These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Anti-Carebears upset me very much
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Haulie Berry
#21 - 2012-06-21 16:12:26 UTC
Someone did something in the game that I didn't like.

Must post about this on the forums at once.
Marconus Orion
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-06-21 16:12:37 UTC
Is there a TL;DR for this TL;DR?
Drunk Driver
Doomheim
#23 - 2012-06-21 16:14:04 UTC

Boom!

POW!!!!

Sparks, flames and lots of screaming.



Yehaaaaa!!!!!

Welcome to EVE online!

Big smile

.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#24 - 2012-06-21 16:15:37 UTC
Marconus Orion wrote:
Is there a TL;DR for this TL;DR?

OP's CEO is an idiot. Also, their corp is afraid to take 30 noobs against one awoxer.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Cebraio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-06-21 16:16:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Cebraio
Marconus Orion wrote:
Is there a TL;DR for this TL;DR?

tl:dr: His corp got a guy accepted who likes to blow up noobs and they can't beat nor kick him - or didn't try hard enough yet.
Doddy
Excidium.
#26 - 2012-06-21 16:17:42 UTC
Basically you aren't very good at recruiting or running a corp and got some noobs killed and now you are wanting to blame the playerbase?
sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2012-06-21 16:19:17 UTC
SKYIINET Caliborus wrote:
The people I had to take care of this weren't logged in at the time, and the players that got killed were new new new, I'm talking less than 4 days. And most of them didn't want to pvp, and I don't blame them.


If it's 4 days, petition it, the griefer will be banned. Just ignore the goon/troll/misc forum tard who say otherwise. CCP is on an active campaign to ban anyone "messing with" (actual term used, inclusive regardless of how narrow someone's definition of griefing is) rookies in 14 day trial period.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-06-21 16:24:21 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Marconus Orion wrote:
Is there a TL;DR for this TL;DR?

OP's CEO is an idiot. Also, their corp is afraid to take 30 noobs against one awoxer.


Didn't new that awox behaviour was encouraged by CCP.

Also reading comprehension helps, a lot of those players that guy kept killing again and again are 4 day old characters witch is obviously also encouraged by CCP.

Ho wait...

brb
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#29 - 2012-06-21 16:28:49 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Didn't new that awox behaviour was encouraged by CCP.

I don't recall it being specifically discouraged either.

Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Also reading comprehension helps, a lot of those players that guy kept killing again and again are 4 day old characters witch is obviously also encouraged by CCP.

I'm not arguing that the guy isn't pretty sad for preying on noobs nor that he shouldn't be petitioned for it, but ferchrissakes you've got 30 noobs and you can't take out one awoxer? Welcome to EVE, I guess, you're just setting yourself up for failure later on.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2012-06-21 16:29:48 UTC
Can I join this corp? My reaper hungers for justice....

Sugar Von MurdererTits : Jake Warbird gets my vote for most intriguing and attractive male character in Eve.
SKYIINET Caliborus
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-06-21 16:30:51 UTC
Yea, all 38 players weren't logged in at once, it was more like 8, and those players didn't have access to the ships being sold in the station. It was near impossible, but one of my corp member's friends was on his way with a Sleipnir to take him out.

I didn't post this just to get attention, I posted this to ask why do people start the CARE-BEAR I HATE YOU stance.

You don't get it obviously. The guy was outside, and you can't kick a person outside. If something could have been done it would have.

Also, did you read where I said the leader miss clicked the accept button for the person I said DO NOT ACCEPT?
Doddy
Excidium.
#32 - 2012-06-21 16:31:10 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Marconus Orion wrote:
Is there a TL;DR for this TL;DR?

OP's CEO is an idiot. Also, their corp is afraid to take 30 noobs against one awoxer.


Didn't new that awox behaviour was encouraged by CCP.

Also reading comprehension helps, a lot of those players that guy kept killing again and again are 4 day old characters witch is obviously also encouraged by CCP.

Ho wait...


Kept killing again and again? Did you actually bother to check the incident out? The guy killed 4 frigs and a destroyer over the course of an hour, with a destroyer of his own. The horror. There was one repeat kill but the guy obviously died once then went back with friends 10 mins later and they all died.

Also ccp has always encouraged awox behaviour, they made a promo vid about it ffs.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#33 - 2012-06-21 16:34:40 UTC
SKYIINET Caliborus wrote:
Yea, all 38 players weren't logged in at once, it was more like 8, and those players didn't have access to the ships being sold in the station. It was near impossible, but one of my corp member's friends was on his way with a Sleipnir to take him out.

wat

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#34 - 2012-06-21 16:35:14 UTC
Doddy wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Marconus Orion wrote:
Is there a TL;DR for this TL;DR?

OP's CEO is an idiot. Also, their corp is afraid to take 30 noobs against one awoxer.


Didn't new that awox behaviour was encouraged by CCP.

Also reading comprehension helps, a lot of those players that guy kept killing again and again are 4 day old characters witch is obviously also encouraged by CCP.

Ho wait...


Kept killing again and again? Did you actually bother to check the incident out? The guy killed 4 frigs and a destroyer over the course of an hour, with a destroyer of his own. The horror. There was one repeat kill but the guy obviously died once then went back with friends 10 mins later and they all died.

