These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Prevent Cynoing in within dock range..

Author
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#1 - 2012-06-22 16:57:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Gizznitt Malikite
There used to be a trick to cyno in a ship directly into a POS's shields. This was remedied, such that cynoing a ship too close to the shields resulted in the cynoing-in ship manifesting 15 km's from the POS shield, or some such.

What if all cyno's were similarly "fixed," such that it's not possible to cyno within dock range of a station, jump range of a gate, nor overtly close to a POS's shields.

CONS:
This would slow down logistics (to which I must profusely appologize to the under-appreciated workhorse of EvE).
This would make logistics operations significantly less safe, but still very manageable!!!

PROS:
This would make logistics operations SIGNFICANTLY less safe, but still very manageable!!!
In NPC space (nullsec & lowsec), the locals actually make it even more difficult for another entity to move in...


The real question, why is this needed??

At the moment, it is extremely easy to move good's to and from Highsec to anywhere in nullsec. Cyno mechanics, when done proficiently, remove almost all risk in moving (dockable) capitals. The goal of this change, is to subtly nerf the jump mechanic in a manner that doesn't BREAK them, but adds a reasonable risk to this mostly riskless form of travel.

I look forward to comments as to why this is not needed, how this will adversely alter the game, any supporting comments, etc...
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#2 - 2012-06-22 18:11:52 UTC
So, you want us to need to either have safe towers along all cyno routes or to have escort fleets.

Okay.

Enjoy the massive increase in T2 prices.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#3 - 2012-06-22 18:51:40 UTC
Liliana Rahl wrote:
So, you want us to need to either have safe towers along all cyno routes or to have escort fleets.

Okay.

Enjoy the massive increase in T2 prices.



While this might cause a marginal increase in t2 prices, I see no reason why it would be "massive." I think the only significant disruption in moongoo will involve lowsec moongoo operations that are so far from their alliances center of operations that they can't adequately protect a JF every few weeks.... and OMG, what a travesty that would be!!! I'm sure every competent alliance will adapt, and the incompetent will lose out (as it should be).

And yes... I expect you to have safe towers along your cyno routes, to have an escort fleet, or to take a risk.... I know, actually having risk when performing logistics in nullsec and lowsec might leave a bad taste in your mouth, but it's certainly not out-of-line!! This change does NOT leave jump logistics unfairly vulnerable. Safe cynoing practices can easily mitigate many of the risks to your ships...


Truth be told, it's the increased risks to Black Frog Operations that bother me the most. I do not want to undermine their operations to the point they go out of business.... and wonder if they feel like they could still operate with these new changes! I'm sure this would eliminate their operations to/from certain nullsec areas where blue on blue hostility is common, but those alliances can reap what they sow..

Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#4 - 2012-06-22 19:28:12 UTC
The only safe way to cyno with this method would be to the edge of a POS, thus my statement that travel routes would thus need POS towers. POS towers cost money and maintenance (fuel).

I'm not exactly opposed to this idea. But I think you underestimate the effect it will have.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#5 - 2012-06-22 19:31:21 UTC
Liliana Rahl wrote:
So, you want us to need to either have safe towers along all cyno routes or to have escort fleets.

Okay.

Enjoy the massive increase in T2 prices.

Not for nothing, but if you are using ships valued up to several billion ISK, and putting expensive cargo into them...

Why do you find it so off putting to get an escort? Isn't the value of your effort worthy of support?
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#6 - 2012-06-22 19:51:42 UTC
Liliana Rahl wrote:
The only safe way to cyno with this method would be to the edge of a POS, thus my statement that travel routes would thus need POS towers. POS towers cost money and maintenance (fuel).

I'm not exactly opposed to this idea. But I think you underestimate the effect it will have.


In my experience, even cyno'ing in at a POS's shields is NOT truly safe. In essense, this change would eliminate safe cyno travel!! Properly done, I think you could web-to-warp an incoming ship before it's ever in significant risk, but generally cyno logistics moves from a trivially safe task (which it is now) to something more vulnerable.

