funny, but I'm pretty sure Goonswarm "employs" more Economics Majors than CCP does. ;)




Q: How many economics majors does it take to listen to a player who, with facts and figures laid out, points out that a proposed mechanism change could lead to extreme results

A: At least one more than CCP employ, since we've been through this whole thing at least 4 times already that I know of, and almost certainly several times more.

Seriously, the only thing different about this event is that it was specifically goons who benefitted.

And, well... since everyone knows that goonies are naughty bad wrong, then it's obvious that they need to be punished.


We are also quite good at exposing game mechanics that may need looking into. It's what we are known for after all. CCP probably didn't understand the warnings of severity. This is just my opinion, but I believe maybe they intended some light gaming, but probably not to the degree that was possible.

Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.

Creator of Burn Jita

Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.

Aryth
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1462 - 2012-06-22 19:34:52 UTC
Udonor wrote:
I predict CCP will fail at addressing the real long term problem associated with this game flaw. I believe that up to now the GOONs have not wagged the whole economy on purpose.


We have. Ice interdiction, Burn Jita, and mineral manipulation were not accidents. They had a purpose.

Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.

Creator of Burn Jita

Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.

BoBoZoBo
MGroup9
#1463 - 2012-06-22 19:35:02 UTC
Fu@king WIN!
Congrats guys absolutely stellar!

Primary Test Subject • SmackTalker Elite

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#1464 - 2012-06-22 19:36:46 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
Are there bugs that are not usage of game mechanics?

It was working as designed. Not working as designed would be a bug, this wasn't a bug.

Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
I doubt it was a knee jerk reaction. It was a follow up to a public company statement about a security investigation, probably had several CCP staff review it, stamp it. Dignitaries of dignitaries and that sort of thing. It's all rather complicated.

They do that type of thing all the time for legit gameplay.

Oh, you know how CCP works now?


We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#1465 - 2012-06-22 19:37:24 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.

How can you delete that which hasn't been created?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#1466 - 2012-06-22 19:37:46 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.


yo

when does your eve sub lapse???

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#1467 - 2012-06-22 19:40:26 UTC
Inspiration wrote:
corestwo wrote:
Inspiration wrote:
That and this thread really makes a case to remove insurance from the game altogether, as quite a few have arued over in the past. If someone wants insurance let the corp deal with it via mechanism or free market parties. Then if you loose ship after ship in pointless ways, your fee would go trough the roof or you just get plain rejected.

It would probably have the majority of the 0.0 folk go like cry baby, but it would return meaning to pvp victory and loss! Lets see how bad-ass those peeps really are :)


Insurance had nothing to do with what we were doing, you know.


Duh.....but if you look closely, the core of the whole matter is using market manipulation to get NPC favors! FW made it extra easy and lucrative as playing both sites gives extra control over the outcome! The same thing could be done with insurance to a lesser extend as that too is rooted in in-game market statistics.


It actually can't be, because once upon a time people did make many billions of isk (injecting new isk into the economy, which this didn't do) off of insurance fraud; CCP has since changed the formula. Blink

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Pr1ncess Alia
Doomheim
#1468 - 2012-06-22 19:41:28 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.

How can you delete that which hasn't been created?


What are you, Socrates now?

The answer to your question would be: with the enter key.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#1469 - 2012-06-22 19:42:39 UTC
Udonor wrote:
I predict CCP will fail at addressing the real long term problem associated with this game flaw. I believe that up to now the GOONs have not wagged the whole economy on purpose. But when a group's monthly operations budget has 10s of trillions ISK and many of its members 100s of billions ISK its normal trade manipulations and for a lark experiments can impact large areas of EVE. And those days of disinterest in EVE wide control may be over.

The problem is that CCP has failed to provide anything meaningful for very wealthy groups to spend their ISK upon -- something MEANINGFUL to an endgame for EVE (when someone can be declared winner and then a fresh player scenario started). EVE is about flying ships to WIN.

*** I suggest player groups be allowed hostile stockmarket takeovers of NPC Empire corporations. That should absorb a good deal of excess liquid capital from huge null sec groups and I think factional warfare would become much more spontaneous.****

CCP should expect that any group with 100s of trillion in excess ISK will be bored with ordinary game play. They have nothing worthwhile to do with all that cash. As i understand it most long term Goons have already paid their subscriptions ahead for years. Ship losses are meaningless. If they all decide to start a fight and log off so their enemies can claim an empty victory...they can just buy new fleets and suffer only the pain of fitting the new ships.