Also ccp has always encouraged awox behaviour, they made a promo vid about it ffs.



It's your right to love this behaviour and it's mine to say that this guy is breaking the rule "don't mess with rookies" + abusing system to not be kicked from the corp witch is an obvious behaviour CCP doesn't like.

However, despite your opinion or mine this CEO should petition GM's ASAP and imho, this guy is about to get in trouble, but you have the right to think I'm wrong.

brb
Doddy
Excidium.
#35 - 2012-06-21 16:39:59 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Doddy wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Marconus Orion wrote:
Is there a TL;DR for this TL;DR?

OP's CEO is an idiot. Also, their corp is afraid to take 30 noobs against one awoxer.


Didn't new that awox behaviour was encouraged by CCP.

Also reading comprehension helps, a lot of those players that guy kept killing again and again are 4 day old characters witch is obviously also encouraged by CCP.

Ho wait...


Kept killing again and again? Did you actually bother to check the incident out? The guy killed 4 frigs and a destroyer over the course of an hour, with a destroyer of his own. The horror. There was one repeat kill but the guy obviously died once then went back with friends 10 mins later and they all died.

Also ccp has always encouraged awox behaviour, they made a promo vid about it ffs.



It's your right to love this behaviour and it's mine to say that this guy is breaking the rule "don't mess with rookies" + abusing system to not be kicked from the corp witch is an obvious behaviour CCP doesn't like.

However, despite your opinion or mine this CEO should petition GM's ASAP and imho, this guy is about to get in trouble, but you have the right to think I'm wrong.


Oh i think the guy should get a slap on the wrist for sure. I am all for killing carebears but actual noobs are a no go in my book. I just think your dramatisation of this incident is almost ridiculous as the op using it to attack "anti-carebears", which has nothing to do with killing noobs.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#36 - 2012-06-21 16:41:01 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
It's your right to love this behaviour and it's mine to say that this guy is breaking the rule "don't mess with rookies" + abusing system to not be kicked from the corp witch is an obvious behaviour CCP doesn't like.
They were pretty much excluded from the “don't mess with rookies” rule the second they joined a PC corp.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#37 - 2012-06-21 16:42:51 UTC
SKYIINET Caliborus wrote:
Yea, all 38 players weren't logged in at once, it was more like 8, and those players didn't have access to the ships being sold in the station. It was near impossible, but one of my corp member's friends was on his way with a Sleipnir to take him out.

I didn't post this just to get attention, I posted this to ask why do people start the CARE-BEAR I HATE YOU stance.

You don't get it obviously. The guy was outside, and you can't kick a person outside. If something could have been done it would have.

Also, did you read where I said the leader miss clicked the accept button for the person I said DO NOT ACCEPT?


People who get mad because of situations like this instead of organizing to kill the awoxer are the reason for the carebear hate.

In other words, YOU are the reason everyone hates you.

Btw, did it occur to you to organize and get all 30 of your peeps on at once? Send out a mail saying 'Everyone log on and have your noobship ready to kill this SOB'

You want anything other than disrespect in EVE, you earn it. Its not going to be given, and if you are not respected, you are a target.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#38 - 2012-06-21 16:46:56 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
It's your right to love this behaviour and it's mine to say that this guy is breaking the rule "don't mess with rookies" + abusing system to not be kicked from the corp witch is an obvious behaviour CCP doesn't like.
They were pretty much excluded from the “don't mess with rookies” rule the second they joined a PC corp.



I actually can not agree or disagree with you since CCP didn't made this also obvious. This is why petition to GM's is far much better than semi viril forum comments on internet honour and villainy.

I'm quite sure you can agree with me that petition about this is the best way to go, but we don't have to agree on what I think it's fair or not.

brb
sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2012-06-21 16:47:16 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
It's your right to love this behaviour and it's mine to say that this guy is breaking the rule "don't mess with rookies" + abusing system to not be kicked from the corp witch is an obvious behaviour CCP doesn't like.
They were pretty much excluded from the “don't mess with rookies” rule the second they joined a PC corp.


This assumption sounds like it was pulled fresh out of a goon's rear end.Lol

See? This is why CCP has been coming down progressively harder on rookie-hunters. They don't want you to "mess with" rookies, period. The term was coined after some idiot attempted to lecture devs on what "griefing" includes. Any new excuses you come up with is just more hassle for CCP to negate. Rinse and repeat.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#40 - 2012-06-21 16:52:22 UTC
sabre906 wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
It's your right to love this behaviour and it's mine to say that this guy is breaking the rule "don't mess with rookies" + abusing system to not be kicked from the corp witch is an obvious behaviour CCP doesn't like.
They were pretty much excluded from the “don't mess with rookies” rule the second they joined a PC corp.


This assumption sounds like it was pulled fresh out of a goon's rear end.Lol

See? This is why CCP has been coming down progressively harder on rookie-hunters. They don't want you to "mess with" rookies, period. The term was coined after some idiot attempted to lecture devs on what "griefing" includes. Any new excuses you come up with is just more hassle for CCP to negate. Rinse and repeat.



This is also called "shoot your own foot" leading to pathetic threads and oceans of tears like you can read about "rules" in this very same forum.

brb