I think this is a signficant change, and it will have a significant effect on logistics. However, I don't think the effect will manifest itself in "massively" increased t2 prices. I think the greatest difficulties will manifest around lowsec and NPC nullsec logistics points. Unfortunately, the people hurt the most will probably be small to medium sized alliances that can't bring new ships into a system becuase an enemy pressense is blockading their logisics... Truthfully though, I think this should be a valid tactic!
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#7 - 2012-06-24 03:49:41 UTC

I see a lot of people have read this, but don't see a lot of replies.... I'm beginning to suspect this is one of those ideas that isn't broken or flawed, but rather something that people don't want to rally behind because it painful.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2012-06-24 04:13:47 UTC
because you want to kill jump freighters easier... no thanks.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#9 - 2012-06-24 05:23:58 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
because you want to kill jump freighters easier... no thanks.

Remind me, in a ~pure PvP~ sand box MMO, why do we need invulnerable logistics chains?

As for this idea, it isn't bad but it needs some work. As an above poster pointed out it will probably just result in POSes being set up along the route. Or, more likely IMHO, people just won't cyno in unless a system is more or less empty.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-06-24 05:54:16 UTC
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
because you want to kill jump freighters easier... no thanks.

Remind me, in a ~pure PvP~ sand box MMO, why do we need invulnerable logistics chains?

As for this idea, it isn't bad but it needs some work. As an above poster pointed out it will probably just result in POSes being set up along the route. Or, more likely IMHO, people just won't cyno in unless a system is more or less empty.



they aren't invulnerable.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#11 - 2012-06-24 06:04:45 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:


they aren't invulnerable.

Then enlighten me, how do you kill JFs?

Excluding Garmon's trick with webs, which was deemed an exploit and patched in <24 hours.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#12 - 2012-06-24 13:39:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Gizznitt Malikite
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:


they aren't invulnerable.

Then enlighten me, how do you kill JFs?

Excluding Garmon's trick with webs, which was deemed an exploit and patched in <24 hours.


I only know of one realistic method to gank a JF. You camp a cyno generator at a POS with a covops or recon. If a JF comes through, you decloak, tackle them, and light a cyno to bring in a supercap or three. The supercaps kill the JF and can then warp away from the typically well defended POS.

You usually lose the tackling cyno ship, but sometimes you can save a recon...

Outside of the above method, JF's are ONLY killed due to poor cyno locations or bad JF piloting.


Note: While this sucks for the JF pilot, if a couple of supercap pilots become predictable, they easily become a target...
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#13 - 2012-06-24 14:43:07 UTC
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:


they aren't invulnerable.

Then enlighten me, how do you kill JFs?

Excluding Garmon's trick with webs, which was deemed an exploit and patched in <24 hours.


I only know of one realistic method to gank a JF. You camp a cyno generator at a POS with a covops or recon. If a JF comes through, you decloak, tackle them, and light a cyno to bring in a supercap or three. The supercaps kill the JF and can then warp away from the typically well defended POS.

You usually lose the tackling cyno ship, but sometimes you can save a recon...

Outside of the above method, JF's are ONLY killed due to poor cyno locations or bad JF piloting.


Note: While this sucks for the JF pilot, if a couple of supercap pilots become predictable, they easily become a target...

Heh, I honestly never realised people were stupid enough to use cyno generators without scouting/checking in their Intel channel. That's pretty funny.

But yeah, jumping in supers unsupported on top of a hostile POS, right next to a hostile cyno generator isn't something I'd do often. Sounds like a good way to lose supers.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Jiska Ensa
Estrale Frontiers
#14 - 2012-06-24 14:50:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Jiska Ensa
safe spot + webs. You'll still never catch capitals. Deal with it.

PS: ALL ships are killed due to one person being better than the other (better prepared, better luck, better skills/ships/whatever). Why should capitals be easier to kill just because the capital pilot is more in-tune with game mechanics than you are?

Are you the same kind of person who thinks "warp to zero" should be removed?
sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-06-24 14:54:37 UTC
Nonhighsec markets don't need another nerf just so you can pad your kb.Roll
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#16 - 2012-06-24 15:05:39 UTC
sabre906 wrote:
Nonhighsec markets don't need another nerf just so you can pad your kb.Roll

Why do people always assume this is about kb padding? And who cares about non-high sec markets when most people buy all their stuff in Jita and JF it up?

I might occasionally buy a single module in syndicate, but a ship or full fitting? Why, when I can just buy 10 ships at a time on my Jita alt and jump it down inside of an hour? Even before I had a personal JF I just used black frog, as most of my friends still do if im not available.

I'll admit null sec industry needs a revamp before JF logistics takes a hit, but by the looks of it null industry is going to feature heavily in the next expansion. So now would seem a good time for CCP to look at removing those ridiculous logistics chains.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

forestwho
Doomheim
#17 - 2012-06-24 15:21:08 UTC
its funny that the ppl that want to kill jf's are not the ones usualy living in 0.0. try doing logistics for an active corp that is in a alliance that is in war. Its a ***** to do and rly time consuming.... You might think its easy but try living in area's futher away that 1 - 2 jumps from the nearest high sec. Try living in esoteria for example.... you need to move stuff from jita to nearest jump off point (30 odd jumps), than 4 -5 cyno's..... not all in blue space...

you just want to have easy ganks for your personal griefing fun, try being a logistic operator and you talk other ways...
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#18 - 2012-06-24 16:39:29 UTC
forestwho wrote:
its funny that the ppl that want to kill jf's are not the ones usualy living in 0.0. try doing logistics for an active corp that is in a alliance that is in war. Its a ***** to do and rly time consuming.... You might think its easy but try living in area's futher away that 1 - 2 jumps from the nearest high sec. Try living in esoteria for example.... you need to move stuff from jita to nearest jump off point (30 odd jumps), than 4 -5 cyno's..... not all in blue space...

you just want to have easy ganks for your personal griefing fun, try being a logistic operator and you talk other ways...

I've lived in syndicate, detorid, querious and various low sec regions all in alliances that are at war. I also currently own a jump freighter, and I am telling you that JF logistics are easy.

The changes proposed in my own thread would not provide me with any extra kills either, since whilst I do currently live in low sec I fight solo and do not fight on gate.

While I will admit JF logistics, if changed, need to be altered in conjunction with the future plans for null sec industry revamps I do believe that they need to be altered. I would also like to see them re-purposed rather than have cyno mechanics altered, but either way it is a step in the right direction and worthy of discussion.

What surprises me is that I often see many of the same people who cry "Eve is dangerous, don't un-dock unless you're willing to lose your ship" support the idea of an invulnerable non-combat ship class.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#19 - 2012-06-24 18:53:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Gizznitt Malikite
forestwho wrote:
its funny that the ppl that want to kill jf's are not the ones usualy living in 0.0. try doing logistics for an active corp that is in a alliance that is in war. Its a ***** to do and rly time consuming.... You might think its easy but try living in area's futher away that 1 - 2 jumps from the nearest high sec. Try living in esoteria for example.... you need to move stuff from jita to nearest jump off point (30 odd jumps), than 4 -5 cyno's..... not all in blue space...

you just want to have easy ganks for your personal griefing fun, try being a logistic operator and you talk other ways...


I've lived in nullsec for the last several years... Both in Highsec border regions like curse, provi, and syndicate, as well as deeper nullsec regions like Venal. I understand that logistics are a PITA, are underappreciated, and can easily suck the desire to play from you!!! I fully admit this makes logistics more dangerous... but it should be more dangerous.

This isn't about killboard padding.... this is about balancing the risks of travel!!!!

Let's review the risks of cyno travel:
a.) You undock and wait out a 10 seconds session change timer while completely invulnerable (even to bumping). If you are bubbled, you can safely dock.

b.) After the session change timer expires, you can right click on your ship and cyno directly to another location while still completely untargetable because of the undock invulnerability.

c.) Assuming your destination is a station, which 99% of the time it is, you cyno into dock range, and have to survive a whole 10 second session change timer before you can dock. With 300k EHP and eyes on grid before you cyno in, pragmatically, there is NO RISK.

Let's be frank, how is riskless travel good for the game???????? Why should we have riskless travel in nullsec and lowsec... it makes NO SENSE...

Someone already mentioned that people can cyno in at a safe spot, and web-to-warp a ship long before a hostile lands on grid. And that is totally acceptable.... because doing that actually includes at least a little bit of risk...

Web to warp is fast, but generally not instantaneous, nor invulnerable to traps!!!
If you reuse a "safe" spot, people can be lying in wait... you cyno in, they can decloak and tackle before you get into warp.
If you typically warp directly to a station, people can use a dictor bubble up to pull your ship away from a station and gank it.
It also limits cyno chaining, where ships can go rapidly back and forth between two destinations, as they can no longer instantly dock to cap up between cyno's.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#20 - 2012-06-25 14:49:47 UTC

I'd like to point out, this is aimed at ALL CYNO TRAFFIC...

It will alter cyno usage of not just JF's, but Carriers, Rorquals, and even Dreads too!!!
12Next page