Very few original or current EVE players have a lot of interest in endless SIMS soap opera about who has collected the most clothes....which unfortunately seems to be where CCP thinks EVE should go. Not that a few cool uniforms might not be nice for celebrating victories. Maybe CCP needs to think of branching off a 3rd political-social game for EVE-DUST watchers that is mostly just attached to EVE (gambling on battle outcomes etc) -- instead of changing the purpose of EVE.

EVE has no endgame, nor should it.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Strong Black Woman
Doomheim
#1470 - 2012-06-22 19:42:39 UTC
Keep them reimbursable Tengu Fleets flying!!
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#1471 - 2012-06-22 19:42:40 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.

How can you delete that which hasn't been created?


Ask Sreegs, hes the one who will be deleting the ISK that was not created.

Also, you can stop saying ISK wasnt created. Its a strawman arguement. Items were created. CCP cant delete the items (without backlash) because the buyers of the items were not all in on the abuse.


internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Dramaticus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1472 - 2012-06-22 19:42:56 UTC
Delete created isk that wasn't created using exploits that arent actually exploits

Duh

The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal

The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#1473 - 2012-06-22 19:43:13 UTC
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.

How can you delete that which hasn't been created?


What are you, Socrates now?

The answer to your question would be: with the enter key.

No isk was created, no isk can thus be deleted.

In fact, isk has already been deleted, last I heard to the tune of 500b or thereabouts.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1474 - 2012-06-22 19:43:34 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Aryth wrote:
I suppose you could be referring to nullsec domination? Far beyond the scope of what I was talking about though.


using our numbers to an advantage in a "massively multiplayer online game" is an exploit

you heard it on eve-o first


This made me laugh. :D
Pr1ncess Alia
Doomheim
#1475 - 2012-06-22 19:44:36 UTC
Dramaticus wrote:
Delete created isk that wasn't created using exploits that arent actually exploits

Duh


Because it's not an exploit until CCP says it's an exploit and this isn't an exploit because CCP has not said it's an exploit.

Therefore CCP will not label it an exploit because it isn't one because they haven't labeled it as one.
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#1476 - 2012-06-22 19:44:59 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.

How can you delete that which hasn't been created?



As has been stated rather clearly already, anyone found to have knowingly profited from the use or abuse of an exploit or other game defect can and will have any ISK removed from their wallets. No use crying about it.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#1477 - 2012-06-22 19:46:21 UTC
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
Dramaticus wrote:
Delete created isk that wasn't created using exploits that arent actually exploits

Duh


Because it's not an exploit until CCP says it's an exploit and this isn't an exploit because CCP has not said it's an exploit.

Therefore CCP will not label it an exploit because it isn't one because they haven't labeled it as one.


The word you pick for it is arbitrary, in this case "abuse" instead of "exploit". Again, the end result is the same no matter how much you try to rationalize.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#1478 - 2012-06-22 19:46:26 UTC
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
Dramaticus wrote:
Delete created isk that wasn't created using exploits that arent actually exploits

Duh


Because it's not an exploit until CCP says it's an exploit and this isn't an exploit because CCP has not said it's an exploit.

Therefore CCP will not label it an exploit because it isn't one because they haven't labeled it as one.

I see we've reached the end of our discussion, if you're unable to comprehend an exploit as something with more meaning than "a thing CCP has said is an exploit". Ahh well, worth a shot.

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#1479 - 2012-06-22 19:46:46 UTC
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
Dramaticus wrote:
Delete created isk that wasn't created using exploits that arent actually exploits

Duh


Because it's not an exploit until CCP says it's an exploit and this isn't an exploit because CCP has not said it's an exploit.

Therefore CCP will not label it an exploit because it isn't one because they haven't labeled it as one.

At this point, it actually pretty much is. It just wasn't a week ago.

Why are you having such a hard time with this concept? Things change, rules change, and everyone adapts.

Except highsec carebears. They just whine that goons need to banned.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#1480 - 2012-06-22 19:47:04 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
We know the end result, which is an ongoing investigation and ISK deletion.

How can you delete that which hasn't been created?


Ask Sreegs, hes the one who will be deleting the ISK that was not created.

Also, you can stop saying ISK wasnt created. Its a strawman arguement. Items were created. CCP cant delete the items (without backlash) because the buyers of the items were not all in on the abuse.

So why should this be treated any differently from when people were insurance frauding like mad for isk, and actively adding isk to the economy? Why should this be treated any differently from when Pax Amarria was refinable into nocx? Why should this be treated any differently from when tracking titans were used to take over tech moons?

Or, were anyone banned for either of those activities? Got their ISK deleted? Any reactions at all?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat